User talk:Nablais

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Nablais. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 07:21, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Nablais, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a couple of biographies about women and hope you will be writing about many more. You will find some good advice on drafting women's biographies in our Ten Simple Rules. It's important to ensure that those you select have already received substantial coverage of their achievements in secondary sources. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:08, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Viet Cong and PAVN strategy, organization and structure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phú Tân (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020 at Women in Red

April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162

April offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:

New: Gender studies / Dance / Geofocus: Caucasus
Photo and image campaign: #VisibleWikiWomen
Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports!

Editor feedback:

Schedule planning at the Virtual Ideas Cafe
Join the conversations on our talkpage

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Louise A. Smith moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Louise A. Smith, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline or WP:NAUTHOR and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Ad Fontes Media

Hello! Your submission of Ad Fontes Media at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Ezra Group (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam Ezra Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adam Ezra Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nablais! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 05:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ad Fontes Media

On 21 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ad Fontes Media, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the founder of the media watchdog organization Ad Fontes Media has compared low-quality news sources to junk food? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ad Fontes Media. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ad Fontes Media), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--Guerillero | Parlez Moi 00:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Committee for Equal Justice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lillian Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reuben Markham article

Dear Nablais, (I also sent this as an email response to the email you sent me yesterday)

Thank you for your edits on the article about Reuben H. Markham. I wonder if you could provide some additional help.

There is a picture of Reuben Markham at a Library of Congress website that seems to be in the public domain. The Rights Advisory says there are no known restrictions. It can be accessed at this link: https://www.loc.gov/item/2017863255/. Would you be able to upload the picture to the article?

Would you also be able add the following two Categories? 1) Missionary 2) Cold War. I can probably do it myself, but haven’t ever done that yet.

I noticed that you removed quotation marks from several direct quotations that came from obituaries of Reuben Markham. Was there a reason you removed them?

I also noticed that you linked “The Great Debate” to a Wikipedia article. The article, though, seems to refer to a different Great Debate. The one the Reuben Markham article refers to was between interventionists and isolationists about whether or not the United States should enter World War II on the side of the Allies. It can be referenced at this article: https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/great-debate#:~:text=The%20urgency%20of%20the%20situation,good%20reason%20to%20get%20involved.

Thank you again for your assistance.

Sincerely yours,

Ankara59 (talk) 15:18, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ankara59,

I will look into getting a picture for Markham. Thanks for the link. Adding categories is pretty easy, you can do it manually at the bottom of the page (see the ones that are already there for the formatting) or use Wikipedia:HotCat, which makes it a bit quicker and tells you if categories actually exist without you needing to look it up. As I recall the quotations seemed like they could simply be stated as uncontroversial facts, and that direct quotes were not needed IMHO. Also, when quoting its generally good to state the source outside of the reference. For example: "According to the New York Times: 'Markham was a great guy'" or "The New York Times called Markham 'a great guy'." Stating he was a great guy isn't npov so you would need to quote it, and also clearly state where the quote was coming from. On the other hand, saying something like "According to the New York Times: 'Markham had brown hair'" isn't necessary since it's just stating a fact, and even though you still need to provide a reference you don't need to quote it directly or state the source within the article text itself. That's my understanding anyway, and of course it depends on the context. The goal is always to make it sound like something you would read in an encyclopedia. Of course you don't want to plagiarize, so if there is a long quote you're quoting directly you want quote marks, but it can often be better to just reword it if it's just stating uncontroversial facts.

It looks like you're right about the Great Debate, although it looks like Wikipedia might not have an actual article on that debate, this seems to be the closest thing I can find, although it doesn't call it a great debate.

Thank you for your edits, I hope you will continue to improve Wikipedia, even though it can take some time to learn all the formatting and standards. Nablais (talk) 16:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently not able to access the link you gave me, it's giving me what looks like an internal server error. I will check back later. Nablais (talk) 17:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice. I'll look at those quotes again.

If you Google 'Reuben H. Markham' the first thing I get is the Library of Congress website with the picture. I think it says something like "Director of Region V". Would that make it possible to upload the picture?

Thanks again for your help.Ankara59 (talk) 19:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for posting the picture and adding the new categories. I think it looks great. I made a few minor changes around the quotes we were discussing.

The article definitely seems to be in the Wikipedia system, but it doesn't appear when I Google 'Reuben H. Markham.' Do you know what causes that to happen?

Thank you again very much for the help you've given the article.Ankara59 (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ankara59, No problem. Google is separate from Wikipedia so it might take some time for it to realize it's here. It should be there soon, but there's not much Wikipedia can do about it. Nablais (talk) 22:37, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I'll keep looking for it. If you have any further suggestions for the article please let me know. I noticed that you posted a note that more needs to be written about Erwin Canham. I think you're right. Canham's book, Commitment to Freedom, is a major source for the Markham article. There's a wonderful picture in the book that has all the CSM foreign correspondents gathered in London in 1930, that has both Canham and Markham in it. They were an impressive group. Ankara59 (talk) 02:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ankara59, yes indeed! I created the Canham article, that's actually how I was notified of yours when you linked to it. Actually when I posted that note the article was even smaller but I expanded it somewhat a couple of months ago. And I have the book you mention, I've really only just started it but it's a great read! Nablais (talk) 15:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering how you came across the article on Reuben Markham. It does seem good if an article can be linked from another one. The Canham article mentions Roscoe Drummond, who is also in the picture of the CSM foreign correspondents in 1930. I wonder if it might be possible to put in a reference to Reuben Markham as well. Perhaps there could be a sentence after saying that Erwin Canham worked in the Geneva bureau along these lines: "He wrote about international affairs in the company of other Monitor correspondents such as Roscoe Drummond, William Henry Chamberlin and Reuben Markham." Are there any other correspondents you recognize in that picture? Please don't consider it, though, if you don't think it adds anything to the reader's understanding of Canham and the Monitor.

A friend of mine's father went to Bates and knew of Canham from his experience there.

One other question I wanted to ask concerns the categories. When one goes to a category, such as Union Theological Seminary, American Journalists or Educational Missionaries, Reuben Markham is placed under the "Rs" rather than the "Ms." Everyone else seems to be placed based on their last name, rather than their first. I couldn't figure out how to make a correction. Would you know how to do that?

Thank you again for all your help.Ankara59 (talk) 23:15, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ankara59, Oh I think I know why, I'll fix it.

Even better would be if a picture of them could be found that didn't violate copyright, they could be labeled and it would add a good visual to whichever page or pages had it. I'm not sure about the one in the book, it's still too recent I think for copyright to have expired automatically. One good place Markham could be added though I can think of is on the CSM page, there's a list of notable journalists he should be on. The history section on that page needs to be expanded as well. Nablais (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for changing the Markham locations to the letter M. I'm sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. I didn't see your post here. A picture would be good, if it could be found. I'll take a look at the CSM page and see if there's a relevant place where he might be mentioned. I looked at the William Henry Chamberlin page. He wrote several complementary pieces about Markham but I didn't really see a good way to introduce him. Thanks again for all your help.Ankara59 (talk) 01:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ankara59, No problem if you can't find a picture. As long as there's an organic way to fit him in that's fine. Thanks for your article! Nablais (talk) 13:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nablais,

Thanks for your post. Did you think the sentence I mentioned in regard to the Canham article fit in organically? I couldn't tell. If not, I won't add it.

I had another idea that I wanted to ask you about. Please let me know if you prefer not to have me asking you so many questions.

There's a passage on page 348 of Canham's "Commitment to Freedom" about Reuben Markham and " the well-known Alexander Dimitrov". I think Canham means "Georgi Dimitrov" who was an important historical figure. He was put on trial for the Reichstag fire in 1934, was the Secretary-General of the Comintern and was Dictator of Bulgaria after World War II. I think Georgi is meant when Canham refers to the "well-known" Dimitrov.

The passage is a moving one in which Canham credits Markham with saving Dimitrov's life, after he was condemned to death in Bulgaria in 1925. I think the account seems plausible. For one thing, as Dimitrov's Wikipedia article says, Dimitrov came from a Protestant family that was well known to the missionary community of which Markham was a member. Protestants in Bulgaria in 1925 were a very small community. So it is possible that his family would reach out to a Protestant American like Reuben Markham. Secondly, Markham was involved in Bulgarian politics at this time, writing about the oppression of the peasants and the workers. It seems very possible that Markham had a relationship of some sort with King Boris. Finally, it seems probable that Canham heard this story directly from Reuben Markham. How else would he know about it? That adds to its credibility in my opinion. I've also wondered if Markham might have enjoyed some protection from Dimitrov when he went to Bulgaria in August, 1945 because of this incident.

Dimitrov's Wikipedia page on the other hand, says that he was able to escape to Yugoslavia, and was then condemned to death in absentia. There are no footnotes citing sources in the Wikipedia account. So, Canham's passage is different. Of course, human memory is fallible. Already, Canham seems to have made a mistake with the first name--Alexander instead of Georgi.

My question is whether you think it would be approprite to use Canham's account in the Georgi Dimitrov Wikipedia article describing how he escaped his death sentence. Certainly, then, it would be logical to mention Reuben Markham and link him to his Wikipedia page.

That's a long question, but let me know what you think.

Thanks again for your interest in Reuben's article.Ankara59 (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ankara59, As for your first question, I think it would be a good sentence to add, especially if the article was expanded more. As you mentioned before I think, the article could definitely go more in-depth, and that sentence would be part of that process.

Regarding Dimitrov, that explanation seems plausible to me, but it might be good to get another source to double check though. Even if it doesn't directly mention Markham, something that makes it clear what happened to Dimitrov coincides with Canham's account and doesn't leave any room for doubt. It is technically possible Canham's talking about someone else, so you want to be really sure, but if the research you do shows that's really the explanation that makes sense then go for it. Nablais (talk) 04:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will go ahead and add the sentence to the Canham article. That's good advice about Dimitrov. I'll try to see if I can locate some more information about what happened to him in Bulgaria in 1925. Thanks againAnkara59 (talk) 15:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin McCarthy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stuart M. Matlins has been accepted

Stuart M. Matlins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Awsomaw (talk) 00:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Nablais

Thank you for creating Stuart M. Matlins.

User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 06:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shawnee Kilgore moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shawnee Kilgore, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources to show it passes notability. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Superstitions in Muslim societies on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Historical policy of the Law and Justice party on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Adam Ezra Group

Hello, Nablais. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adam Ezra Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Baháʼí Administration (book) on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shawnee Kilgore

Hello, Nablais. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shawnee Kilgore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Louise A. Smith

Hello, Nablais. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Louise A. Smith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pavol Hnilica on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Nablais! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
Paste {{Frs user|Nablais|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:06, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]