User talk:Eustress

This user may have left Wikipedia. Eustress has not edited Wikipedia since December 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Some falafel for you!

For withdrawing the Salman Khan RM, not specifically that I have any stake for that RM, just nice to see editors who can change their minds with good grace. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Eustress,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:John F Kennedy Official Portrait.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 22, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-11-22. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Air Force ranks

Hi I Fuad from Bangladesh Air Force. If it necessary to confirm Wikipedia authority, I can submit my proof. I want to inform Wikipedia about the RANK OF AIRMEN OF BANGLADESH AIR FORCE. Before my work This ranks photo's not yet uploaded in Internet. For why you cannot realize the fact of Uploading our rank in Wikipedia. Hope you help me to upload AIRMENS RANK OF BANGLADESH AIR FORCE. Al Fuaduzzaman Sohan (talk) 17:49, 30 December 2013‎

Fuad, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and sorry you're having a hard time getting started. It appears that your edits to Bangladesh Air Force are being reverted because the images you have uploaded and referenced in the article (see, for instance, [1]) are being disputed as copyright violations. Please consult Wikipedia:Media copyright questions if you have questions about this policy, or engage editors on Talk:Bangladesh Air Force. —Eustress 18:19, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A personalized New Year greeting

Hi Eustress, Happy New Year! I hope that you're well. :) Best. Acalamari 12:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for thinking of me, Acalamari. Best wishes to you as well! —Eustress 15:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfD on ALD

Thanks for your AfD comment. But why did you remove the notability template? My thought was the template might draw some interest by itself. In any event, I've seen articles rescued via the AfD process. (E.g., the inclusionists get going and fix things.) Maybe this one will do the same. – S. Rich (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFPP Thanks

Hey Eustress,

I'm not sure if I've interacted with you before, but I'd like to take a moment to say hello and thank you for your work at Requests for Page Protection today. You single-handedly and tastefully responded to a slew of requests. So thanks! Airplaneman ✈ 14:03, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, happy to help! —Eustress 17:41, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, he made errors in responding to requests. You responded to the Katy Perry discography rfp saying user talk pages are exempted from prot. Its an article, not a talk page. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:53, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, thanks —Eustress 17:41, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty and the Beast (franchise)

Hi, Eustress, I'm appreciate of your recent assist at Beauty and the Beast (franchise), but I don't think the current level of protection is sufficient to hand the problem I reported, though I did appreciate the duration! The article is being hit primarily by IPs from Vietnam, which, as far as I know, can't be rangeblocked successfully, and as I'd mentioned in my RPP, the grand majority of IP edits at the page have been from Vietnam-based IPs who are intent on promoting this hoax. The current protection requires that IP edits be checked through our reviewer system, but the reviewer system (as I know from my experience with reviewer permissions) only requires that reviewers revert what is obvious vandalism. If they don't know that there is a history of hoax editing at this article, or that any sort of future 2015 Beauty and the Beast project is bogus, then most of the bollox IP edits can still sneak through. I was hopefully wondering if you might consider elevating the protection to exclude IPs and non-autoconfirmed users without the review process. It's difficult to paint the complete picture for every admin who happens by, but Disney Junior (Asia) is another affected article with a litany of disruptive edits from these 123 and 113 IPs, and if it helps, I've called the Vietnam edits out in my edit summaries, for example here. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern. Is it all right if we wait and see if the Feedback Protection helps? It's possible that may deter the vandals, and that would be preferred to semi-protection, which would prevent altruistic anons and new users from contributing to the page. —Eustress 15:43, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. In the interim, may I also request that the protection at Hercules (2014 film)‎ be taken down a notch? There isn't so much an editor content dispute as there is just one disruptive IP user who is trying to assert his personal opinions of the movie. Please see this rambling talk page diatribe to understand what we had going on. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done... Good luck, and please continue to do your best to be welcoming to new contributors. —Eustress 20:36, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, much obliged. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:54, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Constable

Despite having tried to engage any of the anonymous IPs regarding their edits to the Rich Constable article, none have chosen to enter a discussion about how to proceed with writing it. I do not know if the anonymous IPs are one and the same person, though I'm inclined to think so. I do not wish to become involved in edit war, but am unsure as to how to proceed when dealing with a situation where there's no engagement, references are continually removed, original research is added, article structure is manipulated, and accusations of bad faith and vandalism are being made. You blocked the article based on edit warring, but have not addressed the fact that IP users are not following any protocol. Therefore, with that in mind, and the fact the the block will expire shortly, I wonder what you would suggest as to how to proceed. Below is the list of IP editors thus far involved.Djflem (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Djflem (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I instituted full protection of the article because it appeared all editors have been engaged in edit warring. Please beware of issues of WP:ownership on your part; and be sure to notify IPs on their talk pages of your attempts at discussion, and issue vandalism warnings if discussion goes ignored. —Eustress 20:24, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your kind advice to that editor not being heeded

Hi Eustress; From the notice you left for Editor Chealer regarding the "Wikipedia" page, I have noticed that he/she has ignored your fair warning on 6 August informing Chealer that ignoring guidelines and essays just because they are "policies" is unproductive and disruptive. User:Chealer has instead decided today on 10 August to switch back to the same dissent against WP:BRD and WP:Lede and now put it into boldface with Chealer stating,

WP:Lede is not a policy.
WP:Lede does not "require" such a thing anyway. --Chealer (talk) 18:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Three of us have engaged on Talk page on "Wikipedia" for days and there has been not even a budge in the discussion by Chealer. My attempt to post the RFC for this was foreshortened by an editor who did not realize that the RFC was very short term. The results which were posted appear to be 4 to Support continuing Full Protection, 2 editors supporting a Topic ban with ANI against Chealer with no further full protection, and no-one supporting Chealer. This is the grouping of the 100 disruptive edits of User:Chealer from the last month collected into one place. If you would like me to post the links and diffs for one dozen or two dozen of the most harsh edit warring by Chealer for review, then let me know and I'll try to fill them in if the ANI is needed to help support a Topic ban. The 4 of us trying to help are getting pretty exhausted and may need more time of full protection to continue to try to reason further with Chealer:

Partial list of content dispute by User:Chealer

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

(cur | prev) 01:35, 6 August 2014‎ Eustress (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (214,963 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Changed protection level of Wikipedia: Edit warring / content dispute: as reported at RFPP ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (expires 01:35, 13 August 2014 (UTC)) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))

(cur | prev) 12:42, 5 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,213 bytes) (+425)‎ . . (Undid revision 619916164 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) As explained many times before, WP:Lede does not require such a thing)

(cur | prev) 02:53, 5 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,277 bytes) (+54)‎ . . (→‎Criticism: restore request to specify the kind of regulations alluded to)

(cur | prev) 04:39, 4 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,610 bytes) (+30)‎ . . (→‎Dispute resolution and arbitration: Dispute resolution != Arbitration Committee)

(cur | prev) 04:30, 4 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,580 bytes) (-6)‎ . . (→‎Nature: move Community and Dispute resolution sections out of Nature)

(cur | prev) 04:00, 4 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,586 bytes) (-108)‎ . . (→‎Administrators: the number or new administrators and the selection process's selectivity are not directly proportional)

(cur | prev) 03:40, 4 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,694 bytes) (+25)‎ . . (→‎Community: split paragraph on administrators to a subsection)

(cur | prev) 03:01, 4 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (215,669 bytes) (+5)‎ . . (→‎Language editions: balance media layout moving User - demography.svg left)

(cur | prev) 02:58, 4 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,664 bytes) (-125)‎ . . (→‎Language editions: remove Largest Wikipedias/graph (unclear, redundant).)

(cur | prev) 00:28, 4 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,772 bytes) (+8)‎ . . (→‎Hardware operations and support: request reference about ZFS)

(cur | prev) 00:23, 4 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (215,764 bytes) (0)‎ . . (→‎Hardware operations and support: data server -> data center)

(cur | prev) 07:03, 3 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,764 bytes) (-258)‎ . . (Undid revision 619282485 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) see your Talk page)

(cur | prev) 00:50, 3 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,022 bytes) (-328)‎ . . (Undid revision 619226216 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) the sequence was *already* "Seigenthaler incident first", then BLP improved)

(cur | prev) 00:04, 3 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,350 bytes) (-207)‎ . . (lead: restore content lost in 619455014 (per WP:AN3/LawrencePrincipe). fix typo)

(cur | prev) 12:05, 1 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (215,944 bytes) (-2)‎ . . (Fix Selfref)

(cur | prev) 00:43, 1 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,367 bytes) (-561)‎ . . (Undid revision 619225504 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) WP:Lede is no policy and does not require such a thing)

(cur | prev) 00:40, 1 August 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,928 bytes) (-12)‎ . . (Undid revision 619286714 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) ban enforcement != bot policy. this is a request for a *citation*)

(cur | prev) 12:58, 31 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,804 bytes) (+30)‎ . . (lead: challenge "fifty policies for quality assurance")

(cur | prev) 12:48, 31 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (216,695 bytes) (-2)‎ . . (→‎Rules and laws governing content and editor behavior: Dispute resolution is neither a rule nor a law)

(cur | prev) 12:29, 31 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,439 bytes) (+8)‎ . . (→‎Automated editing: request reference and partially fix)

(cur | prev) 12:27, 31 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,431 bytes) (-54)‎ . . (lead: collaboration and expertise are not exclusive. shorten)

(cur | prev) 12:21, 31 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,485 bytes) (-258)‎ . . (Undid revision 619228137 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) duplication)

(cur | prev) 01:56, 31 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,266 bytes) (-21)‎ . . (→‎Review of changes)

(cur | prev) 00:16, 31 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,287 bytes) (-561)‎ . . (lead: restore definitions of "Wikipedia". the lead's content doesn't have to be repeated in the body.)

(cur | prev) 00:05, 31 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,848 bytes) (-31)‎ . . (Undid revision 619068822 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) the opposite of expert-driven is certainly not "consensus-driven")

(cur | prev) 23:03, 30 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,879 bytes) (-93)‎ . . (→‎Automated editing: structure)

(cur | prev) 19:58, 30 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (217,045 bytes) (+28)‎ . . (→‎Automation: restore request for reference for bots blocking accounts or IPs)

(cur | prev) 19:52, 30 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (217,017 bytes) (-328)‎ . . (→‎Vandalism: Seigenthaler: remove duplicate mention of year. remove duplicate mention of BLP.)

(cur | prev) 02:26, 30 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,126 bytes) (+35)‎ . . (lead: flag unreadable sentence)

(cur | prev) 04:32, 29 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (214,617 bytes) (-30)‎ . . (→‎Editing: split subsection "Review of changes")

(cur | prev) 04:23, 29 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (214,647 bytes) (+3)‎ . . (→‎Arbitration Committee: these statistics are old, and rates surely didn't stay precisely that way for long)

(cur | prev) 02:42, 29 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (214,644 bytes) (-442)‎ . . (→‎Community: remove poorly sourced part on inexperienced editors)

(cur | prev) 02:33, 29 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,086 bytes) (+40)‎ . . (move (and adapt) Talk page coverage from Editing to Community)

(cur | prev) 02:05, 29 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,046 bytes) (-225)‎ . . (→‎Analysis of content: remove paragraph on WikiWarMonitor (off-topic, content-less, poor writing. possibly fits in See also))

(cur | prev) 01:36, 29 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,256 bytes) (-14)‎ . . (lead: fix sentence comparing article count with "Britannica")

(cur | prev) 01:27, 29 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,270 bytes) (+193)‎ . . (lead: move size comparison back where "Britannica" has been introduced)

(cur | prev) 01:23, 29 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,077 bytes) (-1,364)‎ . . (remove lead's last sentence (unreadable))

(cur | prev) 01:08, 29 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,441 bytes) (+35)‎ . . (→‎Criticism: request clarification of "the majority “weight” of viewpoints")

(cur | prev) 04:31, 28 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,030 bytes) (-167)‎ . . (→‎Nature)

(cur | prev) 03:58, 28 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,197 bytes) (-712)‎ . . (merge paragraph on Signpost from "Open collaboration" section to "Internal news publications")

(cur | prev) 03:36, 28 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,909 bytes) (-39)‎ . . (merge "Organization of article pages" section into "Analysis of content" and "Internal quality control and assessment of importance")

(cur | prev) 03:31, 28 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (215,948 bytes) (-121)‎ . . (→‎Organization of article pages: split in 2 paragraphs)

(cur | prev) 02:59, 28 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,069 bytes) (+165)‎ . . (move paragraph on wikiprojects from "Organization of article pages" to Operation)

(cur | prev) 02:42, 28 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,904 bytes) (-56)‎ . . (specify that Wikipedia is a wiki in lead)

(cur | prev) 02:32, 28 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (215,960 bytes) (-25)‎ . . (lead: remove reference to Alexa (broken))

(cur | prev) 02:28, 28 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (215,985 bytes) (-945)‎ . . (remove poorly sourced parts on Google fueling growth. remove redundant and poorly sourced sentence on popularity)

(cur | prev) 02:16, 28 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,930 bytes) (-254)‎ . . (remove broken AlexaTop500. move anyone reference where it seems to belong)

(cur | prev) 02:04, 28 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (217,184 bytes) (+1)‎ . . (move sentence about Time magazine from lead to "Cultural significance". not sure this deserves any treatment here)

(cur | prev) 02:02, 28 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (217,183 bytes) (+4)‎ . . (update URL for Time2006)

(cur | prev) 22:24, 27 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (216,547 bytes) (-7)‎ . . (→‎Open collaboration)

(cur | prev) 22:20, 27 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,554 bytes) (+2)‎ . . (→‎Nature: User-generated content is not specific to Wikipedia. move "Language editions" section out of Nature (whatever "Nature" means))

(cur | prev) 21:31, 27 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,522 bytes) (+31)‎ . . (mark num_users reference as failing verification and request new one)

(cur | prev) 21:20, 27 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,491 bytes) (+111)‎ . . (lead: give example of usage as common noun. shorten first sentence)

(cur | prev) 20:58, 27 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,350 bytes) (0)‎ . . (→‎Impact: move first paragraph from Cultural significance to Readership)

(cur | prev) 20:56, 27 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,350 bytes) (0)‎ . . (→‎Impact: move Cultural significance just below Readership)

(cur | prev) 20:45, 27 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,350 bytes) (-64)‎ . . (→‎Cultural significance: flag broken reference (freedom of panorama))

(cur | prev) 20:38, 27 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,414 bytes) (+99)‎ . . (→‎Cultural significance: flag BBC reference as broken)

(cur | prev) 17:30, 27 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,315 bytes) (-232)‎ . . (→‎History: avoid misleading phrasing about February 2014 traffic)

(cur | prev) 00:26, 27 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,547 bytes) (-415)‎ . . (refactor references to Wikipedia vs the small screen)

(cur | prev) 23:14, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,962 bytes) (+258)‎ . . (lead: attempt to clear up "Wikipedia"'s ambiguity)

(cur | prev) 22:25, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,689 bytes) (+18)‎ . . (avoid contradiction on language count in lead, opting for vaguer language. request reference on contradictory language count)

(cur | prev) 22:20, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,671 bytes) (-20)‎ . . (remove outdated and misleading article count from lead. acknowledge existence of bans)

(cur | prev) 22:07, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (216,691 bytes) (-10)‎ . . (lead: clarify the kind of ranking in question)

(cur | prev) 22:05, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,701 bytes) (-134)‎ . . (shorten lead on popularity and avoid contradiction with the template on rank)

(cur | prev) 18:11, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,820 bytes) (+80)‎ . . (→‎Language editions: ^{[clarification needed]})

(cur | prev) 16:17, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (216,740 bytes) (-9)‎ . . (→‎Internal quality control and assessment of importance: language. shorten)

(cur | prev) 02:50, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,749 bytes) (-33)‎ . . (→‎Analysis of content: move Citing Wikipedia inside Accuracy of content. is a subsection warranted?)

(cur | prev) 02:45, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,782 bytes) (0)‎ . . (→‎Analysis of content: move Medical information from Quality of writing to Accuracy of content. surely a better fit, if not a good one)

(cur | prev) 02:15, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,707 bytes) (-89)‎ . . (request reference for historical hardware and update)

(cur | prev) 01:56, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,796 bytes) (-3)‎ . . (→‎Criticism: request to specify regulations. more encyclopedic tone)

(cur | prev) 01:48, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (216,799 bytes) (+5)‎ . . (→‎Contributors: oops)

(cur | prev) 01:45, 26 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,794 bytes) (+43)‎ . . (→‎Contributors: there is more than one Goldman. request reference about edit-a-thons. request clarification of "top 2%-10%")

(cur | prev) 02:36, 25 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (216,693 bytes) (+49)‎ . . (disambiguate "Wales". flag broken reference. flag reference failing verification and request new one)

(cur | prev) 04:04, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (220,499 bytes) (+146)‎ . . (Undid revision 616859409 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) discussion of "weight" is not necessarily discussion of a "majority “weight” of viewpoints")

(cur | prev) 03:59, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (220,353 bytes) (-45)‎ . . (lead: remove reference contradicting its statement)

(cur | prev) 03:55, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (220,398 bytes) (+76)‎ . . (→‎Vandalism)

(cur | prev) 02:57, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (220,277 bytes) (+14)‎ . . (→‎Mobile access: request to clarify "enumerative approach")

(cur | prev) 02:41, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (220,263 bytes) (+72)‎ . . (lead: restore request to specify standards for quality assurance)

(cur | prev) 02:31, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (220,191 bytes) (-61)‎ . . (→‎Vandalism: Seigenthaler: clarify. assistant and assassination are not exclusive.)

(cur | prev) 02:28, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (220,252 bytes) (+12)‎ . . (→‎Vandalism: Seigenthaler)

(cur | prev) 02:15, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (220,240 bytes) (-15)‎ . . (→‎Vandalism: avoid redirect to Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident. simplify)

(cur | prev) 02:05, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (220,255 bytes) (+17)‎ . . (→‎Dispute resolution and arbitration: Dispute resolution != Arbitration Committee)

(cur | prev) 01:59, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (220,238 bytes) (-11)‎ . . (→‎Readership: remove confusing "however")

(cur | prev) 01:53, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (220,249 bytes) (-913)‎ . . (→‎Automation: request reference about bots blocking edits. shorten by replacing poor and lengthy coverage of so-called incident with expanded description of bot roles)

(cur | prev) 01:46, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (221,162 bytes) (+64)‎ . . (→‎Automation: fix WP edit warning bots 1)

(cur | prev) 01:35, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (221,098 bytes) (+6)‎ . . (→‎Automation: oops)

(cur | prev) 00:37, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (221,092 bytes) (-226)‎ . . (→‎Automation: shorten (Lih))

(cur | prev) 00:31, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (221,318 bytes) (+35)‎ . . (→‎Editing: structure)

(cur | prev) 00:28, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (221,283 bytes) (+17)‎ . . (→‎Editing: fix caption)

(cur | prev) 00:24, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (221,266 bytes) (-194)‎ . . (→‎Editing: compact)

(cur | prev) 00:18, 24 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (221,460 bytes) (+22)‎ . . (→‎Editing: miscellaneous reverts/further improvements)

(cur | prev) 01:58, 14 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (214,664 bytes) (+74)‎ . . (→‎Vandalism: change image caption to describe image)

(cur | prev) 23:25, 13 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (214,590 bytes) (+146)‎ . . (→‎Criticism: mark references as failing verification)

(cur | prev) 23:23, 13 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (214,444 bytes) (+42)‎ . . (→‎Criticism: mark "Wikipedia experience sparks national debate" reference as dead)

(cur | prev) 18:54, 13 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (214,372 bytes) (-20)‎ . . (avoid redundant "large body of rules and regulations for editing")

(cur | prev) 18:51, 13 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (214,392 bytes) (+73)‎ . . (request to specify vague addition to lead on body of standards for quality assurance)

(cur | prev) 18:48, 13 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (214,319 bytes) (+30)‎ . . (→‎Mobile access: request reference about ""All of the above" approach")

(cur | prev) 18:38, 13 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (214,289 bytes) (-2)‎ . . (Undid revision 615902054 by LawrencePrincipe (talk) restore "similar rate of "serious errors"" instead of merely "comparable")

(cur | prev) 20:34, 6 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (213,154 bytes) (+23)‎ . . (→‎Criticism: challenge definition of "majority “weight” of viewpoints")

(cur | prev) 20:25, 6 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (213,131 bytes) (-612)‎ . . (Undid revision 615838303 by TakuyaMurata (talk) broken reference, missing context)

(cur | prev) 20:20, 6 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (213,743 bytes) (-3)‎ . . (lead: simplify "edited articles". language)

(cur | prev) 20:17, 6 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (213,746 bytes) (-64)‎ . . (lead: don't treat NPOV, already covered in body. everyone claims to be "neutral" anyway)

(cur | prev) 20:12, 6 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (213,810 bytes) (+1)‎

(cur | prev) 20:09, 6 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (213,809 bytes) (-1)‎ . . (fix parenthesis missing parent sentence)

(cur | prev) 20:06, 6 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (213,810 bytes) (+50)‎ . . (lead: clarify comparison with Britannica)

(cur | prev) 18:32, 6 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (213,760 bytes) (0)‎ . . (typo)

(cur | prev) 02:49, 1 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (212,834 bytes) (-800)‎ . . (→‎Criticism: move paragraph on Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia to Criticism of Wikipedia)

(cur | prev) 02:43, 1 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (213,634 bytes) (-22)‎ . . (→‎Criticism: shorten further)

(cur | prev) 02:38, 1 July 2014‎ Chealer (talk | contribs)‎ . . (213,656 bytes) (-198)‎ . . (→‎Criticism: shorten new paragraph - few organizations have a size limit on rules, particularly when they're being told to implement one)

If you would like us to continue to try to reason again with that user, then let me know and we can try again. LawrencePrincipe (talk) 00:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear the edit warring persists. You might consider initiating a report at WP:AN3. —Eustress 03:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported both users on ANI at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Prolonged_edit_warring_and_content_dispute_on_Wikipedia EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:51, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

invalid links in deletion notices

When you posted deletion notices about the navboxes of university presidents, you linked to Oct 17 here, here, here and here, instead of Oct 15 where the deletion discussion is. That makes it more difficult for the authors to find your TfD. --rogerd (talk) 04:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for fixing —Eustress 03:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty and the Beast (Disney franchise)

Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar awarded

		The Editor's Barnstar
		for prompt action on what ought not to be included. ElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 12:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Groan

Remember protecting that page on Direct Hit (band)? I was wondering how an obscure band suddenly became the target of so much vandalism—apparently the band asked on Facebook (Google cache, might be gone by the time you see it) to have their page vandalized. Sounds like somebody has too much time on their hands... Altamel (talk) 06:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thx —Eustress 19:09, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Rubin is trying to delete the MRB constant article

Arthur Rubin is trying to delete the MRB constant article. If you think the constant is notable enough to have an article, can you post something on the talk page? Thank you.Marvin Ray Burns (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC) After a hard fought consensus the MRB constant has been spared; looks like it might be here for a long time! Thank you for writing it! Marvin Ray Burns (talk) 19:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

navboxes by athletic conference with no relation to athletics

You had previously cleaned up some nav boxes that related to NCAA athletic conferences but did't directly relate to athletics. I found several more that you may want to look at:

Template:Big 12 Conference student newspaper navbox

--rogerd (talk) 18:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Atlantic Coast Conference student newspaper navbox, etc.

Eustress, as a follow-up to the previous TfD discussion you started with regard to similar navboxes @Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 October 15, I have nominated seven navboxes regarding student media organized by university athletic conference for deletion. As this is a subject in which you have have previously expressed an nterest, you are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. I anticipate that there will be additional similar TfD nominations in the next 24 to 48 hours. Regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:LDSscoutawards

Template:LDSscoutawards has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gadget850^talk 08:45, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brigham Young statue at BYU.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brigham Young statue at BYU.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. kelapstick^(bainuu) 12:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jyilogo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jyilogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eagle Scout article

Greetings and thank you for your contributions. I am letting you know that the article Eagle Scout is undergoing review to be de-listed as a Featured article. Since you have edited this article in the past, this review may be of interest to you. Best Regards,

Bfpage |leave a message 11:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Penn State Law logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Penn State Law logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Johnsonlogoweb.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Johnsonlogoweb.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CornellLSLogo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CornellLSLogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ILRSchoolLogo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ILRSchoolLogo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Latter-day Saints portal

Category:Latter-day Saints portal, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 12:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CALS logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CALS logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Industrial relations education by country has been nominated for discussion

Category:Industrial relations education by country, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:University of Virginia alumni box

Template:University of Virginia alumni box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:University of Phoenix alumni box

Template:University of Phoenix alumni box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In some benign wp:CANVASSING

Community input is politely requested for Jimbo's tkpg with regard ur expertise in gen. notability per wp:GNG & applicabilities of eg wp:PROF, wp:AUTH, etc. w/in AfD's
... here: User talk:Jimbo Wales#Suggested fix.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 00:45, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shrm logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shrm logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BYU Honors Program for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BYU Honors Program is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BYU Honors Program until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Harold B. Lee Library

We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Harold B. Lee Library, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://sites.lib.byu.edu/internal/naslo/docs/selfAssessment.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Harold B. Lee Library and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Harold B. Lee Library, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Harold B. Lee Library. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Harold B. Lee Library with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Harold B. Lee Library saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rideau.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rideau.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Boys & Girls Clubs of America people for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Boys & Girls Clubs of America people is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Boys & Girls Clubs of America people until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Apta logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Apta logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Ulisses Soares

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulisses Soares--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 21:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete

Please undelete this file. It was uploaded to Commons but was subsequently deleted. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew K. McCauley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew K. McCauley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew K. McCauley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of O. C. Tanner (company)

The article O. C. Tanner (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient notability. The references used in the article are either the company's own website, or too local and look more as listings than real in depth coverage. There are 2 dead links leading to empty pages in references as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Unexpositive (talk) 15:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Octanner logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Octanner logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:33, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Craig C. Christensen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craig C. Christensen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig C. Christensen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:04, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VocalPoint logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VocalPoint logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Smith (American politician) GAR

Scott Smith (American politician), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:26, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard J. Maynes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard J. Maynes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard J. Maynes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Eustress. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Portmeirion18 (talk) 12:37, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael P. Clayton

The article Michael P. Clayton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject unlikely to meet notability guidelines for biographies. Cited references are underwhelming, and all irrelevant and/or dead-links, and this soft-focus piece in the BYU Alum magazine is the only non-circular reference I could locate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 01:15, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:59, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... and again today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaiizen

The article Kaiizen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable charity.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kaiizen logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kaiizen logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox business school rankings

Template:Infobox business school rankings has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox university rankings. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Kellogg School of Management rankings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Kellogg School of Management rankings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kellogg School of Management rankings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shrm logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shrm logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re-creating Jeremy Runnells page

In 2013 you rightly deleted a page for Jeremy Runnells because at that time he wasn't notable. At this point he has become notable, and I plan on re-creating the article and wanted to give you a heads up. Epachamo (talk) 16:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Royaldutchshellplc.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Royaldutchshellplc.com, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royaldutchshellplc.com (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of History of Dell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of Dell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Dell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spurious Correlation 19:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CBB Yearly Record Subhead alt

Template:CBB Yearly Record Subhead alt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox business school rankings/USmba

Template:Infobox business school rankings/USmba has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox business school rankings/USundergrad

Template:Infobox business school rankings/USundergrad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox business school rankings/Worldmba

Template:Infobox business school rankings/Worldmba has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of doTERRA.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of doTERRA.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cornell University alumni box

Template:Cornell University alumni box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cornell University faculty box

Template:Cornell University faculty box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cornell University housing box

Template:Cornell University housing box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of University of Denver chancellors

The article List of University of Denver chancellors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:LISTN; group is not notable to have a stand-alone list, only reference is from the University of Denver

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reppop^talk 21:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiProject BYU

BRIGHAM NEEDS YOU!

Hello, Brother Brigham here.

I couldn't help but notice that you've made some edits to articles about Brigham Young University and thought you might want to become a member of the BYU WikiProject. We're reviving the project and would love your help! To join simply add your name to the participant list and start working on something from the To-do list. If you need any help, don't hesitate to ask another project member.

See you soon!

Jmjosh90 06:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Brigham Young University alumni box

Template:Brigham Young University alumni box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cornell University Johnson School alumni box

Template:Cornell University Johnson School alumni box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SOA rankings

Template:SOA rankings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DysonSchoolLogo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DysonSchoolLogo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Religious calling

An article that you have been involved in editing—Religious calling—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 13:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox US university ranking/Global

Template:Infobox US university ranking/Global has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox US university ranking/LiberalArts

Template:Infobox US university ranking/LiberalArts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox US university ranking/Masters

Template:Infobox US university ranking/Masters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox US university ranking/National

Template:Infobox US university ranking/National has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox US university ranking/Regional

Template:Infobox US university ranking/Regional has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William H. Nelson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William H. Nelson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William H. Nelson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Webster University campus locations

The article List of Webster University campus locations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Fails WP:NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Penn State Board of Trustees

The article Penn State Board of Trustees has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not independently notable, no secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Saddi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joe Saddi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of presidents of Southern University

The article List of presidents of Southern University has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources. Fails WP:NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cornell University Board of Trustees

The article Cornell University Board of Trustees has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not independently notable. Zero secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ORCA Grant

The article ORCA Grant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources. No indication of encyclopedic notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WorldatWork

The article WorldatWork has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero secondary sources. Promotional, no indication of encyclopedic notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Saddi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Saddi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Saddi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ORCA Grant for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ORCA Grant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ORCA Grant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 08:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of deans of the J. Reuben Clark Law School

The article List of deans of the J. Reuben Clark Law School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, fails WP:NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 08:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Webster University campus locations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Webster University campus locations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Webster University campus locations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 10:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of University of Denver chancellors

Hello, Eustress. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of University of Denver chancellors, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of University of Denver chancellors

Hello, Eustress. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of University of Denver chancellors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of presidents of Southern University for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of presidents of Southern University is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of presidents of Southern University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 00:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Human resource management books has been nominated for splitting

Category:Human resource management books has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:52, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amateur Athletic Association (basketball)

The article Amateur Athletic Association (basketball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Organization is not supported by sources. Text seems to be confused with Amateur Athletic Union and its national AAU men's basketball tournament.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Bagumba (talk) 03:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]