User talk:NZFC/Archive 1

Squads

Best if you don't re-add the squad. You've show your incompetence and lack of any research assuming players are English because they play in England. Amadou Tangara is Ivorian, Adeyinka Cole is Nigerian, Nathan Campbell isn't Portugese, Lartey Sarpong - despite having a Wikipedia page isn't Portugese either. You also missed off the two of the only four players to have been signed this season. The rest aren't confirmed as you're clearly not aware, players not on a permanent contracts become free agents as of 1 June. You're showing exactly why this template doesn't work at this level, because of ignorance, a lack of any knowledge of and all round incompetence. RTB. ReallyThinBread (talk) 11:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Robert Cristian Trif

Just to clarify how A7 works, it applies to importance or significance, which is different from notability. A person can be important but not notable. See WP:CSD#A7 for more information. GiantSnowman 20:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC) Notable means also imortant.The person is visible in hundreds of news papers and is a famous personality in Romania. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orex22 (talk • contribs) 13:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Re:Speedy deletion nomination of User:Saphina123/MTP

Hello, very nice to meet you. I saw you putting a speedy deletion of my draft page. Just to clarify the article is not in anyway a promotion nor a spam. The article is about a significantly notable album in Vietnam, and the article will also dealt fairly with the album's controversies of plagiarism tracks (you can check out a small part that I'm writing here).

I'm sorry if my writing style in the article made you think the page is commercialized, but please understand that it's still currently under construction. If the final draft in the future still make you unconvinced, you can still help the article be better in its writing.

Thank you and I hope you have a nice day. Saphina123 (talk) 10:30, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Saphina123: That is fine and did see some mention of plagiarism, but you can’t do your draft on your user page. I’d you would like to write the page again, please make sure you use your Sandbox to write the draft. NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 10:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your understanding. I will put Template:draft in my page instead. Saphina123 (talk) 10:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

You are still using your user page for the article though, it would be best to move it to your sandbox. For further information please see Wikipedia:Your first articleNZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 10:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Subject of mass mailing: Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017

Should the women's football task force become WikiProject: WOSO?

According to an op-ed in the recent Signpost, some editors think task forces and subgroups are dying in 2017. What do you think about forming our own WikiProject separate from WP:FOOTY? There's an on-going discussion of the potential pros and cons on the task force talk page. Input is welcome.

Recent developments New initiatives have been created for: FA WSL (England's top-division league) NCAA (American university teams, conferences, etc.) W-League (Australia's top-division league) Ongoing tournaments UEFA Women's Euro 2017 (July 16 – August 6, 2017) UEFA Women's Euro 2017 Final (August 6, 2017) 2017 Tournament of Nations (July 27– August 3, 2017) Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues 2017 National Women's Soccer League season (United States) ongoing 2017–18 Liga MX Femenil season (Mexico) ongoing 2017–18 W-League (Australia) starts in Sept. 2017–18 FA WSL (England) starts in Sept. 2017–18 Division 1 Féminine (France) starts in Sept. 2017–18 Frauen-Bundesliga (Germany) starts in Sept. 2017–18 Indian Women's League season (India) starts in Oct. Did you know? While WP:FPL lists only two women's top-division leagues as notable due to its "fully professional" criteria, did you know you can create an article on any player in any league as long as the references meet WP:GNG guidelines? Make sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}. Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks page if you'd like and other editors may be able to help. Need tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force #wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) – Hmlarson (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Malinaccier (talk) 18:48, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi NZ Footballs Conscience. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Swarm ♠ 06:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Side note about editing

It seems that on Draft:2017–18 New Zealand Football Championship, you based it off of the 2015–16 New Zealand Football Championship season. I would recommend in general to model new seasons off of the latest season, as that way you get all the most recent corrections and fixes. ;) --SuperJew (talk) 08:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

SuperJew yeah copied that one for the icons/colours and was going to update using the last season. See you are making changes at moment so will leave it. But I plan to spend some time tonight doing all the matches as draw was released today NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 08:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead, I think I'm pretty done. I'll have another look after the weekend :) --SuperJew (talk) 10:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Non-free image use of File:National Women's League.jpg

Hi NZ Footballs Conscience. The licensing of each image you see on Wikipedia is determined by it copyright status and not every image file you see on Wikipedia is licensed the same. Some files are licensed as public domain or licensed under a free licensed suitable for Wikipedia and these are often collectively referred to as "free images". Other files are licensed as non-free content because of their copyright status and these file are commonly referred to as "non-free images". Non-free image use is highly restricted and each use of a file such as Image:City of Montgomery Great Seal.png must satisfy Wikipedia's non-free image use policy.

There are various problems with using this file in 2016 National Women's League (New Zealand). The first one is WP:NFCC#10c, which says that a seperate specific non free use rationale needs to be provided for each use. This file is currently lacking such a rationale for the article in question, which means it can be removed per WP:NFCCE. The question then is whether it such a rationale can be written and I don't think that one can in this case. This is because of WP:NFCC#8, which requires that a particular non-free use significantly improve the reader's understanding to such a degree, that omitting the image would be detrimental to that understanding, and items 14 and 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. Item 14 states the logos used for perennial events (such as the logo for a professional sports league) are generally not allowed to be used in individual occurances of said events unless they are somehow specific to the particular year or season in question. The non-free use of the logo in National Women's League (New Zealand) seems fine since the logo is being used as the primary means of identification of the league and appears to be the branding choosen by the league to represent itself. The use in the individual season articles, however, is not so clear. Simply adding the main logo to the infobox of each season article because it is used in the main league article is almost certainly not going to be considered to comply with Wikipedia's non-free content use policy, unless there is something particular about the logo which ties it specifically into a particular season; for example, anniversary logos, commerative logos, change of sponsorship, etc. Item 17 basically states that reusing the logos of parent entities in the article of child entities is typically not allowed, but logos specific to the child entity may be used. The main league article would be considered to be the parent entity and the individual season articles would be considered child entities, so once again you're going to have to clearly establish that non-free use is justified if you want to use the logo in the 2016 article. The default is not to use the parent logo in the child entity's article simply because no child-entity-specific logo exists. In such cases, a link the parent article is typically considered sufficient per WP:NFCC#1 and item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI.

If you feel that the non-free use of the file in the article can be justified, then please provide the required non-free use rationale explaining how. The rationale needs to be specific enough to clearly show how (at least how you feel) the particular use meets all 10 non-free content criterion; in other words, simply copying-and-pasting a rationale for another use and changing the article parameter/name is typically not sufficient. Furthermore, providing a rationale is only 1 (actually only 1 part of 1 criterion) of the 10 criterion and does not in and of itself justify non-free use; the file's non-free use can still be discussed at WP:FFD or the file can be tagged with {{di-disputed fair use rationale}} if another editor feels the rationale is not valid.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask as WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly, thank you for taking the time to explain it too me, I'm afraid I really don't understand a lot of what is written there. I do know with the Male league equivalent New Zealand Football Championship that the logo is used by each season, is that incorrect for that as well or is somehow the logo there got different permissions. I do believe it would be good for the articles to have the logo associated with the competition on it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by NZ Footballs Conscience (talk • contribs) 11:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)‎

Sometimes you may come across a case of WP:OTHERIMAGE, but non-free image use is almost always required to be evaluated on an individual basis. The use of a similar image in a similar manner in a similar article is usually not a good way to try and justify non-free use. In this case, File:ISPS Handa Premiership logo.png is being used in New Zealand Football Championship and it does have a non-free use rationale for that particular use, but the file is not being used anywhere else. Maybe you are referring to another logo such as File:ASB-Premiership.png. That file was also being used without a proper rationale in some individual season articles, so I have removed it as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Sorry yes I wasn't implying that I could use it for the NWL because the mens league does, I was wondering if it had some permission for it which if obviously didn't. Thank you for explaining to me. NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 03:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

how do i add citation? - article " List of oldest dogs"

Hi,

I saw that my pending review was not approved. may I know how to do proper citation? I have included 2 citations.\

Please let me know. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luvmeci (talk • contribs) 04:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC) Hi Luvmeci your referencing was fine how you did it. It was the fact that the link that you added for reference goes to a generic page. It doesn’t link to show that this dog is older [1] NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 05:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

I see. I have the hardcopy of the certificate. does it need to be put up online for the citation to be valid? Thanks so much for your fast reply.

Ok, that I'm not 100% sure so you maybe best to ask others. Can I suggest you submit a question about how best to reference your hard copy certificate of this at Wikipedia:Teahouse as they will be able to give you an answer. NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 21:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!! I will ask them this question. Thanks again for being so helpful

Reverting for no reason

If you are going to undo edits that I have spent time and effort on, you need a much better reason than "removal of content". Unless, that is, there is a policy or guideline that somehow supports what you did. Is there? 95.145.130.78 (talk) 00:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks talk, have reverted your changes again and linked to policy. I think for the removal of those links you are best to take it too the talk page as I think they are valid. I have added back in your edits that where fine but please in future assume WP:GOODFAITH NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 00:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Assuming good faith does not mean ignoring had faith. Undoing other people's work without bothering to explain why is an act of bad faith. Reverting my edit entirely and then readding changes I made is also an act of bad faith. Your post hoc justification for your actions is inadequate. I asked for policies or guidelines which might support your actions; you quoted a barely relevant essay. 95.145.130.78 (talk) 01:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

You clearly have a problem with other users who don't agree with you, going by your edit history so I'm going to leave it and someone else can look after the pending change you have made. They may agree with you that the links aren't valid and if so, then that is fine. NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 01:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

If I have a problem with anyone it's people who destroy the hard work of others out of sheer ignorance of the policies of the encyclopedia. 95.145.130.78 (talk) 02:02, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, please see WP:CIVIL before making any other comments on my page please. NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 02:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Melissa benoist's personal information

I give a link to her verified account on Instagram she just posted it with alink to the website her you go instagram

Bonaniiiia (talk) 22:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Bonaniiiia yes that is fine, but it doesn't show that she has anything to do with the actual I Don't Mind website and/or that she is part of it NZFC^(talk) 22:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Please don't edit if u don't know reality

Varun dhavans real height is 168 cm if u don't believe then compare him from srk who is 170 Correct height editor (talk) 21:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Correct height editorOne, be careful with how you speak to other users on Wikipedia. Two, provide verified sources showing his height or otherwise stop changing it or you risk getting blocked. NZFC^(talk) 21:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Kōbe Rapid Transit Railway

Being aware it might have been a controversial issue, I explained my removal of Kōbe Rapid Transit Railway from the list on the talk page beforehand (about three weeks ago), feel free to go there and motivate your undoing my edit. I also reaffirmed my reasons on the user talk page of Oknazevad (talk), who had reverted my previous attempt of deleting that entry from the List of metro systems: in the end, he agreed whit me about Kōbe Rapid Transit Railway not being a metro system at all. 93.57.255.93 (talk) 07:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi talk, thank you for your message. When I was looking at it, all I saw was "Undid revision 803462749 by Oknazevad" and removal of content and references. I should have looked further into previous edits, which would have meant I saw your previous message around referring to the talk page. I have now accepted your latest removal. NZFC^(talk) 07:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! 93.57.255.93 (talk) 09:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Phoenix keepers

Hey, do you know what is the status of Oliver Sail and Keegan Smith? I didn't see Sail on Phoenix's site, but he's meant to be on a two-year senior contract... it's weird that Smith started and Sail wasn't even in the line-up (unless he's injured or something?) And they both seem to be with the #30 guernsey. --SuperJew (talk) 07:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Hey, so it’s a VERY weird case that I’m still trying to find out more about SuperJew. Italiano is suppose to be our #1 with Sail our number #2. Keegan Smith doesn’t even have a professional contract and is part of the Wellington Phoenix academy. He was playing for Wellington United and the Nix as back up keeper in the ISPS Handa Premiership. For him to get the Start was quite out of the blue and as far as I know he isn’t on an actual contract with the Nix. NZFC^(talk) 09:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Seems an IP has changed Sail's number to #20, but I have no clue where this info is from.. both Phoenix site and Ultimate A-League don't have Sail in the squad, while WorldFootball have him uncontracted, though I doubt that based on news such as this. --SuperJew (talk) 21:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Smith wore number 30 so will get that changed, as for contract that’s the weird one. How does it work in Australia if a player comes from the sides NYL team and plays for their first because that’s basically what has happen here. Smith plays for the reserve team but got a first team call up. NZFC^(talk) 22:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure exactly.. I know there is an option of promoting youth players to youth contracts on the senior team (or scholarship contracts), but I also know of past cases where youth-listed players played a few games for the senior team in the season, though usually when there were a lot of injuries and national call-ups. This case is really strange because it seems that both Italiano and Sail were cleared to play. I know that in footy (Aussie rules), rookies are restricted to a certain amount of senior games.

@J man708 and Matilda Maniac: Would one of you know more about the rules of youth players playing for the senior team? --SuperJew (talk) 22:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Nah, I have no idea whatsoever, unfortunately. - J man708 (talk) 09:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

User:Achyut101

Not seeing it as an attack especially as was tagged for advert and user has created an identical user talk facebook page-- did you mean G11?Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Oops Dlohcierekim, yes sorry I did. Thanks for picking that up. NZFC^(talk) 20:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

To Cite or Not To Cite, That Is The Question (I'm getting conflicting instructions here!)

Hi NZFC -- you've just requested that I stop citing entries on Day of the Year pages. Unfortunately, I am getting conflicting instructions on this topic. Last week, I began adding new entries to these pages, and I did NOT cite them, because I could clearly see (as you just pointed out) that names were linked to the originating articles, and therefore did not need to be cited.

However, I was stopped by an editor called Toddst1, who informed me that the formatting guidelines for Days of the Year pages had just recently changed. Due to these changes, all new entries are required to be cited directly. Toddst1 began deleting/reverting my uncited entries, which is why I began citing entries. You can see my discussion on Toddst1's talk page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Toddst1#Sources_for_lists_of_articles....3F

So... can you please tell me: do I, or do I not, cite sources for new Days of the Year page entries? I'm getting quite tired of being told that I'm doing it wrong, and I would like one single solid answer so that I can start doing it right. Thanks, Alanna the Brave (talk)

Hi Alanna the Brave, thanks for your message, I wasnt' aware of any change. I will have a look into it myself and see if that is the case and if it is, I apologies for the conflicting messages. NZFC^(talk) 00:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

It's a recent change. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Days_of_the_year#Style. Toddst1 (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)r

Meghan Markle

Hi, please avoid 'squeezing' text per MOS:IMGLOC. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 22:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Eagleash, yes I realised that looked bad and forgot about MOS:IMAGES. I have tried to fix up using the Multiple images template instead. NZFC^(talk) 22:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

I think I might try a 'gallery', if you've no objection. I've seen you at the HD so I assume you are aware of the editor who added it originally (and their multiple IPs)? Eagleash (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

No objections from me, whatever is going to look best. Yeah, have seen that IP before, actually came across it at the same time as you as was already editing on that page. NZFC^(talk) 22:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Done a gallery (once I'd managed to find the images at Commons!). See if you think it's OK...change it back if you wish. Best. Eagleash (talk) 23:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Stop Out page.

Just a heads up. I saw your comment "Removed original research that wasn't really related to the club. ". Whilst I follow your 'original research' line the material in place was very much related to the club. Stop Out was much more than a football club. Edwina Jones (talk) 02:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Edwina Jones While I certainly understand that the club has been more than a football club, the article was about the football club and that information was unreferenced original research and had been for a while. It appears me making changes to the page has brought a few users out of the woodworks to help update it and thanks to your comment on the talk page. We can find a copy of the information I removed. I'm happy for it to be added back in, but it can't be added back in word-for-word. As that will violate copyright. NZFC^(talk) 03:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Ignoring 'original research' for the moment. I am puzzled. How can restoring something 'violate copyright'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwina Jones (talk • contribs) 03:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

On Wikipedia you can't just copy and paste text from the source. Reading that PDF on the club page, reads just like the material I removed from Wikipedia. If it is to be re-added to the article, then it needs to be written in your own words. Also, please remember to sign your posts using four ~. NZFC^(talk) 03:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Alasdair Gray

Hello! Thank you again for your help with the Alasdair Gray page. I figured out how to reinstate Nude on a Red Chair; and Mr Gray sent in permissions to Wiki permissions yesterday for it's use, so the CCA copyright is in perfect good order. I've come around to your way of thinking about photo placement. The page is done! (by me, for now). Heartoftheworld88 (talk) 07:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NZ Footballs Conscience. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Edit Needed ASAP

Hi! Thank you so much for updating the Lycee Francais de Chicago Wikipedia page. However, the number is still incorrect. Instead of reducing the tuition listed to $19,820 (per: https://www.lyceechicago.org/admissions/tuition-and-fees), it now says a whopping $139,820. There is an accidental extra "3" in the amount. Can you change it to: $19,820. Thank you again! --Sarah — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.132.157.247 (talk) 19:25, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi IP, that was vandalism by another user after my edit. I have reverted their changes and given them a warning. NZFC^(talk) 19:52, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Main image of Kim Jonghyun's article change

Hi. I'd like to ask if it's possible to change the main image of Kim Jonghyun's article to avoid bad judgement for those seeking mental health support and to avoid stigmatization of depression with this gloomy, hopeless, stern dark connotation. Aside from this issue, the image is not portraying the job of the artist. Considering that many other news sources can use the wikipedia image for future news and articles, it could lead to bad judgement about Jonghyun's mental state from those who don't know about his personality or work. I can not post images on mobile version of wiki, but If possible, I'd like to ask for some image taken in the event: Healing Story by Jonghyun - that happened on 19th of september in 2015.

As a depressed person myself and a sincere fan, It would be good to count with your understanding and help. Thank you in advance. Have a nice day. AuraAcqua (talk) 05:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

@AuraAcqua:, this was discussed on the talk page and is best discussed there, please don't bring it too my page. Reason you have given isn't valid to change the picture and personally I agree with the other user that it doesn't need to be changed. People aren't going to make bad judgement because of one picture. NZFC^(talk) 05:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

BRD: reaching a consensus

Regarding your reversion to this entry:

A number of sources here list the relationship
— User:NZ Footballs Conscience 00:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

While it is true that a number of articles are cited, each of those articles cites the same original article---a Page Six gossip column which cites a single anonymous source. This runs contrary to wikipedia's policy for biographies of living persons, and its policy against tabloid sources. If you check those references, I believe you'll agree. Some of those references are quite clearly attempts to smear the subject (e.g. calling her "israel-hater"). Please reconsider the reversion.

thanks for the work you do and for your efforts on behalf of wikipedia! @GrosvenorMetro:, thanks for that information. I can't look at each reference properly now as I've left home for a few hours. I will have a look later and double check what you are saying about the references each just copying the first un-reliable source, if that is the case we can remove it. NZFC^(talk) 01:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of this, @NZ Footballs Conscience:. Really appreciate your work maintaining the community.

No problem @GrosvenorMetro:, and thank you for pointing out my initial error. NZFC^(talk) 03:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

DUID article

Hello, I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to leave a msg? I'm not a pro at Wikipedia. I wrote the original article and titled it DUID when I was writing a law review article that was later published (I left the citation in the DUID article). With regard to the levels of metabolites used for drugs in the US, the values came from Department of Transportation adoption of numbers that the Dept of Health and Human Services adopted in response to the drug crisis perceived in the 1980s and under then President Regan. Here is the citation to the US Federal Register that explains the first adoption and how these values were determined to rule out people who simply have used drugs in the recent past. at page 164 These values were never initially meant to indicate intoxication. Because it is difficult to determine an objective standard of intoxication with all the illegal drugs, the states simply adopted these values. This is a logical problem and is the reason I wrote the law review article. There is a basic fairness violation in the per se framework of DUID absent a genuine and reasonable determination of metabolite levels that actually demonstrate intoxication to some degree and it should be stated as such in discussing the topic. It is perfectly acceptable to believe that since they are illegal, there should be a conviction, but it should be know that this is actually the case and not let people erroneously believe that it is like the alcohol standard. I am not skilled at wiki editing so I hope you might put it together? Please let me know if you'd like to discuss further. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdova (talk • contribs) 18:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Cdova the best place to discuss this is on the talk page of the article Talk:DUID. Also please don't post personal information on Wikipedia. NZFC^(talk) 19:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

@NZ Footballs Conscience: I think you can talk to an admin to have the personal info struck from the page history too. --SuperJew (talk) 20:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Suge Knight

It says he is going to be portrayed in the DPG movie by Reggie Noble, this is Redman from Wu Tang. I can find no confirmation of this anyhwere and no reference is given so I assume this information is fake. I just found this that confirms my suspicions I think https://www.instagram.com/p/7UcOpFNIdA/ that isn't Redman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:9706:6F00:D8B5:AB14:5269:D669 (talk) 00:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

2017–18 NFL playoffs

Thanks for your reversions on this page. However, the game between the Tennessee Titans and Kansas City Chiefs has concluded as of a few minutes ago, so WP:LIVESCORES does not apply. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 00:53, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

thanks Jd22292, missed the game being over and it was a new user adding them and not the IP like during the game. NZFC^(talk) 01:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Brockhampton (band)

Hello! I am new to Pending Changes Reviewer and I apologize for my multiple edits on Brockhampton (band). It is past midnight here and I planned on making that my last edit but it is completely my fault for not checking other edits first. I just wanted to apologize to you for all the edits because you have a track record of editing on that page. If you have any tips for new Pending Changes editors I'm all ears! I really just want to combat vandalism, like you say on your user page, but that one slipped by me. But again, just wanted to apologize. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC) HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi HickoryOughtShirt?4, it's all good. We need more people like you that will look after pages and I've made the same mistakes too not looking at what's been said before on pages before approving/rejecting them. As long as we get it right in the end it's all good. NZFC^(talk) 06:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words. I hope to continue fighting again vandalism, and hopefully our next interaction is on a brighter note. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 07:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your contributions.

I just had a look at your profile. Mate, how much have you done on football!! That's quite an effort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.79.125.247 (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! It is always good to see more people interested in the local football scene as well, so welcome and thanks for your questions on the Wellington Olympic page. NZFC^(talk) 21:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Kim Jonghyun

There was never an official statement saying that Jonghyun left SHINee. In fact, Onew said that Jonghyun will always be a member. Therefore Jonghyun is not a past member, but a current one. (talk) 03:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Shawolforlife that isn't how Wikipedia works and it doesn't require an official statement when someone dies. He is a past member so please do not change it again or you will be edit warring and may get banned. NZFC^(talk) 03:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Sybil Shearer

if 2 is the obit how does it relate to the sentence, and she did not die at here home in northbrook but at the hospital in Evanston as in the local newspaper etc. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Sybil+Shearer%2C+(1912-2005)-a0141700184 50.254.21.213 (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

50.254.21.213, thanks for that and if you look at Talk:Sybil Shearer you will see I agree with you and you have provided another source showing this. How you went about it originally though wasn't correct. You don't remove references to make your point as the reference you removed was also used for other stuff in the article, not just the place of death. NZFC^(talk) 01:03, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

then we need to add the o-bit from a Chicago paper 50.254.21.213 (talk) 01:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

50.254.21.213 Take to talk page please. NZFC^(talk) 01:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

PS: sorry i am not very good at this as you can see my history + https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Служебная:Вклад/50.254.21.213 OK close 50.254.21.213 (talk) 01:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

somebody just messed up everything, for me that is days and hours of work, this is something i can not get back because his revert was in the middle your edits too and i had cites and can prove it 50.254.21.213 (talk) 22:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

I am sorry. I got confused and thought that I had reverted out your properly sourced materials. I believe that it should be resolved now yes? Metiscus (talk) 22:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

No problem Metiscus it happens. Yep should be all sorted. NZFC^(talk) 22:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

This is more than i can handle http://nyshistoricnewspapers.org/lccn/sn88074234/1970-03-12/ed-1/seq-15/ because of this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sybil_Shearer&diff=next&oldid=818527584 miehle is a German press and blommer was http://www.fold-pak.com/AboutUs/History.htm 50.254.21.213 (talk) 04:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

I'll have a look for you after the weekend NZFC^(talk) 04:18, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject, one should generally avoid providing external links to:Social networking sites (such as Myspace, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, Usenet newsgroups or email lists. An official link is a link to a website or other Internet service that meets both of the following criteria. The linked content is controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Wikipedia article. The linked content primarily covers the area for which the subject of the article is notable. w_w_w dot facebook dot com/morrisonshearer/

Hello again IP, you can't link that on her page. Its not really the Shearer official page but more a link to a Facebook page that the organisation looks after. NZFC^(talk) 02:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:XLinkBot#Sybil_Shearer,_The_Morrison-Shearer_Foundation 50.254.21.213 (talk) 21:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi again, the person is correct. Unless the page was Sybil Shearer own page then it can't be used. This isn't her page, this is a foundation page on her and her friend. There is nothing I can do to change this either. NZFC^(talk) 21:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

this is the sister page does that mean it has to go? 2 many people think they are right and jump on a page, i have been asked to work on for no pay. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Balfour_Morrison, these are bio. of dead people who go on by there foundation and facebook page. 50.254.21.213 (talk) 03:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

It's not yours or anyone associated with shearers article so anyone can edit it and they are also right. It can't stay on their. Also I wouldn't copy that other page as it's terrible and that external link will also have to be removed. NZFC^(talk) 03:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Isn't she more of an artist or dancer than just person-person, and is it bad to have resting place ash-scattering,? there is a lot more to the template that is not being used? 50.254.21.213 (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

No resting place as "ash-scattered isn't appropriate and not every field in a infobix has to be used. NZFC^(talk) 02:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

If we stay with person can it be info box person dancer?50.254.21.213 (talk) 03:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

You can change the info box to dancer or artist is fine. NZFC^(talk) 04:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

ok! but what is she? 50.254.21.213 (talk) 14:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

I am not a word-smith i have done more look and feel, the foundation will be doing a rewrite most of this has been copied from newspapers and web sites.50.254.21.213 (talk) 14:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

@NZ Footballs Conscience: Can you read this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Barek#external_links and this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Externial_Llink's 50.254.21.213 (talk) 23:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

I have read it, nothing changes. You can't use the foundation as an external link as it isn't Shearers personal website. NZFC^(talk) 02:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

so what are you doing? 50.254.21.213 (talk) 02:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

@NZ Footballs Conscience:50.254.21.213 (talk) 02:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

"a dog with a bone regarding the external link to the Foundation website", the bot took them out, you wanted them in, SlimVirgin wants them in then she locked me out how is that fair what is your problem attacking me on my talk page, attacking me on the talk page i went to the tea room for help is this how the community helps, this place is worse than craigslist. all my edits have been cites and the info box no content.50.254.21.213 (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

The problem IP is how you have interacted with the community instead of the community itself. Wikipedia works by consensus and yet you have tried to bash people over the head with policy and other stuff exists. Other users have tried to explain to you multiple times how things are done and have warned you to take a break, yet I notice today you have continued and tried shopping with some else else. That is why you were reported by Barek to Administrators' noticeboard, your own behaviour here. Not because of me, not because of SlimVirgin or any other user but how you have continued this fight. You still haven't even learnt how to use talk pages properly and the way you write on them at the moment makes them looks like a mess. You still don't preview your edits before clicking on them resulting in numerous extra small edits for you to try and correct them. It is annoying and all I was doing was trying to help you with those pages. It has taken up way more time than I like. I'm going to let the outcome of the administrators noticeboard deal with it from now on and come back to those articles on Shearer and Morrison later. NZFC^(talk) 22:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

About cricket templates

Well. I noticed that you support football. And you mentioned Unless we are going to do one for every sport played at the stadium, there isn't much point just doing it for one. But those template does not support to every sport. I believe it's only cricket that display those options. I myself am a huge football fan. But I can't help it. So I suggest that we gonna keep that like every stadium that host international cricket matches. Thanks - Price Zero|^talk 08:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Hey Price Zero, so I thought it was strange to have cricket on the article when it isn't really known as a cricket stadium, however I did some more research looking at other stadiums and it appears precedent is to have an extra cricket infobox on the page as well so have reverted my change. Sorry for the confusion, I have nothing against cricket despite what my name says.. :P. Just thought it looked weird but I'm happy for it to stay. NZFC^(talk) 19:42, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Revert

I don't agree with your reversion. I have zero desire to defend Florida's gun laws, but it feels like editorializing to put "the municipality is under Florida's gun laws" in the lede of the Parkland, Florida article. Don't revert my edit. 2602:306:CFEA:170:E454:2D75:EF1B:BC1F (talk) 02:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

I believe it is something to be discussed and actually agree with you but think it should be discussed on talk page first NZFC^(talk) 02:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

She stated in an interview that the original French pronunciation of her surname was "benoît" . Another source Solidaires2 (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

References

Hi Solidaires2, then you will have to find another source (or find the original interview), both of those are not reliable sources as they aren't fact checked and/or are blogs, so can't be used on Wikipedia.NZFC^(talk) 22:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Ingrid Michaelson

Hello NZ Footballs Conscience,

I removed the date of birth which you had added using a BBC profile as a source. That profile cites the Wikipedia article as its source, which is circular referencing. We need several reliable sources which have done independent fact checking. The subject of the article objects to including the birth date. Please read WP:DOB. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:49, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Hey Cullen³²⁸, no problem. I thought year of birth is still allowed if they don't want the full DOB? Also, is this page considered [2]? NZFC^(talk) 21:55, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Yes, year of birth is allowed if it is reliably sourced. I am not familiar with My heritage.com. You may want to check it out at the Reliable sources noticeboard. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring.

Your constant reverts have been noted on the edit warring noticeboard. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 07:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Spacecowboy420, I have responded there. NZFC^(talk) 07:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Results

There were discussion(s) about that earlier somewhere and was decided not to have those, a simple results table is enough. I seach for that discussion or start a new one if i am unable to find it. Kante4 (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Kante4 You mean not have fixtures and results in a season article? There has always been fixtures and results in football articles? NZFC^(talk) 09:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

I see you have taken it too footy page. Will discuss there. NZFC^(talk) 09:50, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

In club season articles, yes. But not league season articles, as you can see at the 2017–18 Bundesliga and so on. Kante4 (talk) 09:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring

I have closed your report and blocked MAXXII12. Be advised that you were edit warring too, and the main reason you are not also getting blocked is because you have stopped, you were restoring consensus, and the other party looks like a long-term disruptive influence on the article. Next time, pop a note on the talk page first so we can see you were trying to resolve the dispute. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Ritchie333, I will do that in future situations. NZFC^(talk) 16:18, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Cindy Ross Friedman

Thank you for inviting me to add to your talk page regarding undoing Cindy Ross Friedman's edits. Her name no longer appears on Thompson Rivers University's website or staff list. If you go to the Department of Biolgical Sciences faculty list website you will not see her name. She is not employed there and the staff directory and department staff list website back that up. I was merely correcting her employment history as she does not work at Thompson Rivers University, to leave that on her Wikipedia page i incorrect. Truthandrealfacts (talk) 01:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Truthandrealfacts, I find Friedman on their website both here [3] when I search her name and her page [4] still here. Even then we don't remove the sentence but would instead change it too Cynthia (Cindy) Ross Friedman, FRSA was a professor in Biological Sciences at Thompson Rivers University in Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada. Until such time as she started working somewhere else however in this case she appears to still be at the University. NZFC^(talk) 02:06, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Opps!

Did i make a mistake on Alvizaman's talk page? Sorry. Thegooduser Let's Chat 01:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Na you are good, think we were just both reverting them at the same time. NZFC^(talk) 01:05, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Is that User blocked yet? Thegooduser Let's Chat 01:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Na, it appears an investigation has only been opened. Really need to hit up an admin to block them and remove talk page privileges. Otherwise I'm just keeping an eye on them to revert anything in the mean time. NZFC^(talk) 01:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

WOSO Task Force News: April 2018

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: April 2018

Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014 Hello WOSO editors! A few initiatives have been started with an emphasis on making more WOSO links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles. If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, take a look at the initiatives listed in the box below. Sign up at the bottom of an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles ... or create your own initiative. Did you know ... WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in 1 active women's league)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}} Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues Czech Republic: 2017–18 Czech First Division ends Apr England: 2017–18 FA WSL ends May 20 Faroe Islands: 2018 1. deild kvinnur started Mar 11 France: 2017–18 Division 1 Féminine ends May 27 Germany: 2017–18 Frauen-Bundesliga ends Jun 2 Iceland: 2018 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football) starts May 3 Ireland: 2018 Women's National League started Mar 11 Israel: 2017–18 Ligat Nashim ends Apr 28 Italy: 2017–18 Serie A ends May 12 Japan: 2018 Nadeshiko started Mar 21 Mexico: 2017–18 Liga MX Femenil season ends May 5 Moldova: 2017–18 Moldovan Women Top League started Apr 1 Netherlands: 2017–18 Eredivisie ends May 25 Scotland: 2018 Scottish Women's Premier League started Feb 11 South Korea: 2018 WK League starts Apr 23 Spain: 2017–18 Primera División ends May 13 Sweden: 2018 Damallsvenskan started Apr 14 United States: 2018 National Women's Soccer League season started Mar 24 Current season articles needing creation Albania: 2017–18 Kampionati Femrave started in Oct Algeria: 2017–18 Algerian Women's Championship started in Sept Austria: 2017–18 ÖFB-Frauenliga started in Aug Belgium: 2017–18 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal (nl) started in Sept China: 2018 Chinese Women's Super League season started in Apr Cyprus: 2017–18 Cypriot First Division started in Nov Finland: 2018 Naisten Liiga started Mar 24 Northern Ireland: 2018 Women's Premiership starts Apr 18 Norway: 2018 Toppserien started Mar 24 Portugal: 2018 Campeonato Nacional de Futebol Feminino (pt) ends May 19 Romania: 2017–18 Romanian Superliga ends Jun 2 Switzerland: 2018 Nationalliga A ends May 26 Vietnam: 2018 Vietnam Women's Football Championship started Mar 10 Wales: 2017-18 Welsh Premier Women's Football League ends May 18 Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks. Has an article you worked on been nominated for deletion? See: Primer for AfD, AfC and PROD Contributing to Articles for Deletion (AfD) discussions Request a copy of a deleted article Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force #wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2018 Chatham Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Napier, Nelson, Blenheim, Geraldine, Hamilton and Western Suburbs

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Greenhithe Catimba

Greenhithe Catimba

Hello Nz Football Conscience, I notice you block my edit for Greenhithe... please refer to the link you send https://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/north-harbour-news/99547019/football-club-to-offer-senior-pathways-for-local-players, if you read it properly It mention Catimba Joining Greenhithe, please also refer to http://www.nff.org.nz/newsarticle/62586 where the football federation name us Greenhithe Catimba, as from 2018 Greenhithe senior team First and reserves is Called Greenhithe Catimba ... Thank you Salvamar84 (talk) 04:23, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Salvamar84, I understand the top teams are named Greenhithe Catimba and that is fine, but Wikipedia uses the actually name of the organisation and not the nickname. As per the news article you linked "In readiness for senior teams, the club also changed its name from Greenhithe Junior Football Club to Greenhithe Football Club in 2016.". What I would do for the page you have created is call it Greenhithe FC and have a sentence on the page stating the clubs first and reserve team are called Greenhithe Catimba or maybe the clubs nickname is Greenhithe Catimba and they are an amateur association football club in the suburb of Greenhithe, Auckland, New Zealand. NZFC^(talk) 04:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

My edits

Hi. Please understand that my edits to the SHINee page were made out of respect to the deceased and to the remaining members of the group who wish to acknowledge SHINee as five. I have also edited the language of the page which implies SHINee never consisted of five members as that is inaccurate. Please allow this to stand, as I am only respecting the wishes of those closest to the deceased artist by ensuring that the image published in their name accurately reflects the group's view of themselves. Additionally, please allow this to stand because it most accurately represents the group in this past decade. Message me with any concerns, I'm still unsure how the communication here works. Thank you and have a really great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213roses (talk • contribs) 23:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

No, Wikipedia only reports facts and the fact is that the band is only four members now and we don't use flowery language. We say he is dead, not passed away. See the talk page for this. Do not keep changing it or you'll be blocked. NZFC^(talk) 23:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

"Sources"

Just a heads up but if you insisted that you go off sources, try actually extrapolating the information from the source. Saying something in paragraph one and retracting it on paragraph 7 doesn't establish the claim as "sourced". Just thought you should know. 2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC (talk) 03:10, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry my mistake. Saying something in sentence 4 and admittedly discrediting it in sentence 5 does not make for "cited claim" on a wiki page. Had to be more specific to display how little effort was put into your revision. 2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC (talk) 03:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC Seems another user disagrees with you also. If you want to change what is written there, instead of reverting them. I suggest you take it too the talk page to discuss. NZFC^(talk) 03:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

There's not that much to disagree on when you actually reference the "sourced material". It's not subjective in the slightest, the wording of that "source" spells out it cannot establish the number it just quoted you. 2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC (talk) 03:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

I pinged you but I am not sure it came through. I have added comments to the talk page of the article. I also show by references to the Ford's Theater restoration document from 1962 that the capacity was somewhere in the vicinity of 1,700. Donner60 (talk) 04:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Edits

you need to stop trying to get pages deleted that are notable and provide reliable sources from first hand parties. as you did with Jersey Crew Soccer Club and Sam Allington — Preceding unsigned comment added by Footballandsoccer (talk • contribs) 06:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Footballandsoccer you have to leave the deletion discussion tags on the articles. If they are notable then they will be voted there to keep. I suggest you read deletion process. Unfortunately it appears neither article is notable as per WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG.

Ross Porter

Re Ross Porter. If you are going to make edits or additions then provide balanced accurate reporting and tell the complete story You are amateurish and represent yellow journalism and opening yourself up to libel and defamation. Continue if would like litigation expedited Jazzidiot (talk) 06:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

lol Jazzidiot I'm not the one trying to censor an article that you obviously have a WP:COI on. Also, I wouldn't be making legal threats on wikipedia as that's how you get blocked. If you want to add to the article or change anything, you will have to find reliable sources and not try add your own personal information. NZFC^(talk) 06:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Karl Kjer Ref

Hello We had talk earlier on help page to remove as the reference is just a attack agienst the guy Karl kjer. Thats what they are doing this article got brought back to have these details only. Article reference less of his work where are there are tuns of thing one should write. The Aggies story is published after one year of the incident happened. Which clearly look like not with a well intention. Thanks user:Blueparticle^(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Blueparticle best take this to the talk page. NZFC^(talk) 05:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Lifegem Proof which includes patent with mentioned discrepancy.

You asked for evidence for the edits I included on Lifegem's page. Here is a summary of there patent with their claims and a expert in gemology as well as insurance breaking it down. The main thing to note is that on their patent they state they use sublimation which means CVP not HPHT. Sublimation or Chemical Vapor Deposition is not possible to form diamonds out of carbon ashes, it's only possible with HPHT, which they state is not used on their patent. In follow up the owners stated they actually do not handle the process, which is incorrectly stated on the wikipedia page.

http://cremationdiamondreport.com/lifegem2007.html

Please note I am writing this for you to consider families who are grieving and in sorrow who are being misled into thinking the diamonds are made from their relatives, even when that has not been proven or indicated anywhere. For the Lifegem page to exist it needs to contain factual information, it currently has no scientific articles or journals backing it's claim. In fact a quick visit to the talk section shows it is highly controversial page and others have pointed out the lack of due diligence from Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pformenti (talk • contribs) 03:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Pformenti that all looks ok to me and looks like a reliable source if you want to add information to the article. I can't promise others won't disagree but it appears ok. Other thing is you can put in a withdrawal request if you think the article shouldn't exist at all. NZFC^(talk) 03:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

NZFC, where do I put the withdraw request I see the code is withdrawal request. Do I just place it on the article, and should I mention the article with the relevant counterarguments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pformenti (talk • contribs) 21:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Pformenti, see WP:AFDHOW, which lays out the steps that you need to do. I can do it on your behalf but thought better coming from you as you can expand your reasoning and the article you have linked. NZFC^(talk) 22:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi again, could you do it on my behalf and I can explain I read the instructions but I'm still a little unclear with the instructions. I'm very un-tech-savy. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pformenti (talk • contribs) 22:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Done Pformenti. Please remember to sign your posts using four ~. See WP:SIGN. You can view the deletion request here. Read what to do and how to put your vote in here WP:AFDDISCUSS, remember we aren't on Notability about the company. NZFC^(talk) 22:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:New Zealand Football Women's Knockout Cup.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Zealand Football Women's Knockout Cup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:05, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Tyler Boyd article date format

Hi,

I can perfectly understand your logic for reverting the date format. However, MoS guideline I followed in making my edits is the following (MOS:DATERET), quoted below:

• If an article has evolved using predominantly one date format, this format should be used throughout the article, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic or consensus on the article's talk page.
• The date format chosen in the first major contribution in the early stages of an article (i.e., the first non-stub version) should continue to be used, unless there is reason to change it based on strong national ties to the topic or consensus on the article's talk page.
• Where an article has shown no clear sign of which format is used, the first person to insert a date is equivalent to "the first major contributor".

Currently, all three point to DMY, starting with the first date placed in the article (on 8 October 2012) and the majority of existing dates being DMY. That is why I made the edits that I made.

Assuming there is enough consensus to change the format ("strong national ties" being made somewhat more complicated due to dual citizenship), are you going to undertake the change of all the instances of DMY to MDY?

Again, I see your point entirely. But when I've done the same change that you did (and for the same reason), someone else reverted it for the reasons above. Therefore, I figured going with the existing format was the safest edit. Clearly, it's not a straightforward issue, no matter which way we go. ;)

Respectfully, 1980fast (talk) 23:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Hey 1980fast, thanks for bring it to my talk page. My thoughts on this was the article had already been changed from Tyler Boyd (Footballer) to Tyler Boyd (Soccer). Then some of the main dates that stick out are his goal ones. He never scored for NZ, so the only goals listed in the body of the article where is ones he just got with USA. It seem to me it made more sense to just use the MDY format there (and the rest of the article) because otherwise it will just be a case of reverting people that pop into the article who want to put their stamp on it by changing it to American style. I'm not overally fussed, but see his page going forward, having more ties and more information added as his USA career advances. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 23:44, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, NZFC! I concur. Thanks for bringing consistency to the article. At the risk of telling you something you might already know, if you add the "use mdy dates" template at the top of the article, it will extend the format to the references, which will make the consistency complete. 1980fast (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, 1980fast I wasn't aware of that. Will remember it for future articles. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 02:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome, NZFC. Keep up the good work! 1980fast (talk) 05:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019

Opening ceremony of the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, Parc de Princes, Paris, June 7, 2019 Hello WOSO editors! What a 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup in France! There has been a lot of activity on tournament- and player-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of the tournament and its players. Let's keep the momentum going. WOMEN IN SPORTS EDIT-A-THON FOR JULY + AUGUST! WikiProject Women in Red is focusing on Women in Sports during their edit-a-thon for July & August 2019. Get all the info here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/126 Sign up and help fill in the gaps within various articles related to women's football / soccer - whether they be players, teams, leagues, historical, administrators, referees, etc. Every little bit helps. Be sure to tag your article talk pages with {{WIR-126}}. These edit-a-thons are a great way to work with others to help bridge the gender gaps on Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions! Did you know... WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}} Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues Australia: 2019–20 W-League Belgium: 2018–19 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal China PR: 2019 Chinese Women's Super League Colombia: 2019 Colombian Women's Football League Croatia: 2019–20 Croatian Women's First Football League Czech Republic: 2019–20 Czech First Division (women) England: 2019–20 FA WSL Faroe Islands: 2019 1. deild kvinnur France: 2019–20 Division 1 Féminine Germany: 2019–20 Frauen-Bundesliga Iceland: 2019 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football) Republic of Ireland: 2019 Women's National League Israel: 2019–20 Ligat Nashim Italy: 2019–20 Serie A (women) Korea Republic: 2019 WK League Japan: 2019 Nadeshiko Mexico: 2019-20 Liga MX Femenil Moldova: 2019–20 Moldovan Women Top League Netherlands: 2019–20 Eredivisie (women) New Zealand: 2019 National Women's League Nigeria: 2019 Nigeria Women Premier League Scotland: 2019 Scottish Women's Premier League Spain: 2019-20 First Division (women) Sweden: 2019 Damallsvenskan United States: 2019 National Women's Soccer League season Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks. Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See: Primer for AfD, AfC and PROD Contributing to Articles for Deletion (AfD) discussions Request a copy of a deleted article Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force #wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Chatham Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Seth Ward and Michael White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

OFC U23 Tournament ASSISTS

Hello NZFC!

I've been trying to add the assist ranking to the OFC U23 article but it's been deleted twice.

Well, I actually don't have a reliable source like Oceania Football Confederation official website. But I watched 5 times each goal in the championship to make this ranking so I can assure it's right.

You can do the same to check this list, if necessary. All goal videos are available on Youtube (highlights videos) or in MyCujoo (Full matches)

We have some groups to discuss football in Oceania with people from all over the world, if you interest just message me

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amadeu1997 (talk • contribs) 02:59, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Amadeu1997, unfortunately this is a common mistake with new editors. You can't add information to Wikipedia unless you have a reliable source, even if you know for sure that the information is correct, it would be counted as original research. The other issue you have is Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information/stats, so while statistics is interesting, Wikipedia isn't really the place for it and most articles don't include assists, only goal scorers for tournaments.

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but it is good that you are editing here and have an area of interest that you want to contribute to. I recommend you check out Wikipedia Football as it is a great place for templates, resources and to ask questions. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 04:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

...for stepping in to the situation of excessive reverting editing by the Texas teenager. Please keep an eye on these sitations? Because I am not editing as a registered editor, I am not well positioned to institute restraints to prevent disruptive editing. I will be happy if others can take such steps if they become necessary. An article in question is that of Evan O'Neill Kane, and my editing is very close to my professional expertise, and certainly has been undertaken with very great care. Cheers. 2601:246:C700:9B0:6D4C:597C:72AB:665E (talk) 22:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

2601:246:C700:9B0:6D4C:597C:72AB:665E, I did notice they seem to be reverting IPs just because in some cases instead of actually checking if the edits are vandalism. Was going to keep an eye on it and if causes problems, maybe see where to report it. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 22:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

KYTV (TV) file

Hi NZFC. I'm sure you meant well, but the file had actually been provided with a non-free use rationale for the KYTV article before you made this edit. The rationale was added after the bot correctly removed the file but before you incorrectly removed it a second time. Perhaps you didn't notice this because you're using Twinkle, but it's easy to miss this type of thing if you actually don't take a look at the file's page to verify there's no rationale for the file's use. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Marchjuly Thanks for your message. I did check the file but I obviously didn't scroll down the page far enough on my phone and thought it only had permissions to be used on a different article. Thanks for correcting my mistake! NZFC^(talk)(cont) 11:09, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

No biggie but the edit sum you left might possibly be taken the wrong way. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:11, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Yeah for sure, got to watch my comments. Murphy Law that I ended up doing what I accused other editor of doing. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 11:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

In fairness to you, the other editor didn't leave an edit summary, which basically means they actually ended up kinda of doing what they mistakenly accused the bot operator of doing. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi NZFC! You created a thread called User may need some support at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the Invite!

Hey! I just want to say thanks for the invite! I am currently a semi-amateur wikipedia page writer. I am currently working on Butler's single seasons (As I am an Indy native). It's been a pleasure working with ya! I will see the invite out and join you on that. Thanks so much! - Gears

@DrGearsKaktus1234: the Teahouse invite isn't me but they are a good place to go if you have general editing questions. The award is from me as a thanks for working so well together. I'm a semi-amateur too, like to keep an eye on NZ football related articles so got into this years NCAA because Joe Bell plays for Virginia and Noah Billingsley plays in the St Marys team (Both national team players). Also, a good place to join if you haven't already is WikiProject Football. Gives you all the guidance you need for soccer related stuff. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 03:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Update on NCAA DI Tournament Team Names

As per the previous made edit with St. John's and St. Mary's, the team names are added with that in the official NCAA website on the bracket page. Following that, my belief was that they should have their state names next to their University Name, no matter if there is no other school with that name in Division I. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrGearsKaktus1234 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

@DrGearsKaktus1234: Actually that is a good point and we should go with official source. I agree we should change it back and maybe just put a note on the tournament talk page as well. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 20:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

@NZFC: Yea. Let's go ahead and do that. Official source always matters. 20:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of NCAA Division I men's soccer First-Team All-America teams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Booth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

I see you recently accepted a pending change to December 23 that did not include a direct source.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline and the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. All new additions without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. I've gone ahead and un-accepted this edit and backed it out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 12:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Tony Ferguson

Hi NZFC, Pls note that the height is as per sherdog.com for all MMA fighter - the source info is at the bottom of the page - see sherdog Tony Ferguson. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Cassiopeia sorry this maybe my bad. So is Sherdog a more reliable source for information than the UFC website? And as I type that I think I see where I have gone wrong. He is an MMA fighter and the Sherdog website is the source for MMA fighters. Thank you for fixing that for me. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 10:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi NZFC, Good day. UFC is the primary source and Sherdog is the most comprehensive, largest MMA fighter database and a secondary sources. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 13:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Your objections to my edits

I have added the citation to the Kreis Schubin page as you suggested. Please inform me before you delete any other edits done by me, so that I can address your objections and make the necessary changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fereydoonshah (talk • contribs) 10:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Kia ora Fereydoonshah seems we crossed talk pages. You will see I've raised a query about the adding of all this informaiton on Incidents noticeboard. I only came across your editing because that was unsourced, you appear to have done enough edits to know, everything you add has to have a source with it. Will leave the rest up to the discussion, thanks. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 10:55, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Could you tell me why you have raised this incident about my editing? It was a single page in which I had forgotten to mention the citation. I have mentioned the source in all other edits. As I mentioned, I requested you to inform me personally in case of errors on my part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fereydoonshah (talk • contribs) 11:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Action Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

AIV

I've blocked 138.0.116.11 per your report. Just a tip for AIV - admins patrolling it are not looking to do research, they're looking for obvious vandalism that needs a block now. When you get an editor like that where every individual edit looks reasonable on the face of it (Sure, Japan might be playing France. Sure, Kim Jong Un might be attending that event. Sure, Japan might be having a friendly against Nagoya Grampus) it's quite helpful if you can pick out an individual edit and explain briefly why it's specifically wrong or disruptive. If an admin at AIV can't (a) read your summary, (b) check the contributions, and (c) agree that it needs blocking within, say, 30 seconds, they're just going to move on. I just thought I'd mention this, as I actually saw your report this morning and just moved on because there was other, more clear and urgent, stuff to deal with. Cheers and keep up the good work. ~ mazca ^talk 19:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Kia ora Mazca thank you for the advice, that is good to know and will keep in mind for future reference. Makes sense to me to make it as easy as possible for you guys to understand what vandalism we are seeing. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 20:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Recreation enquiry

Hi NZFC, just letting you know this article you added to AFD that resulted in delete was recreated. I don’t know what the previous version looked like so won’t be able to check if there has been any improvement. If you wouldn’t mind checking that would good, thanks Steven (Editor) (talk) 09:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

The recreated article was the same as the one deleted, and has received minimal updates since which did not add new sources. I've deleted it.-gadfium 21:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you @Steven (Editor): for checking with me and @Gadfium: for the follow up. Appreciated! NZFC^(talk)(cont) 21:25, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome NZFC and thanks gadfium Steven (Editor) (talk) 21:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Upcoming US vs Australia match

Hey mate, just wanted to point out that the upcoming US vs Australia soccer match isn't "fake". See the reports for example on Fox Sports and MLS. I haven't restored it to the page since it hasn't been officially confirmed and finalised yet. But it does seem that it will happen :) --SuperJew (talk) 06:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

@SuperJew: sweet as, can be restored later. IP though has been banned as putting on fake matches for other pages. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 07:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

User talk:96.44.5.219

The editor can blank their talk page if they like. Drmies (talk) 15:42, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

• @Drmies: All good, just thought WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK that the block needed to show on the page. I expect that when this latest block ends, IP is going to continue their editing style again as well. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 17:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • I would not be surprised. Note that I revdeleted some of their more blatant racist claims. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:06, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Please take special note of the last sentence of WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK. Edit warring with blocked editors is a particularly fruitless activity, and just makes a bad experience even worse. – bradv🍁 22:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Kia ora @Bradv:, thank you for the message and I do get where you are coming from. Was leaving it before after Drmies message but think I did get pulled back in as IP now appears to be block evading also under Oea the King. See Sockpuppet and Edit War. However you are right be to just let it run its course now. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 22:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Roy Krishna

Hi NZFC - please follow the template guidelines as laid out by WikiProject Football when making edits to articles like you've done on Roy Krishna. You can find the guidelines here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players. Thanks. Rupert1904 (talk) 19:49, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

It's a suggest layout, not required and personally looks silly when someone has spent a number of years in one league like Krishna has in the A-League. I point to Lionel Messi template that doesn't met those requirements. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 20:37, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Rupert1904 Please don't revert until it's discussed. The guidelines say This page provides a suggested layout for footballer biographies. While nothing is set in stone, this layout is used in most of the best biographies as judged by the community, and following it is a good idea. That doesn't mean every single article has to follow them. As I've pointed out, I don't believe it is best for Krishna article. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 20:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Northern Rovers FC Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Northern Rovers FC Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Football Barnstar

		The Football Barnstar
		And they score! This user made significant contributions to a myriad of Soccer Football-related articles, thus demonstrating tremendous passion and an unwavering desire to make Wikipedia a sharper place. Double Plus Ungood (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Double Plus Ungood, thank you! That is really nice of you. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Page on osteoporosis.

The page on osteoporosis is wrong. However, I do not have any experience editing Wikipedia articles so when I cited my sources in the editing part I just put on the links. Still the studies clearly show that the current version is supporting a myth about dairy. However, my version was declined because of lack of sources. I guess the problem is I didn't edit the citations properly and the links alone are not enough.

Current version however has NO studies to back it up.

So if you can do a better job editing - please do - here is an article heavily backed up by studies showing that dairy is good for bone health and protein leading to acidosis is one of the dumbest myths ever: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/is-dairy-good-for-your-bones

Educate yourself and fix it yourself since you do not like my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.126.34.134 (talk) 22:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

87.126.34.134 You didn't provide any sources, you only changed what was on the page. I agree with you it doesn't appear will sourced but making changes without providing one yourself isn't the way to do it. Now you have provided one source but it is not a reliable one, so I won't be making any changes. I suggest if you want the page edited, you go to the talk page and ask for it, as long as you can provide better references to back it up. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 22:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't look at the article probably. I see the healthline page links to other scientific articles. When I have a bit of time, I will look through it more. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 22:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Kolkata Derby

Total Derby number is 370. Competitive Derby number is 328. Mohun Bagan won 120 Derby. Your edit in Mohun Bagan AC Wikipedia is wrong. You can see Kolkata Derby Wikipedia. SAIKAT MARINERS DEY (talk) 08:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

SAIKAT MARINERS DEY provide a source. Link to another page doesn't mean that page is correct either as it appears that reference for the games is out of date by about two years as well. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 09:00, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

That stuff isn't unsourced

He's unsourced he says the cramp twins ended in August 2006 when google litterly says it ended in September 2006 Pieboy999 (talk) 06:03, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Catdog didn't end In 2005 it actually ended in 2000

It actually ended in 2000 if you look on google Pieboy999 (talk) 06:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

I'm tired if this catdog never ended in 2005 period.blank Pieboy999 (talk) 06:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Active departments in Mohun Bagan AC

What's the problem in copying a template from some other page? It was done just to save time. There is no unique coding or any copyright on codes. The same codes are used by every other football club pages. I see no difference in copying a public code and writing the same code line by line. Debankan Mullick (talk) 22:18, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Its not the taking it from another page, its the fact that the information is already on the Mohun Bagan page, so you are creating it twice. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 22:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Sarah Fuller (athlete)

On 20 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sarah Fuller (athlete), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that shortly after winning a conference tournament championship with Vanderbilt's soccer team, Sarah Fuller became the first woman to play football in a Power Five conference game? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sarah Fuller (athlete). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sarah Fuller (athlete)), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Comment in my talk page

Why do you bother asking me why i'm not updating the entire page 2020-21 New Zealand Football Championship. I already do part of it and I also have other things to do.  — Martijnvdam97 (talk) 16:31 10 January 2021 (CET)

Martijnvdam97 I told you why I asked. It's bloody annoying someone that does a half arse job updating a page. Better to update less pages and do everything than half arse a lot of them like you're doing. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 15:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

I don't like you, then better do it yourself if you think it's a problem. I see it as helping this community and then every bit can help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martijnvdam97 (talk • contribs)

I don't give a fuck if you don't like me Martijnvdam97. I think you are lazy but you don't seem to care about that either. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 15:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

That is not very nice of you to say, I don't like your language. I think you are very frustrated because of the lockdown. I understand that it takes a toll on all of us, but I see no need to use that kind of language in this friendly community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martijnvdam97 (talk • contribs)

SPI

The oldest named account is considered the sockmaster, not the IP. Thanks for the report. Cabayi (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

RE Wilding.

You are being more patient than I would be in your position. Only in death does duty end (talk) 22:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@Only in death: Thanks! I know I should be upset, but I find it kind of funny actually. This is the second time I've been attacked as a way to try to prove my editing of the article is bias, honestly had never heard of them before I came across the deletion discussion, and now I am just trying to stop the disruptive editing.NZFC^(talk)(cont) 22:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Player statistics

Please refer to here for player's career statistics. Kingjeff (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

I did, you will see I linked to the same thing before you did your edits on the article, when I moved the stats in the table and updated them. The loan stats get counted in the total of their home club. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 00:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

@Kingjeff: saying that, you are right it doesn't quite still look right. Do you think Bayern Munich should have its own bit with totals and then the Bayern Munich II seasons with the loan as another section? NZFC^(talk)(cont) 00:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

So hopefully you see other change I made, let me know if you think either works or you have a third idea? NZFC^(talk)(cont) 00:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

If you see the table at WikiProject Football/Players, you will see that, when loans are involved, it is not done in the order of seasons. Bayern Munich II should be immediately under Wellington Phoenix. Then after Bayern Munich II, should be Bayern Munich (His first team appearances and goals). After that, it ahould be 1. FC Nürnberg (loan). Any future move from the club should be shown after 1. FC Nürnberg (loan). Kingjeff (talk) 03:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

KingJeff Ok think got it now but it looked weird without the total columns on your edit. Assume it'll look better when he gets another year added onto the table. Also for future reference, your initial message comes across as condescending. As if you had looked, you would have seen I mentioned the same link, you decided to tell me I was missing, in the edits before yours. Now if I'm reading it or doing it incorrectly as appears to be, you make no attempt to explain what was wrong and looking at your edit history, this appears to be common occurrence and a bit of a crusade for you. It's great you want to fix the tables and standardise them but you might need to think about how stuff reads to others when you're typing or you're going to put a lot of people off working with you. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 03:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Linking a league more than once in the table is WP:OVERLINKing. Also, we don't add totals for single seasons or multiple, non-consecutive seasons with the same club. I've fixed that at Singh's article. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Kia ora Robby.is.on, thank you and sorry to KingJeff. Hadn't even thought/realised that I had left the linking in. Good to know about the single seasons or non-consecutive. Wasn't sure how it worked and what you've got was better than we both had. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 10:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

👍 Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Your edit to Madills Farm Reserve has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Denied edit on Discrimination against asexual people

Hi,

I see you denied the edit on Discrimination against asexual people.

The quote in the article:

Spaces designed for asexual people have also been known to internally discriminate based on age, and to centre on whiteness.

is inherently wrong, unless proper citation is given that proves otherwise. The cited Buzzfeed article makes no mention of "spaces designed for asexual people" as being ageist or racist, or centering on a specific race. Even if it were, which is not, it'd still be hardly any evidence to make such strong assumptions on the matter.

Quoting the possible source of contention:

“ Adam has felt unwelcome in ace spaces because of his age (he said the community skews younger) but also in gay spaces as a graysexual man. “Especially among gay men, I don’t think it’s a totally controversial statement to say that it’s a very, very hypersexualized culture,” he said. ”

Please, review this passage on the article, and take the proper measures. CapoFantasma97 (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Why do you keep wanting me blocked

I feel I do alot of good edits and correct mistakes. But you always want to get me blocked for something you don't like for some reason. Bigboy 691 (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Bigboy 691 You know what you are doing, you are adding deliberate errors into your edits. None of those needed the date change and you are aware that you are doing it.NZFC^(talk)(cont) 00:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

The stats I change are literally almost all correct and date so I don't see the problem if I'm being honest with you bro.

I'm not your bro, you are doing it deliberately, same as you did last time. Wikipedia uses a WP:MOS and you know better. Also remember to sign your comments.NZFC^(talk)(cont) 00:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

My bad man didn't mean to cause troubles I'm just trying to help update players stats and I feel I was doing it right but wasn't and I'm correcting my mistakes so if you could give me a chance without blocking again. Thanks

2021 New Zealand National League

Hello NZFC, I'm fairly new to editing on here and don't want to cause any troubles by making lots of mistakes. Just wondering what we are able to add to this page in terms of data. Are we able to add a fixtures/results table and top scorers for each of the regional leagues so long as we have the proper references? Just don't want to add stuff if it's not allowed to be there. (any feedback is appreciated as well) Cheers. Kezyfooty (talk) 04:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey Kezyfooty, happy to have another person helping out. Yes data is fine as long as we can source it and I think because the qualifying leagues are part of the whole season/competition, any information you can add will be welcomed. I was looking at completing a home/away table for each league as per my Sandbox here. Will need to do a Southern League article as well at some stage when we have enough to make one from the Mainland and FootballSouth competitions.NZFC^(talk)(cont) 04:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Okay that's all good. I'll leave you to do the home/away tables and I'll look to do the top scorers at some point. Also, one more thing, would there be point in adding a league positions by each round, such as the one seen in the 2020–21 Scottish Premiership? Or is there not much point? Kezyfooty (talk) 05:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

I thought about it myself but thought it might be too much information for the regional leagues and on the page. I find top goal scorer and head to head pretty interesting, but thought the position by round might be best for the championship phase. Saying that, if you want to add it (and its sourced), I'm happy for you to do it. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 05:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2013 Chatham Cup

Hello, NZFC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2013 Chatham Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 10:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

New Zealand football league system

Hi — are you happy with the way the large table is displayed in New Zealand football league system? On my monitor, I have to scroll sideways to see the right half of it. Cheers, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:45, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing: no I'm not actually, think I need to redo it.— NZFC^(talk)(cont) 05:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Northern League Auckland teams

Hey NZFC, just thought I may as well explain why I had the Auckland map for the teams. Had just seen other league pages such as the Premier League and the National League and how they do it for the London clubs so thought it could be worth doing. Understand why you don't want it there and that's all good. Think having it for the National League Championship would be a good idea though. Kezyfooty (talk) 12:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hey, @Kezyfooty: thanks for your message. I get that it is on other pages but with Auckland they were just all together it really didn't define anything. Think it'll look good when National Championship is going as it'll be across the whole country. I did try keep the second map but I couldn't get them both to work on the page and not leave a massive white space that you had to scroll past to get to the title winners section too. If you can figure out that, then I'm also fine for it to come back on. — NZFC^(talk)(cont) 20:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

All good NZFC. Yeah I'm sure there is a way of doing it but I couldn't sort it either, all sounds good though mate. Cheers Kezyfooty (talk) 01:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Regarding your reversion of my edit to "Template:2021 New Zealand National League"

Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you reverted my edit to Template:2021 New Zealand National League. I grant you that I was lazy and did not create a proper reference, such as this one:

"Competitions: National League". New Zealand Football. Archived from the original on 19 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.

Note that I fudged the title of the page by adding "Competitions:", so that it is obvious to which of the topbar's menu items that is being used, and archived the current URL/page using the Wayback Machine's "Save Page Now" function.

I am puzzled by the lack of use of proper references, since otherwise the bare URLs are subject to link rot. Note that I had to use a different URL (https://www.nzfootball.co.nz/COMPETITIONS/Football/National-League) than the one (https://www.nzfootball.co.nz/COMPETITIONS/National-League) in the version of the article that you reverted because the current one redirects to the site's front page—i.e, the link has already rotted.

Just because some is "the way it's done here" doesn't mean that it is a good idea. I suggest that you be bold and change it—here's a reference template, completely filled out:

{{Cite web |title=Competitions: National League |url=https://www.nzfootball.co.nz/COMPETITIONS/Football/National-League |publisher=[[New Zealand Football]] |access-date=19 July 2021}}

Or at the very least let me change this example of it for you. —DocWatson42 (talk) 08:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Removing some areas on the University of Canterbury page

Hi NZFC I would just like to query on why you deleted the section on halls of residence at the University of Canterbury as well as student culture. Bothered were not advertising and were simply informative, this is similar to other University pages such as the University of Otago and Harvard. It seems you want to monitor and adminster the page to your standards but not contribute towards. Cheers MitchellMatchbox MitchellMatchbox (talk) 22:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Both* MitchellMatchbox (talk) 22:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

MitchellMatchbox find me references then that don't use the university or hall of residence pages themselves because of WP:PRIMARY. Also just because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS doesn't mean it is correct. People aren't coming to the Wikipedia page on the University to find out about the halls, they would go to the Uni page themselves. Also, I suggest if you don't like my edits, then you take it to the talk page and discuss it there. Gain consensus to put stuff back in but you will need references that aren't the university itself to really add some of it back. — NZFC^(talk)(cont) 23:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Also why was the University Alumni page changed as well, I only altered the layout which is exactly the same as the Harvard University Alumni page. The Information put up about the halls was historical. Also what do you mean take it to the talk page... it hasn't been used for the last 4 years. MitchellMatchbox (talk) 23:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Again you are using other things exist, Harvard may do it that way, a lot of others don't. Why were those ones chosen as the most notable, what made them more notable that others? The talk page is there to be used, so anyone watching the page can comment. Others aren't going to see any discussion if you keep having it here.— NZFC^(talk)(cont) 23:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2016 National Women's League table (New Zealand)

Template:2016 National Women's League table (New Zealand) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2017 National Women's League table (New Zealand)

Template:2017 National Women's League table (New Zealand) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2018 National Women's League table (New Zealand)

Template:2018 National Women's League table (New Zealand) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)