User talk:Nataliemhowe

Hello, Nataliemhowe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Simplified Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! User:Peavyeavy (talk) 00:38, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Hypotrachyna oprah, from its old location at User:Nataliemhowe/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hypotrachyna oprah has been accepted

Hypotrachyna oprah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 09:57, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaenothecopsis penningtonensis has been accepted

Chaenothecopsis penningtonensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 04:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lichen task force

Hi Natalie: Given your interest in lichens, I wonder if you'd like to join the lichen task force, which a tiny band of us started a little of a year ago. We're making very slow progress in improving lichen articles, but could sure use any help that you (or your students) might be interested in doing! Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. MeegsC (talk) 19:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meegs! Yes! I'd love to join the lichen task force! Thanks for inviting me! Nataliemhowe (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tremella imshaugiae has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tremella imshaugiae. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:19, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tremella imshaugiae has been accepted

Tremella imshaugiae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gyalecta nana (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 14 novembre was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gyalecta nana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

14 novembre (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nataliemhowe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 14 novembre (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Phyllopsora ochroxantha has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Phyllopsora ochroxantha. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phyllopsora ochroxantha has been accepted

Phyllopsora ochroxantha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaenothecopsis jordanianai has been accepted

Chaenothecopsis jordanianai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Calicium brachysporum has been accepted

Calicium brachysporum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 19:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Amerosporiopsis phaeographidis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amerosporiopsis phaeographidis. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amerosporiopsis phaeographidis has been accepted

Amerosporiopsis phaeographidis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the lichen task force!

Hi Nataliemhowe; welcome to the lichen task force! It's great to see a new editor getting involved. Feel free to ping any of us if you have questions. Otherwise, dive right in! As you can undoubtedly see, we have loads to do. ;) MeegsC (talk) 16:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April lichen task force newsletter

The April issue of the lichen task force newsletter is available here. Delivered by MeegsC (talk) 20:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hypotrachyna kauffmaniana has been accepted

Hypotrachyna kauffmaniana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 02:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian coincidence

Natalie: wanted to say hi from a fellow lichen fan and to point how unusual it is that we published articles on lichens named after Canadian lichenologists at nearly the same time! Cheers, Esculenta (talk) 21:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! Thanks Esculenta for pointing that out! And for all your contributions to wikipedia world of lichens! Nice to chat with you! Nataliemhowe (talk) 13:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]