User talk:Mr. Guye/Archive 23
| This is a subpage of Mr. Guye's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mr. Guye. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | → | Archive 30 |
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:21st-century Bangladeshi painters
A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century Bangladeshi painters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Fayenatic London 09:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Closing CFD
Thanks for helping out by closing this CFD discussion.
After closing CFDs as keep/ no consensus/ withdrawn, please remove the CFD banner from the category page. It's also helpful to post a link to the discussion on the talk page, in case the category comes up for discussion again; there is a template to help with that, e.g. [1].
As we have such a backlog at CFD, all help is very welcome. The fullest notes on how to help are at WP:CFDAI. – Fayenatic London 09:48, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:46, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Microaggression
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Microaggression. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Sources for biography
Hello I am Mary, writing for the Wiki account "DehoniansUSA." I have been trying to get an English version of a biography of Heiner Wilmer published on Wikipedia. It is primarily an English translation of the German Wikipedia page on him. Twice (most recently by you) it has been rejected because it does not have reliable sources. In your personal note you state that the sources are mostly works by the subject. I did list several of the books that Heiner Wilmer published, but not as sources in regards to who he is as the superior general of the Priests of the Sacred Heart. For that I cited two of the websites associated with the Priests of the Sacred Heart but also an independent article written about Heiner Wilmer in German; this is the first footnote listed under references. I put the author's name in the front of the footnote to clarify that it was by another author. Here is the link to the profile: https://www.herder-korrespondenz.de/heftarchiv/69-jahrgang-2015/heft-9-2015/portraet-heiner-wilmer-glaubenssuche-und-politischer-einsatz
I added the references from the German Wikipedia page to the English. Will this meet the citation standard? The German page: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heiner_Wilmer
Any advice would be welcome. Thank you!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by DehoniansUSA (talk • contribs) September 28, 2017 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians who consider themselves participants in many WikiProjects has been nominated for discussion
Category:Wikipedians who consider themselves participants in many WikiProjects, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
08:53:04, 24 December 2017 review of submission by Deltacosupreme
I am requesting a re review because I added more reliable sources to back the article. If it still isn’t good please tell me how I can improve the article!
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
- please help translate this message into your local language via meta
|
The 2017 Cure Award |
| In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. |
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation
Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2020
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2020. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Edinburgh Central (Scottish Parliament constituency)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Edinburgh Central (Scottish Parliament constituency). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
New edit submitted
Good morning Mr. Guye: I have submitted an edited version of the Chapin Hall Wikipedia page where I eliminated language/ modifiers that seemed promotional. Would you mind taking another look and letting me know what you think?
Thank you.
Marrianne McMullen — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarrianneMcMullen (talk • contribs) 14:32, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Civility re: Microaggression
Hi there. You recently chided me for "uncivility" in the discussion on Microaggression. I was not rude; I didn't engage in any personal attacks; I didn't belittle another editor personally; and while I cast an accusation of impropriety, it wasn't inappropriate. I do my best to assume good faith, but the other user's edits are readily apparent, as are their discussion on the Talk page, and it is clear from those that the user is using Wikipedia to push a political agenda, rather than to improve the project. It's not inappropriate to call attention to that, and going after me for being "uncivil" for pointing out another user's bad faith comes uncomfortably close to tone policing. Etherjammer (talk) 15:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Multiple users
Hello: Mallory Van Meeter started the Chapin Hall Wikipedia page, but no longer works here. She passed this task on to me when she left. What do we need to do to continue working on this? Have Mallory sign off in some way, or start a whole new process? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarrianneMcMullen (talk • contribs) 19:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @MarrianneMcMullen: Oh, ok that's fine. That doesn't violate policy. Thanks for asking! — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Rcats
Just a gentle reminder in regard to redirects like this, rcats like R from misspelling should never be used to tag soft redirects. Thank you for your work with redirects! Paine Ellsworth put'r there 18:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Paine Ellsworth: Thank you for assuming good faith. Though I still have a question: why? Why can't you add redirect categories to soft redirects? — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- It's my pleasure! AGF goes without saying because I am always grateful for editors who work with redirects. My information is that the only rcat that can be used on soft redirects at present is {{Wikidata redirect}}, which does not use {{Redirect template}} as a meta. It is the Redirect template that can cause unexpected results if used on soft redirects, and all the other rcats use it as a meta-template. Thanks again! Paine Ellsworth put'r there 19:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
It's definitely too long. There is on going discussion about what qualifies as RS in a bomb and slower work being done about actually condensing. Your help in that matter would be most welcome (I'm actively condensing a related article List of box office bombs (2010s). Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 05:31, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Why?
Why did you blank the user page of Hafspajen? We keep the talk of those who died, why not of a user who is still loved and missed, and whose images appear frequently on the main page, so readers may want to know about who created them. ?? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:59, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: I removed a lot and added {{Inactive userpage blanked}}. I guess maybe I shouldn't have blanked such a high-profile user's talk page, but the vast majority of Wikipedia's longest pages are these user talk pages that are never archived. I'll reverse the blanking on this one I guess, but still. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 06:04, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you! How about archiving all before 2018? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:11, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- It looks like the page has been deleted again. On what do I click to see the archive? Coldcreation (talk) 07:04, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you! How about archiving all before 2018? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:11, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Coldcreation, you click on 6 in the archive box.
- Mr. Guye, the stars on top (for the featured pictures) could perhaps also go to the archive, leaving some? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: I don't think that's the kind of thing you archive. Plus, I think they are being transcluded from a subpage of his. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 08:03, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Review Draft
Hi Usser:Mr Guye can you kindly review this draft Draft:Mangamu Primary School Joseph Kalimbwe (talk) 09:22, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the message regarding my creating "We Believe (song)" which is a very worthy contemporary hymn. I have also created pages for similarly worthy modern hymns like "10,000 Reasons (Bless the Lord)", "Blessed Be Your Name (song)", "Clear the Stage", "In Christ Alone", "Jesus Is a Soul Man", "Lord, I Lift Your Name on High", "Mighty to Save (song)", "My Hope Is Built on Nothing Less", "Where I Belong (Building 429 song)", "I Love to Tell the Story" and I have edited importantly to List of contemporary worship songs, Elevation Worship, Hillsong Worship and Christian singers and songwriters like Anthony Evans (singer), Rick Founds, Jason Gray (musician), Matt Redman. Although I have launched hundreds of pages for songs and albums in various genres, the Christian hymns are always something special that I enjoy the most as they give me great satisfaction and uplift my soul while I am working on them. The starting point would be listening to a hymn, then discovering no page exists for it on Wikipedia. Then I wonder why we didn't have pages for these songs earlier in Wikipedia, as these are just fantastic and sometimes very successful songs with awards. It just astounds me not to find pages for such songs despite all the expertise Wikipedia and its editors have. And yes "We Believe" is a huge song at all levels, musically, lyrcally, in performances and in impact. By the way, I didn't even know about the song yesterday, then I get to hear a version by the songwriter himself Travis Ryan (musician). It swept me like the storm and I listened to tens of versions while searching for data and information from available sources. Many thanks to you as well. If you could suggest from your own side other worthwhile phenomenal Christian tunes and hymns not covered presently by Wikipedia, suggest them here to me and I'll try my best if I see the song is notable and more importantly effects my soul. It would be a great pleasure. By the way if you could review the page and add other sources, it would be great and appreciated. werldwayd (talk) 20:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Infobox criminal
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox criminal. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
|
Hello Mr. Guye, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- June backlog drive
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
- New technology, new rules
- New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
- Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
- Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
- Editathons
- Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
- The Signpost
- The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apparent motion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Growing Pains episodes
A tag has been placed on Category:Growing Pains episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Aspects (talk) 22:33, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:45, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
User:Coffee
Please leave the page as it was left by the user in question. Thanks. Nick (talk) 20:16, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. The block was self-imposed and there is absolutely no reason that the page needs to be blanked or the blocked user template added. Please don't continue to restore your disputed edit.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:19, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, leave it alone, please. —DoRD (talk) 20:26, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Strong support
Template:Strong support has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 02:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
User page blanked?
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Seems like the amount drama correlates directly with the length of this discussion. Sooner or later someone's gonna invoke Hitler or the Nazis. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Please let me understand why we keep the user pages of users who died, and of some some banned, but not an inactive one? If I - as a reader - want to know what kind of user wrote some Good article, I find it inconvenient to have to go to the history. - As an editor, can I request somewhere that it won't happen to me in case I get inactive? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:18, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- There is no purpose for blanking the userpage of retired editors. Natureium (talk) 20:21, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- If I were you, Gerda, I'd add a instruction sub page or comment in the markup of your page to that effect. It won't happen, of course, since you're banned from ever leaving Wikipedia ;-) Nick (talk) 20:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- +1 - I've never been Coffee's best fan but even I can agree the blanking is not only disruptive but pointless...... Please stop. –Davey2010Talk 20:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- You're flying dangerously close to disrupting the encyclopedia in order to make a point. [2] [3]. Perhaps, just leave retired wikipedians userpages be? SQLQuery me! 21:21, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- @SQL: What!? Not only
iswere my edits not disruptive, but those two edits were per consensus. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 21:37, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- In what universe was what you did "by consensus"? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:45, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Chrissymad: I was told that tagging the main user page of an inactive user with {{Inactive userpage blanked}} was improper use of the template. So I clarified the template documentation to say that, and reverted someone else who made my same mistake. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 21:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- No, after being asked to stop, you nominated the template for deletion. Then when TonyBallioni closed the deletion discussion unfavorably, you modified the template documentation, and removed the template from an editor's page that had been there for years. It doesn't get much WP:POINTy than that. My advice would be to drop the stick, and let it go. SQLQuery me! 22:02, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) @SQL: I was mostly referring to the last two edits. And I'm not sure you were aware of the discussion I had on TonyBalloni's page, where he clarified the purpose of the template. So then I changed the documentation based on his clarification and reverted edits that were not what I was told it was for. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 22:13, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- I'm still waiting for you to explain WHY you were tagging pages anyway. Did you log in tonight and decide 'I know, I'll look for users who have left Wikipedia, and I'll find a template to put on their userpage, and then I'll go around blanking their userpages and adding this new template I've just found, because this will be SOOOO useful for the project' ? Nick (talk) 22:10, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Nick: Not exactly like that. Honestly I remembered the template and (foolishly?) believed that if it has remained for so long, then it was not against policy. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 22:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- @SQL: What!? Not only
If you have the time and energy, I'm sure there are other areas of the project that could use the effort, as opposed to messing around with other people's user pages. Just sayin'... - theWOLFchild 00:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Thewolfchild: Do you honestly think that all of my contributions to Wikipedia, including the edits I've made in between my response to Nick and your comment here, were made solely on other people's userpages? — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 01:02, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- Do you honestly see anything in my comment that even remotely states I think that? - theWOLFchild 01:14, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Thewolfchild: Yes, I do. Your comment suggested that somehow I wasn't aware of other areas in the project or that other areas of the project need help. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 01:20, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- Omigawwwd... if you are aware an area of the project that use some help, then how about you take all the energy you're using to try and start a dispute here and put it into actually helping out there... mm'kay? I was just chiming in with ALL the many, many other editors here that were advising you to leave user pages alone, that's all. I'm not doing this dance with you. We're done here. Good night. - theWOLFchild 01:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- Do you honestly see anything in my comment that even remotely states I think that? - theWOLFchild 01:14, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Israel
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:George Galloway
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Galloway. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Strong support
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Template:Strong support, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Newslinger talk 13:31, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:28, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Probe.ly
Hey Mr. Guye,
First of all I would like to my written material back on Draft:Probe.ly (the one that was recently deleted due to your speedy tag)
Secondly, I couldn't find a way to contest your deletion tag. And I would like to get some help on it. I'd also like to know which parts of the text did you see violating G11?
I have seen your history of reckless deletion tagging, and I would kindly invite you to reconsider the basis that you tag these pages for speedies. DavorPetreski (talk) 11:21, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- @DavorPetreski: You should speak to Anthony Appleyard, who is an administrator and the person who actually deleted it. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 14:55, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Mr. Guye: Thanks for the help! However I'd still like to get an answer to my second question. Which parts of the text did you see violating G11?
I wrote the article guiding myself with other Wikipedia Articles about similar companies and I don't believe I used any promotional wording. However, I would like to hear some feedback from you so I can improve my article. DavorPetreski (talk) 10:18, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:58, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Political activity of the Knights of Columbus
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political activity of the Knights of Columbus. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Shamma Hamdan
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shamma Hamdan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 05:02, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- There are a number of press articles in both English and Arabic which point to her notability. Please help to expand.--Ipigott (talk) 08:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red
Hi there, Mr. Guye, and thanks for becoming a member of Women in Red. I see you have contributed a number of very short women's biographies. It would be good if you could try to add a bit more information. Our Ten Simple Rules might help you along. If you run into any difficulties or need assistance, please let me know. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Timeline of the war in Donbass (July 2018–present)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timeline of the war in Donbass (July 2018–present). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Pmsltech
Hello Mr. Guye,
You have deleted my page that i have recently created on wiki. But I believe I had never used promotional word or any wrong information for the company.
I don't want to promote through wiki. I know this is encyclopedia. But Still I don't believe why this happened. I have read several company articles in wiki, then I had prepared the post.
Can you please tell me what is the difference between the page I have created and about this company page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluehost
I have never used keyword spam, never posted link through this article. so can you please review again it.
i know it's hard to publish article through wiki. But why???
why we can't publish company info. We have not that much capable to post simple company information. As you mentioned can you please tell me where link spamming done through this article?
If possible, please have look again on it.
Thank you
--- He pretty much did the same thing for me. As far as I saw from his talk page he is known for reckless deletion tagging DavorPetreski (talk) 11:23, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Dhirenray1985: First of all, I didn't delete it. I just nominated it for deletion. I am not an administrator, so I can't unilaterally delete pages. Second of all, it looks like you got the page restored at User:Dhirenray1985/sandbox. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 15:04, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Mr. Guye: Can you please assist me to live this article. Still this topic in sandbox. I have removed reference links and added more information about the organization. Dhiren Ray 05:48, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:59, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Illinois gubernatorial election, 2018
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Illinois gubernatorial election, 2018. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John McCain presidential campaign, 2000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maverick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Open draft
Template:Open draft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:41, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of cities in Israel
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of cities in Israel. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
September 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Please comment on Talk:Nadine Dorries
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nadine Dorries. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 27 August 2018 (UTC)