User talk:Nerudap

Welcome!

Hello, Nerudap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Forrest Yoga, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! §everal⇒|Times 03:53, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Forrest Yoga

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Forrest Yoga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. §everal⇒|Times 03:53, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.Curb Chain (talk) 08:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What was the spam that this user inserted? Citing a book published by HarperCollins on the Trikonasana article? Morganfitzp (talk) 22:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Witch hunt

Hi Nerudap. I am of the opinion that someone is on a bit of a Wikipedia Witch Hunt regarding the Forrest Yoga article and its creator. The issue seems to be that one or two people see it as advertising because many of the sources cited come from Forrest Yoga's creator, Ana Forrest. That's actually pretty common in yoga: B.K.S. Iyengar's books for example are used as sources in the Iyengar Article and that has not been raised as an issue. Whether or not this is a personal vendetta against Forrest Yoga or some other bias, I cannot say. I can say that if you want to officially register your vote to keep the Forrest Yoga article on Wikipedia, insert this tag on the thread about its proposed deletion:

Keep. (Followed by your reason for keeping it.)

Thanks for your work. Morganfitzp (talk) 22:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. So something worth noting about Iyengar yoga is that Iyengar yoga is a cultural phenomenon so significant it is a central feature in the history of modern yoga, and he is written about academically by countless sources who are not personally connected to Iyengar (academic authors like Elizabeth DeMichelis, Joseph Alter, Mark Singleton). He has an undeniable role in shaping a much larger phenomenon almost any other yoga teacher in the West. While many modern yoga styles have reached points of incredible popularity, they have little historical significance because they are really young, not that notably distinct from other schools, and of little academic consequence (to date). When wikipedia decides things like Forrest yoga are not up to notability standards, that means that there is nothing to say here in a considered encyclopedic manner that is not already said on Forrest yoga's own websites. It also means the sources from which to draw the information are not academically published or peer reviewed. If you were to find academic and etic articles or books on a subject like this, that would help you show notability. Magazines like Yoga Journal and human interest pieces in newspapers (even NYT) are not the kind of citations that these articles are supposed to stand on, nor are they rigorous investigative pieces (an interview for example would still be expressing Ana Forrest's opinions and not an outside objective evaluation). Nor are these articles supposed to be an advertisement or endorsement of any school, which is all that these cited sources are, promotional. They are supposed to stand on academic ground i.e. academic journals and published books from outside of the school. A paragraph long description of a wrist exercise is not something that belongs here, nor does the fallacious implication that she invented shoulder shrugs. In fact the page does not seem to show there being anything that she innovated, but rather that she blended Shivananda, Ashtanga, and Iyengar, which describes most modern schools. Nothing about it looks like something you would see in a real encyclopedia; it looks like her webpage. Furthermore, there is a rampant problem with unencyclopedic material being added to the yoga pages as self-promotion or promoting groups people are connected with (and let's be honest, I'm guessing you have a connection to these schools you are editing, which is considered a conflict of interest here). Having a threshold for notability is the only fair way to keep the 'schools of yoga' page from becoming a useless compendium of every asana school that gets founded. I can not tell you how many times someone adds their own school to wikipedia. Even as notable as Forrest and many other styles are, they are not significantly different than any of the hundreds of other modern 'trauma informed' schools. Not enough for its own page at least. A better strategy might be to add a section about trauma informed yoga to one of these pages and include a blurb about different schools within it. It is not that it should be removed from wiki, but presented with due weight. If it weren't for the scandal, Anusara probably wouldn't have a page either, although that page has most of the same problems that Forrest and Core Strength Vinyasa have. Not that long ago we had to fight to keep famous ayurvedic doctor and author Vasant Lad from having his page removed, because his academic mentions were only from within the ayurvedic community, just to give you an idea of how stringent the notability standards are. I hope that clarifies the attitude of the wiki a little, and maybe saves you from feeling persecuted by the wiki police. It takes a while to fully get on the same page with how things work around here, but I'll bet you're well on your way. Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 07:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that thorough explanation, Iṣṭa Devatā. What makes Wikipedia different from, say, Britannica, is that articles about grand patriarchs and lofty institutions sit side-by-side with more plebeian and pedestrian fare. There is an article about Carnegie Hall and CBGB's. There is an article about Prince Charles and Prince Buster. Few have access to being bandied about in the language of the academy, just as the witches of Salem had no access to legitimate counsel in their day. Mr. iyengar's books may be enshrined in the libraries of magnificent universities while Ana Forrest's end up in the bargain bin. It doesn't mean that one is more worthy than the other, it just means that certain people with a degree of power shone their spotlight at a particular thing for a particular time. This is Wikipedia, a dragon with a very long tail. Morganfitzp (talk) 12:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can certainly respect where you are coming from. Who knows Ana's place in history? Not many have ventured to guess yet, which is exactly the problem. It will be challenging to find anything neutral and significant to say about some of these topics, because if they only reflect what people are saying about themselves it is questionable why their own websites are not adequate resources for people, especially if all the research has been done through google. If everything you can say about Ana already comes up with a simple web search, maybe we could save some server space until there is more to say about her objective impact. CBGBs probably would have been kept off wiki in its heyday, but time has attracted plenty of attention to the phenomenon it was and what we say about it here reflects the balanced portrayal that comes from academic and primary sources blended together into a tapestry of information. Her page has nothing that non-forrest yoga people would actually find informative or interesting. The instructional section on wrist exercises taken from a yoga journal book are not the kind of information that expands the encyclopedia (which is not meant to be instructional). Perhaps, in time, she will be as notable as CBGBs. Maybe even now with better sources than the ones that are there. Comparing Ana Forrest to Iyengar seems out of perspective to me, but as a professional yoga teacher myself, I sympathize with the desire to see people who have impacted us represented respectfully here.Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 18:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you for all your input. I hope to add to this by providing more on the Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga article in particular. In construction of that article, i asked for and received wikipedia editorial feedback approval prior to its posting. I respect the community rules and gained that approval. I respect your view points and hold many that are similar. But the process for article topic acceptance, structure, content, and inclusion was followed here Again, many thanks for your help.Nerudap (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Linda E. Ginzel (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 07:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nerudap, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

File permission problem with File:Linda Ginzel portrait photo, September 2014.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Linda Ginzel portrait photo, September 2014.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linda E. Ginzel (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linda E. Ginzel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 10:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linda E. Ginzel has been accepted

Linda E. Ginzel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Primefac (talk) 21:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Agtx was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

agtx 18:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Draft:Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KSFT was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KSFT ^C 15:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 01:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga has been accepted

Core Strength Vinyasa Yoga, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 12:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nerudap. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nerudap. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nerudap. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Holly Auna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holly Auna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Auna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]