Jump to content

User talk:Mr Birchwood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Bon courage (talk) 18:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in complementary and alternative medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Bon courage (talk) 09:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bon Courage!
Glad to hear from you. I am curious to know as to reasons behind excluding the sections on the SY page? In sum, they contribute to knowledge about the topic in manner that is both complementary of wikipedia's guidelines as well as regulations, while contextualising a page that is otherwise skewed in an orientalist and xenopohobic light. Encyclopedic knowledge should be embrace all forms, as long as they show stringent adherence to the rule of law. I ask you to reconsider your authoritative air of editing. Mr Birchwood (talk) 10:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there! Please discuss article content at its Talk page (or the newly-opened section at WP:FT/N). In short the article must conform with the WP:PAGs, in particular, WP:NPOV, WP:FRINGE and WP:MEDRS in this case. Please remember also not to edit war. Bon courage (talk) 10:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!
I am well aware of the conventions and rules applicable to wikipedia articles, as the scientific section stringently followed and fulfilled all requirements of academic integrity with reference to well established journals (mind one which wikipedia considers predatory but the wider academic arena does not). Therefore, seeing that you have paid little to no interest in the actual content of the scientific section, I deem that your edits are far from neutral, but rather malicious. I will look for an adjudicator in this matter to settle the dispute. Mr Birchwood (talk) 10:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, for transparency and to ensure proper WP:SCRUTINY please could you say (yes or no) whether you have ever edited Wikipedia with other accounts? Bon courage (talk) 11:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
By chance, I also forward this question to you too: please could you say (yes or no) whether or not you have edited Wikipedia with other accounts?
To your question – no – I am a relatively new user from beginning of last year, with an academic interest in the fields of hinduism, yoga, and syncretism. Mr Birchwood (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, just one account me. Bon courage (talk) 13:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mr Birchwood. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Sahaja Yoga, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It is clear from your image upload that you have a conflict of interest regarding this page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moi mitä kuuluu!!
So glad to hear from another Scott-Finn :) I, for one, would have called myself ScottishFinnishPalsternakka if I had any sense of creativity ;)
I can see where such assumptions may be drawn, but to elucidate on the topic, I simply have an avid interest in spirituality, be it Sahaj Yoga, Advaita Vedanta, Sufism, Samkhya Philosophy, Jung, Hinduism, Nath Panth etc...I have collected a wide range of resources regarding this topic, including some of the submission made onto wikimedia, too. I am affiliated to a University in the Netherlands, and from general interest have sought to bring to light the research conducted on SYM in a much broader context as this is what one of my recent literature reviews was focused on (see first edit in about November or so...) The previous iteration of the page was, due to lack of better terminology, a paskakasa, and I was surprised something so far from reality could be in Wikipedia. Some users are strongly vindictive in this regard, much like a perään ammuttu karhu, but I do hope reason may prevail in subsequent iterations of the page.
Hope this helps?
Would be keen to hear more from you, too! Mr Birchwood (talk) 14:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are a number of pictures you've uploaded as your own work that either demonstrate a COI, or demonstrate that you're violating copyright.
This for example is found here and here. This is from a video on this page. This and this image are also used on wemeditate.com. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:39, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I notice you uploaded[1] a picture to the Commons as your "own work". Yet the file appears in multiple web locations spanning many years (e.g.[2]). Could you please confirm you are indeed the photographer and copyright holder for this photograph? Bon courage (talk) 13:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Bon courage (talk) 15:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Birchwood. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  firefly ( t · c ) 18:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr Birchwood (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To whom it may concern, I am glad that we have such alert Wikipedians in the community as Bon courage, and would like to take a short moment to explain my intention. As can be seen in the logs about Sahaja Yoga, the page is prone to bouts of edit wars that have left it rather emaciated in terms of content. I, for one, wished to provide a more substantive and source-based contribution that is not based on a point of view, but a plurality of views. However, seeing that there has been a strong backlash against pages on New Religious Movements, due to their possibility of peddling paranoia and pseudoscience, out of fear I, as a new user, adopted a method that was completely wrong. For, if I truly had confidence in what I contributed, I would have followed the bold-revert-discuss cycle, and not feared the confrontation that it would create. It was plain immaturity on my behalf. I still stand behind the intention that my contributions would, in the long term, not only serve to give a more comprehensive account of Sahaja Yoga, but also other spiritual-religious movements I am interested in, lending multpile views to create an overall, robust NPOV. I look forward to meeting Bon Courage's comments and edits, knowing that his experience and understanding help to refine, not undermine my contributions to wikipedia. A fruitful exchange can only create lasting change. Thank you for your attention firefly, and thank you Bon courage for your alertness! I am ready to have a proper dialogue, and am keen to understand the do's and dont's of wiki.

Decline reason:

You worked hard to destroy the community's trust. Probably the best way back from this is to follow WP:SO. This requires six months with zero edits (not just zero edits with this account), then making a new unblock request. If you do that, there's a very good chance your request would be viewed favourably (and I don't often see that). Now, though, is much WP:TOOSOON given your actions. Yamla (talk) 11:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr Birchwood (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To whom it may concern, my intentions to constructively contribute to the grassroots efforts of expanding our online encyclopedia still stands. I hope my 6 months zero-edits highlights this belief in providing a more substantive and source-based contribution rooted in recent data and research. As before, I do look forward to meeting other users comments and edits, knowing that their experience and understanding help to refine, not undermine our collective contributions to wikipedia. A fruitful exchange can only create lasting change. There is much to know about how this vast cornucopia of knowledge works, and I'll remain receptive to the guidance, reciprocal for rapport, and retain integrity in all interactions with our community. Thank you for your time and attention.

Decline reason:

That's a lot of nice sentiment. Unfortunately, not a single word of it addresses in specific what you did to get blocked, or what you will do differently going forward. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser data shows no evidence of recent block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 17:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mr Birchwood/sandbox

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Mr Birchwood/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mr Birchwood/method

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Mr Birchwood/method requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mr_Birchwood&oldid=1168718001"