User talk:Narutolovehinata5/Archives/2016

Don't delete Left Wing Fascists there is a long history of music here

why would you want to delete my article? There is a new release by the band and history since 1987

The band may have been around for decades, but a search on Google failed to show sources which could establish notability; sources which discuss why the band is notable. The article did not credeibly indicate why its subject deserves a Wikipedia entry. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kisida Kyoudan & The Akebosi Rockets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Explain the Deleted Article?

Can you explain why you deleted the article on Impossible Ventures. You had flagged it before it was even finalized. - Nouhb (talk) 10:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes but the company appears to not have been covered in reliable sources, which in most cases is a requirement for establishing the notability required for a subject to have a Wikipedia article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Find something better to do than keep getting pages marked for deletion ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinips (talk • contribs) 17:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Re: Mami Kawada

I don't know much about real people articles but I would recommend archiving citations if you plan to take the article to FA. Still, I think it would pass GA in its current state. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC) @Tintor2: Actually, I was asking if you could review it for GA status (i.e. start the GAN). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry but I also don't have experience with real people articles and I could a bit bias. I would recommend you to at least seek help in the project other GANs even if it's your first time. Try searching for a small article first to reduce the pressure. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 02:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I see. I see that Cirt hasn't been active for about two months now, so Karas (anime)'s GAN is currently on hold. Will take a look at it in a moment and will try leave feedback there. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mami Kawada

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mami Kawada you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 01:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mami Kawada

The article Mami Kawada you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mami Kawada for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mami Kawada

The article Mami Kawada you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mami Kawada for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 02:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations in making the article pasa gan. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Thanks for the message. I've nominated it for DYK too and it's passed, so if all goes well, the hook should go up on February 13 (her birthday). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Anonymous;Code for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anonymous;Code is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anonymous;Code until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 14:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Swpb. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Carola Pavlik, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. —swpb^T 14:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

buypaa

article about "BUYPAA" was deleted & i wud like to improve it further and also i gave the reason about why it should not deleted..

DYK for Mami Kawada

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Yay! Congrats on the GA and DYK! :) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: Thanks for the message. It's a shame I had to work on her article as she's about to retire, but I guess at least she can retire with her having a pretty good Wikipedia entry. The effort I put into the article actually amazes me considering how the article looked like this when I started working on it. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

The good thing about retirement is that the article isn't having to constantly update for new material and having to scrub a pile of gossip and cruft. But yeah, it's quite satisfying to bring such articles to a well-written encyclopedic state. The version back then wasn't too bad for content, but now it's sourced and readers should get a better idea of what she's about instead of just being yet another Japanese anime singer. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: Here's a fun fact: my original plan was that I wouldn't actually nominate her article for GA status until today. I was planning to nominate the article today (February 13, which happens to be her birthday). I wanted the GAN to be kind of like a birthday gift for her. However, her announcement of her retirement made me change those plans, so I decided to nominate her for GAN status earlier than anticipated. When it passed, I thought it would be a good idea for her article to be a DYK hook, and when it passed the DYK nomination, I requested that the hook go up today, her birthday. So I guess her being a DYK today is my birthday gift to her. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you!

I appreciate you cleaning up after my mess. Thank goodness for new-page patrollers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie Sanders (talk • contribs) 03:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Deleted Article

Sir, why did you delete my article without a warning or any permission?!

UR LIKE WORSE THAN JANSEN HOWANG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoizh (talk • contribs) 01:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Teen angst

I wasn't trying to be promotional. Is it because I offered solutions to the problem instead of just stating the problem. What could I change to make this page more successful. i was really just trying to make a page so I could have some edits under my belt. I think teen angst is a real thing that warrants its own page, and I have no relation to any of the sources used, except the link which is just a picture of someone I think perfectly embodies teen angst. I had to use that link because I wasn't allowed to upload a picture until I have ten edits already. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to keep this page up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Achenbam (talk • contribs) 04:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Echoes from the past

Hey Narutolovehinata5. You may be interested in the new reply to an old question of yours at WP:Reference desk/Archives/Entertainment/2010 June 26#old anime?. Cheers! -- ToE 23:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Glitter Force move review

There is a move review at Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2016_February#Glitter_Force that you might want to look at. It's about moving "Smile Precure"/"Smile Pretty Cure!" to "Glitter Force". --Joseph123454321 (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA Nomination for Fitso

Hi, I am sorry that I published the article whereas I meant it to go in drafts. I couldn't find the option for drafting it. My bad. Request you to move it to drafts if possible. Sajelsaxena (talk) 10:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Quick speedy tagging of new articles

I just want to let you know that I moved an article that you recently tagged A7 into draft space, Draft:PetCloud. It was live for less then 60 seconds before you tagged it and the person came into the IRC help channel asking why it was tagged and that they were in the process of adding references. Perhaps in the future you can wait at least 10 or 15 minutes before tagging things for deletion unless they are blatant copyvios, attack articles, or vandalism? Article creation is hard and tagging the first article of a new contributor that quickly can be a big shock and a little bitey to someone that is trying. Thanks. --Majora (talk) 01:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

As someone who himself has experienced articles being nominated for deletion shortly after creation (see messages posted on my talkpage above), I understand the feeling. The problem is that it seems the article failed criterion A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, as the article did not credibly state why the article is important (not necessarily notable) enough to have a Wikipedia article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Serious? I'm so sorry, I didn't realise it would be that serious. I'm new here, and don't understand the rules completely PLEASE don't block me Gigantopithecusman (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

@Gigantopithecusman: Don't worry, you won't necessarily be blocked just because an article of yours was nominated for deletion. It happens even to experienced Wikipedia editors (such as myself). The problem is that the article appears to have been copied word-for-word from another source, which is generally against Wikipedia policies, unless the content is available under a compatible license which allows reuse and adaptation even for commercial purposes (i.e. being licensed under CC-BY or CC-BY-SA). While the source of the article (cryptidz.wikia.com) is licensed under CC-BY-SA, that license requires attribution (i.e. stating where the content came from), which you were unable to do. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Gigantopithecusman (talk) 14:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asami Imai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Records. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Starcraft Flash Action 3

I believe that the page did explain its significance (SCFA3 is the first flash based TD game), and that similar pages about similar games such as "Flash Element TD" set a precedent for its inclusion on wikipedia. Would you be able to clarify why you believe the page does not meet the critera for significance?

Speedyblupi (talk) 15:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anonymous;Code

The article Anonymous;Code has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not prove notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

NPP review

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. NPP is probably the most important single meta task on Wikipedia. There is shortly to be a round of discussions on how this work can be improved - perhaps by updating the soft ware. The WP:Page Curation has now been in operation for 4 years and I have noticed that you have never used it. I would be very grateful if you could take take a moment to let me know why you still patrol new pages using Twinkle. Your feedback will be important for us to know how we can improve the current system. You can leave your answer on my talk page. Many thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:19, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

@Kudpung: I have tried Page Curation in the past and I don't feel very comfortable using it. One reason is that, at least when I used it, it was pretty buggy: for example, Page Curation would add a CSD template to articles, even when one is already in the article. Another reason is just a minor pet peeve but is the main reason: notifying users with Page Curation leaves a message with I feel is too short and doesn't fully explain the reasons for deletion, unlike the default message templates that Twinkle uses. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your valuable feedback. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Sir' why . speed undeletion request Speedy deletion501 Please template !! Speedy deletion501 (talk) 03:53, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Why would you delete an article about one of the oldest cultural organizations in the USA located in Washington DC, active and influential for more than 130 years and which as a presence on the web with links to those pages, which mentions connections to the Smithsonian, the British Embassy and other overseas organizations? one which promotes scholarly research on history, music and culture, yet you focus on comic book material?Griffcats (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Has the organization been covered in reliable sources? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sayaka Sasaki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lantis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

deleting my page

§Jthommee (talk) 14:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Hi I am a new Wikipedia author, so I am still getting to know all of the components of creating articles. I was not finished with the article that I was writing for the PEO Presidents of Enterprising Organizations page. I was in the process of adding the logo, company details, and other important aspects. There are a lot of important reasons why this page should be up. I was going to write about executive leadership development and executive coaching. Not too many business leaders know that these services exist, so it's important to define what they are. I was not finished writing the article before you took it off.

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Jthommee (talk) 14:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC) jthommee

The organization has not been covered in enough reliable sources to establish notability. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Square the Circle (Mami Kawada album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Square the Circle (Mami Kawada album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Square the Circle (Mami Kawada album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 09:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Flagging for speedy deletion of Lifepack page

Hi @Narutolovehinata5

I added some notability links to the page Lifepack - including an article from Inc. Magazine hopefully that helps?

If you can verify the page changes so it is not speedy deleted that would be great. Thanks!

Adrian Solgaard

(A.solgaard (talk) 08:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC))

Probably enough for the speedy deletion nomination to be declined, but we still need to wait for an administrator to make an action. Given how more sources are needed, it is still possible that the article may be nominated for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:09, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Why?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wild_Bunch_Paintball_Team — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:446:4200:9790:F83C:3B26:978C:599D (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Please read the articles for deletion page. The reasons I nominated the page for deletion are there. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 06:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Stop!! Hibari-kun! at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:39, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Saint marie records....please don't delete

This is not just a record label....and I'm new to making a wiki page...I'm going to elaborate on the page. Alot of former bands for 4ad are on this label...and Wyatt is doing his best for the new resurgence of shoegaze. I'm going to contact the band's on the label and ask them for help on the pages construction. Just not well versed on how to put all the info I have in the page. I have a ton of info on the label and do believe it is a note worthy topic and of interest to many people who love music snd donnot know where their favorite bands have moved to. I love music...it's not about promoting the label...it's about the musuc. Please give me some time before deleting my efforts. This means slot to me as it is my first attempt to do something important to me and others I know. Thanks for your consideration. Scott Theteachersson666 (talk) 15:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 15:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Stop!! Hibari-kun!

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Deprod

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Sunflower Bean, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Adam9007 (talk) 00:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Allen Walker

About Allen Walker's Did you Know, I think it already made it when TenTenParasol created the article. Can an article be nominated twice? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Is that so? Sorry, I wasn't aware. The DYKCheck tool I use must have malfunctioned. Please close it ASAP. And no, articles can't be DYK'd more than once. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Actually, I'm not sure if this is the case. According to my contribution history, Template:Did you know nominations/Allen Walker was created by me and isn't preexisting. Also, you could check the talk page and see if it's been DYK'd; if not, then this nomination is still good to go. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Over hasty tagging of Pagal kunal

Tagging this a minute after creation is far too soon and is explicitly discouraged in WP:A1: "Don't use this tag in the first few minutes after a new article is created." Don't be so hasty and see WP:BITE. Valenciano (talk) 11:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

I know, but the article's subject is so obviously not notable that it's best to put it out of its misery quickly. I try to avoid using A1 or A3 myself, only tagging articles with them if it's obvious that, even if they were to be expanded, they would still very much be unsuitable for an encyclopedia. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Theerapak's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ธ๊รภัค 13:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Minori Suzuki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minori Suzuki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minori Suzuki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Madoka

I added a bit more of reception to Madoka Kaname's article but I run out of sources. Maybe you could find reviews of the series' manga adaptations to expand it just a little more. Good luck with the article. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 00:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Update: I found this award for Homura Akemi. I guess you could add it to the article. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Judas Biblia

It doesn't matter what the contents are within the article. The term "Judas Biblia" is a plausible redirect. You might consider reverting and redirecting. Thanks. Xender Lourdes (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Nilgai

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 09:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

My neighbour Totoro Page

Hi Narutolovehinata5, I was trying to get a discussion going about inserting that new section about Urban Myths and My Neighbor Totoro. I can see you removed the section. Please join in the discussion on the talk page about it - just tried to avoid a revert war. Cheers Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, you flagged Energy Rock Radio before I added Cites.GoingToHell (talk) 02:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add the citation to the article, then let the deletion discussion determine if they will be enough to establish notability. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

AfD for Minori Suzuki

The result of the AfD for Minori Suzuki was to userfy. It can now be found at User:Narutolovehinata5/Minori Suzuki. — Music1201 ^talk 03:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	wtf is this Natewag (talk) 03:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar is an award given to Wikipedia users due to good work. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

NPP / AfC

Hi. Just a reminder that in just over a week at Wikimania there's going to be a cross-Wiki discussion about the systems of control of new pages. This is a round-table rather than a presentation or a lecture. On the agenda are reforms to the new article reviewing systems and ways to help new users better understand our content policies. If you are going to Italy and would like to take part, please check out the conference schedule, and I look forward to seeing you there. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

@Kudpung: Italy? But I'm based in the Philippines and my Schengen visa expired three years ago. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 21:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Corpse Party, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mystery and Horror. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Shūmatsu no Izetta

I was rather surprised to see that you created this article. Whats the rationale? It's such a trivial announcement, no details or what even the type of anime it is.SephyTheThird (talk) 17:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Well, it was covered in a reliable source (i.e. ANN). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 21:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Redirect suppression inquiry

The deletion of the former titles in the Lost and Found (Movie 2016) → Lost and Found (2016 film) (Lost and Found (Movie 2016) → Lost and Found (2016 film)) and ALTURAASH ART. → Alturaash Art (ALTURAASH ART. → Alturaash Art) moves through suppression do not seem to meet any of the criteria for redirect suppression or criteria for speedy deletion. Unless I'm missing something, it would have been more appropriate to list those at RfD, if deletion was desired. Pinging Nakon who granted you this right to welcome their input.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 03:58, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

@Godsy: I see. In any case, the reason why I suppressed redirects was because I thought that the original titles would not be viable redirects. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

ALTURAASH ART. probably would have been deleted anyway at WP:RfD based on WP:RCAPS and precedents such as Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 31#Ancient rome. as it doesn't seem to have any special affinity for full capitalization in that manner or that punctuation. Lost and Found (Movie 2016) may have gone either way. It's a slippery slope. If redirects aren't explicitly speediable it is outside of the deletion policy to unilaterally delete them. That being said, I think your judgement was reasonable, but I also believe proper process is important. Otherwise, users with this right may exercise deletions in what they believe is good judgement (e.g. User talk:MSJapan#Inappropriate redirect suppressions; Kohail brother murder case and Research lodge; which I've recreated), but other users may disagree. If we stick to the csd policy, if anyone disagrees, they are disagreeing with policy. Best Regards,—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 15:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

@Godsy: I see. I'll be more careful with page moves next time. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 21:14, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Please respond to various clarification requests.

Lots of people have asked why you've flagged their stuff for deletion and have recieved no justification or explanation. There are a lot of requests that you have answered properly, but these mainly relate to articles which are clearly not appropriate for Wikipedia, while you've ignored or overlooked queries about many articles about subjects which are notable either in their popularity or physical significance which you deemed were not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedyblupi (talk • contribs) 22:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

If you've seen the rest of my talk page, you will notice that I do tend to reply to most of the messages I leave here, including clarifications on deletion nominations. Plus, my talk page has an edit notice with links to pages explaining why articles get nominated for deletion. And remember, it's not me who decides whether or not subjects are notable, it's either administrators or the community (through deletion discussions) as administrators have the final say on whether or not an article should be deleted. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Attack on Titan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Attack on Titan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 05:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Attack on Titan

The article Attack on Titan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Attack on Titan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 07:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Congrats

Good work in the GA review of Attack on Titan. Reviews from big articles might be tiring. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome. Now, if I could bring up Madoka to FA status that would be great too. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 21:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Brahmins of Buddhism

Hi. Actually the article does not cover any of the same topics mentioned in the "Brahmins" article. This is different and talks about Brahmins in regards to Buddhism, just as there are Brahmin-related articles with respect to a host of topics from "Brahmins of Maharashtra" to "Nagar Brahmins", "List of Goan Brahmin Communities" and others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirvansena (talk • contribs) 01:48, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Attack on Titan

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

OH I AM SO MAD AT YOU!

Did you delete my sentence for Kings the upcoming film!?!?!? ARGH!!! Don't do that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewsal16 (talk • contribs) 04:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

1. The article has not been yet been deleted. An administrator will decide whether or not the article is kept.

2. Don't act like that. Acting like that counts as personal attacks towards editors, which is not allowed on Wikipedia.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew

Listen

Honey, stop playing like the victim here. I didn't "attack" you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewsal16 (talk • contribs) 04:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

I want to delete a page

I created a page called Mobotap. I got that information on the internet to create that page.I mentioned it.I don't know that information exactly correct or not. I don't have much knowledge about this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishan Jaya (talk • contribs) 12:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Miku Sawai

On 20 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Miku Sawai, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Miku Sawai transferred to a high school in Tokyo due to her work as a singer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Miku Sawai. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Miku Sawai), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Eyecon Forever, Llc

Hi Narutolovehinata,

As much as I love the village hidden in the leaves, I will have to disagree with your decision to delete all information gathered on the company Eyecon Forever, Llc. The article that was created was to compile all know data on the subject of the enterprise and not to promote any kind of product or service. Below is another guideline used in making the decision of page creation:

"One of the key policies of Wikipedia is that all article content has to be verifiable. This means that a reliable source must be able to support the material. All quotations and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged must include an inline citation of a source that directly supports the material. This also means that Wikipedia is not the place for original work, archival findings that have not been published, or evidence from any source that has not been published.

If you are adding new content, it is your responsibility to add source information along with it. Material provided without a source is more likely to be removed from an article. Sometimes such material will be tagged first with a [citation needed] template to give editors time to find and add sources before it is removed, but sometimes editors will simply remove it because they question its veracity."

I understand you my question the veracity of the company but, it does in fact have verifiable sources of its existence and perpetuation.

P.S. I too was for the Naruto and Hinata love interest over Sakura, at least we are on the same page as that.LegendsWatchtower (talk) 15:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Answer to your question about Jehovah's Witnesses and the cross

Hi Narutolovehinata5! I saw your question about Jehovah's Witnesses, the cross and 607 B.C.E. I am a believing Witness of Jehovah and can answer your question better than an unbelieving ex-JW.Wandering-teacher (talk) 08:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Celestinesucess. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pintu kumar, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Celestinesucess (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of edit to Abra, Kadabra, and Alakazam wiki page

222.13.208.50 (talk) 07:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC) Hi,

I added information concerning the origin of the Japanese names for the Pokemon characters Abra, Kadabra, and Alakazam.

The source I used as reference was not appropriate, however, I am having a hard time finding the original source. Do you have any suggestions as to where I could find this information. I don't think that it will be published in a physical form.

I did find this article in English regarding a lawsuit from Yuri Geller.

Bulbapedia also references the names of the Abra line being based on famous psychics.

If the link I provided was not reliable enough, you should probably delete the comment about Fudin being named after Harry Houdini since the link is broken.

The link I have provided gives the source for all three names.

I look forward to your response. 222.13.208.50 (talk) 07:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

I guess The Guardian is a good enough source. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

References

Wiki-page Ultra Ever Dry

Hello Narutolovehinata5,

My wiki-page Ultra Ever Dry https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_Ever_Dry is a year old - NO PROBLEM. My new wiki-page Ultra Ever Dry - English (08/22/2016) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_Ever_Dry - PROBLEM (has been deleted)

Why?

Thank you very much for your help... ;o)

Tomas Preucil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomáš Přeučil (talk • contribs) 11:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC) Please rewrite the article in such a way that it does not sound promotional. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:09, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Re PenPal App A7 tag

Hello, I wanted to inform you that I changed your A7 tag to a G11 tag (advertising). I have been told by others that A7 does not apply to apps, but only to the listed criteria. I once tried to make the argument that apps are web content since you download them and they often require internet access to use once downloaded, but that didn't fly. You are welcome to attempt to expand A7 to apps by starting a discussion at WT:CSD. but I'm fairly sure it's been tried before. 331dot (talk) 13:46, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GeekSohel Rana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GeekSohel Rana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 10:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

@Melcous: Wrong send? I didn't create the article in question. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes, sorry, a weakness of Twinkle - looks like you created the user talk page with a warning, and the user then moved that page into the main space as an article. Please ignore/delete, cheers, Melcous (talk) 13:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Bigen One Push

Sorry, but you can't A7 a product. I'd suggest prod or Afd as I can't see much on Google that looks like RS material. Would you by any chance know what the author is asking on his user talk page (just below welcome)? Doesn't make any sense to me. Peridon (talk) 09:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Geologia e minas

Hello Narutolovehinata5. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Geologia e minas, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Geology and mining is not a person, thus the article is not eligible for A7 speedy deletion. Thank you. - MrX 12:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Articles to work into

Hello, I still have to answer some concerns before the article becomes a FA but I can give you advise. About Sword Art Online, the article seems to lack more reception. Is the plot divided in storylines like Jojo's Bizarre Adventure or are they all connected? If they are all connected, you might have to clean up the plot to a small form. The same with the lack of production section. The user who created the Kirito and Asuna pages managed to added some real world information about the making of the characters. Try asking him for help since he appears to be a fan of the series. See also Re:Zero -Starting Life in Another World-; the article has a lot about the making of the series. Also, if you are not sure about the state of the pages, consider requesting a peer review and possibly a copy-edit (for the FA). When making the peer reviews, also go to peer review other article from any category and exchange feedback (that's how I got feedback in the Allen Walker review). Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 13:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Also, remember to use the "ping" function. It will be really useful if you want to make a FAN. For a example, try @Tintor2: if you wish to discuss more here.Tintor2 (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Invicta Motors - recommendation for speedy deletion

Hi Narutolovehinata5,

Thank you for your remarks / comments regarding my first attempt for my first article on Wikipedia. For your remark, regarding the lack of notability, I was under the impression that when a company wins awards could be a reason for a company to be considered notable in its field. Please allow me to remind you the specific section about Awards and Recognition:

In July 2014, parent motor retail group Cambria Automobiles plc received the Franchised Dealer Group of the Year Award 2014 at the 2014 Motor Trader Awards.

I hope that this will help you reconsider to remove some of the remarks that you have made and generally the recommendation that you have made for speedy deletion. I will be looking forward to your feedback.

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Otto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottoziering (talk • contribs) 08:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

New newsletter for Notifications

Hello

You are subscribing to the Notifications newsletter on English Wikipedia.

That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements.

Please subscribe!

All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Dewoky : Why you have tagged my page for deletion

Answer please I want to know — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dewoky (talk • contribs) 11:55, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Because the article does not appear to meet our notability guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Michael Moon Dreamtime Poet

Hello Naruto

I messed up because I mis-understood the ideology and method of adding information into Wikipedia. I tried hard !0 edits? but you were right in your deletion decision,that I now understand.

However we simply request that you unblock - 'administration only creation' so that one day, someone may honourably set the record straight and create the reference page to Michael Moon Dreamtime Poet, to stop the confusion between the different Michael Moon's of our world, and honour his long 40 working years of contribution to this planet.

I was incorrect in what was uploaded (a lot more references are essentially required) but please give a faithful supporter of Wikipaedia and others, the chance to set the record straight and one day celebrate this unique poet.

Yours sincerely Michael MoonMichael Moon - Dreamtime Poet (talk) 09:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately, Moon does not meet our notability guidelines for inclusion. As such, he cannot have a Wikipedia article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Kūdō

I recreated Kūdō today, not knowing the original Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daido Juku Kudo had been put up for deletion 3 years ago. Can you help me improve it? Thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

about Robert jozef Louis Maes page

Good afternoon, Sir, since I can not find your name, I address you as Sir, with no lack of respect intended. I do not mind you want to delete the webpage on Robert Maes, it was my first attempt to make a page, and i was going to edit it and format it correctly, by learning from other pages, however, did not get the time to do so. May I suggest to give me 2 or 3 days so I can adjust and format it correctly ? I do know Robert, worked with him, but I am not him. I learned from him when he was in Italy. I frequently use wikipedia for information but I had noticed that the website on Yokohama fc contained a huge number of mistakes, non intentional, I am sure. About the Robert website, I was going to format as I mentioned, add links, references and factual information. I was also going to change the username for myself , used this one as it was for that page, 05:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Rob Maes (talk)and I wonder why Wikipedia does not ask for more personal information about contributors, like name, address, phone numbers to have some kind of control about contributions made. rob maes

Unfortunately, it appears that Maes is not notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia. However, you are free to edit his article and improve it if necessary. However, as it appears you have a connection with him, please first read Wikipedia:Conflict on interest and keep in mind the information given in the said page. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Willyou, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 03:47, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Katsura Hoshino

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Late Night Shift

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Your Name Guru's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A7 for Bat-Kado & Wablast

Hello Narutolovehinata5 -- I've declined both these speedies as neither card games nor fictional characters are eligible for deletion under the A7 criterion. Proposed deletion is probably the right course. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

User group: New Page Reviewr

Hello Narutolovehinata5/Archives.

Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed.

New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter

Hello Narutolovehinata5/Archives,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 805 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

Mid July to 01 Oct 2016

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .

Madoka's reception

If you noted how in the talk page Talk:Puella Magi Madoka Magica, I've been searching across the web and I found more reception for at least the main character. I don't remember which one but a source compared her with the main character of Sailor Moon. Hope this helps to improve the character's reception section. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 18:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello Narutolovehinata5. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Drexel University Paraxylene Production. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 00:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@Adam9007: Yeah, I nominated it under A3 because, although 10 minutes had not yet passed after creation, searching for the article title did not result in any relevant hits for any plausible subjects. I try avoiding tagging articles under A1 or A3 as much as possible unless the article has doesn't have a snowball's chance of surviving anyway, so in such cases (including this one) it would probably be better to do an WP:IAR tagging to put the articles out of their misery. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

And possibly annoy the author so much he leaves Wikipedia? That's twice you've given the article absolutely no chance at all whatsoever. Adam9007 (talk) 00:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

It's not that. I honestly hate seeing people's work go down the drain (I have experienced it a few times). But there are times when some articles simply don't belong in the encyclopedia for various reasons, usually for simply not meeting our notabiity guidelines. I avoid tagging articles for speedy deletion if a quick search reveals any form of significant coverage (in cases where the coverage is not enough but several hits are available, I would instead nominate the article for deletion). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

You're missing the point. It's not about whether you think it's suitable for an encyclopaedia (the author obviously thinks it is). You haven't even given it a chance. That is very WP:BITEy as you are basically, on sight, saying his work is not welcome. Adam9007 (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Drexel University Paraxylene Production, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 00:19, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hi, you have put up the page that I've created for Speedy deletion because it isn't important. Firstly may I ask you to remove that tag because firstly it is close to midnight and I am planning on editing TBJZL's page tommorow by adding more information. Secondly I made this page because TBJZL has a worldwide fan base and would possibly like to get more information about their favourite you tuber

Thank You Cricket_Aus49 Cricket Aus49 (talk) 10:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

@Cricket Aus49: If you wish to contest my tagging of the article, please click on the button on the tag which says "contest this speedy deletion", which will lead to a page where you can explain why the article should not be deleted. An uninvolved administrator will review the explanation and will untimately have the final say on whether or not the article meets our inclusion guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/D.Gray-man at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello Narutolovehinata5/Archives,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

• Improve the tools: Vote here.
• Reduce your review load: Vote here

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .

CSD tagging

Please don't tag pages with non-urgent speedy tags such as A7 immediately after they are created. It is considered good practice to leave a grace period of 10–15 minutes before tagging with A1,3,7,9 in case the author adds more content. BethNaught (talk) 12:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Syndicato

You have flagged this article for speedy deletion per CSD:G5 criterion. This may well be true, but as the registered account which created the article shows no block notice, and you have failed to indicate the name of the editor whom you are accusing of editing while blocked, what do you expect me to do? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy decline on Install/Uninstall Testing

Hi, Narutolovehinata5. Thanks for your work on patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for Install/Uninstall Testing, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, under criterion G11 because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. The article may qualify for deletion under aspects of WP:NOT, however. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 17:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Accidentally deleting comments at ANI

You accidently deleted some comments from other users at ANI. You may want to have a look at that. diff. Cheers mate! --Adam in MO Talk 02:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

It has been fixed. Phew things move fast over there.--Adam in MO Talk 02:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

It moved so quickly KKid managed to sneak in a post while I was doing it :p SephyTheThird (talk) 02:28, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Yeah sorry about that, I left my computer for a while before coming back to save the edit. Didn't exactly notice that I accidentally removed all those responses. Edit conflicts are really a pain to be honest. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:51, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Just a word...

about A11. You tagged Josh Andrew Wright as A11, but I deleted it as G3 hoax. There's still some confusion around about these two criteria. This article was about a presumably real person, with two blatantly impossible achievements. That's a hoax G3. A11 is for things that could well be real, but outside a group of about six students or at most one class, no-one either knows or cares. It's things like Vodka Pong (think Beer Pong, but more lethal), a new game sweeping the country (OK, Class 6B at Deadwoof Flatts High School) which appears to be a cross between baseball and water polo, or the new word 'squatchilliary' which is alleged to mean 'quite nice', 'resembling the feeling you get when you see a dead mouse in the custard', or '279 items that aren't eggs'. There should be an indication that the creator of the thing is the author of the article, or knows him/her/it. That usually doesn't take much in the way of stretching one's imagination... A person can't be A11ed, unless stated to be fictional. Basically, we assume good faith with A11 - could be real, but... We assume bad faith with G3 - it's definitely deliberate misinformation and couldn't be real. How we got A11 in, I don't know. The 'keep it at all costs' brigade must all have been on holiday. Peridon (talk) 14:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

I'd advise nowiki-ing those references, wherever they are from. They can be a pain on talk pages. Peridon (talk) 14:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello Narutolovehinata5. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Rana Shujaat Ali. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.  {MordeKyle}  ☢ 01:04, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

• Hi. You were accorded the New Page Reviewer user right under a grandfathering procedure that did not require any close scrutiny of the quality of your work. However, Patrolling pages needs solid knowledge and experience. Please take a moment to read and fully understand the new tutorial before continuing to patrol pages. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

@Kudpung: Thank you for the message. I tend to be careful when patrolling pages and I only nominate articles for A1 or A3 when necessary. I try to not be too hasty when tagging articles and in most cases I tend to make at least a brief search of an article's subject before tagging (if necessary). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:52, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Please read the tutorial. It will be a hour worth investing. There's a lot in there that will be new to you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hi Narutolovehinata5, thanks for reviewing The Boy Who Swam With Piranhas

Coolabahapple (talk) 04:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Television TV series

Hi, I am regarding to let you know that all of Filipino TV series or Article preferred English article rather than their own languages article. This have been done to all of the article I have been seen. Other wikipedians may put Filipino languages on English article since, Filipino languages does not exist to them and prefered our languages. Kazaro (talk) 04:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

@Kazaro: I apologize but I do not understand your point. But in any case, the reason I moved the article is because the new title meets our Manual of Style for list articles. You can read more at Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#Episode summaries

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#Episode summaries. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

PMMM

Hello, umm... So I've seen some Anime Wiki have a "Themes and Analysis" and "Legacy" section. Shouldn't Madoka have one too? UnknownUsername480 (talk) 18:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

@UnknownUsername480: While not an absolute necessity (note that PMMM became a good article even without the aforementioned sections), you are always free to add such sections as long as reliable sources exist which discuss its themes and legacy. A simple "Themes" section would suffice rather than "Themes and Analysis" as that title could be interpreted to contain original research which is a big no-no here. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:39, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Mhmm... Alright. How about Popular culture then? http://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-news/2015/04/19-1/tokyos-tokai-university-offers-madoka-magica-class Also, I'm thinking of creating an article about The Different Story manga. Is that okay? UnknownUsername480 (talk) 21:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

@UnknownUsername480: Sorry for the late reply, I was away from a computer for a number of days. A popular culture could be a subsection of the Reception section as long as coverage about it could be found (preferably in Japanese). As for the Different Story manga, two questions need to be addressed: 1. is there enough sources to write an article? 2. has the manga itself been the subject of coverage in reliable sources (Japanese or English) independent of the franchise as a whole? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Alright, I'm going to start searching for information's about Madoka's popular culture, influence etc. What kind of Japanese sites btw? Well, I guess that's a "no" for different story because it doesn't have enough reliable sources. XD Btw, could you do me a favor please? I just found this review from THEM anime reviewes and I think we should add it to the reception section and remove the other one because that reviewer Tim Jones criticized the character development whereas this one praised it. http://www.themanime.org/viewreview.php?id=1352 I'm not really good at writing reviews since I'm still learning English so I'm leaving this to you. UnknownUsername480 (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Shristi Rajbhandari, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 04:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)