User talk:Naveennath6966

Welcome!

Hello, Naveennath6966, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Nath did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Nath, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:59, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Nath (surname). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 03:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Nath (surname) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 03:55, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nath (surname). Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 03:56, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nath (surname) is covered by sanctions

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Film Company, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. 94rain ^Talk 04:47, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nath. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent removal of sourced content and addition of unsourced irrelevance to Nath articles.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 13:06, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that you have been repeatedly warned. Bishonen | talk 13:06, 11 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Subwaymuncher. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nath without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sub |_HMU 02:51, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NAVEEN NATH

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NAVEEN NATH requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Production company, you may be blocked from editing. creffett (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 17:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nath cast

Why you edit this i have already prove nath cast is garhwalo Bramhin General catagory in Uttarakhand ... Please read carefully why you blocked me ... Now i am Putting RTI

Nath is an Indian Garhwali Brahmin clan, with the same surname, found in Uttarakhand Tehri Garhwal village Dhung Mandar in northern India. The original village of the Nath clan is "Dhung Mandaar" situated near Ghansaali Garhwal, the ancient capital of Garhwal. The Kuldevta (Clan deity) of Nath " Khetrpaal Devta. The main temple of the Goddess is situated in Dhung Mandar, which is visible. Many Nath migrated from Rajasthan And different parts of Garhwal and even to Kumaon. Today, there are many more villages inhabited by Nath clan. Naveennath6966 (talk) 04:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Naveennath6966 (talk) 07:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]