Jump to content

User talk:My name is not dave/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Blessthefall

This edit had some good elements, but it moved the dates to the start of the sentence which makes for awkward reading. See WP:PROSELINE and please consider changing those parts back. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

The article seems to suffer heavily with this issue but if anything helps, I've gone and rewritten the Hollow Bodies section. I may revisit this article for more copyediting and fixing of this issue. Insulam Simia (talk ·contribs) 20:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Ricco Villanueva Siasoco

maybe someone knows more about him? --Kmen245 (talk) 16:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Probably not, as the man doesn't appear to meet the general notability guideline. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 16:44, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Good work for reverting so many edits of that tough vandal. Jianhui67 Talk 16:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 16:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Port Angeles

I really need your help adjusting the port angeles page it is not neutral point of view, how can you agree that it is neutral please help me make the appropriate edits and quit calling me a vandal. I am very disappointed in the wikipedia editors, and how much trouble I am having trying to remove damaging info. How do you think putting info like that is neutral ,and in the big picture of things how do you think that will make the world a better place. Many other towns do not have this awful information posed while they have the same or worse problems. So . . . help me out here. 65.243.151.219 (talk) 16:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Other stuff exists - other town articles do not have this info because nobody has written about it yet. The content that you attempted to place it with was not neutral either. The facts are backed with a reliable source. And I have never directly called you a vandal.Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 16:47, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism FSitalia

it is he who removes official sources in Line Naples-Giugliano-Aversa without saying why, make it stop.--79.22.0.23 (talk) 14:55, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

There is now an explanation on the revision history page from my revert. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 14:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
sign up is not necessary, but will abide by the rules--79.22.0.23 (talk) 15:07, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
official sources must not be removed even without explaining why--87.11.17.240 (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Blocks must not be evaded, whatever reason you have. Insulam Simia (talk· contribs) 18:03, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
I was stuck just me, the war you did too. Official sources must not be removed, it is a metro is not a railroad--87.11.17.240 (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Look. That is an official name, but we don't use official names on Wikipedia. We use the common name used in most sources. Whether it's made up or not is not an issue. In fact, the source (machine-translated - http://www.eavcampania.it/web/content/linee-e-mappe) refers to the line being a railway. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 18:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
says that a subway is the first and the second source, laws and sources and stop:http://www.eavcampania.it/web/content/la-linea-napoli-giugliano-aversa --87.11.17.240 (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Acad Ronin/sandbox

Hi Insulam Simla, what happened, i.e., how did you come to delete stuff from my Sandbox and then revert your delete? Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 14:22, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Ah sorry about that - slip of the finger on Special:RecentChanges. Insulam Simia (talk· contribs) 14:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Roger that. No harm no foul. Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 14:25, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring on Clare Bowen

I do not feel Soundofair's changes are blatant vandalism. Once notified, the editor made an effort to explain their changes. In my opinion, everything beyond this is pure edit warring by all participants, especially since no effort was made to resolve the dispute on the associated talk page. Please see WP:ROLLBACK, which states the rollback right should not be used by any means in edit wars. — MusikAnimal talk 18:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Please excuse my mistake. I did not, in the past, read that section correctly and thus followed the rule at the top of the section ("[...] where the reason for reverting is absolutely clear") which in my interpretation of the guideline means that once a revert has been explained, I may use rollback at any time if the user does not engage in discussion and/or blindly storms ahead in reverting (narrowly construed).Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 18:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
No worries, I'm not questioning your good intentions, and again this is all my interpretation. I merely noticed the editor'svalid reasoning that the supplied sources were inaccurate, to some degree I agree with, but other removed sources (such as TV Guide) appeared to reliable. A dubious template would have been best – and a talk page discussion – but new users don't know to do this. At any rate, logging out to circumvent impending blocks and continuing to edit war is clearly disruptive. I've added the IP to the edit war discussion. Cheers — MusikAnimal talk 19:00, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Date changing vandal

Since he apparently has a dynamic IP, blocking each one won't do much good. It's probably best to just semi-protect his usual targets instead. Let me know (or WP:RFPP) if you see pages he returns to multiple times and we'll get them protected. Mark Arsten(talk) 16:13, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Probably also best to protect ITV Meridian, ITV Weather, ITV Yorkshire, Carlton Television, Risingson, Inertia Creeps, Mezzanine (album) and well, many more (this one is a real bugger). Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 16:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for the tip. I've taken care of those for now. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia

Would you please confirm that you registered this same name at Uncyclopedia, as one motive for doing so was to object to the incriminating mention of your name there by an anonymous user and possible vandal? Thanks. Spike-from-NH (talk) 15:55, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 16:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Audio articles

Collegial sweets

Thanks for helping out on a few articles under the general audio topic, such as mastering and pink noise. It's always good to see a new face! If in real life I could buy you a treat appropriate for a sunny day I would do so. Cheers! Binksternet (talk) 19:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

No worries! Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 19:26, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

"Usurpation" on frwiki

Hello,

I have renamed your account "Insulam Sinia" to "My name is not dave". Is that what you wanted us to do? You were not very clear. Do not forget to merge your accounts again. Litlok (talk) 16:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, this is correct. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 16:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

AIV reports

I've turned down two of your reports already. I don't understand the whole "Automatically reporting user whom edits were reverted multiple times and who was warned by at least 1 user" thing. First of all, "whom" should read "whose" (and how is this "automatic"?). Second, those reverts and warnings have to be recent. In the case of 64.40.89.98 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), there wasn't a single warning since December 2012, when their last vandal edits took place; their recent vandalism was of the mild kind. Third, you didn't even warn them, never mind the fact that their last warning wasn't even of a very high level and yet you reported them. I urge you to be more careful: you are reporting much too quickly, and without warning. Admins will start simply reverting your reports, since they may well consider them a waste of time. Thank you.Drmies (talk) 16:43, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Point all garbled grammar issues to User:Petrb (in fact, I'll make a merge request to the github repo to change that) - I'm testing the new Huggle 3, of which seems to be tracking the last edit before the vandal edits. Until this is fixed, be assured I won't be using this again for reverting vandalism. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 16:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Well, whatever it is it seems to be looking waaaaay in the past for IP editors in an unsophisticated manner. Drmies (talk) 17:02, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
It's not unsophisticated, it's just in development. See this thread (don't trust the image, there has been a lot more added in 8 days). Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 18:04, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Nandana Sen Page

Hello, I see that the Education section was deleted. I have put it back and have letters from Harvard University to confirm the content. How can I send these to you? Thank you, Amy Price

Amy.marie.price (talk) 12:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

No need, you can cite it with more accessible sources that are cited already. You can upload the (scanned, I shall assume) certificates toWikimedia Commons yourself but a web search shows that you can reference these sort of things easier (it is also inappropriate to cite "A family member emailed certificates to me" - reliable sources must be published). The IP who removed the section appeared to have made a mistake in removing the section; I conclude this because he used a new editing system to edit Wikipedia called VisualEditor that, like anything new, is having teething problems (a couple of days ago this software was changed back to opt-in, so this has less chance of happening again).
Thanks, Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 15:50, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your E Fuller Torrey comment

I'm not sure what you are talking about, since I am just trying to update the beginning of the E Fuller Torrey entry. I'm sorry if I changed anything on the actual page, rather than my sandbox; that was not my intention.Wikiwonderwhy101 (talk) 15:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, my laptop touchpad has developed a mind of its own and decided to unwarrantably click and highlight things. Please ignore the message.Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 15:36, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

No problem.

Perhaps it is fortuitous that you contacted me. I need help adding a paragraph to E Fuller Torrey. After a lot of work, since I am inexperienced at using templates, I added the paragraph, and someone deleted it--and my two carefully-formatted references--without leaving any contact info that I could see.

I am going to add something like: Fuller has appeared on national radio and television, perhaps most notably CBS News in late September 2013, [1] where he perpetuated the idea that untreated mental illness is routinely responsible for mass shootings in the US. Nevertheless, most scientific evidence, including an American study published four weeks before Fuller's controversial appearance, indicates that mental illness does not cause violence. [2]

What if this person deletes it again? This is just a heads-up that I'll return in that case!

Thanks in advance for your help, if I need it. Wikiwonderwhy101 (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Yes - User:FreeKnowledgeCreator deleted your paragraph. He said in his edit summary that your 'tendentious edits' are questionable underWP:BLP - and I agree slightly. Your edits were not exactly neutral and are potentially controversial (I have just noticed that he explained this already on the article's talk page - [1]). Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 14:55, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

gtabroker

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gtabroker

I've rewritten it all... and removed all bias sounding or self promoting material. whats left is neutral toned facts. how can i send it to you for your review prior to creating a new page?

Hello again; you can put the page in your sandbox. Please be aware that user pages must be in first person or they will be deleted per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 19:08, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Bradley Manning/October 2013 move request

Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412T 21:35, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Opting in to VisualEditor

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 100 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Big Ben

OK, can I just point out that The clock on the houses of parliament in London, Commonly called BIG BEN is NOT a STRIKING CLOCK, its a CHIMING CLOCK 125.239.23.173 (talk) 07:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Well instead of ranting about that in the article, you could correct it - but it must be supplied with some reliable sources. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 07:12, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Oh wait - the link chiming clock actually redirects to striking clock. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 07:14, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

TreCoolGuy

I have a feeling he's sockpuppeting again. There is another discussion underway. Rusted AutoParts 00:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Would you like helping me install Huggle 3 Beta

Hello! I'm having issues installing Huggle 3 Beta, since your currently testing it, would you like to help me? When I build it using QT Creator I get errors. I'm more of a visual learner I use videos or descriptive text/steps when doing something. ///EuroCarGT 20:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, well I couldn't really help you with descriptive text or a video as both of my computers that I own don't run Windows (Ubuntu only - I was only running Huggle 2 today on my grandfather's computer), so some steps might be different. What sort of errors are you getting? Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 20:35, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Here:
16:35:24: Running steps for project huggle...
16:35:24: Configuration unchanged, skipping qmake step.
16:35:24: Starting: "mingw32-make.exe" 
qtcreator_ctrlc_stub: Command line failed: mingw32-make.exe
16:35:24: The process "mingw32-make.exe" exited with code -1.
Error while building/deploying project huggle (kit: Desktop)
When executing step 'Make'
16:35:24: Elapsed time: 00:00.

I wished there was a video tutorial or something... ///EuroCarGT 20:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Does Qt Creator know where mingw32-make.exe is? Are the environment variables for MinGW set correctly (saw a video once about this)? Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 20:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
No I didn't set them properly as I don't know the path, I have the option, in Option > Build and Run > Compliers however I'm stuck there.///EuroCarGT 21:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Are any there any auto-detected compilers there? If there is, you should probably locate the path of where MinGW was installed, then edit the path that is specified in Qt Creator in the right direction. If there isn't, then you should go to Add > MinGW and add the compiler path to 'Compiler path'. Ignore the options about 'Codegen path' and 'Linker path' and also - well, I don't know what the ABI would be on Windows.Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 21:44, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Alright thanks! Will come back once I try that. ///EuroCarGT 22:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Now I'm lost, it says to select a Compiler Path where is the file location? (I installed it the MinGW the recommended way) ///EuroCarGT 23:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
I assume the file you would need is mingw-make.exe which would probably be in where it should be (C:\MinGW if I remember from the video?).Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 08:11, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Got everything right however still did not work unfortunately. ///EuroCarGT 00:11, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Same error I assume? Maybe you can use the command line and do mingw-make.exe manually. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 08:33, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Code Hollywood

The article is extremely biased and has too much reverse racism, it actively promotes hate and divisions of peoples. There is much more to be said here than the continuing topic of racism in most every section. Why do you keep reverting the article? it is currently the year 2013, the United States has an African American President there is more racism now than the era I grew up in!

The text removed is sourced, so I would question its non-neutrality - unless, of course, you have the source with you and you can confirm that it is biased thus rendering it inappropriate. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs)17:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

--

in a little more plain English please, I am a new user and you mine as well be speaking a foreign language to me with this tech talk. Please explain so I may understand how to have my edits accepted. I came here to read about Hollywood in the 30's not the continuing theme of racism. Thanks

You know you removed the stuff inside that <ref> tag (the thing after the offending text - it had an author's surname and page name in it - see this diff for an example)? Well that's the reference for the text - it's used to verify the claim that you removed. Now, unless you have the book referenced there (calledHollywood's Censor: Joseph I. Breen and the Production Code Administration) and can confirm that it is heavily biased, the text will stay, as it is verified. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 17:28, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

--

ok I see... so I just need to go get a book from a more neutral author unlike this "Doherty" character... who is obviously;y a biased and controversial writer from CANADA of all places! an Atheist actively promoting hate and divisions writing about a nation he is not even a citizen of! I will use the library of congress to source my edits! I am tired of this on Wiki! everywhere you go! this place is trash anymore... nothing is accurate. I will have my edits accepted THIS IS IT! I am sick and tired of this... and I will make this little issue the beginning of my quest to re-validate wiki the trash alternate history encyclopedia.

is there a page somewhere that I can read about how to go about getting a proper edit accepted on Wiki? something more neutral from authorized texts.

Calm down - you misunderstood. I didn't say that the source was biased, I said that if you can confirm that the source was biased then you can have your way. If you can't, then it's a no go. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs)17:50, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

--

I will prove it, this "source" which is overly used here has two book I think credited to his name, the article I keep editing didn't even lead to the correct source I had to search it on google. In 2005 Doherty was awarded a World Fantasy Award in the "Lifetime Achievement" category. note the Science Fiction and Fantasy...

how did this ever even get in the article on Pre-Code? what is it doing there? he is the only person to my knowledge so fa and from searching google to even write the non existent titling of a category which does not exist called " Exotic Adventure Film"

something has to change... who wrote this article? how do I find out the original writer of this article? where did it come from?

I appreciate your help.

there we go! how was that? I took the source from the same author and the main Wiki article...

Hmm, okay then, that should be fine. Mynameisnotdave(talk/contribs) 18:42, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Important Notice: Your 2013 Arbitration Committee Election vote

Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them atthe election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis

Your edits to Thoth

Information icon Hello, I'm My name is not dave. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Thoth, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs)21:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism by same IP user.

The IP user who has been vandalising articles is back but this time he putting in edit summaries by typing in undid edit revision number with the wrong user who edited the articles. They included you, Crazyseiko and Yeepsi. Here's the user IP who continues to do this -86.159.20.231 I've reverted all his edits until someone takes action.86.172.31.195 (talk) 23:24, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

It's back again, 86.143.56.24. I have warned the IP user but it ignored it.86.133.108.36 (talk) 04:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
This IP user won't give up and is back vandalising articles - 109.155.176.75. Is there some kind of Block Evasion to stop this IP user? 86.133.108.36 (talk) 03:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Today's special was 109.154.85.26, now blocked and fully reverted. There seems to be a pattern in what looks like a single person's activity. Nick Levine (talk) 22:08, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm GeorgeLouis. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Richard Alatorre without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! When you make a change, please explain in the Edit Summary what you are doing. Also kindly try to avoid WP:Edit War. Thank you. GeorgeLouis (talk) 23:53, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Please don't template the regulars. And also, what have I blanked? Insulam Simia (talk/contribs) 05:46, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
I will have to admit that I am confused by the recent blankings in Richard Alatorre, and I suggest that discussion about them be confined to the Talk Page over there. If I have made a mistake (quite probable), I apologize. GeorgeLouis (talk) 13:03, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Insulam Simia, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and -- t numbermaniac c 05:43, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

BBC Page

Firstly my edit was not vandalism, but simply adding to the summary within the main page, the claim is also made on the sub-page. My I also remind you of the wikipedia policy on vandalism, which is very clear: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#What_is_not_vandalism please do not tag without justification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.155.125 (talk) 01:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, My name is not dave. You have new messages at DarthBotto's talk page.
Message added 09:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DarthBotto talk•cont 09:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Unsourced content

What article of mine did you take down? I don't know which one you're referring to.

I reverted your edit to The Solids, as it was unsourced. Insulam Simia (talk) 08:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dub (music) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Garage (music)
More Tales from the Observatory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dub
The Orbserver in the Star House (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dub

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Women scientists

Hi Insulam. I saw your reverts in a certain article about a female scientist. I thought you might want to have a look at Richard Nevell (WMUK)'s talk page history. There is a certain connection between all those posts today and the edit patterns of the users. Many of the accounts are created today. All edit in articles about female scientists. Sophia Jex-Blake and Mill Hill East are two string I have seen several times on their user pages. The edits in articles are a bit above my level, i.e. to the common patroller could look legit. Please forgive me if my give unfounded cause to concern here. Best, Sam 🎤 16:49, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

I see what you mean. Thanks for raising this. Insulam Simia (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

I will take it on board on what you're saying, but I'm being perfectly honest with you that it was an accident and a misunderstanding. I don't appreciate you calling it vandalism when it was an accident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The25City (talk • contribs) 17:38, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm so sorry about all of this. In that instance, I should've used the good faith button on STiki and warned you with {{uw-delete}}. Insulam Simia (talk) 17:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

==

I'm guessing this is some form of communication with you, ms. simian. Please stop removing my edits to escape from la. the film is both ridiculous and comedy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.56.98.124 (talk) 20:46, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations!

The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar

Congratulations, Insulam Simia! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and  Tentinator  07:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

IMESC CSD

Hello, I appreciate your concern over my new page. You nominated it for speedy deletion on the basis that it did not prove its worthiness of inclusion in an encyclopedia and its brevity. However, this nomination occurred much prior to the completion of the article which is why I believe you received a wrong first impression. I invite you to review the page once more. CSD is an ugly tag to have and so I hope you can empathize over my urgency to correct this error. Thank you. F.ali214 (talk) 20:43, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

I have removed the tag - it no longer qualifies for A7 criteria. Insulam Simia (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Thames Diamond Jubilee Pageant

Your reverting of an addition by a new editor, who had taken the trouble to get themselves a name in order to edit, was a bit heavy handed. The [citation needed] tag is still usable, I suppose? The ship the name of which was added is on the list of vessels that took part, and is therefore referenced. It's just a bit hard for a new editor to know that. Much easier for an experienced editor to have a quick look at the way in which all all the other named vessels are referenced and apply the same. You're an experienced editor.

I meant to make the point that there was absolutely nothing dodgy or suspicious about what the editor did. Nothing indicated vandalism, spam or anything other than additional information, that was plainly important to somebody.

Amandajm (talk) 13:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I'm deciding to mostly move away from STiki and revert back to poking things out from recent changes, so I'm not that reckless when reverting. Whenever I see (what appears to be) unsourced content on STiki I almost feel obliged to revert it and this is obviously causing problems. Insulam Simia (talk) 15:34, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Insulam Simia, However you come across the addition of unsourced material (STiki, recent changes etc.) please don't revert purely for being unsourced. Two things people sometimes forget about are Google and the {{Citation needed}} tag. Going into more detail, I would recommend something like this:
  • Blatently untrue and also deliberately offensive - revert as vandalism
  • Blatently untrue but not deliberately offensive - good-faith revert
  • Not sure whether it is true - Google it
    • Google shows its untrue - good-faith revert
    • Google shows it is true - leave it in. Consider adding a citation if Google has found a reliable source
    • Google fails to clarify the situation. Consider if it is damaging to a living person:
      • Damaging to a living person - remove it, possibly mentioning WP:BLP in the edit summary
      • Not damaging to a living person - leave it in but add a {{Citation needed}} tag
  • Blatently true - Leave it in.
  • You're pretty sure it is true, based on your own knowledge - either forget about it or see if you can find a source somewhere to support it.
Obviously, when I say things like "Google shows it is true", this may require a bit of interpretation on your part, depending on what search results Google throws up.
Yaris678 (talk) 22:22, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
I should clarify that I stopped using STiki so I would stop seeing unsourced content and stop causing problems. Since unsourced content usually doesn't usually trigger filters, most of the time I don't revert it in recent changes. The only time I do the above is when something pops up in my watchlist that is of interest to me (not just something that Twinkle unwarrantably added). Insulam Simia (talk) 06:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Mistake?

Wait it looks like you removed my warning template, thats fine with me, but wouldn't that be refactoring? or did you mean to remove your own warning template? Prabash.Akmeemana 16:19, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Kind of. The rollback system didn't inform me about the edit conflict that seemed to of happened, so I assumed my edit went through and yours didn't, so when I saw the warning given by you I thought "too late, I got there first" and removed your notice. I only knew from the diff you just gave me now that you reverted it (with Huggle). Sorry about the confusion. Insulam Simia (talk) 16:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Thats fine! when I first got rollback, I got confused with the tool. Though it is a useful admin tool that only a few users have, 2000 users out of 19 million total users have it (at least I think) there could be be a bit more. Remember, vandal fighting isn't a competition of sort, its for the sake and integrity of Wikipedia itself. Prabash.Akmeemana 20:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the info, but I am aware of that. Insulam Simia (talk) 20:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Deleting things

Please, do not delete things from the Tallinn town hall page. A lot of work has been put into it and I am currently checking the translation made by one of my friends. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mailaxxx (talk • contribs) 08:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page. Insulam Simia (talk) 08:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Hollow Bodies (album)

Hello Insulam Simia. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hollow Bodies (album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I'm relucant to do this while the AfD is ongoing. Whilist it looks like it'll survive, moving the parge makes the afd harder to manage. Let me know when the AfD is complete and i'll hapiily move it. Thank you. GedUK  11:42, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Justice at Stake Campaign

Insulam Simia, Thank you for your feedback on my page. I am new to Wikipedia and confess I was unaware of the importance of creating summaries of the changes I had made. In fact, by deleting the content, I was attempting to make the organization's page more neutral in accordance with Wikipedia's neutrality guidelines. In addition, there was a great deal of information on the page that did not relate to the organization directly. The edits to the page were not vandalism nor should they be interpreted as such. If there is any way that you could restore the edits to the page, I would greatly appreciate it. If there is anything else that I should do, please let me know. Laurabeth hooper (talk) 13:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Edits restored. Thanks! Insulam Simia (talk) 18:09, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Creationism

Dear Insulam,

They didn't give me a box like they normally do to explain why. The information that was on the page was highly biased towards evolution and not objective. It claimed that Creationism was pseudoscience and not based on science. In reality, evolution and creationism are both based on observations coming from a different viewpoint. Neither creationists nor evolutionists were there to see what really happened.

The basis of this article should be definitive, not biased, and by using terms such as pseudoscience...it is no longer keeping with that objective. I can find sources anywhere to say anything on the internet, but many are severally biased. Just because they provide a biased source doesn't mean they are accurate. The point of Wikipedia is to keep the material objective. This is why I deleted the "crap" that comes from a biased viewpoint.

-Nathan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.39.88 (talk) 18:41, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for explaining why you deleted the content. Insulam Simia (talk) 18:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Well now it seems you want to censor the place. As others have said please discuss it on the articles talk page. Insulam Simia (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: Leonardo3-30

You are correct. I've changed the block to indefinite. Thank you for reporting. Alex ShihTalk 07:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

AoA

Hey Insulam Simia

Hopping for your good health. About the change that I did that was not by mistake There was a mistke in the Preferences and I removed it Yes that was a mistke that I didnt explained but now You have cleared the mistake Thanks for doing that. Next time I will be careful and leave some comments or edit summary so it would be helpful for others.

Thanks agiain With good wishes Alishah

Yes, thank you for spotting that. Insulam Simia (talk) 18:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Treadmill equipment

Thanks for message. I've told him that I'll remove talk page editing if he posts anything other than an unblock request, and I'm watching the page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:18, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. Insulam Simia (talk) 12:19, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inertia Creeps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Wave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Nandana Sen Page

I have been employed by Ms Sen to update the many erroneous statements and missing facts on her page. Please can you guide me, as you undid about 3 hours of my work!

In her Education section: do you really need transcripts from Harvard? I can provide these, which also document her various awards whilst at Harvard. This seems to me very extreme, but I will comply if necessary.

I can put the various links to her published articles and interviews in the References section? Is this OK?

You have also removed various references to films and TV series that Ms Sen has acted in. I can provide links to IMDb to prove her participation? There are also many internal Wikipedia links that will substantiate my additions.

Thank you for your help,

Amy Price

Amy.marie.price (talk) 09:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

If you have been employed by Ms. Sen, then I recommend you stop editing immediately. Wikipedia strongly discourages paid editing. I can apply the edits myself though (yes, it would be helpful if you could provide links or books sources etc. to the Harvard transcripts as we are very strict on verifability for living people), but I would have to remove a lot of what you added and proposed, including:
  • The links. Unless they are somehow useful for referencing, they will be removed.
  • Some parts of the text you have reworded show the classic problem with conflict of interests. They sound non-neutral and/or promotional (in this instance, a lot of peacock terms and a very promotional and unsourced controversy section - I have never seen a controversy section so supportive and postive).
  • The reference in the personal section is by my standard and probably the community's standard a reliable source. Therefore - it will be kept.
  • The info about films will be removed, unless you can find refs from the relevant film pages that can prove Nandana starred in that film. IMDB is not a reliable source, nor is Wikipedia itself.
All I need now is the links or the book ISBN of the Harvard transcripts and I can start reworking.
Thanks, Insulam Simia (talk) 12:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


Well, I am not employed specifically to do this Wikipedia work - I work for the Sen family as a personal assistant. Who else would they trust to update these sensitive pages? I have now informed Nandana Sen that my hours devoted to this project will be pro bono.

I apologize, but I am confused about your request for an ISBN for Nandana's University transcripts? American universities do not publish their students grades as books! A transcript is a list of the courses and grades received, and the final graduating GPA of the student. I can provide a scanned copy of Nandana's transcripts and her graduation diploma? I can also request that Harvard sends a copy directly to you. However, I would need an email or a postal address for you. Do you ask this of every person listed in Wikipedia when their educational history is mentioned??

I will send the links to the relevant film pages.

I must admit that I find this present process inherently flawed. You state that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Yet, you demand that it contains reliable sources. However, what you take for a reliable source in itself contains no reliable sources. This article that you insist upon keeping - http://in.omg.yahoo.com/news/nandana-mantena-part-ways-theyll-team-film-122916557.html - where are the citations or reliable sources here? If all of the Wikipedia film pages that show Nandana as an actor are NOT reliable sources, why does Wikipedia allow them to exist?


Yours sincerely,

Amy.marie.price (talk) 13:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes, sorry about that. Nevermind though, I found something which says she attended Harvard. And yes, we do. We have a very strict policy for biographies of living persons.
And in answer to your query, well, unlike Wikipedia, it's because that article can't be edited by everyone so not many bad things slip through. We do have a problem of bad quality control on Wikipedia, but bear in mind that we are all volunteers working on a project and we do not work until sweat is pouring from our armpits; we don't have an official QA team and we aren't magicians either. A lot of bad things slip through (especially on India-related pages in fact - unsourced content everywhere, badly formatted content). I only chased your edit up because it triggered the edit filter, which tagged it as "Possible BLP issue or vandalism" (your edit is clearly not vandalism though). I saw this on my recent changes patrol and decided to investigate your edit.
My area of expertise is mostly music articles (specifically heavy metal music and electronic music), where there is a general high level of quality since some of the related articles are being continuously watched by me and others. (see the level of edits by me on this page and this page - I ensure there is no lowering of quality). Quite a lot of articles are not monitored so intensely.
Thanks, Insulam Simia (talk) 14:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


Thank you very much for your help. I have now added many citations in the Education and Professional Life section. The Filmography section was already there before I began editing - so do I really need to provide independent proof of Nandana's participation all of those films? I can, of course, but it would be odd as it was not required before.

I also see that you removed the Controversies section. That is fine - but again, most of it was there before I began editing.

I have tried to tone down any subjectivity in the article. I would like to add a few sentences about the reception of Nandana's film and theater work by Indian and international reviewers. Is this ok?

Will these edits enable you to removed the two large exclamation points above the article?

Again, thank you for your patience.

Amy.marie.price (talk) 20:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, never mind about citing all the films. I or someone else can do that later. Leave the controversy section alone - unsourced parts like that should be removed on sight, but that never happened. And don't add a critical reception section on the article - if you want to add anything like that, add it on the respective film pages under the reception section (if there isn't there, either don't add anything at all or add info about the general critical reception of the film if you want to) but ensure that anything added about Nandana is small so we don't bump into problems related to undue weight.
And yes, the templates at the top will be removed. I would also like to remind you that because you have a clear conflict of interest, all your edits will be placed under close scrutiny.
Insulam Simia (talk) 21:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks.Deb (talk) 16:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

No worries. Insulam Simia (talk) 16:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Enslow Publishers

Hi Insulam. I wanted to help out in the Enslow Publishers with a couple of better refs, and turned to Google Books. Would you have any idea of how to filter out books published by Enslow Publishers when you do such a search? Best, Sam 🎤 18:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Here's a link to some published. In future, you can find a certain publisher by heading to advanced search, where there should be a publisher section. Just add the name of the publisher and relevant search results show up. Insulam Simia (talk) 18:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
You misunderstand the question, it's a matter of avoiding books they have published. Best, Sam 🎤 18:57, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Sorry. If you want to do that - then, well, I don't have a clue. Insulam Simia (talk) 18:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

WP:RFD "vandal"

Just a note to mention that I think you should (if you can) keep an eye on the following pages;

These are the pages that this "vandal" who won't use the RFD correctly is targeting and there may be others as well within the same scope. His IP does change but the provider is the same. 58.164.105.136 (talk) 01:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll make sure to watch all of them. Insulam Simia (talk) 06:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

98.225.58.33

Thanks for cleaning up this idiot's vandalism. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 07:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

No worries. Insulam Simia (talk) 07:53, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

I am very thankful to you for my correction . I want to do more edits on the wikipedia so can you suggest me some tips which can lead to my progress and also suggest me to which things which i should not be involved during the edits.?

Metal Roof

Not sure why you've deleted the advantages of metal roofs. There were proper citations to back up the info. The disadvantages are listed, why no allow for advantages as well?

MetalJean (talk) 15:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

We don't generally treat YouTube as a reliable source (or an appropriate external link), unless it is being used to cite things like music video descriptions. Also only one of your sentences added were sourced, unless the link was meant to cite the whole thing, which means you should of added it at the end, so we aren't confused. Thanks, Insulam Simia (talk) 16:02, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Will Parry

Hi, I'm 82.31.117.127 or just 82 for short. Apologies for not summarising the changes I made to the Will Parry article, I only removed the paragraph you mentioned as I was intending to rewrite the entire biographical section and add references. As you can probably see its not up to scratch at the moment so would you kindly re-do my edits so I can finish working on it. Thanks, 82. 82.31.117.127 (talk) 18:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your explanation. Insulam Simia (talk) 18:38, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

FYI

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HKFYG Lee Shau Kee College. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I'm going to close the debate. Insulam Simia (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey

Hey I tried writing the article about Russian and Ukrainian mercenaries in Syria, and have a link but since I rarely edit things on Wikipedia I'm not too sure how to put it in. Could you plus put it in for me? http://syriareport.net/report-russian-ukrainian-volunteers-pledged-for-syrian-army/

OK, will do. You can refer to WP:REFBEGIN on how to add references. Insulam Simia (talk) 17:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, My name is not dave. You have new messages at Redalert2fan's talk page.
Message added 17:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Redalert2fan (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

hey

so do you think you can add that article to the foreign Syrian fighters? I can retype the article if you want. I already provided the link! Sorry if I'm being a nuisance, but this short period when I'm not at school is the only time I can find when I can long in to wikipedia.

By saying article, do you mean the reference I placed? If so, yes, but please retype it, and retype it a lot.
Also can you please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), as this is required per our behavioural guidelines. Thanks, Insulam Simia (talk) 07:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

It must, however, adhere to our rules on NPOV, etc. Fiddle Faddle 08:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

God save the Queen, Patrick Stewart..and Marina Sirtis*..although not in that order.:) Appreciate your input-Hook-em.......and rock-on!

  • -who i met in Orlando in 1994-She might even confirm that!:)

Wwkweinberg (talk) 20:27, 21 August 2013 (UTC)K

No problem. Insulam Simia (talk) 20:43, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Scott Wild

Please look again at this article. There is probably just sufficient notability asserted to make the BLPPROD sufficient. IN general these work well for an article of this length because an editor who has taken that much trouble is likely to find citations. If they cannot then it goes anyway. Fiddle Faddle 16:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, once I saw the BLPPROD, I thought of removing my CSD, but I didn't, as I thought I might just wait for you or someone else to contest it.Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 16:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for self reverting. I didn't want to contest or decline it. You;re fairly new to this so I felt that guiding your hand might be the most useful :) The article is borderline, so it was a close call either way. Let's see how the BLPPROD prompts it to develop. Fiddle Faddle 16:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
I'd admit that since my account creation in May, this is one of my weakest CSD requests. Nevertheless, it's not notable anyway. Google comes up with nothing; therefore the BLPPROD could appear, well, near to useless. The article also may be an autobio (check the end of the creator's username and compare it with the birth date of the person). Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 16:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
BLPPROD will defeat the article at the end of its period in that case. They just take time. We only discourage autobiographies, you know, not prohibit them. For CSD candidates there must be zero assertion of notability. This one crosses to the non CSD side of the line. Fiddle Faddle 16:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

edit conflict

In this edit, you appear to have deleted two other people's comments. (I've since repaired one, and the poster of the other re-did the other.) If that was a result of an edit conflict or something, this was not the right way to resolve it. —Steve Summit (talk) 16:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. Admittedly, I was too lazy to resolve it properly. Also, if I we're to fix, I'd probably be caught up in another EC, when I'm frustrated about it already. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 17:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm not impressed by the way you "stole" my !vote. This is not acceptable behaviour, ec or not. Kindly refrain from such editing in future. Snappy (talk) 17:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

WP:BRD

Perhaps you should re-read WP:BRD. What the process means is that YOU make a bold edit, I revert the edit, and then YOU initiate discussion. It does not mean that YOU revert my revert and then call "BRD!" as some kind of immunity against the edit-war that you just started. Please start a discussion on Talk:Ubuntu (operating system) and justify your edit - the onus is on you here. Elizium23 (talk) 17:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

I self-reverted myself anyway. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 17:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Picture

Cant you use this one instead for Christina Aguileras page:

Picture 1-2012

or this one:

Picture 2-2012

Its much better and more flattering, and even more recent than that other one. And its Creative Commons-licensed content and can be used commercially!

--91.154.97.139 (talk) 18:30, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

 Not done IMO the current photo looks formal, and thus fits the formal tone of an encyclopedia. Again, please discuss the matter with other editors on the article talk page. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 18:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Insulam Simia, that IP is just Mathiassandell evading his block again. If you notice edits to articles about Aguilera by IPs in the 91.154 range, they are best reverted and ignored. I would appreciate it if you let me know about them so I can block the IPs involved.—Kww(talk) 19:13, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the note. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 19:14, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Every Day I Get Closer to the Light From Which I Came, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ascension (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Jobbik

Szia! Én miért kaptam figyelemeztetést pedig a csak azt javítottam ki hogy a jobbik nem szélsőjobboldali párt hanem radikális Ezt weboldalak is megerősítik http://alfahir.hu/nem_nevezhetik_szelsojobboldalinak_a_jobbikot_a_hirmusorok http://jobbik.hu/hireink/nem-nevezhetik-szelsojobboldalinak-jobbikot-hirmusorok http://blog.xfree.hu/myblog.tvn?SID=&pid=98280&n=zgfumag&blog_cim=Nem%20nevezhetik%20sz%E9ls%F5jobboldalinak%20a%20Jobbikot%20a%20h%EDrm%FBsorok Hello! Why I got the warning is only corrected by the NOT far-right Jobbik party is right radical This websites is confirmed (hungarian websites) http://alfahir.hu/nem_nevezhetik_szelsojobboldalinak_a_jobbikot_a_hirmusorok http://jobbik.hu/hireink/nem-nevezhetik-szelsojobboldalinak-jobbikot-hirmusorok http://blog.xfree.hu/myblog.tvn?SID=&pid=98280&n=zgfumag&blog_cim=Nem%20nevezhetik%20sz%E9ls%F5jobboldalinak%20a%20Jobbikot%20a%20h%EDrm%FBsorok

That may be, but the info is sourced. Google Translate translates the top source badly so I find it hard to read; I assume that is an opinion piece. The next is a primary source (which aren't good for such situations) and the other is a blog, which we don't allow as a source.Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 20:16, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I am again. I hope that this official. This is hungarian Wikipedia (I did not edited) you can check. "A Médiahatóság 2013-as döntése[szerkesztés] A Jobbik úgy véli, hogy egyes csatornák megsértették a Médiatörvényt, amely szerint "médiaszolgáltató hírszolgáltatást és politikai tájékoztatást nyújtó műsorszámaiban műsorvezetőként, hírolvasóként, tudósítóként rendszeresen közreműködő munkatársai bármely médiaszolgáltató által közzétett műsorszámban szereplő politikai hírhez véleményt, értékelő magyarázatot - kivéve a hírmagyarázatot - nem fűzhetnek". A Médiahatóság eltiltotta a további jogsértésektől ezeket az adókat, ám ők fellebbeztek a Médiatanácsnál. A Médiatanács ezeket a fellebbezéseket elutasította, így a továbbiakban már pénzbüntetést is kaphatnak ezen médiaszolgáltatók, ha továbbra is szélsőjobboldaliznak. 2013. május 2. után nem nevezhetik szélsőjobboldalinak a Jobbikot a hírműsorok. [4]"

http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szélsőjobboldal#A_M.C3.A9diahat.C3.B3s.C3.A1g_2013-as_d.C3.B6nt.C3.A9se

And not mentioned in hungarian Wikipedia " fascist,neo-fascist,Neo-Nazi, racist, anti-Semitic, anti-Roma and homophobic." http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobbik I did not edited you can check. http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radikális_jobboldali This table is Engllish transformation

{{nincs forrás}}

The rightist categorization
Don't have
superiority
consciousness 		Have
superiority
consciousness
Moderate
politicist
means		 Rightisti
party Central		 Ultra-
nacionalists
Radical
political
means		 National
radicals		 Neo-nazi

I apologize if it made ​​it difficult to editing restore. I want to tell the justice on Wikipedia.Please take that back to my alerts

The citation on hu.wiki is a primary source, and cannot be trusted. I will replace the primary source on hu.wiki with the sources cited on this wiki. The table also cited here is original research. Also the fact that Jobbik doesn't like the term 'far-right' is a non-issue; the only thing we need to worry about is content being verified by reliable sources. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 20:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

This may well argue. If I would not alleged barbaric then I wrote you and I create any number of users to edit the Jobbik was but I want to to demonstrate my truth But the media wants to cut down the reputation of Jobbik. This should be recognized.

(I am aware of the language barrier but it is really hard to reply to this) Well, I can place in the article that the Jobbik do not want to be called 'far-right'. Insulam Simia (talk·contribs) 20:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Well, you could instead look like this: And please correct the my grammatical errors.

Jobbik, The Movement for a Better Hungary' (Hungarian: Jobbik Magyarországért Mozgalom), commonly known as Jobbik (pronounced [ˈjobːik]), is a Hungarian radical nationalist[3][4] political party. The party describes itself as "a principled, conservative and radically patriotic Christian party", whose "fundamental purpose" was the protection of "Hungarian values and interests."[5] Jobbik has been described by, different press outlets and its political opponents as fascist,[6] neo-fascist,[7] Neo-Nazi,[8] racist,[9] anti-Semitic,[10] anti-Roma[11] and homophobic.[12] Measured according to its representation in the European Parliamentand theNational Assembly, it is Hungary's third largest party.A many people are generally mistaken for reasonsJobbik Neo-Nazi expressions make him the only national Radicalism . This is not to be confused with each other.


My name is not dave/Archive 2
LeaderGábor Vona
Founded24 October 2003
Headquarters1113 Budapest, Villányi út 20/A
IdeologyHungarian nationalism[13]
Political radicalism[14][3][4]
Euroscepticism
Political positionRadical Right [15][16][17]
European affiliationAlliance of European National Movements
European Parliament groupNon-Inscrits
International affiliationNone
ColoursRed and Silver
National Assembly
43 / 386
European Parliament
3 / 22
Website
www.jobbik.hu (Hungarian)
www.jobbik.com (English)
 Not done It isn't sourced and is an opinion. Insulam Simia (talk·contribs) 07:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello! I said that it is the self-description of the party so it is an important information. Far-right have an especially bad connotation in Hungary and it nearly equals to fascism. That's why the huwiki uses the more neutral national radicalist as description. It may be true that they are the most far-right party in Hungarian National Assembly (I guess most of the sources use the term that way) but it is still far from fascism or hungarism (according to scholars like Rudolf Paksa: The History of Hungarian Far-right which calls Jobbik populist but not fascist). That's why the Hungarian National Media and Infocommunications Authority prohibited the usage of the word 'far-right' for Hungarian news agencies in their reports about the party. It can be inserted in huwiki that the party is also described as far-right but the self-description shouldn't be removed to stay npov. At least that's how I see things. Laci.d (talk) 20:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thank you for the explanation. I'm not planning to add anything, as I don't do Hungarian. Thanks, Insulam Simia(talk · contribs) 20:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Blessthefall may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gv7EQbaWf4I |title=blessthefall - "Higinia" Official Music Video [HQ |publisher=YouTube |date=2010-02-23 |accessdate=2013-08-28}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Harry

thanks for that, I've copied your post to Yonshui Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

VisualEditor blanking see also

Hi IS, for certain the browser list is a tentative link, but Node.js is even in the infobox. If you aren't certain, then why remove the whole see also section? Widefox; talk 07:54, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Um, let's say I was a bit of an idiot. I didn't look at the article first when removing the see also section and instead used my common sense and lack of knowledge about VE to think "what's Node.js got to do with VE?"
Though still, Node.js isn't a WYSIWYG editor and is therefore unrelated to the subject. Thanks, Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 09:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
That's ok. Are you confusing with visual editor? The VisualEditor software is programmed with Node.js (the server side part), but the link hasn't gone into the article yet. So yes it is part of the article, not even a related article. Widefox; talk 09:27, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
No, I'm not getting confused. I'm just saying that it's probably best that other WYSIWYG editors go into the "see also" section, rather than a component of VE being there. Thanks, Insulam Simia (talk·contribs) 15:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Sure, feel free to put others in. The see also being a staging for links going into the article (which is preferential) is quite normal, don't you agree? I was waiting for a ref, but I've put it in the body now. Widefox; talk 19:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
I disagree. The 'see also' section should not be a host for random links and instead should be used for placing links related to the article (in terms of the subject, not the components/features of it). Thanks, Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 08:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wasting My Young Years, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update

Hey Insulam Simia. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Pah, it should be disabled on all pages. Insulam Simia (talk·contribs) 21:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to BeAnywhere may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • lugar, June 5, 2013]</ref><ref>[[Remote support]] ‘’Wikipedia’’, Remote Suport, June 5, 2013]]</ref> It has two main products: BASE (BeAnywhere Support Express)<ref>[http://www.computerworld.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

MCA

The talk item on the MCA page justifies the inclusion of the list of companies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Merchant_cash_advance

This is from 2011 and hasn't been a problem until you decided to remove it.

MCA is not a typical product offered outside the US, and this is a valid section for merchants looking for alternative financing options. Even the author of the talk item acknowledged that the sector is rife with ISO's, resellers looking to syndicate, and predatory lenders that do not offer MCAs.

I understand Wikipedia is not a company directory or an advertising site. If you would rather clarify that the list represents MCA companies that fund their own deals then that would be acceptable, as it would not be advertising but would clarify companies that are actually in the business of originating, funding, and maintaining cash advances.

Shotllama (talk) 15:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Jose Anigo

you changed my add about Josè Anigo maybe you should now change it back how you found it and stop deleting people posts


http://www.huffingtonpost.fr/2013/09/05/fils-jose-anigo-marseille-om-milieu_n_3874177.html

Thank you for the source. It's just we are very strict on living and recently dead people. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 17:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

You should propably lower your shown french level since José Anigo is not dead on September 5th, his SON - Adrien - is.

Okay my bad, I didn't even read the source (I now saw the source and it says something about a 29 year old being shot dead). But why did you place that Jose died ? Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 18:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Software companies based in Switzerland

Category:Software companies based in Switzerland, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:00, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Friendly reminder

Just a friendly reminder to be more careful with your reversions... Especially on talk pages. Although you did revert my notice back, surely it shouldn't have been done in the first place, certainly not on another users talk page. As a user with the rollbacker right I'd expect more care when editing. --- Xenomm (Leave a message!) 11:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about that - finger slipped on the mouse. I did, in the end, revert what I was originally going to revert though. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 11:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Replied: Not a problem, thanks for clearing that up! --- Xenomm (Leave a message!) 11:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Melos grainca

"Not in English" is not a valid speedy deletion criterion; please don't do that. However, I did speedily delete it as A1, because the Google translation of what was there is "The only known fact is that love for Melosi tibeten known as beti." LadyofShalott 19:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I am aware of that; I just use that rationale when there is a non-english article that doesn't appear to helpful/useful. I should indeed nom these with a proper rationale, but oh well. Insulam Simia (talk·contribs) 19:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
No, not "oh well". Please use valid rationales if you're going to do that. LadyofShalott 20:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited If You Wait, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Garry Thompson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Garry Thompson, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Usage share of operating systems

If you want to discuss this in the discussion page, fine. Just deleting the information with a laconic "Nope" isn't useful. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 03:20, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Garry Thompson

Hello My name is not dave. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Garry Thompson".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Garry Thompson}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Bret7600

Hello My name is not dave. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Bret7600, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:34, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

I am AGAIN reverting your reversions at N Afshan-Jam

I am a serious academic editor, and your reversions—RATHER THAN DISCUSSION IN TALK, WITH PERHAPS LIMITED EDITS—do not have substantial enough Talk and explanation, as required by WP, to allow you to remove blocks of carefully constructed text. IF YOU WANT TO REMOVE SPECIFIC TEXT WITHOUT CITATION, MAKE A NOTE IN TEXT AND WAIT FOR DISCUSSION. If you are really set on removing material without citations—first, my new material should not be removed, because it has citations, and second, to be consistent, you will have to remove very large swathes of the rest of the article. Take it slow; stop exerting authority that is not yours. Be respectful, to others, and the process. If you do not have time to discuss them, you should not be making big edits. Le Prof 71.239.82.39 (talk) 16:21, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Joni Ernst

Content removal from Joni Ernst's page

I was going to put the info back 30 second later but you were too fast. I was trying to protect my improvements from being revered by the "undo" option. Both times I tried to put the info back but you had already done so - we're on the same team :) 24.19.210.69 (talk) 19:27, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh sure sorry - make sure next time that you use to the edit summary box to explain this, then I wouldn't of needed to revert your edits. Thanks. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 19:30, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Ronnie O'Sullivan

Have you watch the world snooker championship. Every time when in his intro Rob Walker always called "Blink and you will miss him, the rocket, Ronnie O'Sullivan." at the end so I think this is part of the nickname. (131.111.185.11 (talk) 20:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC))

Nah, Snooker ain't my thing, but I'll trust you to know that it's right. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 14:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for giving me the push…

Encouraging departure of a content expert
Thanks for giving me the push I needed, to realize how very high the opportunity cost of trying to make a dent in the article issues and self-aggrandizing editor and administrative attitudes that pervade this Huggle- and otherwise folly-driven site. Don't ever let anyone persuade you, yours is not the highest good, you not the deepest and wisest authority, here or in general. mort de rire. Au revoir. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
I might be a hypocrite for saying this, but I'm certainly not guilty of being a hypocrite for saying it (I feel that there is a difference); what a terrible shame it is for you to leave. Your time here is valued, believe it or not, and experience is gained through bad times. I don't feel that NeilN has given you a good job of saying goodbye - he still seems very blunt in his responses to you. Nevertheless, may I recommend Citizendium? It loves people like you - i.e. people who are formally educated in a subject. À bientot, Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 14:59, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the well wishes. I will do fine, and might return to a role here if some higher level discussions bear fruit. No banter or philosophising in trenches among footsoldiers in the Great War would have allowed the Marne or Somme to have been avoided. The real issues here are a the fact that computational tools allow rapid detection of possible problems, but no such sophistication is applied to ensure that actions taken as a result are accurate to the situation, or truly fair to the individuals involved. The technology of Wikipedia is well out front of the human wisdom required to properly apply it. This fundamental shortcoming and the lack of a truly fair process of adjudication in case of disagreements leads to a capriciousness of process outcomes here (my two blocks, for exactly opposite reasons, being a case in point). No, it will only be through discussions at higher levels, and by bringing pressure from a variety of sources, that there will be any change here. Meanwhile, I will look elsewhere, but likely not Citizendium as it now functions (reasons to be explained later). For you, may I make a personal suggestion? Perhaps, as a discipline, that you never revert an edit without checking the Talk pages? (Identifying edits with issues other than vandalism, and giving them the analysis and discussion they are due?) Had you done this, we would have had a discussion, and not a war. NeilN appears in love with the power associated with rapid action, the control it brings over others, and the affirmation associated with winning (even when wrong, or at least ungracious). You do not display these character weaknesses to his degree. You and I might have worked together on issues, had you been quicker to discuss, slower to revert. (And I will never understand the "He's back" comment and reopening of the Admin discussion, which I squarely place with you; as the second Admin noted, it was this that led to a block long after the reversions had ceased.) But, water under the bridge. As the second Admin also noted, flaws in original decision-making logic and edit process do not matter once reversions start; thereafter, it is all about the counting, and is necessarily political if one editor brings on others (a game which I will not join). Bottom line for me, this flawed system is one that leads to no end of ironic outcomes (mine being among the least), and fixing it is a matter beyond you, and me alone. As I said, it is worthwhile, that I have realized the folly of engaging in such squabbles, and will move on to bigger things. This situation and outcome has given me the conviction and confidence to do so. Cheers, and best wishes. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 15:14, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Nbsp

Do you realize that you're making wide-ranging formatting changes with edits like this? None of those non-breaking spaces should have been added. Please go clean them up, and if it's the result of a script, then you need to remove it until it's fixed. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:06, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

What? How the hell did that happen? To my knowledge I don't use any scripts that would do this. Mynameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 07:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm as lost as you are. The same thing just happened to User:Piotrus in this edit, and I'm betting that he's going to be just as surprised. What's your web browser? Do you still use the Monobook skin (and thus these scripts)? Do you use any less-common gadgets (WikiEd, maybe?)? Is there anything that you two might have in common? WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
{{[ping|WhatamIdoing}} Not on purpose, through I do use some scripts. Usually I tend to blame such things on WP:WIKIED which loves to mess things it shouldn't, through no, I haven't seen this happen before and I don't know if WikiEd is responsible. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:50, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello My name is not dave. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
go to hell hateme 13:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  1. ^ http://www.cbsnews.com/2102-18560_162-57605146.html. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. ^ http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/data/Journals/AJP/927544/994.pdf http://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/newsarticle.aspx?articleid=1739096 http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/data/Journals/AJP/927544/994.pdf. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  3. ^ a b Jobbik signs agreements with other European nationalist groups, Politics.hu (source: MTI), 2009-10-26, Hungary's radical nationalist Jobbik party signed an agreement with four international parties to set up the Alliance of European Nationalist Movements, Jobbik deputy leader Andras Balczo said on Saturday. {{citation}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  4. ^ a b Radical nationalist Jobbik for toppling Trianon borders, says MEP, The Budapest Times, 2009-06-14, Hungary's radical nationalist Jobbik party plans to fight for the toppling of borders set by the 1920 Trianon treaty, newly elected MEP Csanad Szegedi said at the memorial meeting. {{citation}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  5. ^ "Jobbik confident of winning EP seat, party leader says". politics.hu (source: MTI). 2009-05-13. Jobbik describes itself as "a principled, conservative and radically patriotic Christian party. Its fundamental purpose is protecting Hungarian values and interests."
  6. ^ LeBor, Adam (2009-06-09). "Jobbik: Meet the BNP's fascist friends in Hungary". London: The Times Online. Retrieved 2009-07-05.
  7. ^ Chomsky, Noam (2011-04-21) Is the world too big to fail?, Salon.com
  8. ^ "Jobbik Deputy Campaigns Against 'Israeli' MP - Jewish World- News". Israel National News. 2012-11-30. Retrieved 2013-08-25.
  9. ^ "Xpat Opinion: Will Hungary's Jobbik Split? - Xpatloop.com-Expat Life In Budapest, Hungary - Current affairs". Xpatloop.com. Retrieved 2013-08-25.
  10. ^ Freeman, Colin (2009-05-24). "Feminine face of Hungary's far-Right Jobbik movement seeks MEP's seat". London: The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 2009-06-07.
  11. ^ Chebel d’Appollonia, Ariane (2012), Frontiers of Fear: Immigration and Insecurity in the United States and Europe, Cornell University Press, p. 245
  12. ^ Lisiak, Agata Anna (2010), Urban Cultures in (Post) Colonial Central Europe, Purdue University Press, p. 18
  13. ^ Nationalist Jobbik Party Doubles Voter Base In Hungary, xpatloop.com, 2009-06-25
  14. ^ The political effects of the European elections, budapestanalyses.hu, 2009-06-11
  15. ^ Huggan, Graham; Law, Ian (2009). Racism Postcolonialism Europe. Liverpool University Press.
  16. ^ Schori Liang, Christina (2007). Europe for the Europeans: The Foreign and Security Policy of the Populist Radical Right. Ashgate.
  17. ^ Kirton, Gill; Greene, Anne-Marie (2010). The Dynamics of Managing Diversity: A Critical Approach (3rd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:My_name_is_not_dave/Archive_2&oldid=1255505902"