User talk:Audriusa

Archive

• User talk:Audriusa/Archive1
• User talk:Audriusa/Archive2
• User talk:Audriusa/Archive3
• User talk:Audriusa/Archive4

Gametophyte

Hi Audriusa, I am happy for you to correct the error on angiosperm archaegonia, but in doing so you have also removed other material that I added, without explaining why. CAn we discuss this please? Plantsurfer (talk) 20:20, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

I have preserved the most of your input, this correction is not a revert edit. But it was necessary to do some merging on the paragraph I needed to split and rewrite because angiosperms and gymnosperms were discussed together - and the female gametophytes are different. I have recently checked if I could preserve even bigger part of your edit and found it is possible to restore the two more sentences, done already. Audriusa Audriusa (talk) 08:44, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Thx. I will continue to edit this. Plantsurfer (talk) 12:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

WP:TPOC

Could we get you to read over WP:TPOC as you seem to be editing other peoples comments.Moxy (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

As long as you read WP:WPA WP:RPA. But let's do not go too deep in this, I prefer to keep that anonymous post rather than wasting yours and mine time in flaming here. Thanks for archiving. Audriusa (talk)

Read it and seems to be completely unrelated to the topic at hand and its not a policy or guide in anyway. But agree should simply move on if you understand the problem.Moxy (talk) 20:33, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for the wrongly remembered or typed abbreviation, this was not intentional. The rationale was Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence, and the lack of evidence is that I have resigned because of the small disagreement. Nobody in the whole world resigns because of small problems, should be logical, and I have resigned because I have seen my duty to do so. Maybe it was a mistake from my side and more optimal solutions were possible, yet the comments as "was not problem at all" are as grounded as to call me a green monster from Andromeda galaxy. However this is a very difficult history, I fully understand people who take other side without knowing any of the sides, so probably better to leave that anonymous comment in peace. Audriusa (talk) 10:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of JAMWiki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JAMWiki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JAMWiki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

JAMWiki Content

I've emailed you the content of the article as it was just prior to deletion. Please do not repost it on Wikipedia until such time as notability can be clearly establised. Regards. --Cactus.man ✍ 19:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Audriusa (talk) 19:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Corba Server.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Corba Server.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:18, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Need help with translation

Hello Audriusa. It's not uncommon that new editors add articles to the English Wikipedia that are actually not in English. So there are templated messages to notify them about Wikipedia in other languages. Usually those consist of a statement in the user's native language and the English equivalent, but there are still some templates that have only English messages. Could you please add the equivalent translation of the English message to {{Contrib-lt1}}? It should be placed above the English text. Your help would be very appreciated. De728631 (talk) 13:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

I wonder if anybody, ever, wrote a Lithuanian article into English Wikipedia? Audriusa (talk) 13:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC). Well, it seems that a few people did. I have translated the template. Audriusa (talk) 14:09, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Lithuanian help needed

Hello Audriusa, I'm contacting you because we need some Lithuanian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on lt.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Lithuanian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 22:03, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

43616: Provide a way to create interactive 2D/3D timelines and infographics e.g. Java applets, AJAX, Flash

FYI, I've moved an old proposal of yours to this bugzilla ticket. I see you made a Java applet edit just yesterday, wonderful! --Nemo 10:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Reward_board#As_we_are_going_to_keep_this.2C_do_we_need_to_tighten_the_criteria_a_bit.3F

Given it's been kept at MfD, I've reposted a proposal to tighten it. See header. Cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ElectricLocomotiveCabine.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ElectricLocomotiveCabine.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:04, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Audriusa. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 12:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 12:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Tiobe index.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tiobe index.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 16:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Baltic)

Hi. I see you are listed as a member of a WikiProject of a Baltic state. I was wondering if anybody who actively works on Estonian, Lithuanian or Latvian articles, would be interested in launching your own Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Baltic), based on the Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic) and Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea would be to try to bring about 1000 article improvements and creations on this region as an enjoyable challenge and potentially things like National Contests with prizes. If you'd be interested and think it's something you might regularly contribute to, comment and sign up at Talk:Baltic states. If there is interest we can move this to a project somewhere and set something up, thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Audriusa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ObjectWebLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ObjectWebLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Addressed. The logo, maybe, should be retained. It is the old (historical) logo. Audriusa (talk) 18:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Audriusa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Prolonged sine

Hi Audriusa back in 2006 you wrote the article Prolonged sine. It doesn’t have any sources to support it. The only reference I could find is at [1] and this source indicates that the theory is doubtful. Do you know of any other sources that would support the article? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 13:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

This is rather old article, I have extended a little bit now and added the references. The law itself is not doubtful. Audriusa (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Fantastic! Thank you. Mccapra (talk) 23:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Audriusa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Audriusa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

;)

Opart45 (talk) 19:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Request translation Isabelle de Charrière

Hello Audriusa, Would you like to write / translate the article of Isabelle de Charrière for the LT Wikipedia? That would be appreciated of you could do it. Boss-well63 (talk) 13:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

June 2021

Your recent editing history at Python (programming language) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

My goal is to increase the neutrality of Wikipedia project, by providing also negative views on the subject of the article. I know the three revert rule and follow it. Kinda strange to be blocked for the efforts of this kind. Also, please stop scaring. Audriusa (talk) 16:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Deprodding of Pyrex (programming language)

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Pyrex (programming language), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! SailingInABathTub (talk) 14:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

It is somewhat contra-intuitive that an article that is ten years both without references and questioned for notability does not deserve to be deleted but be with it if there are such rules. Audriusa (talk) 14:46, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Audriusa, I see you created Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Pyrex (programming language) as an attempt to get the article deleted. MFD does not apply to articles; if you believe the article should be deleted, you should start an AFD for it. If you do that, please make sure you follow all the procedures, including listing it properly and tagging the article (you didn't do either of those in your MFD attempt).

I've marked your MFD for speedy deletion as having been created in error. (If it had been an AFD, I would have completed the steps you skipped, but there's no point to repairing an MFD discussion that doesn't belong.) I express no opinion on the merits of whether the article deserves an AFD, or, if one is made, what its outcome should be. TJRC (talk) 05:30, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Technologic Systems

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Technologic Systems requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – S. Rich (talk) 01:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Technologic logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Technologic logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Airliner accidents and incidents involving mid-air collisions has been nominated for renaming

Category:Airliner accidents and incidents involving mid-air collisions has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:03, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ObjectWebLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ObjectWebLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Saadoun Brahim moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Saadoun Brahim, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 00:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

I have reverted your action as a page move vandalism, because the article is based on 10 references and contains no single sentence that would not be based on these. These are references that should be recognized in Wikipedia, not social media postings. Audriusa (talk) 09:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lomboz

The article Lomboz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article describing a defunct software project. Aside from the 2004 review at Eclipse Plugins Central, summarising its pros and cons in bullet points, there is a 2007 press release and various passing mentions in lists of products at the OW2 site; searches find how-to-install type postings, but I am not seeing evidence that the project attained notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 17:42, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)