Deletion of Fresh Healthy Vending

Wondering why you chose to delete this page, I worked hard on it and I thought it was important because of the Healthy hunger free kids act and the new regulations on vending machines in schools. Fresh Healthy Vending is one of the only companies out there that provides this service, and they have been working with the "let's move" program as well. Were there not enough sources? Z1nemo (talk) 19:46, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

delete this pls

my redirection failed. i redirect Media Markt to Media-Saturn-Holding. can u delete Media-Saturn-Holding so that media markt hasnt got any redirects. thx. -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Jack Bradley Feldman

Why did you delete the page Jack Bradley Feldman. He is an upcoming young photographer who has gained substantial local success, and is moving onto the national level. The article cites three sources, his website, and two very credible newspapers: the Litchfield County Times and the Housatonic Times. Please advise. Ofe1kanofee (talk) 03:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of Master of Malt

Hi there. Whiskyinspector is back and has vandalised the page again! He's clearly affiliated with a company, otherwise he wouldn't repeatedly target the page, as well as others!

Please help!

(Huckleberry113 (talk) 15:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Gnodal Deletion

Hi, you deleted the page I was still drafting, bit too speedy! Can you reinstate it please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by FPisani (talk • contribs) 12:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BinaryTreeInc Deletion

You deleted my page within 5 minutes of me creating an account and taking a test drive. I didn't even have time to add the final content. Our competitors all have Wikipedia entries that would have been very similar to ours. Please explain.

BinaryTreeInc (talk) 19:15, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia isn't for advertisement. My guess is that it got speedily-deleted as spam. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Carl Johnson)} 19:27, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

==

'This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments with four tildes (~).

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

___________________________________________________________ Hello,

Do you think it is acceptable? Please let me know! ~

(Superinsect2010 (talk) 16:57, 8 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry, I'm very new, I understand. I will change what I copied from in her myspace to be more neutral as it does sound like that. I will work on that now. Thank you!

(Superinsect2010 (talk) 14:54, 8 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

(Superinsect2010 (talk))

(Superinsect2010 (talk) 14:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Sperse

Hi NawlinWiki,

Please tell me how Sperse would be considered advertising? If this is advertising then all other Search Engines should be considered advertising aswell. We have well written the Article with reliable citations. Sperse is a new meta search engine with a unique technology that changes the way people search. Sperse receives over 1 million searches a month and therefore its necessary for people to find it on Wikipedia and to know how it works. Please tell us the required changes so we can rewrite it according to Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thank you. Shiv92 (talk)

Dundalk Cricket Club

Can I ask why you deleted my entry on Dundalk Cricket Club ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EddieLu (talk • contribs) 19:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In Irish cricketing terms we are a very siginificant club, being the newest in Leinster and the only one in Co Louth as well as getting a mention in Wisden Cricketer only six months into our foundation and being semi-finalists in a cup competition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EddieLu (talk • contribs) 19:11, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance of getting an answer on this EddieLu (talk) 12:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi:)

Hi:) Just when you were deleting the article Pleazure Atlanta, I was opening an AfD. End result, Twinkle recreated the page (and the AfD) just the moment you deleted it. Could I request you to again delete the same page (and archive the related AfD with comments)? Thanks and warm regards. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 17:54, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! thanks :) ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 17:55, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did u delete my article I was about to add sauces with help @ —Preceding unsigned comment added by O.lowe2010 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Love Me (Beyoncé Album)

Curious, why delete this under A1? I'd just declined the A7 and A9 speedy tags, and by linking to the artist, the context of the article is very clear. Nyttend (talk) 02:54, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing, the cited source doesn't give the title as "Love Me" - it's an interview with the producer, and essentially all he says is "yeah, we're working on an album." So it's really more of an a3, no substantive content. Once there's a source with any information at all (like a title, or a release date), it would make more sense to have an article. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:46, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 August 2. Nyttend (talk) 11:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think that you have removed my content (The Theory of Human Excellence) because you have categorised it as an advert or trying to sell services. I assure you this is not my goal.

I am not sure if the web site www.theoryofexcellence.org was up when you took your decisions as it went live just about the same time as this site was updated. If you refer to this site you will be able to see that this new theory is a new management application that can be applied to many different areas of business. It could be the next SWOT theory or personality profiling technique such as Carl Jung invented. I have been researching this for several years and have just formulated the exact working of the human brain, how it thinks, how it makes learns, how it basically operates. I believe this is fundamental ground breaking work. It could re-write the rule book on decision making, learning, change management, leadership, motivation, team building and many more areas.

I recognise that it is not referred to as yet in any journals or other magazines but I am just completing my validation of the theories within several companies and therefore have not circulated my work. I wanted to check it out in real life before I 'blew my trumpet'. I am ready to do so now and believed that one of the first places to do so was on Wikipedia. I also wanted to use the audit trail to protect the IP of the theory to make sure no body else took recognition for my work. Hence registering it on this site first to get it time and date stamped.

If you are unsure, please just give me a little time to extend the reference ability of my work with other sources. If it does not get recognised then remove it after I have had chance to circulate the theory.

I thank you for your consideration, Terry Wilcox —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilcoxft (talk • contribs) 14:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you're trying to do, but that's not what Wikipedia is for. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, listing things that are already recognized as notable by reliable independent sources. Please see Wikipedia:No original research. In particular, please read Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day: "[Wikipedia] does not exist to promote new things and spread new knowledge. If you find yourself arguing that your Wikipedia article is necessary because no one else has written about your new invention yet, you have misunderstood the purpose of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is here for documenting things in which precisely the opposite has occurred." NawlinWiki (talk) 15:09, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Punk is Dead (band)

Can you help explain why this was deleted. I believe it to be relevant due in large part to the various members in the band and the premise of the band. Did I fail to do incldue something? Robertocarlos13 (talk) 15:33, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing in the article to indicate that the band might meet the notability standards of WP:MUSIC. The bass player who was in a notable band isn't enough: per WP:MUSIC, a band is notable if it "contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles." NawlinWiki (talk) 15:49, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

can you send me a copy of my page so I can work on it. Thank you. Robertocarlos13 (talk) 16:00, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About your recent blocks

NawlinWiki, can you please explain to me why you're blocking IP addresses from all over the place, many of them dynamic short term leases, for three months a piece? Some of those IP addresses do not even have edits. I'm finding this concerning. Risker (talk) 05:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

24 hours, NawlinWiki, not 3 months. A lot of these IPs are dynamic and will be assigned to someone else tomorrow. Risker (talk) 05:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, except for the occasional one that has done this more than once. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

By request of oversight we don't do this anymore, because filter logs are not deletable. I reverted the change. Hope you understand, Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 05:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I get it, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Interesting, tho'. I'm completely oblivious to those edits, BTW - Alison ^❤ 05:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Smee protection

Hi there! As the Smee page is protected, I ask you to change the redirect from Characters of Peter Pan#Smee to Characters of Peter Pan#Pirates, since Smee has not an individual section. Greetings! --LoЯd ۞pεth 08:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marty And Doug's New Religion

I am curious as to why you deleted 'Marty and Doug's New Religion'? The article is about something that is significant. We have sources that include the Internet Movie Database as well as Tubefilter.tv. These are both significant independent sources that have articles written about them in wikipedia. There were other sources to other third party websites about the subject as well. What up with that? TomMcComeryi (talk) 11:00, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You claim that IMDB is not a source that meets wikipedia's standards, however you have used it in articles that you have written. Can you please explain this justification to me? How come you may use it for your articles but I may not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomMcComery (talk • contribs) 22:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

You are mentioned (in a nice way). Keep up the good work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Toddst1_misconduct RIPGC (talk) 04:12, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Smikle

Hi, would it be possible to restore article for Brain Smikle which you deleted on 23 January? The UK football season started yesterday, Smikle played a fully pro-game and I would like to update his article. Thanks.--Egghead06 (talk) 08:06, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done (although I restored an older version - the 23 Jan version was a copyright violation because it was cut and pasted from the team website). Please update the article as soon as you can. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 13:56, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why?

why did you delete my page?! it said clearly at the top IN EDITING STAGES! from Dw4567

Moving "FC Barcelona media" to Barca TV

Could you please undo your move and start a discussion on the talkpage before simply deciding to move a page? Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest FLC} 19:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

it's a merge between R@dio Barca and Barca TV; both a part of Barcelonas media-strategy. Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest FLC} 20:46, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Galko Homes

Could you please reinstate my page? Galko Homes is an extremely prominent business in Southern Alberta, and I'd like to finish creating my article, if possible... Galts2010 (talk) 15:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hakubaku

Hi! I'm working on a project to teach people more about noodles and noodle making. I'm not sure why my page had to be deleted due to probably a too commercial context? What about the other companies that have Wiki pages? Since you have to make a start somewhere, I decided to start with Hakubaku. The noodles in my article are type of noodles, not just names that Hakubaku gave it. For example: Ramen noodles are for Japan like hamburgers are for the USA.
I'm happy to change some of the text, but to be honest I do not see much difference between: Hakubaku makes noodles (deleted) and Nike makes shoes, which is ok.

thanks.

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ContrillionAU

With 10 edits, this should be speedily closed. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:27, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the page: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ContrillionAU ----moreno oso (talk) 03:27, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sense and Order

21:43, 11 August 2010 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted "Sense and Order" ‎ (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)

Hey NawlinWiki,

As a first time Wikipedia article author, I was hoping you could explain to me why Sense and Order was taken down due to G11. Please help me understand how I can improve my page so that it will be published. Your help is appreciated.

Thank you for your time, Cardinalcom (talk) 16:47, 12 August 2010

Neil Hutchins

I am sorry but I am having trouble understanding how, and accredited person, by many well known organizations, and people in the industry cannot be listed on this website as notable. He created a unique program and break through of the industry. Yet you let snooki, the fat whale of a guido, who is from NY claiming to be from Jersey Shore and her show is in Miami is considered credible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dobieboi8520 (talk • contribs)

Justin Cooper Deletion

Hi, you deleted my page concerning President Clinton aide Justin Cooper, you'll notice I've included several sources indicating why the person is notable. As a senior presidential aide, primary editor of the presidential memoir, and member of the governing board at the American University in Dubai, I hardly see reason to consider the person unworthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Please reinstate the piece. I plan on editing the content further. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WildHorses325 (talk • contribs)

Talkback

Hello, NawlinWiki. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Edit filter.
Message added 17:21, 12 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You deleted my page about the Casuals United female division. How was is not relevant? You have the main Casuals United on here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisalashesxxx (talk • contribs) 20:29, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Guerin

Sorry. You and I did that thing. You know that thing that happens sometimes. I went to delete it, and you had beaten me to it again. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That thing? NawlinWiki (talk) 21:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, this thing. But definitely not that thing. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

False positive

Ive made a small change to a filter you've edited recently because it was tripping up a false positive for this user and would continue to produce problems in the future. I hope this doesnt interfere with what you were aiming at getting the filter to do. —Soap— 20:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually a true positive -- see your talk page. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Madeline Alexis Author

If I were to list the actual web address for each book and the publisher, would I then be able to keep this page? I am just trying to see why I was deleted so fast and to fix what is necessary to keep the page please. Chrmdgddss (talk) 00:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)Chrmdgddss —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrmdgddss (talk • contribs) 00:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Justice

So I just thought I would drop a line asking for some justice. The URL 168.9.25.23 has been blocked for several short amounts of time for constant vandalism but always gets their priveleges back. Is this because they are a Muscogee County School District URL? Meanwhile, 68.153.29.23, which is a URL for Athens Regional Medical Center gets a five year ban on their first ban. I propose either a reduction in the latter's ban or an increase in the former's. There just doesn't seem to be much concensus amongst admins as to what a fair ban for vandalism should be. I have to wonder if the 5 year ban on the latter has to due to their edit of of Rachel Marsden's page which I suppose would be considered high visibility vandalism. WesUGAdawg (talk) 02:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ultrastudio.org

While it may be that I made a mistake posting an article on Ultrastudio.org too early, WP:SPEEDY does not list lack of notability for the web site of this type as the reason for speedy deletion. As for normal deletion process, I cannot imagine it being done properly when the deletion discussion has been "resolved" by two people and without giving the original author at least several hours to reply. I am working on the project that seems doing well and plan to restore the article in the future. After I will do this, I think, no argumentation could be used that the article has been deleted with "consensus" of the two people and it should be treated as a contribution without the past history. Audriusa (talk) 11:40, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Final Frontier

~~Did you read the notice on the edit you made? ~~Bigtop~~ みんな空の下 (トーク) 16:18, 18 August 2010 (UTC) ~~Bigtop~~ みんな空の下 (トーク) 16:18, 18 August 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

Whoops, sorry, I was targeting for Oscar776. ~~Bigtop~~ みんな空の下 (トーク) 16:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Restore access to Nimbuzz page

Hey, Andi from Nimbuzz here. I see you have deleted our wiki page and now the access is blocked. Can you please restore access to it and undelete the page? Also can you give me an advice on what needs to be done about it so we can avoid this kind of issues in the future. I appreciate your time. Andi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.56.49.28 (talk) 19:37, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are two distinct problems. First, the article is written like an ad: "Nimbuzz is a free mobile application that allows you to chat..." Second, the article did not indicate, by citation to reliable independent sources, how this company meets the notability standards of WP:CORP or WP:WEB. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:37, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your feedback, I understand the reasons and I trust you have made the right decision by deleting it. I think that Nimbuzz is a big player in its space and a WIKI entry would be only fair. Since the access is restricted for an undetermined period I would really appreciate any advice you can give me on what do to get the article back again. What would be the best way in your opinion. To be clear I do not intend to do it myself, but we have a lot of users asking us what happened with the WIKI page and how they can help to get it back.

Thanks in advance for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreipiftor (talk • contribs) 10:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chepe Limon

I believe you have just banned me by mistake.

I am not a vandal; I actually was trying to upload images on commons but it seems that many policies has changed since I last used wiki (over a year ago). The images I upload belong to other people; but I personally ask each and every one of them permission to use them. I ask on the comments section so any admin can see that the images are legit. This is my Flickr account (so you can see I am not a vandal): http://www.flickr.com/photos/50846966@N08/favorites/

For example, look at this image: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edurickes/4908072213/in/faves-50846966@N08/

I have asked the author for permission to upload his images (not just that one), with the condition that they are cited and sourced (giving him the credit). He has agreed (via personal email) and I have just notified to mention it on the comments section so everyone can see. Since they are not technically "free" commons wouldn't allow it to stay. But on normal wiki it is well withing the policies. Most of the images on "My favorites" is the same thing, with many already giving me permission to upload them to use on wiki articles (I will be expanding South American football articles).

Now, can you unblock me, please? Only reason I did the 11 BS edits was to see if I can upload them now (seeing your new autoconfirm policy).

Thanks! (I am Chepe BTW) 68.215.155.90 (talk) 17:14, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to move this request to Wikipedia:Requests for unblock and let someone who's more conversant with the image uploading policies take a look at it. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Backstreet Cultural Museum

I see you deleted my recently created Backstreet Cultural Museum page under CSD A3 because the page was blank. That makes sense because the article was in fact blank except for the category tag of "Needed-Class New Orleans articles." By adding the tag, I made the article appear in the needed articles page of WikiProject New Orleans. Is there a better way to add pages that should be created to the WikiProject? I'm new around here and am still learning. Thanks! 5oh4 (talk) 18:21, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Try Wikipedia:Requested articles. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)~~ Actually, edit Wikipedia:WikiProject New Orleans/to do and add the article. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 19:14, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, NawlinWiki. That looks like a good way to accomplish what I'm after. But I'm still wondering why the "needed articles" category exists at all and why its prominently displayed on the WikiProject page. But you probably have nothing to do with that. :-) 5oh4 (talk) 19:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pascal64/Fabasoft

Hi NawlinWiki, I did some translation from a German article w:de:Fabasoft. It is a software company. Could you be so kind and have a look at the article? If it is okay, I would move it. Thanks a lot. kindly --Pascal64 (talk) 19:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did some typo cleanup. Looks OK to me. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:03, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, thank you. I will move it now. --Pascal64 (talk) 07:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request of Chepe Limon

Hello NawlinWiki. Chepe Limon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, - Vianello (Talk) 19:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds conceivably legitimate, so I wanted to bring this to your attention to have a look at. - Vianello (Talk) 19:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment on Chepe Limon's talk page - I'd really like someone who spends more time with image uploading to look at this. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a lot of experience with uploading images, but I think the editor's other behaviour is enough to justify declining the unblock request. Also the editor's last post appeared to indicate that they were leaving Wikipedia, in which case it doesn't matter one way or the other. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Bradley Feldman

I just noticed you deleted this article several times. It's back again. I proded it, but I figured you'd want to take a look at it again. Regards, P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 03:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And this one: Jack bradley feldman. He's determined. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 03:36, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User tripped Filter 17; can you review?

I am unfamiliar with this user's behavior, but could you check to see if this is the guy it was supposed to catch? See [1] and [2]. --Jayron32 04:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not who we're looking for. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 11:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Benton Habitat for Humanity

Why was the page deleted? Benton Habitat is an affiliate of Habitat for Humanity International and I had just started working on the page. Over the next few days, references and materials were to be added on the organization, its history and present work. It is a rapidly expanding organization in Oregon, USA.

Appreciate your speedy reply. Miss.saumya (talk) 22:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Shoesandbags

Please give me further information as to what is the problem with the article or which bits should I rewrite as I can not see why this article should be deleted. I have followed the guidelines of other articles about the same subject such as Matches fashion and Net-A-Porter on wikipedia and of course wikipedias own guidelines. My wording of the article is the same as it appears in publications out of my control. Please advise as to what do I need to change in the article if at all? Does the termination of the article mean that you will have to terminate the following articles Matches Fashion and Net-A-Porter? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoesandbags (talk • contribs) 16:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of WebVisible, Inc.

Hello,

Our initial attempt at a page was deleted fro advertising. We have since revised and are trying to figure out how to submit. Can you please advise if we are still being blocked?

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by WebVisible (talk • contribs) 21:46, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I may jump in- there isn't any correct way to write about your own company, because of your conflict of interest. Don't worry- if your company really is notable, it's inevitable that people outside the company will write about it based on what they read in the newspapers. To avoid advertising problems, Wikipedia doesn't permit us to use company names as our usernames, so if you want to continue at Wikipedia as a volunteer, you'll need a personal username. Thanks! -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request that deleted article be userfied (to create new article within Wikipedia guidelines)

I am contacting you regarding the deletion of the article for Bethel School of Supernatural Ministry. At the time of page deletion, I was not active on Wikipedia. At this point I would like to open up a new article in my userspace, and enter into a discussion regarding inclusion of the subject article. Any new article would be written according to NPOV (Neutral Point Of View). Of course, another option would be to merge the information into another article. I am fairly new to the Wikipedia community, so I would appreciate the suggestion of any other possible options. Houseofisaac (talk) 08:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine - let me know when you've written the draft page. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:52, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spring Water Asset Management

I am wondering why the Spring Water Asset Management page was deleted. It follows the same organization as First Affirmative Financial which also flows in the same manner (slightly product pitching). What is unique about these companies is how they are starting to focus on socially responsible investing. This is what I find interesting and I am starting to get the word out. It was nice to see that Wikipedia already had a company profile similar to Spring Water Asset Management so I modeled after it. Getting the information out there about new green options is important. Please review both Spring Water Asset Management's page and First Affirmative's and provide reasons why one is worthy of Wikipedia and the other is not. They seem to have the same feel and content. mnovotny 12:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MelNovo (talk • contribs)

The Spring Water page was deleted for "product pitching" such as "By building relationships around trust and integrity, every client receives a specialized investment plan that suits their financial goals." See WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM. I've reviewed the First Affirmative page - while it is less overtly spammy, it doesn't indicate that the company meets the notability standards of WP:CORP, so I've deleted it as well. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:52, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request that Epoch LARP's page be restored

I am hoping to have the page for Epoch LARP restored. First, it was a work in progress. Second, it was deleted "because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia." I think that this is discrimination. There are a number of pages for different LARPs. If you're going to allow one then you need to allow all. If not then I would like to see a list of requirements for a LARP to complete to be treated like these "special LARPs" that are allowed pages. Sheighnah —Preceding undated comment added 18:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

There aren't specific notability requirements for LARPs, but they fall under the requirements for organizations, WP:ORG. As far as the other articles, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If you think any other specific LARP article should be deleted, let me know. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:59, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request to NOT delete my "Baby Police" article

Hi, I saw this awesome Nigerian movie called Baby Police and I want to create a wiki article for it. This is my first time doing this so I posted something bogus on there just as a place holder when I first started and that one got deleted. I tried it again now that I have more info and it looks like someone is still trying to delete it.

AramFingal (talk) 21:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of the article "Woe, Is Me"

The band Woe, Is Me had it's page deleted before because of insignificance but the group have now released a full length album and their cover of "Tik Tok" has become very popular and I was wondering if it would be appropriate to recreate this page. Thanks for reading! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordan199311 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem

Did you see the discussion page on the article Woe, Is Me? According to the creator of the article (which I have no recollection of), the band is gaining fame and is relevant. Can I ask how does this fit under A7? Thanks JeremyMcClean (Talk) 20:33, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The band's album was released (on a small independent label) *yesterday*. The article asserts only, with no references, that "They became famous mainly for their cover of "Tik Tok" by the pop sing Ke$ha." It's not enough just to baldly say "They are gaining fame" -- we have dozens of band articles submitted every day that say that. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally posted the article before I finished. I meant to hit preview. Velocity Records is owned by Rise Records which is a pretty major record label. I was going to add much more info to the article, including the whole first album's info. I believe the band is very relevant and should be enough to have their own page. If not, then I am sorry. Jordan199311 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you, NawlinWiki, for clearing up that. Sorry if I caused trouble. JeremyMcClean (Talk) 20:53, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jibe framework deleted?

Hi, I wonder why you deleted Jibe framework as it is an open sourced framework using Alfresco_(software), Extjs also you can see there is Spring Framework ... Jibe framework is licensed under GPL v3 and I do not see why should it be deleted? Why is that ‎(G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)? (Talk) 22:59, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Innography article marked for proposed deletion

Hiyo! I saw that you had marked the Innography article for proposed deletion due to notability. I believe I've outlined in the discussion page at Talk:Innography that the article meets the notability criteria. I'd be happy to modify the article if you believe I'm misinterpreting the guidelines. I've removed the template for proposed deletion, per the comments on the talk page. Thanks! TonyHagale (talk) 21:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]