User talk:Mufidkce

Welcome!

Hello, Mufidkce, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Javanese language may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Båså Jåwå)<ref>Piwulang Basa Jawa Pepak, S.B. Pramono, hal 148, 2013</ref>; {{lang-id|bahasa Jawa}}) is the language of the [[Javanese people]] from the central and eastern parts of the island of [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mufidkce, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Chinese Indonesians has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that three of the images you are adding are only allowed under fair-use in the article on the individual. If you continue, you are likely to be blocked. Thank you. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Transliteration

Hi Mufidkce,

I've noticed that recently you've changed the transliteration of Javanese in the Javanese script, language, etc. Particularly a into å. I've asked the opinion of a user experienced in these fields, and he said that this transliteration is obsolete and uncommon. Therefore, I'm reverting your edit from å to a. If you'd still like to use that, discuss it first the talk page or make a new page regarding Javanese transliteration. Alteaven (talk) 23:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jawabnya pakai bahasa Indo ya? Saya sendiri walau 3/4 Jawa tidak bisa bahasa Jawa, cuma aksaranya. Hehe

Nah, perkara transliterasi. Terutama di artikel aksara Jawa dijelaskan bahwa huruf a bisa dibaca dengan /a/ atau /ɔ/ (o jawa). Para penutur asli yang saya kenal umumnya mengerti kapan a harus dibaca /a/ kapan harus dibaca /ɔ/ tanpa menggunakan å. Dan masalah lainnya adalah anda memberi sedikit referensi. Baru-baru ini saya dihimbau bahwa Wikipedia tidak menyarankan menulis suatu hal yang seharusnya atau semestinya. Jadi walau transliterasi bapak lebih tepat, transliterasi tersebut tidak umum dan karena itu sebaiknya dihindari. Menurut pendapat saya pribadi, transliterasi tersebut tidak estetis dan kurang jelas. Tidak estetis dalam arti terlalu banyak diaktrik, dan kurang jelas dalam arti masing-masing huruf tidak ditulis padanan IPA-nya. Akan lebih pas jika hal tersebut dibahas mendalam dalam artikel sendiri (tidak lupa dengan referensi yang memadai).

Terima kasih juga anda mau mengikuti saran saya untuk bertanya dulu di talk page. Talk page mengenai aksara Jawa seringkali sepi, jadi saya pikir anda lebih baik langsung bertanya saja ke ahli yang tadi saya bicarakan, entah di talk page [Indonesia] atau [Jawa]. Kemungkinan responnya lebih cepat, dan pendapatnya akan berbeda jika diberi pemaparan beralasan seperti yang anda tulis ke saya. Matur nuwun, maaf panjang Alteaven (talk) 12:03, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disarankan untuk mengumpulkan materi dari sejumlah referensi, tidak hanya satu. Poin kedua masih agak rancu. Bapak bilang â padanan IPA-nya /e/ (e seperti dalam kata enak), padahal dari yang saya tahu padanan /e/ adalah é. Salah satu alasan mengapa saya tidak menggunakan transliterasi ini adalah karena IPA-nya tidak jelas dan saya tidak punya sumber yang menjabarkannya. IPA ini menjadi begitu penting karena IPA bukan suatu transliterasi, melainkan sebuah tulisan yang jelas menunjukkan bunyi spesifik dalam konteks segala bahasa. Jika IPA-nya sudah jelas dan referensinya memadai, saya menyarankan untuk membuat artikel baru saja yang membahas transliterasi bahasa Jawa, nanti baru disambungkan dengan artikel bahasa Jawa :)

Oh iya, åjå IPA-nya bukan /ɔjɔ/ (itu bakal dibaca åyå), penulisan IPA yang tepat adalah /ɔdʒɔ/. Kemudian /ō/ juga seharusnya /o:/. Alteaven (talk) 14:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mari saya bantu sedikit mengenai IPA. Ini yang saya tahu:

Transkripsi	Konsonan
Umum	h	n	c	r	k	d	t	s	w	l	p	dh	j	y	ny	m	g	b	th	ng
Alternatif												ḍ							ṭ
IPA	h	ɲ	tʃ	ɽ	k	d	t	ʂ	w	ɭ	p	ɖ	dʒ	j	ɳ	m	g	b	ʈ	ŋ

Sementara itu menurut saya vokalnya yang agak membingungkan:

Transkripsi	Vokal
Umum	a			i		u		é		e	o
Alternatif	a	å	â	i	ì	u	ù	é	è	ê	o	ò
IPA	a	ɔ	?	i	?	u	?	e	ɛ	ə	o	?

Terima kasih Alteaven (talk) 01:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mufidkce, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mufidkce! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tenggerese, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Banyumasan people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages KKB, Javanese and Instrument. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sundanese language may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|fam3=[[Nuclear Nusantaran languages|Nuclear Nusantaran]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arekan dialect, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mataram, Jombang and Javanese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nusantaran languages

You have moved Malayo-Polynesian languages families to Nusantaran languages and varieties thereof without any discussion at all. That is a tremendous change and while "edit boldly" is genereally a good idea, that language family comprises 385.5 million speakers. Not to mention that your "cite" is a single book from 1974 and it's not in English so it cannot even be confirmed. This is a problem. Ogress _smash! 10:40, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The book you cited was a book on old Javanese literature. See Petrus Josephus Zoetmulder. It was not a book on language classification. All the books I have seen have named it Malayo-Polynesian. Also see http://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/mala1545 and http://www.ethnologue.com/subgroups/malayo-polynesian, http://www.freelang.net/families/#famille_austro --Mrjulesd (talk) 11:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the same vein, I reverted your moving Malayo-Polynesian languages to Nusantaran languages. Eklir (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kedu dialect for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kedu dialect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kedu dialect until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arekan dialect for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arekan dialect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arekan dialect until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:57, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kedu dialect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edi warring.

Please stop edit warring: please read WP:BRD, and if you wish to change the long-standing text, use the talk page to do so. – SchroCat (talk) 09:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. satusuro 09:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Megawati Sukarnoputri may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{Javanese script}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

O-Javanese_spelling

The key foundation of articles on wp en (English Wikipedia) - are WP:N, WP:V, and WP:RS

The article you have created has nothing to verify or confirm the argument found in the article - as a consequence it needs WP:RS.

Please attend to the article - or ... ask for help.satusuro 09:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Javanese people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kraton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you are at the right location?

This is English Wikipedia. It is expected that articles and references are in English. The O-Javanese article does not have any english language reference to back up what is basically WP:OR unless you are able to verify = in English. Your editing is basically more suitable for wp:id, or wp:jv - are you sure that you might not try to do editing there instead? satusuro 08:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ABOUT and WP:NOT - the article Javanese people is about people - the section about etymology - is about the word java... are you sure it is not better somewhere else - at least the refs are better... satusuro 08:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your english does not help you - if the specific ethnic sub groups exist, indonesian and/or javanese sources are not enough (ie belum cukup), this is english wikipedia - and if you want to not have your indonesian sources reverted regularly - it is important, if you know or have access to english articles or books that explain the javanese sub-groups - indonesian sources on this matter are not good enough. satusuro 09:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Placing incorrect block notices

Can you explain this? You are not an administrator, the user is not blocked, nor has he warranted a block that I can tell. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for this, my account were hacked by someone several hours ago, I'm trying to fix this...

Mufidkce (talk) 14:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Very sorry to hear this. If you feel your account has been compromised beyond repair, you might want to start a new account, and have an administrator permanently block this one. Cheers and good luck. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

Please be careful when editing and reverting - your last edit at Javanese people also removed text which was valid and referenced. satusuro 22:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mufidkce. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of O-Javanese spelling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article O-Javanese spelling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O-Javanese spelling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JarrahTree 00:02, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]