User talk:Mosaicberry

December 2018

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to BusyBox have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Materialscientist (talk) 23:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucky Patcher (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucky Patcher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucky Patcher, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:24, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mosaicberry! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:24, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI/WP:PAID

Please read and follow. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't been paid for writing anything, I don't know about others. Mosaicberry (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucky Patcher

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lucky Patcher, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:52, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating an article after it was deleted just a week ago is disruptive and continue disruptive behaviour may lead to a block. Additionally, most of the sources you cited are not reliable sources, with the books generally being self-published and forums are user generated and therefore unreliable. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I will give up on the page. But about XDA, are you actually that stupid, the XDA threads are to show that Lucky Patcher is banned on XDA because they have all been closed as LP is warez. There is no official thread on XDA that prohibits LP because it would be technically promoting it or at least interest people in it which they don't want to do as it will hurt developers. Mosaicberry (talk) 16:59, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lucky Patcher

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Lucky Patcher, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:19, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it, I give up. Mosaicberry (talk) 17:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ganool

Hello, Mosaicberry,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username PrussianOwl and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ganool should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganool .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|PrussianOwl}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PrussianOwl (talk) 01:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfD comments

Hi there. I see that lots of your comments on deletion discussions are simply "Keep per X". Comments such as these, which don't offer evidence, are liable to be discounted when consensus is determined. See WP:PERX for further explanation. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:51, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will try to do my own research. Mosaicberry (talk • contribs) 14:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Baidu, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 14:45, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. I forgot to hit minor edit, please accept my apologies for any inconvenience caused. Mosaicberry (talk • contribs) 14:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FMovies

The article FMovies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are trivial passing references, usually alongside a host of similar illegal streaming services. Insufficient substantial, independent coverage to establish notability on its own. Fails wp:orgcrite

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hugsyrup (talk) 10:28, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (FMovies) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating FMovies.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

You don't ever need five citations after a claim, unless that claim is "five separate sources said X". I would remove citations to some of the less reliable sources. TorrentFreak and ZDNET are generally reliable sources, though.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangoo

Hi Mosaicberry. I have revdeled a comment you made at the AfD for reasons that I assume don't require a lot of explanation. If you want to discuss anything please email me privately. Thank you for your contributions to the project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Rasta City" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rasta City. Since you had some involvement with the Rasta City redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rasta City has been accepted

Rasta City, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:GBO Gaston

Hello, Mosaicberry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "GBO Gaston".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:APKPure

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:APKPure, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:09, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]