User talk:NCurse/Archive11

Stent page

Hi there, I saw your username on the medicine portal. I noticed that the stent wikipage is lacking, especially considering the importance of stents in cardiology. Then I noticed that the article was listed as "low importance" on the medicine importance scale. I couldn't find a spot to nominate it for higher importance, but there is no way that this article should be of low importance. Let me know what you think. 65.209.6.2 (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cancer Research Institute Article

Hello, I am contacting you in regards to the creation of an article for the Cancer Research Institute. It seems from your edit history and your user page that this article may be of interest to you. If not, could you please recommend any users you may know that might be interested?

The Cancer Research Institute is a non-profit dedicated to research in cancer immunology. We believe we should have an article as there are many other Wikipedia articles that mention us, yet we have no article of our own. We were founded on the premises of Dr. William B. Coley's work, have a close relationship with the Ludwig Institute, and relationships with many acclaimed scientists and institutions. In partnership with the Ludwig, we run the Cancer Vaccine Collaborative and Cancer Vaccine Consortium, programs that aim to create a strong network of clinical investigators and cancer vaccine trials worldwide to effectively immunize against cancer. The ultimate goal will be the development of therapeutic cancer vaccines. Please help us create this article, as we would like to remain neutral. Please contact me with you interest and/or for help in finding references, photos, etc. Thank you for your time and consideration, kfowler@cancerresearch.org--CancerResearchInstitute (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Szia

Szia, gondoltam megkérdem hogy vagy mizujs? Rég nem láttunk téged a huwikin, és hiányol a társaság. Szerintem örülnének, ha néha bekopognál a kocsmafalon vagy ilyesmi :) Azóta már én is admin lettem, hogy szalad az idő.... Üdv, --Timish ¤ Gül Bahçesi 12:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sok sikert az orvosihoz! másfél millió olvasó.. az bizony már nem elhanyagolható szám :) csak így tovább, aztán majd ha híres nobel-díjas leszel ne feledkezz meg a wikiről :P Nálam semmi különös nincs, egy ex-GE cégnél dolgozom, most fogom befelyezni az egyetemet (hopefully, már csak a szakdoga maradt), aztán remélhetőleg irány Törökország :) Üdv, --Timish ¤ Gül Bahçesi 09:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good articles newsletter

Delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 01:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

H.i.

Szia! Az unciadminválasztás határideje lejárt. [1]. Örülnék, ha te hirdetnéd ki az eredményt. Végülis te vagy a főnök. Üdv: OsvátA ^Palackposta 22:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A kihirdetés nem kérdés. A hatalom sem. Ezeket megoldom. De a plusz fülecskéket megkapta-e? Amiket csak te tudsz a fejére ragasztani neki. Hogy működőképes legyen. Üdv: OsvátA ^Palackposta 13:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Látom: megfülezted, sőt! Kösz! Asszem, többé-kevésbé sejti a bürokratát, illetve, rájön, illetve kérdez. Üdv: OsvátA ^Palackposta 19:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MCOTW

The present MCOTW is going pretty well. I'm certainly enjoying the work :-). I notice you're not on wiki a lot, so I suppose it might make more sense if I formally take over the job of rolling over the MCOTW. I have set the date for the next rollover in my PDA so I have no intention to forget it anymore.

I hope you noticed that Wilson's disease is now a good article, in part due to your kind contributions to the "genetics" content. If you're looking for work, I'm hoping to submit subarachnoid hemorrhage for FAC soon. JFW | T@lk 23:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MCOTW

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week.
This week Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was selected.
Hope you can help…

JFW | T@lk 22:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I've been (very gently) critical of you here, lol.

It's completely understandable that if you're not familiar with cricket you wouldn't recognise that the articles did contain notability assertions (and good ones at that!)

Cheers --Dweller (talk) 09:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the article is recreated so the problem is solved. NCurse _work 13:59, 7 Au

gust 2008 (UTC)

magánwiki (own wiki help)

Szia! Indítanék egy saját matematikai wikit, ahová időnként a magam dolgait tenném fel, amik nem férnek el a Wp-án; de úgy látom, elég nehéz. igénybe venném ehhez a tapasztalataidat, minthogy egykor magad is üzemeltettél ilyet ... tudod, a Tudoda). Ha hajlandó vagy segíteni, kérlek azt jelezd a HuWikikönyvek-es vitalapomon; a nehezét megcsinálnám én is, csak azt nem tudom, hogy kezdjek hozzá. hol regisztrálhatok megfelelő ingyenes webszervert, van ilyen? de az is jó, ha a wiki csak a saját gépemen futna, ez megoldható? Megoldható a telepítés a php tényleges ismerete nélkül? Sz'al, kb. ilyen kérdéseim lennének. Gubbubu (talk) 11:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MCOTW

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week.
This week Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was selected.
Hope you can help…

JFW | T@lk 21:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey request

Hi,
I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.

Thank You, BCeagle0312 (talk) 03:13, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Medicine Featured Topic Task Force proposal

Hey NCurse, I've just set up a proposal for a new task force in the WikiProject Medicine called FTTF, or the Featured Topic Task Force. We aim to create a featured topic for medicine, most likely to do with an infectious disease of some form (the proposals so far include polio and bacterial infections in general) and become the first medical featured topic. The proposal can be found here and further discussion can be found at the bottom of the WikiProject Medicine talk page. I've very much appreciate your comments and possibly support of such a proposal, if you'd be willing to take part! —Cyclonenim^T@lk? 13:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 20:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uncipánik

Az archívumaim szinte mind elszálltak! [2]. Nyomtalanul (?) eltűntek! Van ennek valami racionális oka? Vagy itt essek kétségbe??? --OsvátA ^Palackposta 09:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Néhány hét múlva visszatértek. Most meg már megint nincsenek. Ezek direkt engem heccelnek (ejtsd: hekkelnek)? Üdv! OsvátA ^Palackposta 08:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MCOTW

Are you still around? Anyway:

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week.
This week Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was selected.
Hope you can help…

--WS (talk) 23:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force

I wanted to know if you (or any friends of yours) are interested in dermatology, and would be willing to help me with the WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force? Kilbad (talk) 14:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation of dermatology articles on Wikipedia, input wanted

Hey NCurse. Kilbad (talk · contribs) has asked me to ask around a few people to get their opinions on the current catagorisation tree proposed at this discussion, as he seems rather eager to get going with the work but would like a few more opinions. Any chance you could have a quick look and post your thoughts? Cheers. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 15:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Digging up old news.... websites and organizations

Hey NCurse, I realize it has been a long while since the MinnesotaLindy article debate and it has been deleted and I'm okay with that. Now Yehoodi, a similar website and organization in NYC has an article under the WikiProject: Dance. I am wondering what your thoughts would be on this article and how its inclusion in WProject:Dance affects it.

Thanks for helping me understand.

~ Shawn (talk) 19:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment of Asherman's syndrome page due to vandalism

Hi, I've written most of the Asherman's syndrome wikipedia content and have added 31 references from peer-reviewed medical journal articles to support my citations. Although the page is not totally 'complete' and I plan to add some more details, it is at least 90% complete and has an excellent reference list. However, I noticed that on October 24th, a user (IP address) removed all of the references. Spencer made note of this in the usertalk of that person. I noticed that the page was assessed as "start" level. I can only assume this rating was given because ALL of the references had been removed. It appears that the removal of the references was a deliberate act of vandalism in order to give the page a low assessment. This is extemely unfair and the page should be reassessed by the assessment committee with all of its 31 references. I hold a PhD in Life Sciences by the way.

I look forward to your response.

Thank you.

Floranerolia (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 00:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Wikidézet

Szia! Kérlek, foglalkozz ezzel, ha szükséges. Kösz. OsvátA ^Palackposta 17:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replies

Hey guys, I'm sorry I cannot answer your questions. Being really busy in RL. Please give me a few more days. NCurse _work 20:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elásott uncikutya

A magyar Unciklopédiában ezt látni:

Telepített szoftverek:

MediaWiki 1.14alpha

PHP 5.1.6 (apache2handler)

MySQL 5.0.45

Tetszőlegesen talált, más Wikia projectben pedig ezt:

MediaWiki 1.13.2

Wikia releases/200812.1 (code r4281, configuration r15797)

PHP 5.2.6 (apache2handler)

MySQL 5.0.50sp1a-enterprise-gpl-log

Hát jól van ez így? Ebből engem leginkább az alpha gondolkodtat el. Különben is jól eltűntél... OsvátA ^Palackposta 12:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blog rally

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Blog rally, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:NN neologism. While used in a couple of articles, not clear that it meets guideline.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Toddst1 (talk) 15:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And now, for Fvasconcellos' traditional nonsectarian holiday greeting!

Wherever you are, and whether you're celebrating something or not, there is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! So, may you have a great day, and may all your wishes be fulfilled in 2009! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a combination of my Christmas greeting from 2006 and my New Year's greeting from last year? Why, it most certainly is! Hey, if it ain't broke...

Editing Watchout! Theres Ghosts

I removed the db-band tag from Watchout! Theres Ghosts, see Talk:Watchout! Theres Ghosts for discussion. It was a marginal call.

You deleted it this morning for A7.

Consider restoring it and, if you feel it deserves to go, sending it to AFD. If nominated today, it would probably go down but it wouldn't be a snow-job and the resulting discussion would be valuable. If you waited until mid-February it would probably survive. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 16:52, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Text of my explanation on the talk page:

Speedy delete tag declined

Inhumer (talk · contribs) tagged this for speedy deletion as {{db-band}}. I removed the tag on the grounds that the band is on a national label. I'm also declining it on the grounds that if this were to go to AFD it would likely have at least some support, and if an AFD were to happen 2 months from now the article would likely survive. Yes, I know this is crystal-balling and the proper thing would probably be to take it to AFD now, let the article die, then re-create it after their debut album is released and their national tour starts in February. I considered putting that tour on the article but it seemed to WP:CRYSTAL-ish, even though the dates are on the MySpace page. Tours get canceled. In the interest of not making a WP:POINT, I'm not going to AFD this until after the tour starts, if then. If anyone else wants to AFD it go ahead, it will probably get deleted but not without a fight. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:18, 25 December 2008 (UTC)}}

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 16:55, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:)

Boldog új évet (mostanra bizonyára leért a pusztába is).

Gondoltam, beszólok, mert a végén még teljesen elfelejtesz minket. :) – Alensha ^talk 00:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

viszgaidőszak szépségei, mi? azt én is imádom... (tényleg, te gazfickó, fogadjunk, hogy azt se tudod, hogy szeptemberben egyetemre mentem... >:-( – Alensha ^talk 01:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ELTE, egyiptológia. Most szidom, mert egy k**** adminisztrációs hiba miatt lehet, hogy csúszok egy évet (gotta love ETR), és most is egy beadandó feladattal küszködöm, de amúgy élvezem :) (ha valahova hieroglifa kell, szólj :D) – Alensha ^talk 20:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Üzi

Figyelmedbe: http://unciklopedia.org/wiki/Szerkeszt%C5%91vita:NCurse#Tudod-e.3F OsvátA ^Palackposta 19:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Boxxy

I have restored (selected revisions) of this article. It did not meet G10, which requires the article to be negative to be deleted, and this one wasn't. Dlohcierekim had already restored it (after his own deletion) as it didn't meet G10 as well. seresin ( ¡? ) 00:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Urbach–Wiethe disease GA

Hi NCurse, I noticed that the review of Urbach–Wiethe disease has been outstanding for over a month now. I just wanted to let you know, you probably won't ever be able to get in touch with the article's main writer (this article was the only thing he ever did on Wikipedia, and he stopped editing right after that and hasn't been back in two months—apparently he had to do the article for a class project), so there's probably not much point waiting, unless you think there is someone else who's willing to adopt the article and address your concerns. (I can't adopt it, it's not really something I know anything about; I just nominated it because I thought it was well-done.) If there's no one who will do it, it might be time to just close the review on account of there being no one willing to fix the last minor issues. Politizer ^talk/_contribs 07:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National Skills Academy

Hey, could you just take a look at National Skills Academy and see if this is to be speedy deleted or you have another solution (letting it stay, perhaps). Also, see my talk page for a discussion with an original author about his copyright violations on that article. Thanks. Peasantwarrior (talk) 19:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization of pharmacology aritcles

I have posted an updated draft at WT:PHARM:CAT, and, if avaliable, would appreciate your feedback. kilbad (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiology task force

Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!)

-- Addbot (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 22:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I'm going to promote it. NCurse _work 18:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MCOTW time

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week.
This week Huntington's disease was selected.
Hope you can help…

JFW | T@lk 16:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:)

Puszták gyöngye! Az Istvan szócikket rakd már át légyszi az ékezetesre, mert rossz így ránézni. Én nem tudom, mert van ott egy laptöris redirekt. És hiányolunk a magyar wikiben :) pussz, – Alensha ^talk 22:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article on RFQ/"Radio Frequency Quadrupole" deleted in 2006

I think I might have written this article, it was on a component of particle accelerators. You deleted it with db-empty, I can't see much of the original content but I guess this was because of "lack of context". I might be able to rewrite it to explain a bit more thoroughly if you send the original to sb@stephenbrooks.org . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen J. Brooks (talk • contribs) 14:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sent you an e-mail. NCurse _work 06:48, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Coaching

I saw that you were listed in the Coaches for reconfirmation section of the admin coaching status page. Could you please update your status, and if you are still interested, drop me a note on my talk page? Thanks, Genius 101^Guestbook 14:23, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps invitation

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'Beverly Hills, 90210'

Hi. I actually did give an explanation for the recent edit I made to the Beverly Hills, 90210 article. The information removed was sloppy with regard to WP:LEAD (as mentioned) and also unverified. I am making the edit again in accordance with the original policy I cited. Thank you. -- 4.249.87.204 (talk) 07:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Drv for List of extraordinary diseases and conditions

An AfD for this article, which you participated in, was recently closed as "no consensus." I have request a deletion review here [3].Bali ultimate (talk) 16:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps June update

Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 396 articles were swept in May! That more than doubles our most successful month of 163 swept articles in September 2007 (and the 2 articles swept in April)! I plan to be sending out updates at the beginning of each month detailing any changes, updates, or other news until Sweeps are completed. So if you get sick of me, keep reviewing articles so we can be done (and then maybe you'll just occasionally bump into me). We are currently over 60% done with Sweeps, with just over a 1,000 articles left to review. With over 40 members, that averages out to about 24 articles per person. If each member reviews an article a day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. I know that may be asking for a lot, but it would allow us to complete Sweeps and allow you to spend more time writing GAs, reviewing GANs, or focusing on other GARs (or whatever else it is you do to improve Wikipedia) as well as finish ahead of the two-year mark coming up in August. I recognize that this can be a difficult process at times and appreciate your tenacity in spending time in ensuring the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pusztalakó...

Szia, pusztalakó, rég láttalak :) Egomban tali lesz júliusban, nézz át a hu:WP:TALI lapra. Ha akkor nem érsz rá, akkor június 18-án gyere a minitalira, arról itt van megbeszélés: hu:user vita:eLVe.

Az Istvan cikket mozgasd már át ékezetesre, nekem nem engedi.

pussz, – Alensha ^talk 21:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps July update

Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 290 articles were swept in June! Last month was our second most successful month in reviewing articles (after May). We are currently over 70% done with Sweeps, with just under 800 articles left to review. With nearly 50 members, that averages out to about 15 articles per person. If each member reviews an article every other day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. This may sound difficult, but if everyone completes their reviews, Sweeps would be completed in less than two years when we first started (with only four members!). With the conclusion of Sweeps, each editor could spend more time writing GAs, reviewing at the backlogged GAN, or focusing on other GARs. Again, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MED COTW and Portal templates

Hi, I'd brought up bundling some of the Portal:Medicine and Med collab of the week templates into the banner at Template talk:WPMED#COTW and Portal links from this template. Just wanted to make sure you were aware of it before I went ahead and made the changes since this almost fell off my watchlist and forgot about it myself. -Optigan13 (talk) 07:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps August update

Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 215 articles were swept in July! We are currently nearly 80% done with Sweeps, with under 600 articles left to review. With 50 members, that averages out to about 12 articles per person. Once the remaining articles drop to 100, I'll help in reviewing the last articles (I'm currently taking a break). If each member reviews an article every other day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. Again, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 19:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mass reversions

You have today reverted a large number of edits without explanation. I was wondering what the reason for might be. For example (to take just one), at Yak-18T, why did you perform this reversion? And why did you offer no explanation? Paul Beardsell (talk) 15:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1956 FAR

Hey Doc, if you have a moment, please take a look at this. Thanks! István (talk) 06:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

St. Paul's Cathedral

Hi, I was hoping you could make a clarification in the description and/or categories of Commons:File:St. Paul's Cathedral.jpg, which is apparently your photo. You don't say where it is, and there are quite a few St. Paul's Cathedrals in the world. - Jmabel | Talk 06:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note. Done! NCurse _work 13:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hey doc, can you check if I've messed up something with the AfD of the article Amennefernebes? Enwiki's deletion process is so complicated that I'm quite surprised that hoaxes aren't all over the encyclopedia. This article is such a hoax that it'd make any decent Egyptomaniac scream.

This is my sixth year in Wikipedia and I think I realized only now that anyone can add anything to it. – Alensha ^talk 19:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mozgatás

Szia! Tudnál segíteni egy lap átmozgatásában? A Julius König szócikkről van szó, ami teljesen indokolatlanul szerepel ezen a címen, az elsődleges Gyula Kőnig helyett. Viszont a wiki nem enged mozgatni. Indoklásnak valami olyasmit gondolnék, hogy he was a Hungarian mathematician, countinuously residing in Hungary, therefore his native name is the primary one. Köszi. Pasztilla (talk) 07:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Sajnos nem, még mindig német név alatt szerepel. Pasztilla (talk) 16:02, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hálás köszönet! Pasztilla (talk) 12:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikikönyvek

Szia NCurse! Az a paradox helyzet állt elő a Wikikönyvekben, hogy nincs olyan admin, aki néha benéz és új admin jogot ad, hogy legyen már ott valaki, ha kell. Ránéznél az adminok üzenőfalára és(/vagy) a jelentkezésemre? Akar a halál admin lenni, de a hu.wikibooks teljesen el van hanyagolva. Légyszi' segíts, köszi. Pipi69e (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Úgy látom, meg leszel szavazva, én sajnos nem tudok már ott dolgozni. NCurse _work 13:50, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday NCurse

Hey, NCurse. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!-- Vatsan34 (talk) 08:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! NCurse _work 13:50, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday Berci! --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:25, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Hey, happy (belated) birthday! Haven't seen you around in a while. How is the blog going? Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:39, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Boldog szülinapot kívánunk Neked Svédországból! (Így kicsit elkésve is!) Jutka és Ádám —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.216.120.79 (talk) 20:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since you've offered...

Cystic fibrosis is undergoing Featured article review. Perhaps you could help out with the genetics aspects, or even with the article as a whole if you have time? The biggest issue is sourcing. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Fvasconcellos, for the note! I'm going to check it out this week. NCurse _work 13:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Batman in film

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ArtistScientist (talk) 13:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note, but actually I only [reverted http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Batman_in_film&action=historysubmit&diff=333046688&oldid=333046522] the removal of content done by an anonymous user. NCurse _work 18:16, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

I wish you Merry and Blessed Christmas. Have a great, happy and peaceful time, my Hungarian friend, and a productive 2010. - Darwinek (talk) 16:07, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And now, for FV's traditional last-minute nonsectarian holiday greeting!

Here’s wishing you a happy end to the holiday season and a wonderful 2010.
Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:29, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deadmin

Szia! A három hónappal ezelőtt módosított irányelv szerint ma inaktivitás miatt elvesztetted az adminbitedet a huwikin. Eddigi munkádat köszönjük, és ha úgy alakul az életed, visszavárunk! Bináris (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps update

Thanks to everyone's efforts to the GA Sweeps process, we are currently over 90% done with only 226 articles remain to be swept! As always, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. With over 50 members participating in Sweeps, that averages out to about 4 articles per person! If each member reviews an article once a week this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. At that point, awards will be handed out to reviewers. As an added incentive, if we complete over 100 articles reviewed this month, I will donate $100 to Wikipedia Forever on behalf of all GA Sweeps participants. I hope that this incentive will help to increase our motivation for completing Sweeps while supporting Wikipedia in the process. If you have any questions about reviews or Sweeps let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MedportalSA

Template:MedportalSA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February GA Sweeps update

Thanks to everyone's efforts to the GA Sweeps process, we are currently over 95% done with around 130 articles left to be swept! Currently there are over 50 members participating in Sweeps, that averages out to about 3 articles per person! If each member reviews an article once a week this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. At that point, awards will be handed out to reviewers. Per my message last month, although we did not review 100 articles last month, I still made a donation of $90 (we had 90 reviews completed/initiated) to Wikipedia Forever on behalf of all GA Sweeps reviewers. I would like to thank everyone's efforts for last month, and ask for additional effort this month so we can be finished. I know you have to be sick of seeing these updates (as well as Sweeps itself) by now, so please do consider reviewing a few articles if you haven't reviewed in a while. If you have any questions about reviews or Sweeps let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Viraemia

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Viraemia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. B.Wind (talk) 07:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Completed!

Thanks to everyone's amazing efforts in February, we have reviewed all of the articles and are now finished with Sweeps! There are still about 30 articles currently on hold, and once those reviews are completed, I will send you a final message about Sweeps process stats including the total number of articles that were passed and failed. If you have one of these open reviews, be sure to update your count when the review is completed so I can compile the stats. You can except to receive your award for reviewing within the next week or two. Although the majority of the editors did not start Sweeps at the beginning in August 2007 (myself included), over 50 editors have all come together to complete a monumental task and improve many articles in the process. I commend you for sticking with this often challenging task and strengthening the integrity of the GA WikiProject as well as the GAs themselves. I invite you to take a break from reviewing (don't want you to burn out!) and then consider returning/starting to review GANs and/or contribute to GAR reviews. With your assistance, we can help bring the backlog down to a manageable level and help inspire more editors to improve articles to higher classes and consider reviewing themselves. Again, thank you for putting up with difficult reviews, unhappy editors, numerous spam messages from me, and taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Coaching: Reconfirmation

I was looking through the coaches at Wikipedia:Admin_coaching/Status and saw that there are a lot under "reconfirmation".

Could you let me know if you are still interesting in being involved with Admin Coaching, or if you would prefer to have your name removed from the "reconfirmation" list. If you want to be involved, could you please move your entry from "Reconfirmation" to "Active" and indicate how many students you would be willing to have (obviously, if you are actively coaching at the moment, then please indicate this!)

If I do not hear from you within a week, I will assume that you would like to have your name removed from the list of coaches.

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 18:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A sincere thank you from Wikiproject Good Articles

On behalf of Wikiproject Good Articles, I would like to express our gratitude to you for your contributions to the Sweeps process. Completion of this monstrous task has proven to be a significant accomplishment not only for our project, but for Wikipedia. As a token of our sincere appreciation, please accept this ribbon. Lara 01:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the award! NCurse _work 16:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Imedix

I have nominated Imedix, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imedix. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wintonian (talk) 18:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I just replied to you. NCurse _work 16:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion of Radio Frequency Quadrupole

On October 16, 2006, you deleted the article Radio Frequency Quadrupole. Although I can't seem to find a way to see the entire article, I can see that it had the template db-empty on it, followed by text explaining what the RFQ is. This leads me to believe that the article was not empty, since there is text visible. Is there any way that I could find out what the article's content was and why it was deleted? --Slon02 (talk) 04:21, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just replied to you. NCurse _work 16:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Watcha!

Hi there, hope all goes well :) I noticed you sign onto the google project, that's great - there's some great reviews and suggestions that we just haven't had the people power to address yet. see you around ... Lee∴V (talk • contribs) 10:23, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hi NCurse, are you still around? --WS (talk) 23:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear :-) Congrats on the Best Medical Technologies/Informatics Weblog award! --WS (talk) 23:46, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! :)) NCurse _work 11:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 00:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A humble request

Hi! I'm not sure whether you're involved in WP "politics" (i.e. CU/SPI filings, blocking of users etc.) or do article deletions only, but I hoped that maybe you could lend me a helping hand in an issue I'm having. My problems began a little bit more than a week ago when I've added a new section to the Hungary-Slovakia relations about the history of Hungarians in Czechoslovakia after 1920. Unfortunately everything I've added was removed by User:Iaaasi (a Romanian editor and puppet master) on sight. I've added another part of the section a bit later, then Iaaasi has removed both of my edits immediately arguing (on my personal talk page, not the article's) that the content has nothing to do with the whole topic of the article. He proceeded to even threaten me with reporting, should I continue undoing his deletion. That was when I've decided to call it a day and took a break from editing on WP (I didn't make any additional edits that day). Later on I've seen that a new user, User:Koalicio has sprung up and reinserted the section in question. Then the following day I've checked the article's edit history again and it turned out that Iaaasi has engaged into an edit war with Koalicio. Iaaasi has also flagged his move of removing the section above a "minor edit" and in the edit summary he was referring to my addition (reinserted by Koalicio) as "vandalism". I was about to report Iaaasi for edit warring, when I've noticed that User:Nmate has already done that. Iaaasi has later had his permban reinstated for this edit war.
Just about the same time an SPI was started by User:Diannaa against my account with the assertion that Koalicio is a sockpuppet of mine (she has also quoted the fact that I've reported Iaaasi for edit warring with Koalicio as evidence, even though Iaaasi was reported by Nmate). Unfortunately I wasn't notified of this SPI at all, and I only got notice of it WAY after it's been finished (from the fact that Iaaasi was boasting about it on his talk page). The result has turned out to be negative though. About 6-7 hours later however in came HelloAnnyong, took a look at the SPI and concluded that Koalicio might be my meatpuppet and blocked him. That was when I've confronted him about this, citing the fact that he had absolutely NO evidence of Koalicio being a meatpuppet of mine. He refused my request of having Koalicio unblocked on the grounds that he took part in the edit war that led to the indef ban of Iaaasi which's been purportedly started by myself, the fact that I'm "protective" of him and the fact that the content restored by Koalicio was identical to the one added by myself. So I've tried to disprove these accusations and pointed out that the proofs presented are really weak as well, but he didn't bother with a reply. I gave the dispute resolution another try with dropping another note on his talk page a few days ago, but he didn't reply to that one either. So I've tried to find an admin that hasn't been involved in sanctions against Iaaasi and any other events in connection with this issue either, so that he can remain as neutral as possible.
Please don't get me wrong, it's not that I need/have to have Koalicio unblocked at all costs. My problem's rather the fact that the SPI and blockage of Koalicio with the notice that he's a meatpuppet of mine is quite derogatory of not only him, but me as well. I feel a bit like I've been accused of something without proof and without a possibility of a due process. Since I still hope that WP is a democratic community which doesn't tolerate extortion/blackmailing/personal revenge especially against innocent editors, I hope that maybe you could help me. It's been asserted by HelloAnnyong (and Diannaa as well) that Koalicio's only edits were the edit warring at the Hungary-Slovakia relations article, which isn't true. He has also edited articles Debrecen and Austria-Hungary (I've never edited any of them, at least definitely not in the past 2-3 years), which shows that he hasn't created this account for the sole purpose of edit warring only, but he has obviously intended to make some useful edits as well. This is not to say that he should be unblocked no matter what. Currently though Koalicio's only "sin" seems to be the fact that he (as a new user) has engaged in a single edit war with Iaaasi (who's notorious for ignoring others' arguments) and was blocked immediately after that without a single warning (which's definitely NOT what a due process looks like). I wouldn't want that to happen to me either for that matter. CoolKoon (talk) 19:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Pregnancy#RfC: Which photo should we use in the lead?

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pregnancy#RfC: Which photo should we use in the lead?. You participated in the previous RFC on the lead image, Talk:Pregnancy/Archive 4#Lead image RfC. Apologies if you have already joined the new discussion, as I am doing this manually and there is a large number of people to notify, it is difficult to ensure I exclude those who have already participated in the new RFC. Nil Einne (talk) 14:39, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notifications, I'm going to weigh in. NCurse _work 19:17, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Alex picture-1a.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Alex picture-1a.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit on the melanoma page

Why did you revert my comment about the high incidence of melanoma in southern italy. Dammit, that is what it is and I have the tickets to Italy (where I attend international melanoma conferences) to prove it. Also, there is not a particularly high incidence of melanoma in "Northern Europe". What there is is a high incidence in areas of historical migration of northern europeans into southern climes. Classic example is Sicily, with its large Norman component to the gene pool. I note you have had various conflicts with other experts on melanoma before. And yes, I know experts don't count for much here, except we know the literature. Drjames1 (talk) 20:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I take it back. With apologies. Upon checking,--the increasing incidence of melanoma seen with decreasing latitude seen in European immigrant lands such as Australia and Texas is not seen in Europe itself, at least not lately. Just the opposite, in fact. Arguable reason is that in Europe populations haven't moved around as much. So the north-south susceptibility gradient holds better. Drjames1 (talk) 21:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems you found out why. Thank you for your appreciation. NCurse _work 06:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Applications for free, full access, 1-year accounts from HighBeam Research officially open

The applications for 1000 free accounts is now officially open until April 9th. I have the account codes in my email box and we are ready to go. This week's main goal is promotion. Several editors have already done a great job of getting the word out, but there is still time to make sure people don't miss out on the opportunity. Please tell your Wikipedia friends, WikiProjects, non-English Wikipedias, and anywhere else you think people would benefit from knowing. You can record your progress at WP:HighBeam/Promotion where we're keeping track of all of the notifications. Thanks so much for your help! I'll keep you posted. Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 20:47, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know! NCurse _work 15:29, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Webicina on Health 2.0

Hi there, I noticed you added a link to Webicina on the Health 2.0 article. Given that Webicina is a commercial company I'm not confident that this link belongs in the external links section given several of the WP:EL guidelines including:

Very large pages, such as pages containing rich media files, should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Worldwide, many use Wikipedia with a low-speed connection. Unusually large pages should be annotated as such.
Direct links to documents that require external applications or plugins (such as Flash or Java) to view the content, unless the article is about such file formats. See rich media for more details.
Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article. A general site that has information about a variety of subjects should usually not be linked to from an article on a more specific subject. Similarly, a website on a specific subject should usually not be linked from an article about a general subject. If a section of a general website is devoted to the subject of the article, and meets the other criteria for linking, then that part of the site could be deep linked.

I may be mis-reading it though so if you'd like to invite other editors please feel free on the talk page? Cheers, --PaulWicks (talk) 12:11, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul! Thank you for your message! Please feel free to remove the link, I understand your concerns. Myself, I'll run through many of the related entries and will remove such links. NCurse _work 16:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your HighBeam account is ready!

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
- Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
- If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 20:53, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's great! Thank you! NCurse _work 18:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Stories Project

Hi!

My name is Victor and I'm a storyteller with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. I'm chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who make and use Wikipedia have so much to share. I found your username from the Highbeam application list.

I'd very much like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project, or if you know anyone with whom I should speak.

Thank you for your time,

Victor Grigas

user:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 00:00, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Project for medical residents

Hi, NCurse. Would you mind commenting here? Axl ¤ [Talk] 20:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Thanks for letting me know! NCurse _work 09:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding the medicine Article: Eschar

Hello NCurse,

as stated in the headline I have a Question regarding the medical Article Eschar. I am slightly confused by the image included in the Article. The caption states the wound in question to be covered by an Eschar (scab). Searching for scab though leads nowhere near the Article in question. This leads me to the following I would like to inquire: Is the object in the picture a wound covered in an Eschar or in a scab? (Especially since the term "black wound" redicrect to Eschar and the picture shows no such thing.) If it is the latter, the picture would have to be removed. The former leads to the second question. Are scab and eschar synonyms? If yes it would follow that appropriate consequences be taken in the article scab. If not, the word would have to be removed from the question.

I sinccerely appreciate your input and would like to thank you for your time.

With regards --Abracus (talk) 21:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it would be better to hear the opinion of the whole medical community on this. Please post it on the talk page of WikiProject Medicine as well. NCurse _work 06:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on the medicine page. ---My Core Competency is Competency (talk) 15:55, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kérdések

Szia. Szerinted miért nem tudom szerkeszteni a szócikkek tartalomjegyzék előtti bevezető részét?

"Szerkesztő közreműködései" link nincs az angol Wikipédiában? SirVivor (talk) 20:29, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, tudod szerkeszteni, de a kódban a tartalomjegyzék előbb lesz, mint a szöveg, ami a cikkben előtte van, ez megtévesztő lehet. Illetve User:Contributions alatt található a jobb felső sarokban a közreműködések listája. NCurse _work 05:39, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Telefonon szoktam netezni... A szerkesztő közreműködéseire találtam megoldást (mobil változatra kell váltani...).

A magyar Wikipédiában van egy "bevezető szerkesztése" link, itt nincs. Csak az egész lapot tudnám szerkeszteni, ha a bevezetőt akarom módosítani, de a szerkesztési ablakba maximum 5000 karakter fér, és a legtöbb szócikk ennél hosszabb, ezért a teljes lapot általában nem tudom szerkeszteni, így a bevezetőt sem. SirVivor (talk) 19:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for your assistance for The Wikipedia Library

Hi! You signed up to be a helper at the Highbeam project page. As The Wikipedia Library expands, I am seeking some assistants who can collaborate on project administration by spending a few hours now and then working on a variety of tasks.

Right now I am looking for help on the Questia round 1 signups, reviewing editors' applications to check for edit count (1000), account history (1 year), and current blocks. Note, there is no subjective judgment required, just a factual criteria-check. Here's what you can do:

Sign up for a section of 50 applications at this page
The first check involves using Popups (enabled in Special:Preferences -> click "Gadgets", check the box to enable Popups, then click save).
By hovering over a username on the applications list, Popups will show the edit count, age of account, and whether the editor is blocked on English Wikipedia
If an editor is blocked, list their name at this page
If an editor does not meet the 1-year/1000 editor check using Popups, open their user talk page in a new tab in your browser.
Then, you then need to check if the editor meets the criteria on another Wikipedia language project.
To check global contributions use the Global Contributions surveyor] on toolserver.
Toolserver is a bit slow so I find it helpful to have 3 tabs running simultaneously.
Scroll down to the bottom of the toolserver results to see if 1000 edits or 1-year age of accounted are met at another project. You can also see if the editor is blocked on another project.
If neither Popups nor the Global Contribution Surveyor met the criteria, then list their name at [less than 1000 edits, or less than 1 year old account|this page]
Mark your section {{done}} at this page

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks so much! -- User:Ocaasi 19:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ilyenkor nem tudom én hogy mi van

A magyar wikiben szülinapos leszel mindjárt. Hát már teljesen elfelejtetted mi van ott? :) Vadszederke Agnes Modis (talk) 19:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Évek óta nem jártam arra, örülök, ha itt tudok eleget dolgozni. NCurse _work 14:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)

Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:31, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Update for: WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)

Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:20, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - October 2012

Delivered October 3, 2012 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter any longer, please remove your name from this list.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:42, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Second Call)

You are reciving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the first message sent out in September, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The current deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. A third and final message will be sent out during the last week of the clean-up before the deadline. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot

huwiki

Szia! Ha jól olvasom, már évek óta nem jártál a magyar wiki közelében és ahogy nézem itt, az enwikin is jó ideje csak visszaállításokra szorítkozol. Tán ha időd engedi, a magyar wikire nézz be valamikor, mert sok víz lefolyt a Dunán 2006 óta. Lett pl. magyar Wikimédia Egyesület is (bár kétlem hogy ne tudnál róla) illetve a jelenleg 225ezer szócikk közt akad számtalan, jellemzően gyenge, esetlen egészségügyi témájú szócikk, amik rendbetételében egy témában jártas szerkesztőnek a segítsége jól jönne... Üdv, --82.131.129.188 (talk) 23:25, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Final Call)

You are receiving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the past two messages sent out in September and October, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. This will be the last message sent out before the deadline which is in 2 days. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot

The GAN Newsletter (November 2012)

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume III, No. 2 – November 2012

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue
Request for Comment: An RFC about the Backlog Elimination Drives has been started this month. Go and voice your opinions! Featured editorial: A Matter of Time: The Future of Backlog Elimination Drives Project News: Over 345 unreviewed articles, 13 at reassessment	Good Articles of the Month GA Task Forces: A calmed GA community awaiting for an RFC Member News: 223 members of the GA Wikiproject

Read this newsletter
Single-page
Unsubscribe
Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 3 November 2012

WikiMedicine

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.

Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:20, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the note, I just listed myself among the contributors. NCurse _work 20:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (December 2012)

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume III, No. 3 – December 2012

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue
Featured editorial: "Drive-By Reviews": A Retrospective About Reviews During Backlog Drives Project News: A backlog elimination drive is being held now at GAN.	Good Articles of the Month: Our picks for November, 150+ promotions. GA Task Forces: Results from the Backlog Elimination RfC Member News: 227 members of WikiProject Good Articles and counting

Read this newsletter
Single-page
Unsubscribe
Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 3 December 2012

Science collaboration of the month

Hello: I've noticed your contributions to science-related articles, so if you're interested, check out:

The current science collaboration of the month article is: Chemistry

Please help improve this article to featured article quality standards.

Last month's collaboration was Science in the Middle Ages.
To propose future collaborations, please contribute here!

V • T

From: Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:30, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (January 2013)

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume IV, No. 1 – January 2013

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue
Featured editorial: Skyfall by Hahc21. Project News: A record, and issue and a future. Good Articles of the Month: See which articles were picked this year of records: 190 articles passed in December!	GA Task Forces: Results from the drive Member News: Two crucial users leave the project

Read this newsletter
Single-page
Unsubscribe
Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot · 3 January 2012

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[asof-1] As of October 2, 2012 at 19:05 (UTC).

[2] Before quick-failing the article, verify that one of the several referencing templates is correctly placed at the bottom of the article. If the template is not placed, try to place it to see if references are displayed. If this proof returns no references, then proceed to quick-failing.

[1]

[2]