User talk:Moltenality

This is Moltenality's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Moltenality, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited was Draft:Ameer Ali Salman, which appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 16:26, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello i am seeking some suggestions for my article! Draft:Ameer Ali Salman

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi wikipedians i am seeking help for my new article! Draft:Ameer Ali Salman (Moltenality (talk) 16:59, 13 August 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Have a read of WP:YFA - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 18:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Irfan junejo

Hello Moltenality,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Irfan junejo for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk 22:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello Moltenality. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Irfan junejo, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Moltenality. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Moltenality|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC) This was not paid and i swear to god i did it because i am a huge fan of him! please tell me if it needs any changes i can do it! please do not delete it i have done so many hard work! please (Moltenality (talk) 22:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC)).[reply]

Irfan junejo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Irfan junejo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to be written in an encyclopedic tone. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 23:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irfan junejo (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheBirdsShedTears were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources of potentially unreliable. Blogs cannot be accepted as reliable sources. See WP:CITEKILL for future references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Irfan junejo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Irfan junejo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 01:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moltenality! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 01:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irfan junejo (August 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 01:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm Wallu2. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pakistani hip hop music have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Wallu2 (talk) 07:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irfan junejo (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Irfan junejo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Irfan junejo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove speedy deletion tags from a page you have created yourself, but if you believe you have good reasons to think the speedy deletion nomination was mistaken then explain why on the relevant talk page. This applies whether or not you are logged in to the account you used to create the page. JBW (talk) 09:56, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Posting the name of a person you are trying to promote (probably yourself) into numerous articles where it is totally irrelevant is unacceptable, as you must know. The same goes for inserting irrelevant promotional links.JBW (talk) 10:07, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i am sorry if i am wrong here! i just want to edit on wikipedia to help improve it.I am sorry if i am not doing this. Moltenality ^PK 15:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

please help me edit wiki articles and guide me this will be really helpful for me.Thanks Moltenality ^PK 15:31, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous accounts

What account or accounts have you used before this one? JBW (talk) 10:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I give you this barnstar because of the excelent writing in the recent articles.ENJOY CosbyCreates (talk) 20:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Goat for a G.O.A.T

CosbyCreates (talk) 20:24, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much! Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 20:28, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks MOLTENALITY for diligently reading through all submissions on WP:ITNRD and providing your notes. I know we often do not credit editors who read each article and provide their feedback, as much as we credit creators, nominators, and updaters. I wanted to use this chance to say, "Thank You!" CosbyCreates (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much for this really appreciated Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 20:29, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moltenality, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 20:38, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous accounts

Please answer the question I asked above about previous accounts. I know of one other account you have used, and it seems there may be more. What other account or accounts have you used? JBW (talk) 21:51, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i have not used any other accounts neither i created. Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 21:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you use a signature which gives a different name from your user name? JBW (talk) 21:57, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

because that is my real name! is that a problem? Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 21:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Moltenality! Your additions to 2015 Würenlingen shooting have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GeneralNotability (talk) 23:51, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Shawntheshipper per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moltenality. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 05:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moltenality (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 05:45, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 05:46, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't know who is Shawn the shipper and this block was baseless.I want to be unblocked now! I have made so many useful edits that have been reverted baselessly.This block needs to be reverted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moltenality (talk • contribs) 05:45, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This block is based on technical evidence. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 05:48, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moltenality (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi this is moltenality and you recently blocked me as a sockpuppet of Shawn the shipper which I don't know who he is and if you think I was editing this wrong on Wikipedia than I am truly sorry now I understand the Wikipedia policies and will do my best to edit accordingly. I will not do any un useful or misleading edits or any others which violate the Wikipedia rules and regulations! I am apologising to you and requesting to revert the block so that I can edit on Wikipedia, I have done so many contributions and you just blocked me and it is baseless. I know you'll understand and revert my block. Then if I do the same you can block me indefinitely. Giving a last warning is good some times. BEST REGARDS Moltenality Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 05:59, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have clearly used more than one account and lied about it. You have clearly used this account for block-evasion. Whether Shawntheshipper was one of your accounts I neither know nor care. JBW (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I see that above you have written "I have made so many useful edits". Out of interest I looked through your editing history to see those useful edits. For some reason I couldn't find them. JBW (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

really appreciated the wikipedia administrator's tone of conveiying whats wrong!From now on not using wikipedia nor editing anything. Goodbye and have a nice day Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 17:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. JBW (talk) 20:14, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moltenality (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it's been 9 months since the block has been carried! I have been desperately trying to get into work on Wikipedia but couldn't because of the block but I admit the mistakes I have done before which won't be happening again and I mean it! Please consider the request of unblocking my account because I have done much work outside Wikipedia which has emphasised my Senses to not make any unauthorised and self benefit doings! I heartfully request you to unblock the account and ignore what I said earlier thank you Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 10:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You continued to attempt to mislead us here by falsely claiming you only had one other account. When pressed, you admitted this was not accurate, you had at least two other accounts. Given that, I think you are a poor candidate for unblocking at this time. Yamla (talk) 12:55, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser data shows no recent evidence of block evasion, though note that sockpuppetry was Confirmed and is not in doubt from back in August. I'm not reviewing this unblock request because, frankly, it doesn't address the problems that lead to the block. --Yamla (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have vandalised made multiple accounts to transfer barnstars and I have been accused of sockpuppetery and I accept it all and lifting the block would be a huge effect on me as I have mentioned above it's been nearly a year and I won't be doing such mistakes Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 10:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are accused of being Shawntheshipper. Are you now agreeing you are indeed the person behind this and attempted to lie about it? You were caught violating copyright but haven't addressed this. You indicated you made "so many useful edits" but haven't yet pointed to any of them. And Shawntheshipper was blocked for violating WP:BLP and having no understanding of WP:RS, but you haven't addressed this yet either. --Yamla (talk) 11:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Shawntheshipper but I violated several terms of Wikipedia and I am sorry about it and requesting for a unblock! And shawntheshipper is someone else not me Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 11:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the administrators have done a mistake by relating my account with shawntheshipper I only had one account cosbycreates which is also blocked by sockpuppetery of shawntheshipper I only condemn my end of violation on Wikipedia but shawntheshipper isn't me please review the block again Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 11:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What about Ameer Ali Salman? And you still haven't addressed your copyright violations, nor pointed to your "so many useful edits". --Yamla (talk) 11:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes ameeralisalman is my account but shawntheshipper isn't related to any of the accounts! And about the useful edits I have done you can check my contributions I have done over 123 edits on Wikipedia and you can see for yourself! The minor details that were edited. And the copyright violation I have took the picture accordingly to the respected article but didn't knew it was a copyrighted content which was then removed Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 11:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yamla Please review the block and lift it because I am not related to that shawntheshipper as soon as possible Thank you Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 12:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I literally told you that I only had those accounts which I mentioned but the reason of blocking me was being a sockpuppet of shawntheshipper but I don't even know who he is further! The main reason of blocking me is based on false accusations that need to be reviewed Ameer Ali Salman ^{Expert | Wiki} 14:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]