User talk:N3al tabbonmoh anwar w mimi 6

Welcome!

Hello, N3al tabbonmoh anwar w mimi 6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I am pleased to present you with your very first service award, in recognition of becoming a Wikipedia contributor.

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that may help you to get up to speed:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Signpost, our newspaper.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page.

Again, welcome! C F A 💬 18:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Wadi al-Laban. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 17:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Battle of Wadi al-Laban. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 20:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:N3al_tabbonmoh_anwar_w_mimi_6 reported by User:M.Bitton (Result: ). Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 20:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Battle of Wadi al-Laban. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N3al tabbonmoh anwar w mimi 6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i just blocked because I provided more information and changed the result and I provided different sources N3al tabbonmoh anwar w mimi 6 (talk) 01:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not why you were blocked. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom, for chronological flow. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". 331dot (talk) 08:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning Tread very carefully. Almost all of your recent edits have been reverted. Editing while logged out is not allowed. If it becomes necessary to block you again, it will likely be indefinite. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this looks like you repeated your reverted edit while logged-out. Do not do that again, as you could be accused of sockpuppetry and that would be an automatic indefinite block. R Prazeres (talk) 02:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]