User talk:Muhammad Umair Mirza

Welcome!

Hello, Muhammad Umair Mirza! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. ^{(talk to me) (My edits)} @ 06:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Jerusalem

Hello! Do you have a source for [1]? --Dweller (talk) 15:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Anjana Larka. An edit that you recently made to Moses in Islam seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Anjana Larka^Talk 08:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.

Speedy deletion nomination of Mubashir Ali Zaidi

Hello Muhammad Umair Mirza,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mubashir Ali Zaidi for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ueutyi (talk) 06:56, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mubashir Ali Zaidi

Hi, I'm Human3015. Muhammad Umair Mirza, thanks for creating Mubashir Ali Zaidi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, kindly add independent reliable sources for your WP:BLP article so that it will pass WP:GNG. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Human3015^{Let It Go} 15:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mubashir Ali Zaidi

Hello, Muhammad Umair Mirza. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mubashir Ali Zaidi, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Mubashir Ali Zaidi to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Human3015^{Let It Go} 15:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Farrukh Shahbaz Warraich.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Farrukh Shahbaz Warraich.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indubala

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Indubala, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTFSICtf474.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Indubala

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Indubala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0408569/bio. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Al-Bayhaqi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khorasan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ibn Qudamah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shaukat Ali (politician), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:57, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cypress Tomb

added a link pointing to Mughal

Jamal ad-Din al-Afghani

added a link pointing to Asadabad

Mohammad Ali Jouhar

added a link pointing to Rampur

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please don't change the format of dates. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. JudeccaXIII (talk) 19:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes to pope-related articles

You seem to be making a number of unsourced, undiscussed changes to articles about ancient popes. These have been challenged, so in accordance with WP:BRD you should stop and explain yourself. Favonian (talk) 19:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pope Evaristus. Please read my comment above! Favonian (talk) 19:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 08:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation

I have removed possible copyright violation(s). Some or all of the content appears to be copy pasted. Please remember that you must write in your own words. We cannot copy and paste from other websites.

Your addition: "...On January 1st, 2016, Farrukh was elected president of Pakistan Federal Union of Columnists (PFUC) for 2016 in elections held recently. His panel got 57 votes of member columnists from all over the country while his opponent Khalid Mahmood from Islamabad got 45 votes. The members of the union who were not present in Lahore on the polling day had the option to cast their votes through their email accounts or cell phone numbers registered with the election commission in advance. They were supposed to send their opinion through email and text messages between 11am and 1pm on the polling day...."

The source is: "...LAHORE - Farrukh Shahbaz Warraich (pictured), columnist of Urdu daily Nai Baat, has been elected president of Pakistan Federal Union of Columnists (PFUC) for 2016 in elections held recently. His panel got 57 votes of member columnists from all over the country while his opponent Khalid Mahmood from Islamabad got 45 votes. The members of the union who were not present in Lahore on the polling day had the option to cast their votes through their email accounts or cell phone numbers registered with the election commission in advance. They were supposed to send their opinion through email and text messages between 11am and 1pm on the polling day...."

If you have made any other edits that are copy pasted, please remove them or rewrite them in your own words.

If I have made an error, please accept my apologies.

Editors who persistently add copyrighted material to articles may be blocked from editing.

For further information, please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. If you have questions, please ask. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded images

Please see these. They are the images you uploaded. Are they really your own work? May I ask where you got them? Are the from some Internet site? Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're at it again

With this edit you have resumed your habit of adding "precise" dates for people or events that are not supported by sources. Please stop, or your next block is likely to be indefinite! Favonian (talk) 11:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Maslama al-Majriti

added a link pointing to Córdoba

Sind ibn Ali

added a link pointing to Sindhi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Farrukhi Sistani

added a link pointing to Royal

Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād

added a link pointing to Timurid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Humayun Nama

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Humayun Nama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://turklib.ru/general_history/the_history_of_humayun_-_humayun-nama.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KSFT ^C 18:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Badr-un-Nissa

added a link pointing to Mughal

Muhammad Husain Azad

added a link pointing to Aab-e-Hayat

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hegira may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|Date = 9 September 622— 20 September 622 (11 days}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changing Dates

Over the last 24 hours or so, you have changed dates on a number of articles dealing with the key individuals and events in the early history of Islam. You have changed key dates by a few days or made dates more precise than seems to be supported by current reliable sources. Can you please advise where you are getting this information from, as you have not provided any sources (reliable or otherwise) to support your changes. Thanks --Chewings72 (talk) 07:52, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Funny thing you ask I had the same question. Alexis Ivanov (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Selim 1 Caliph of Islam

How did you get the 22 January from, I would argue such transition of authority as big as Caliphate didn't occur between the Abbasids to the Ottomans, 22 January seems VERY DETAILED and SPECIFIC. Alexis Ivanov (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Favonian: I remind you about Favonian's warning to you back in March (see above) about you making dates more precise without any explanation as to the source of your information. Please provide suitable explanations for your changes otherwise you may be blocked from using Wikipedia. --Chewings72 (talk) 01:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 10:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dates in Shah Jahan

Your edits to Shah Jahan switched some dates from Old Style to New Style, without explanation or prior discussion. The change of date style goes against long-standing convention in the article, against discussion on its talk page in 2011, 2013, and 2015; and against a sampling of reliable sources (e.g. Encyclopædia Britannica, Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture, and The Jahangirnama translated by Wheeler M. Thackston). Although Old Style is not the only possible choice (Abraham Eraly and Fergus Nicoll, for example, chose New Style in their works), changing styles the way you did is disruptive.

The edits also introduced inconsistencies within the article and added unsourced information. They have been reverted as unconstructive. If you disagree with the article's date style, please seek consensus on the article's talk page before changing it again. Also, when editing an article, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, briefly explaining what you are changing and your reasoning for the change. Thanks! --Worldbruce (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Thanks for adding infoboxes to articles, but please don't include the subject's nationality in the occupation line. "Writer" is an occupation, but "French writer" is not. Cheers! bd2412 T 15:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks my brother for reading.

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Antoine Isaac Silvestre de Sacy

added a link pointing to Orientalist

Isaac Casaubon

added a link pointing to Classical

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kazi Nazrul Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1761 in India

Hello Muhammad Umair Mirza,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1761 in India for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Celestinesucess (talk) 07:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Theodor Nöldeke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comets Appeared in China for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comets Appeared in China is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comets Appeared in China until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 04:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

There are many areas in Wikipedia which need attention, and where you can edit constructively. Changing dates and/or date formats or level of date detail is not one of them. Please find something to do that adds real value, because right now you are wasting both yours and others' valuable time. Wikipedia:Pages needing attention is a good starting place to look for where you can help the project go ahead. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 23:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Gulzar.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 09:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have changed key dates by a few days or made dates more precise than seems to be supported by current reliable sources. Can you please advise where you are getting this information from, as you have not provided any sources (reliable or otherwise) to support your changes.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 09:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are many areas in Wikipedia which need attention, and where you can edit constructively. Changing dates and/or date formats or level of date detail is not one of them. Please find something to do that adds real value because right now you are wasting both yours and others' valuable time.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 09:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies,if I'm wrong.Please correct me(If you choose to bother and reply!) sincerely.Cheers! Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 09:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Muhammad Umair Mirza. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Fakhr al-Din al-Razi page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eperoton (talk) 19:14, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 19:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad, you really need to stop changing dates without citing a WP:RS to support your changes, about which you've already been warned repeatedly. You've also been making constructive edits, so it would be a shame if you were permanently blocked because of it. Eperoton (talk) 19:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mubashir Ali Zaidi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mubashir Ali Zaidi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mubashir Ali Zaidi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 17:14, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Your addition to Tomb of Khan-e-Jahan Bahadur Kokaltash has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

About this article, I was busy in research about this tomb, and I visited many times there and took photographs. Copyright material is not available here, and I'll be write in detail soon. Thanks.

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Moorcroft (explorer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shalimar Gardens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Muntakhab-ut-Tawarikh

The article Muntakhab-ut-Tawarikh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only indication of notability is from the article itself, also written poorly and zero sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Terrariola (talk) 09:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - LouisAragon (talk) 02:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to start using edit summaries and to provide sources for your changes (in particular all these changes to dates, amongst others). - LouisAragon (talk) 02:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. DrKay (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please format dashes according to MOS:DASH. DrKay (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I note from multiple comments above that you have been asked multiple times to provide sources for the dates you are adding to articles. However, you are still adding them without sources (and labelling such additions as minor)[2]. You are required to provide sources or cease these edits. DrKay (talk) 19:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content and disruptive editing. You've been asked explicitly not to label content-changing edits as minor or to add dates without sources, yet you have done exactly that once again[3] despite multiple warnings and requests. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Zafarnamah Ranjit Singh

Hi, I'm Markdask. Muhammad Umair Mirza, thanks for creating Zafarnamah Ranjit Singh!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi - good article but you need to work on the language :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mark^Dask 01:39, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muhammad Umair Mirza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll write with references.

Decline reason:

I am declining this request; when you can explain the reason for the block, what steps you will take to not do it again, and explain specifically what constructive contributions you want to make, you may make another request. 331dot (talk) 15:15, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please offer a reason that you should be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 14:57, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to do better than that; given your numerous warnings and prior blocks, why should anyone believe you now? 331dot (talk) 15:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what was the reason.

Nomination of Farrukh Shahbaz Warraich for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farrukh Shahbaz Warraich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farrukh Shahbaz Warraich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 10:17, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]