User talk:Necati Yüce

CS1 error on List of elevator test towers

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of elevator test towers, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, there does not appear to be any error. Can you please detail where the error is? Necati Yüce (talk) 14:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yukselis Elevator (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yukselis Elevator and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Necati Yüce! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I showed the necessary references related to my article. However, my article was still removed. Please approve my article. Necati Yüce (talk) 06:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello. Your recent edit to List of elevator manufacturers appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 06:28, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I added the references along with the article, please look again. Let me know what you see missing. Necati Yüce (talk) 07:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read the template. It says: "a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists" Your entry does not have an article. Meters (talk) 19:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of elevator manufacturers. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop doing this. The company does not have an article. A declined draft is not sufficient. And your inclusion of this company under both "current" and "former" manufacturers smacks of promotion. Meters (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is a company that is in the top 13 in the world rankings and in the top ten in Europe. If you think I'm promoting, you're wrong. You can find many resources on Google as Yukselis Elevator. Turkey's highest elevator test tower belongs to this company. There is not a single word written on Wikipedia about the manufacturers in Turkey. You are also blocking those who write this. Your system is entirely aimed at adding European manufacturers to the list and proving their existence. How many times has Wikipedia been banned in my country because of this attitude? Now, I am trying to write an article on Wikipedia as a writer, but I constantly encounter obstacles. My name is Necati Yüce. I have articles in many magazines. However, one day, when someone wants to write a CV about me, will Wikipedia try to prevent this or will it create an article for sources just because I don't have an interview?

The person trying to approve many articles here does not even use the name he or she uses in real life. Please stop blocking my posts. Let's work together on how we can improve the articles or how Wikipedia can be a more comprehensive and broad place.

Thanks Necati Yüce (talk) 14:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot add your company article to lists until after the draft is approved. Kindly stop this promotional edit warring. MrOllie (talk) 14:28, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yukselis Elevator moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yukselis Elevator 1. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 08:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the references for the draft of the article. I kindly request you to get back to me for the references you find inadequate.

If you want to make an addition, you can get sources and references from many websites, including the official website, if you type in Google. Necati Yüce (talk) 09:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Necati Yüce, please resubmit your draft once you have added sources. Annh07 (talk) 15:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yukselis Elevator 1 (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yukselis Elevator 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 09:16, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yukselis Elevator (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yukselis Elevator and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello Necati Yüce. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Yukselis Elevator, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Necati Yüce. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Necati Yüce|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple drafts

Please don't create multiple drafts on the same subject; you now have both Draft:Yukselis Elevator and Draft:Yukselis Elevator 1 in the system. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Yukselis Elevator

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Yukselis Elevator, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Yukselis Elevator 1

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Yukselis Elevator 1, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:45, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:47, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]