User talk:Mrbeastmodeallday

Re: Dave Farrell

Please do not re-create deleted articles without a proper discussion as you did to Dave Farrell article. The article only contains two sources, only one of which would be considered 'reliable' and 'legitimate.' However that source has not been updated since 2002 and covers little information. Last.FM is a publicly edited community and is not reliable by our standards. For further information on our notability and reliable sources, please refer to WP:N and WP:RS.

Please note that previously deleted articles may be quickly deleted without contest per WP:CSD. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Thanks. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 02:28, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nate Iese

Hello, Mrbeastmodeallday,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username 331dot and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nate Iese, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|331dot}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

331dot (talk) 12:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nate Iese for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nate Iese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Iese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 07:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dakarai Allen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dakarai Allen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DannyS712 (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Austin Madison

The article Austin Madison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCREATIVE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 21:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I-80 and Oakland

I'm a local and I'm here to say that you are blatantly incorrect. The Oakland touchdown of the Bay Bridge and the MacArthur Maze are both firmly within Oakland city limits. It's true that I-80 doesn't quite reach downtown Oakland, but downtown Oakland is not the same as Oakland as a whole.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:56, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jordan Smallwood (American football)

Hello, Mrbeastmodeallday,

Thanks for creating Jordan Smallwood (American football)! I edit here too, under the username Willsome429 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add more sources that show significant coverage of Smallwood, not just transaction records.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 18:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creatng disambiguation pages

Hello. Noticed your move of Jota (footballer) to create a disambiguation page at that name. I'm guessing you haven't done this before, as there's a couple of things that needed doing and haven't been. The easy one is to add descriptions to the entries on the dab page, so that the reader can distinguish the Jota they're looking for from all the others. The boring but important one is that when moving a page out of the way of a dab page, we're supposed to fix all the incoming links to the original pagename before overwriting the original pagename with the dab page. See the bold line at WP:FIXDABLINKS. At the moment, all incoming links to Jota the Spanish footballer land at the dab page, which isn't a great state of affairs for our readers.

The broken links do need fixing now: if you don't have the time, I'll do it, please let me know. thanks, Struway2 (talk) 10:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've fixed all the broken links. No harm done, but another time, you'd be wise to read up on the relevant instructions before doing technical stuff. Ask at the Teahouse if you need help with anything. And a bit of advice: if someone sends you a message about something you've done on here, it's a good idea not to ignore it. Most of us are only trying to help. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the help! 🙏🏼 Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 15:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closing move requests

Hi, Mrbeastmodeallday, and thank you for your contributions! For the future, please remember to remove the {{Requested move}} template when you close a requested move. For details, see WP:RMCI#Closing the requested move. Thanks again! Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 16:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please, you again failed to remove the {{Requested move/dated}} template when you closed the RM at Talk:Guts (John Cale album)#Requested move 11 March 2019. This error results in a malformed requested move listing. Also, are you going to move the second entry in that RM? Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 12:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caution

It appears you're not responding to concerns raised above. You now closed this move request as moved but you neither removed the {{Requested move/dated}} template and also failed to move the page. Please consider this as a warning and stop closing discussions until when you understand all that is required. – Ammarpad (talk) 09:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ammarpad: - Hello, due to that page’s protection level, I was unable to remove the requested move template and move the page. I don’t see why a warning is necessary for something that is beyond my control. Thank you for your understanding. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 09:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Warning" in this case is more of a reminder that there can sometimes be several things that need to be done when you close a requested move debate. Those several things are listed in the RM closing instructions. So while your contributions are respected and your help with closing debates is appreciated, you just need to thoroughly familiarize yourself with all that might be required by the closing instructions. For example, I always check the proposed page to see if it's "move-protected" before I close a debate. Then if I still choose to close the debate, I will submit the page move to technical requests with "page is move-protected" in the |reason= parameter. Thanks again for your understanding and for your help! Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 02:15, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, here's your warning: When you do not properly and correctly close a requested move, it ends up as a "malformed request". Since you refuse to follow correct procedure as seen at Talk:Paramount Theatre (Brooklyn)#Requested move 21 March 2019 after several requests here on your talk page, then from now on your closures will be reverted. If you want to continue to close requested moves, then read the closing instructions, which have been developed by community consensus over several years, and abide by them. Further disruptive closes may result in your being blocked from editing. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 10:32, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Osika moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Craig Osika, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 14:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guts

Hi. You closed the RM at Talk:Guts (John Cale album)#Requested move 11 March 2019. Although you moved one page, you missed the second Guts (Joe McPhee and Peter Brötzmann album). In the RM there is a clear consensus to move the page from that title. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 18:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Terrell Williams Jr.

Hello, Mrbeastmodeallday,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Terrell Williams Jr., for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:39, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jordan Smallwood (American football)

Hello, Mrbeastmodeallday,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Jordan Smallwood (American football), for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Austin Madison) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Austin Madison.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The lead should include mention of Madison's most notable roles and accomplishments, in this case Brave

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jordan Smallwood (American football) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Smallwood (American football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Smallwood (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Luke Walton appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 23:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Redmond moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jimmy Redmond, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 10:43, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm CrispyCream27. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Frank Vogel have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CrispyCream27 ^(Talk) 23:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CrispyCream27: Hello, please specify which edits you are referring to. I do not see any edits of mine on the Frank Vogel page that were undone or unconstructive, and I do not see your username in the recent edit history of Frank Vogel. It appears that you may have sent this message to me in error. Thanks Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 23:28, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrbeastmodeallday: Yep, that was sent in error. Sorry about that. I was working a little too fast. CrispyCream27 ^(Talk) 02:41, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please withrdaw Drake RM

Sorry but you failed to read MUSICDAB or note the previous RMs, so please close, All the best In ictu oculi (talk) 19:47, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnotes

Thanks for improving pages by adding hatnotes to ambiguous titles. Regarding your addition to Larry Bird, the use of {{distinguish}} should be reserved for more obvious cases. In this case, it's not clear who Larry Byrd is without clicking on it. In this case, something like {{for}} provides more context for readers at the wrong page. Refer to the documentation at Template:Distinguish for more guidance on its usage. Again, thanks for improving pages for readers looking for an ambiguous title. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 06:39, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Jones (rugby)

Please can you fix all the links that no longer work since the page move.Theanonymousentry (talk) 07:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Kevin Johnson (disambiguation) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 04:47, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of longest NBA field goals

Hello, Mrbeastmodeallday. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:List of longest NBA field goals.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:12, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Malcolm Butler Super Bowl XLIX interception

Hello, Mrbeastmodeallday. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Malcolm Butler Super Bowl XLIX interception.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Men in early childhood education

Hello, Mrbeastmodeallday. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Men in early childhood education".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheTrainNoch (talk) 09:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Transportation in the Sacramento metropolitan area

Hello, Mrbeastmodeallday. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Transportation in the Sacramento metropolitan area".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 10:30, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Mullin page move discussion

You were involved in the discussion to move Chris Mullin (basketball) to Chris Mullin last year. This move is being revisted so I wanted to invite you to take part in the discussion at Talk:Chris Mullin#Requested move 22 August 2020 if you would like to. Rikster2 (talk) 15:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the September 11 attacks. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saudi role in the September 11 attacks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saudi role in the September 11 attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saudi role in the September 11 attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 20:22, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elk Grove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Humboldt County. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Holmes testimony fix

First off, much praise to your edits to various true crime articles. I was wondering if you could rewrite this sentence on the Lee Harvey Oswald article that has been discussed on the talk page. The article says that Oswald told Holmes he was “working on an upper floor when the shooting occurred, then went downstairs”. Looking though Harry Holmes testimony, especially on page 306, it is clear what Holmes meant where Oswald said he encountered the officer: ...as I started to go out and see what it was all about, a police officer stopped me just before I got to the front door, and started to ask me some questions... Mr. BELIN. By the way, where did this policeman stop him when he was coming down the stairs at the Book Depository on the day of the shooting? Mr. HOLMES. He said it was in the vestibule. Mr. BELIN. He said he was in the vestibule? Mr. HOLMES. Or approaching the door to the vestibule. He was just coming, apparently, and I have never been in there myself. Apparently there is two sets of doors, and he had come out to this front part. Mr. BELIN. Did he state it was on what floor? Mr. HOLMES. First floor. The front entrance to the first floor. Mr. BELIN. Did he say anything about a Coca Cola or anything like that, if you remember? Mr. HOLMES. Seems like he said he was drinking a Coca Cola, standing there by the Coca Cola machine drinking a Coca Cola. Holmes clarifies that Oswald was talking about encountering the officer at the vestibule on the first floor by the front entrance. Holmes describes two set of doors which were in the building vestibule (which were a front lobby between two set of doors). I suggest the paragraph regarding Holmes on the “Police interrogation” section should be rewritten to say “Holmes (who attended the interrogation at the invitation of Captain Will Fritz) said that Oswald said he was at the first floor vestibule by the front entrance and wanted to see what the “commotion” was when he encountered an officer.” 88.104.82.204 (talk) 08:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the kind words. Most of the edits I do in the Wikipedia space is reformatting, structuring, and clarifying things I already know, and adding WP article links and other navigational aids.

I’m unfamiliar with the Holmes story, and I’m not very skilled or talented in researching from scratch.

Your request is a bit beyond what I’m capable of doing. However, I can send you the WP “edit request” form for you to send to that page. Be sure to read the instructions, and follow all the steps, so that your edit request can be assessed on its merits alone, and not tied up in procedural issues. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 22:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

United States

I have shortened your edit tag re current superpower status for the U.S. Succinct WP taglines are standard and appropriate. Further details about why, or how, to amend the text should be taken to the Talk page for full discussion—and full attention, as few readers (even regular editors) read taglines. Thanks. Mason.Jones (talk) 15:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mrbeastmodeallday reported by User:Moxy (Result: ). Thank you. Moxy- 11:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alcohol.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Partial revert

Hey, I just wanted to pitch in and let you know I manually semi-reverted one of your edits in light of removing redundant bluelinks. While I agree there's way too many, I believe one you removed should stay. In particular, you mentioned nonviolence being self-explanatory. While this may seem to be the case, we should take caution not to assume too much prior knowledge of readers (see WP:POPE). The definition of nonviolence/nonviolent as 'a lack of violence' is probably common knowledge, I'd agree, but the ideology that drove the group that's being described probably not so. Hope you understand my reasoning! Amadeus²² 🙋 🔔 22:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That’s true, thanks for the heads-up and for explaining. That makes sense, because it was such a central theme to the progression and success of the civil rights movement, it’s useful to shed some light on the background. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Indians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Days of the week with adjectives has been nominated for discussion

Category:Days of the week with adjectives has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:14, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking mentioned many times by many

Mulituple editors over mulipule articles have mentioned overlinking multipule times to no avail......perhaps this many help in understanding why it causes accessibility problems....P. Thruesen, J. Čechák, B. Sezñec, R. Castaño and N. Kanhabua, "To link or not to link: Ranking hyperlinks in Wikipedia using collective attention," 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 2016, pp. 1709-1718, doi: 10.1109/BigData.2016.7840785....Moxy- 21:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the United States (2008–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2008 presidential election.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cut & paste move

Gentle reminder to please not perform WP:CUTPASTE moves like you did at Billups (disambiguation). Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 03:40, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion

Please review the instructions at WP:3O before re-posting your request. You must provide evidence that there has been significant discussion of the issue under dispute, and the page you've linked to does not illustrate that such discussion has occurred at this time. If this is unsatisfactory to you, I would recommend waiting to see whether the other editors do engage in discussion with you and you reach an impasse, or consider pursuing other forms of dispute resolution. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 20:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bludgeoning

You are overwhelming article talk pages by WP:BLUDGEONING the discussions. How is anyone supposed to participate when the conversation looks like this and this? Even if they could decipher the discussion despite your multiple replies to each comment, how could any other editor even get a word in when you are dominating the discussion to this ridiculous degree? When you've reached the point where you're attacking other editors, it's a sign that consensus is not in your favour or, at the very least, it's time to walk away.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Meters (talk) 23:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Personal attacks and harassment, tendentious editing, and bludgeoning discussions are also contributing factors. Cullen328 (talk) 23:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hockey helmet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dmitry Orlov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.X-750 _{Rust In Peace... Polaris} 03:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@X750: Thank you for notifying me! Cheers! Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 04:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rfd nominations

Hi there, in reference to Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_4#San_Jose, make sure when you initiate a discussion at Rfd that the current target is the one listed at the top of the nomination, not what you propose it should be. Instead, you should indicate where you propose that the redirect be retargeted (or other action you propose occur, such as deletion) in your rationale/nomination statement. You also included a page in the discussion that is not currently a redirect; only redirects should be nominated for an Rfd discussion. Proposing that a page should be a redirect requires a discussion at another venue, such as a requested move discussion. Cheers, Mdewman6 (talk) 04:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 15:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Awolf58 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Awolf58. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of athletes who came out of retirement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of athletes who came out of retirement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of athletes who came out of retirement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]