User talk:Mohammadreza zii

Sohrab MJ moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sohrab MJ, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ho3ein moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ho3ein, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Alireza JJ—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alireza JJ. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alireza JJ, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you assume ownership of articles, as you did at Alireza JJ. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Alireza JJ, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Sohrab MJ. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alireza JJ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alireza JJ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alireza JJ (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sohrab MJ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sohrab MJ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sohrab MJ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore my access in Wikipedia. I just entered Wikipedia and I didn't know its rules. If possible, please restore the access or tell me a solution to restore it. 🙏🤍 Mohammadreza zii (talk) 12:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to follow -->{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} but replace "your reason here" with a valid reason as to why you should be unblocked. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks bro🙏🧡 Mohammadreza zii (talk) 12:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammadreza zii (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please restore my access in Wikipedia. I just entered Wikipedia and I didn't know its rules. If possible, please restore the access or tell me a solution to restore it.Mohammadreza zii (talk) 12:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your contributed article, Arabo-Persian Gulf

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Arabo-Persian Gulf. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Persian Gulf. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Persian Gulf. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:16, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your blankings

You have not explained them. If you want to delete the redirects, use a Wikipedia procedure. Unexplained blankings may be considered vandalism and you may be blocked. Xx236 (talk) 10:00, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been alredy blocked and you declared to not know Wikipedia rules. Please learn the rules.Xx236 (talk) 10:05, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to a dozen of redirects, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Xx236 (talk) 10:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to edit Persian Gulf, you have to quote reliable sources.Xx236 (talk) 10:20, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at North Arabian Gulf. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:23, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for continuing unconstructive editing, similar to that which led to your previous block, including, but not limited to, repeatedly removing all content from pages without any explanation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 10:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir Mohammadreza zii (talk) 10:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked me for two months for a simple edit! Mohammadreza zii (talk) 10:39, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I blocked you for a continuing pattern of editing, continuing in defiance of what you have been told, and undeterred by either a shorter block or warning messages. I find it difficult to believe that you really thought it was for one edit, simple or otherwise. JBW (talk) 10:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this beautiful work. It is clear that you are a worthy administrator in Wikipedia. I hope you will be successful!! Mohammadreza zii (talk) 10:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sohrab MJ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Sohrab MJ, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:04, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yasin Cengiz

Hello Mohammadreza zii,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yasin Cengiz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 11:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sohrab MJ (2)

Hello, Mohammadreza zii. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sohrab MJ (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ho3ein

Hello, Mohammadreza zii. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ho3ein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sohrab MJ (2)

Hello, Mohammadreza zii. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sohrab MJ".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:34, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]