User talk:Nathanww

Welcome

Hello, Nathanww, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Chris53516 ^(Talk) 14:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. —Anas ^talk? 18:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Movement to impeach George W. Bush

A request was posted on the BLPN board related to Movement to impeach George W. Bush. I provided an answer that might help you in your mediation of the matter. The post on the BLPN board is here. Thanks for stepping forward to address this matter. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 17:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Checking in

How are things going with Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-04-25 Movement to impeach George W. Bush? Vassyana 07:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunatley, I've really been too busy to do this. Sorry. Nathanww 16:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Striking your vote

Hello Nathanww,

Thank you for your interest in the Wikimedia Board Election. The Election Committee regretfully informs you that your previous vote was received in error and will be struck according to the election rules, described below.

The Election Committee regretfully announces today that we will have to remove approximately 220 votes submitted. These votes were cast by people not entitled to vote. The election rules state that users must have at least 400 edits by June 1 to be eligible to vote.

The voter lists we sent to Software in the Public Interest (our third party election partner) initially were wrong, and one of your account was eventually included to our initial list. There was a bug in the edit counting program and the sent list contained every account with 201 or more edits, instead of 400 or more edits. So large numbers of people were qualified according to the software who shouldn't be. The bug has been fixed and an amended list was sent to SPI already.

Our first (and wrong) list contains 80,458 accounts as qualified. The proper number of qualified voters in the SPI list is now 52,750. As of the morning of July 4 (UTC), there are 2,773 unique voters and 220 people, including you, have voted who are not qualified based upon this identified error.

In accordance with voting regulations the Election Committee will strike those approximately 220 votes due to lack of voting eligibility. The list of struck votes is available at https://wikimedia.spi-inc.org/index.php/List_of_struck_votes.

We are aware of the possibility that some of the people affected may have other accounts with more than 400 edits, and hence may still be eligible to vote. We encourage you to consider voting again from another account, if you have one. If you have no other account eligible to vote, we hope you reach the criteria in the next Election, and expect to see your participation to the future Elections.

Your comments, questions or messages to the Committee would be appreciated, you can make them at m:Talk:Board elections/2007/en. Other language versions are available at m:Translation requests/Eleccom mail, 07-05.

Again, we would like to deeply apologize for any inconvenience.

Sincerely,
Kizu Naoko
Philippe
Jon Harald Søby
Newyorkbrad
Tim Starling

For Wikimedia Board Election Steering Committee

Everything was well source to reputable sources

I did not add defamatory information to Prem Rawat. Everything was well source to reputable sources. Andries 14:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop using editwarring as a way to engage in editing. You have a pending case of Mediation based on your previous inability to find compromise and stop edit warring. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 14:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will request a new mediation if my recent addition leads to yet another mini-edit war. I think I have shown a lot of willingness to compromise. Now it is the turn of others. Andries 14:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the revert was my fault. I didn't see that you had the citations. Nathanww 14:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: The Russia Journal; Google juice; Spermatozoon; Talmudical Academy of Central New Jersey; Content management framework; Pasadena High School (Pasadena, Texas); Chris Baty; Steady state (biochemistry); Fab lab; Krum High School; Google Translate; Criterion validity; Hanatarash; Google Toolbar; MreB; Oakcrest High School; Saguaro High School; Arjun Singh; Myrtle Corbin

Cleanup: Palm Multi-Connector; Ingushetia; Volga Tatars
Merge: MSN Hotmail; Texas Academy for Leadership in the Humanities; Military of Hungary
Add Sources: Google Web Accelerator; Military of the Republic of Macedonia; Khanate of Kazan
Wikify: History of the Faroe Islands; Foreign Intelligence Service (Russia); Geography of Greece
Expand: York Community High School; Picasa; Post-Soviet states

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 20:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You recent report to WP:AIV

Thank you for making a report about 63.3.22.129 (talk · contribs · block log) at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. In this case the user hasn't been warned since the 22nd May, and looking through the recent edits I'm struggling to see any obvious vandalism, with the exception of one typo. If you have any further question please don't hesitate to get in contact ^Khukri 17:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for helping out on my talk page. I have now blocked the newly-registered user, regrettably. Regards, Ground Zero | t 15:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out on my talk page too! That Bbytyrone's a funny guy! Ewen 19:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page

Yea thanks for that. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 03:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dfghdxdhgfdgh

Why did you revert my blanking of this userpage? They were blocked as a violation of username policy and appeared to be using their userpage for spam (a really common problem alas). Secretlondon 16:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see the "blocked" template on the userpage Nathanww 16:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nanotech recording

Are you still recording nanotechnology for the Spoken wiki project? I was actually thinking of doing it. .:DavuMaya:. 16:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recordings in progress removed

I have removed your spoken article in progress status for Nanotechnology. If you wish to continue work, please re-submit. Thank you. Reason turns rancid (talk) 03:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robobot

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Robobot, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Robobot. Jfire (talk) 04:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your test

Thank you for experimenting with the page John Adams on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Pak aran 21:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RUSSIA roll call and your input required

Privet. You are receiving this message as you were listed on the membership list of WP:RUSSIA at Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Members. Recent times has seen minimal activity within WikiProject Russia, and there is an attempt to re-invigorate the project and have it become more organised into a fully-fledge functioning project, with the aim of increasing the quality of Russia-related articles across English wikipedia.

As we don't know which listed members are active within the project and Russia-related article, all listed members are receiving this message, and are requested to re-affirm their active status on Russia-related article by re-adding their username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Members by adding:

# {{User|YOURUSERNAME}}

to the membership list. You may also like to place {{User Russian Project}} on your userpage, as this will also place you in Category:WikiProject Russia members.

There is also an active proposal on the creation of a single WP:RUSSIA project. The proposal can be viewed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Russia#Proposal_for_overhaul_and_creation_of_a_single_WP:RUSSIA_project, and your comments and suggestions are welcomed and encouraged at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia/Proposal.

We all look forward to your continued support of WP:RUSSIA and any comments you may have on the proposal. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 04:34, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Counter-Vandalism_Unit/Task_Force/Members

Hiya. Is this list still in use? Recently I used it to post this msg. to this user who was on the list, and in green (& I presumed green was the best to approach?). The user's not responded, and I wonder whether s/he still uses Wikipedia. Thought you'd want to be kept abreast of such matters. Best, Trafford09 (talk) 11:30, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Vandalism attack

Hi. I havent logged into Wikipedia in a long time, so I just received a message about me as a contact of a certain "The King's a-poopin." I have no idea who he is or why he added me as a contact. I don't even know what me being a contact of his means. Just lettin' ya know. K C 109 00:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

need info

Hey Im trying to expand a battle article and someone keeps reporting me for vandalism and deleting my posts.. Is that normal? Im new and I need help. Can you help me with info about properly doing this so that I dont have this anti-vandalism stalker ruin my contibution? Thanks!

Edits by User:Mighty9080

Hi there,

If you see Special:Contributions/Mighty9080, a user was making "automated" messages in your name, are you operating this account?

Thanks,

The Helpful One 21:22, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Received message from you

Hi,

I have received a message stating "You have been paged because a user has reported a high level of vandalism and you are listed as a contact" signed by you. What does that mean? Waiting for your quick response.

Thanks Rohit Saxena 05:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Rohit Saxena (talk)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Task Force/Communication

Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Task Force/Communication, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Task Force/Communication and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Task Force/Communication during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs 22:30, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jimbo watching.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jimbo watching.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 23:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saguaro (Palm OS) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saguaro (Palm OS) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saguaro (Palm OS) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 10:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]