User talk:NeilDavidB84

Welcome!

Hi NeilDavidB84! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 13:34, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your first article

There are many things to read. Please start with Help:Your first article whcih is a good primer, and then consider the methodology suggested in this essay, one of many on creating articles. Fundamental to your quest to wrote neutral, flat, dull-but-wortyhy prose is the initial research you do. Since you work for Wired Productions you will inevitably think to wrote the things you know. Please do not.

Instead, please research what other people know about the organisation. Wikipedia records faithfully what other people say, not what the organisation itself says. We only want what other people say. What the organisation wishes to say is for its own web outlets, Facebook, Linked In, etc. It may not say it in Wikipedia.

Your next challenge is that paid editors are only marginally welcome. Wikipedia volunteer editors consider that anyone drawing a salary (broadly construed) for editing Wikipedia is very much on their own in terms of offering more than the very basic help, usually referring them/you to policy pages. That is because a paid editor's time is paid for, so they are deemed to have loads of it for their task.

If the organisation passes Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) the draft will be accepted when submitted (0.9 probability). Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 13:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The current draft has been rejected. My suggestion is that you start again. Go to Wikipedia:Articles for creation and use the article creation wizard to create a draft entitles Wired Productions 2, and work hard on research, and storyboarding. Ignore 100% of the rejected draft. It was rejected for a reason. Then submit it for review when ready Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 13:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wired Productions (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wired Productions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wired Productions, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NeilDavidB84! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]