User talk:Mjcgonzalez02

This is Mjcgonzalez02's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Hasbulla (internet personality) (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Poorly referenced, needs to be better supported by more reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mjcgonzalez02/sandbox/Hasbulla (internet personality) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Mjcgonzalez02/sandbox/Hasbulla (internet personality), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:17, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mjcgonzalez02! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:17, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hasbulla (internet personality) (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Ladbible and YouTube are not reliable sources, neither are interviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hasbulla (internet personality) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hasbulla (internet personality), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @doublegrazing, or whoever this may concern. I have chose to written about this subject because I feel that he is significant enough in popular culture to write about. He is very well-known and is mentioned a lot on internet culture. I have found several wikipedia articles on lesser-known internet personalities, with a significantly smaller following, for example British Instagrammer and TikToker Francis Bourgeois, who has about half Hasbulla's amount of followers. On Francis' page, they have included sources from LadBible, which is why I included them on mine (because I thought that meant they would be "wikipedia approved"). Aside from LB, I have read media bias/fact check reports on the rest of my sources and they all have similar or higher accuracy reports to mainstream news sources such as NBC, Fox, CBS, etc. If I delete the LadBible and Youtube-sourced parts from my article, do you think it will get published? I also think that unfortunately, due to the fact that Hasbulla does not speak English and is from a relatively-lesser known place (Dagestan), he has had less "mainstream" coverage than, for example, Francis Bourgeois. That, however, should not be grounds for his exclusion from the site, especially since many well-known and reliable sources have in fact covered him, and I have cited them. Everyone I have asked knows who this guy is and is shocked that he does not have a wikipedia page yet, and even though that doesn't necessarily provide empirical evidence of his relevance, it does prove that he has a sizeable place in pop culture and his deserving of a wikipedia article about him (especially because I live in the West, outside of the centre of his following). Do you have any other tips for me that would help me get this article published? I am only a beginner writer (but long-time reader) at wikipedia, so I really appreciate the feedback I have been getting, and I would love to know the "tips and tricks of the trade" so I can get into less problems creating articles in the future! Mjcgonzalez02 (talk) 16:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC) mjcgonzalez[reply]

Hi, in response to your comments, there are a couple of misunderstandings here:

How 'well-known' someone is doesn't matter; notability, in the Wikipedia context, does not mean 'fame', etc., it means how much other (reliable and independent) sources have covered the subject. If there is significant coverage in multiple sources, the subject is likely to be notable. If there isn't, it is very likely not to be.
How well (or not) other similar articles are sourced isn't the criteria against we must judge new articles. Instead, we measure them using accepted guidelines and policies. If OTHERSTUFFEXISTS which is badly sourced, those articles should be brought up to the required standard; not that new articles are created which are also sub-standard.

Hope this helps, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hasbulla (internet personality) (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by C1K98V was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hasbulla (internet personality) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hasbulla (internet personality), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 07:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hasbulla (internet personality)

Hello, Mjcgonzalez02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hasbulla (internet personality), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:23, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]