User talk:Musiclaborotry

Welcome!

Hello, Musiclaborotry, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Musiclaborotry, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jan Myšák (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Musiclaborotry

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Musiclaborotry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jan Myšák (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jan Myšák please remove the tag. I'll fix my mistakes Musiclaborotry (talk) 20:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have created the page again, it's no longer there. Best, Jan Myšák (talk) 21:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit AfC templates

Hi, please don't change the AfC templates of pending drafts, like you did with Draft:Lungelihle Zwane. The AfC process relies on the templates remaining there until the draft is either accepted or deleted. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my bad. Musiclaborotry (talk) 10:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again RE AfC

Hi again, could you please help me understand what you did here, and especially your edit comment "Approved Article"? What did you mean by that?

I'm similarly curious about this edit of yours, which gives the impression you've reviewed and accepted a draft at AfC.

Anything you wish to share? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:09, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

could you please review my "draft:Lungile Zwane" as this is an article about a female DJ who is most talked about and people would really like to know more about this person, Please. Musiclaborotry (talk) 10:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Jamiebuba. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Lungelihle Zwane have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jamiebuba (talk) 10:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Remove speedy deletion on my work🙄 Musiclaborotry (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Uncle Waffles has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:08, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Uncle Waffles, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please do not remove the templates, they are there for a reason. You appear to have caused a copyright violation in this article, and the offending content must be removed from the page history, for which reason I have requested revision deletion. You removing the revdel template doesn't resolve the problem in any way. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:21, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Musiclaborotry. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Musiclaborotry. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Musiclaborotry|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TenPoundHammer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Waffles have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Musiclaborotry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"New and upcoming"

Your user page says "Aim of this user id to create new article about South African new and upcoming artists". Wikipedia is interested in articles about established artists, not new and upcoming artists. New artists don't usually have enough information published about them in independent sources (blogs and interviews don't count). Getting articles about new artists accepted for publication in WP will be a struggle. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 02:45, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry my bad, nd thanks. Musiclaborotry (talk) 04:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uncle Waffles

Uncle Waffles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Musiclaborotry (talk) 04:57, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved Uncle Waffles back to the draft space, because it was not accepted by a reviewer. Please fix the draft's issues (i.e. non-encyclopedic tone and poorly formatted sources) and then resubmit it for review. I also wonder whether your are getting paid to do this? If so, you must disclose (see WP:PAID). Please also not that Wikipedia is not a place for new and upcoming artists, it is a place for writing about notable topics that have been subject to significant coverage in reliable sources. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 09:22, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uncle Waffles (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to improve the draft prior to resubmitting it. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please help with citation.Could Musiclaborotry (talk) 17:37, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uncle Waffles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uncle Waffles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Turna .

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Turna . requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 17:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Turna .

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Turna . requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uncle Waffles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Uncle Waffles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Uncle Waffles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uncle Waffles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Waffles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PRAXIDICAE💕 15:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a spam-only account and confirmed sockpuppetry.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]