User talk:RIPGC

GA Review

Thanks for the constructive feedback and the compliment on my talk page. I wanted to see if you would be interested in looking at the GA status of another article (Chemical Bank). The reviewer seems to have made some comments and then disappeared so it is in limbo. Would appreciate your feedback on that one. Thanks again. |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 04:27, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page header

Per my warning on AN/I, which I assume you read because you responded to it, I am asking you to take down the spoof message banner. I want you to remove the banner because it is a source of consternation and because a chorus of other users has asked you to do so. I'm not particularly interested in bargains or wikilawyering or any of that. I would like you to remove the banner whenever you read this message. Thanks. Protonk (talk) 05:04, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ask nicely, unlike that dickish warning by that IP, and your wish might be granted...it is granted. RIPGC (talk) 05:18, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Assuming no one else comments on that AN/I report, it should be automatically archived in 24 hours. Protonk (talk) 05:26, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked this account as an abusive sockpuppet of Gaydenver, confirmed by Checkuser. Newyorkbrad (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Dean Witter Reynolds

Dean Witter Reynolds has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 08:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]