User talk:Nana222222
Welcome
[edit]
|
| This is Nana222222's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: G Flip has been accepted
[edit]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
CNMall41 (talk) 19:34, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Nomination of Kinder (band) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kinder (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinder (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:02, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Dylan Joel) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Dylan Joel, Nana222222!
Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your new article on Dylan Joel. Note that Wikipedia has strict policies on the notability of musicians, and this article may be targeted by other editors seeking more information on what makes this singer notable beyond releasing some records. That information could possibly be found in some of the sources you have already used. Good luck!
To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:51, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allday, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kinder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "User:Jonnycraig888". Thank you. --Peter James (talk) 20:47, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nana222222. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 18:05, 8 August 2018 (UTC) |
Nana222222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #22324 was submitted on Aug 10, 2018 10:05:08. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 10:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Nana222222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, a friend and I have a lot of interest in Australian music and musicians and we believe there is not enough information about notable Australian musicians on Wikipedia. We were creating and editing articles about Australian musicians on the same Wifi account, however we were blocked because people thought it was sockpupperty. We understand this is wrong on Wikipedia. We didn't know it was wrong at the time to both have input on discussions and therefore skew the outcome. We really do apologise. We have learnt from this mistake and will not continue to do so in the future. We loved learning about Wikipedia and researching topics. Sorry if this offended anyone, It was all in good faith. We will only continue to use Wiki in the right way.
Decline reason:
It may or may not be true that you are two friends editing together, but even if it is true, it is clear that there was a deliberate attempt, using both logged-in and logged-out editing, to give the impression of a larger number of people supporting one view in a discussion than there really were. That was not "all in good faith". I can't speak for any other administrator, but I would require something much closer to a full and true account of what happened before I would consider accepting an unblock request. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- In my decline of the unblock request above I said "It may or may not be true that you are two friends editing together", because either way it makes no difference to the outcome of that request. However, for the benefit of any administrator who may have reason to review this, I should like to put on record that in the light of a careful check of the relevant editing histories, I think it is far more likely that it is all one person. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Nana222222. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Young Franco, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Rosguilltalk 20:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Block evasion
[edit]This user has engaged in block evasion as of October, 2018. Any further violations may result in a ban under WP:3X. --Yamla (talk) 14:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Nana222222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi Sorry, I clearly don't know the rules or how to use Wikipedia. I created the new account thinking I was doing the right thing. I thought by using this account I would be in trouble because my IP address ban had been lifted and I thought I had to start again by starting fresh with a new account. I didn't know you could appeal again after being declined. I have learnt what I did was wrong as I said before. You can clearly see I waited 2 months before doing any more editing or creating accounts as I generally thought I was doing the right thing by waiting and then starting over once my IP ban was over. I have a passion for researching artists and want to contribute to the music side of Wikipedia. I will follow all the rules and learn from my mistakes. (Nana222222 (talk) 14:45, 4 October 2018 (UTC))
Decline reason:
JamesBWatson said: "I would require something much closer to a full and true account of what happened before I would consider accepting an unblock request." I don't see that. I also have severe doubts about "After I was blocked for using multiple accounts, I thought it would be totally OK to create more accounts." Huon (talk) 18:27, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nana222222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Here is the full truth- A friend and I were using the same accounts at my house back to back on this account and a different account. We were using this also to back each other on deletion articles and we would log onto each other’s account and vice versa. He no longer cares to edit after all the drama. We have learnt from our mistakes. No other accounts have been made except for the one I made thinking I could start again after my IP address was unblocked. I have learnt that this is wrong. You can only have 1 account on Wikipedia. Clearly I have now learnt the rules and will never repeat the same mistakes. I have such a passion for researching musicians and we have created successful Wikipedia’s for artists such as- G Flip, Manu Crooks, George Maple, Dylan Joel, Carmouflage Rose, Kota Banks and more. I will continue to research and help articles relating to music on Wikipedia if you give me the chance. I will prove I will no longer make the mistakes I have made in the past. I am deeply sorry for my past mistakes and understand the severity of it. It was all in good will and we were both naive. Hopefully I can one day help contribute to Wikipedia again after learning from my lesson. Thank you.
Decline reason:
I am declining your request because I am not convinced that the benefits outweigh the possible disruption. Given that you further evaded your block after your first block appeal, I think it's not unreasonable to doubt your sincerity. In that light, I suggest reviewing and following the process at WP:SO if you are still interested in editing.
To be absolutely clear, regardless of whether you appeal this block or not, Wikipedia policy prohibits you from editing Wikipedia – on any account, on any IP address, even asking others to edit on your behalf – until this block is lifted. Editing in violation of this block will simply make any further appeal more difficult.
Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(Nana222222 (talk) 11:49, 14 October 2018 (UTC))
Nana222222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, I have patiently waited over 6 months without without any sockpuppetry or block evasion (WP:SO). I promise to never use sockpuppetry again as I have clearly learnt my lesson and wouldn't be stupid enough to do it again. I am a very passionate person that just has an interest in editing and following Wikipedia articles on Music. I mean absolutely no harm and am hoping you can trust me again to follow the rules of Wikipedia and only do the right thing. Thank you so much for your time (talk) 6:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Accept reason:
With the consent of the blocking administrator and on my own judgment, I have unblocked you. I believe you when you say you will not engage in sockpuppetry again. Welcome back. Please be careful; any further blocks will likely be indefinite. This isn't a threat, I believe you'll be a productive contributor to Wikipedia. But it is a strong encouragement to take any future warnings seriously, so you can avoid that situation. Yamla (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
@Bbb23: More than six months have passed here with no sockpuppetry as far as I can see. If there's been no sockpuppetry, I'm tempted to unblock, given that it's easy enough to reblock if problems recur. As the blocking admin, what are your thoughts? --Yamla (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Yamla: I have found no evidence of socking in the last three months. If you believe the user is going to behave, go ahead and unblock--Bbb23 (talk) 20:44, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you so much for giving me a second chance. (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2019 (UTC))
Your draft article, Draft:Manu Crooks
[edit]
Hello, Nana222222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Manu Crooks".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 13:57, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dylan Joel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kira Puru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Kelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 27
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Super Cruel
[edit]Hello, Nana222222,
Thanks for creating Super Cruel! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Thank you for your new article on Super Cruel, though I recommend more text from any professional reviews or feature article they may have received, to indicate notability beyond their basic existence.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Thanks for creating Listen Out (festival).
User:Doomsdayer520 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Thank you also for your new article on the Listen Out festival.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warner Music Australasia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hartley and Jack Gray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve KLP (musician)
[edit]Hello, Nana222222,
Thank you for creating KLP (musician).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for your new article on the musician KLP, but note that several of the footnotes are missing required fields (as can be seen in red in the References list).
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 28
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Party In The Paddock, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Odette and Jack River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for December 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stonefest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Example (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brazilian Bass (genre), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhaskar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Brazilian bass
[edit]You don't need the parenthetical disambiguation here; you can just move the article back to Brazilian Bass. Happy editing! VQuakr (talk) 17:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Oops, I mean it should be at Brazilian bass; no capitalization on "bass". VQuakr (talk) 17:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
The article Beyond The Valley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG; no reliable sources can be found to demonstrate notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The article Brazilian bass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability, stub with little to support it, appears promotional.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Acousmana (talk) 16:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
June 2021
[edit]
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! 220 of ßorg 12:50, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tasker (producer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tuka.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Dave Winnel moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Dave Winnel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 14:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Creating articles
[edit]Hi. It's great that you're creating articles for notable Australian artists, but there's a few things you need to work on. Please stop preemptively disambiguating titles when they don't need it, i.e. using "Australian band" as a disambiguator when the band in question is the only one by the name (you would also benefit from reading this, as two-person bands should be created with the disambiguator "duo"). You also need to be sourcing albums, extended plays, and singles with an inline citation, as each of them require a reference for verification. And finally, please work on sourcing things a bit better. It's a surefire way to get an article nominated for deletion by including as few sources as you do, and other editors may be less inclined to act with good faith and search for sources beforehand. Sean Stephens (talk) 04:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Arno Faraji moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Arno Faraji, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dave Winnel (May 27)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dave Winnel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dave Winnel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Nana222222!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HenryTemplo (talk) 12:37, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Arno Faraji (August 4)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arno Faraji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Speedy deletion nomination of John Summit
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on John Summit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 TT me 12:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Your article has been moved to draft space. Please work on it there before submitting for independent review. Please do not move it yourself. Deb (talk) 19:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Dave Winnel
[edit]
Hello, Nana222222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dave Winnel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:59, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Arno Faraji
[edit] Hello, Nana222222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arno Faraji, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Coco & Breezy (DJs) (September 15)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coco & Breezy (DJs) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Disambiguation link notification for September 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coco & Breezy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apple Valley.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)