User talk:Missvain/Archive 44
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Missvain. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 40 | ← | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 |
This Month in GLAM: October 2017
| ||||||
WiR December highlights
   
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 13:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Missvain. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: November 2017
| ||||||
Dyk
I submitted the nomination for the Lilac Fire. Feel free to comment. Bardic Wizard (Happy HanukkahMerry Christmas) 21:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you! Happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 03:37, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jones Fire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red flag (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
A toast sandwich for you!
|
Great clean up work at Chris Smith (New Jersey politician)! Marquardtika (talk) 00:12, 22 December 2017 (UTC) |
- Thank you!! :) Missvain (talk) 00:14, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Missvain. You accepted South Shore Furniture for Wikipedia:Articles for creation. The article was nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Shore Furniture. Cunard (talk) 05:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
HH!
|
Happy Holidays! Happy New Year! | |
| Thinking of you and wishing you good health and happiness. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC) |
Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!
.jpg) .jpg) 
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
- Thanks, I'm already a member. Missvain (talk) 18:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry! I made a mistake. I wasn't supposed to send that and I'm editing everyones' page by hand. :( Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm already a member. Missvain (talk) 18:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection is rather unprecedented in the mainspace, and the protection policy spells out that indefinite full is only used in limited circumstances (WP:PPINDEF). Could you add an appropriate expiry time to this protection? ~ Rob13Talk 07:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Please see here Talk:Linda_Sarsour#Pending_changes?. Missvain (talk) 15:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Did you mean to change the page from full- to semi-protected (log)? —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- This is what happens when you edit without coffee. Missvain (talk) 16:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Did you mean to change the page from full- to semi-protected (log)? —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Please see here Talk:Linda_Sarsour#Pending_changes?. Missvain (talk) 15:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Sarsour 1rr or 3rr
Is the Pearl edit under the 1RR or 3RR rule? Thanks for the clarity. The Kingfisher (talk) 16:36, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ask User:Sangdeboeuf. Missvain (talk) 16:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) The article is within the Israeli-Palestinian conflict topic area, so it's under 1RR. ~ Rob13Talk 16:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree that the Pearl quote should be because of the word "Zionphobe," but if there is an edit about, say feminism, would that fall under the 1RR? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Kingfisher (talk • contribs) 17:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks User:BU Rob13. I was just taking a look into the history to see that and you arrived at the perfect time. Missvain (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree that the Pearl quote should be because of the word "Zionphobe," but if there is an edit about, say feminism, would that fall under the 1RR? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Kingfisher (talk • contribs) 17:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) The article is within the Israeli-Palestinian conflict topic area, so it's under 1RR. ~ Rob13Talk 16:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ask User:Sangdeboeuf. Missvain (talk) 16:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 31
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Hal Rogers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Christian Coalition
- Steve Scalise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Second Amendment
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
False posts on Barry Loudermilk page
You need to stop posting blatantly false content on Barry Loudermilk's page.
You wrote that "At almost the same moment as Equifax revealed the breach, Loudermilk, who had been given thousands of dollars by Equifax as part of an extensive lobbying effort, introduced a bill that would reduce consumer protections in relation to the nation’s credit bureaus, including capping potential damages in a class action suit to $500,000 regardless of class size or amount of loss." Actually, the bill was introduced on May 4, 2017, more than four months before the Equifax breach was revealed. [1]
The statement that "The bill would also eliminate all punitive damages" is false. The bill would eliminate punitive damages only under the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970. Every single other consumer financial protection law besides the FCRA already prohibits punitive damages.
The bill does not reduce a single consumer protection. It only caps statutory damages which are generally awarded to trial lawyers and are completely separate from the actual damages that a consumer may recover. [2]
The statement that the bill would cap damages in "a class action suit" is incomplete and misleading because it fails to state the fact that the bill would only apply to damages for lawsuits under the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970. You also fail to state the fact that these limits on statutory damages are already present in every single other consumer financial protection law besides the FCRA.
You also falsely portray the bill as a giveaway to the credit bureaus by failing to note the fact that frivolous FCRA class action lawsuits have been skyrocketing in recent years against numerous industries other than the credit bureaus, including auto dealers, grocery stores, universities, transportation, fast food, software, background screeners, retail, banks, credit unions, and human resources. [3][4][5][6]
You also refer to Rep. Loudermilk as [Rep. Buddy] "Carter" under the "cannabis" section.
You should correct these false statements or remove the content entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrusheauriga (talk • contribs) 00:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't write 99% of the what you just wrote above. Please post on the talk page about making changes, backed up with reliable secondary sources. Cheers. Missvain (talk) 02:29, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rose Halprin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rose Halprin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2017
| ||||||
DYK for Lilac Fire
On 11 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lilac Fire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Lilac Fire in Southern California grew from a small brush fire to 4,100 acres (17 km2) in one day? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lilac Fire. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lilac Fire), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Feburary 2018 at Women in Red
.jpg)   New:
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Nomination of Sarah Boone for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Boone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Boone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 12:37, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Linda Sarsour
Now that full protection has expired at Linda Sarsour, the vandals have returned. Would you mind restoring extended-confirmed protection per WP:ARBPIA3? —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:15, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for pinging me, been slammed IRL so I've been slacking on my Wikipedia! Taking a look now. Missvain (talk) 19:18, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2018
| ||||||
Your March editathon
As you are arranging an editathon on March 9 & 10, you might be interested in Women in Red's plans for Women's History Month. We have also developed Ten Simple Rules for new editors interested in creating biographies, which might be useful.
 
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 15:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
This Month in GLAM: February 2018
| ||||||
Image copyright
Hallo, Missvain, thanks for adding the image to Margaret Deborah Cookesley, but are you sure it's OK in copyright terms? The painting is out of copyright, the copyright of the photograph belongs to Towneley Hall gallery. See https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/the-gamblers-wife-151064#image-use and https://artuk.org/about/image-use , and note that "All images on Art UK are protected by a secure invisible digital watermark that allows Art UK and other copyright holders to identify and track any unauthorised use of the image." PamD 16:29, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- It's fine. They actually have no right to be able to claim copyright on it due to its age in the UK. :) Missvain (talk) 17:01, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- So you don't believe that the copyright of the photograph exists, as something separate from the (expired) copyright in the painting? Well, that's not my understanding. I'll research a bit further when not on my phone. PamD 17:56, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- No, you can't claim copyright on a photograph of a public domain painting. There is actually a lawsuit that involved the National Portrait Gallery in the UK, in which they lost, trying to claim photography copyright on public domain artworks. Now, if it was a 3D artwork (sculpture) then they could claim copyright on it. Here's a bit more information here: [7]. Missvain (talk) 18:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's very helpful - I hadn't found that in a brief exploration of Commons help files. But I wonder whether you've used the right licensing tag? That article talks about the {{PD-Art}} tag but doesn't say how it's used, but their example file File:Benjamin_West_by_Gilbert_Stuart_1783-84.jpg displays a copyright statement which explicitly states "This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason: ..", and more below, which your upload of File:LAN TOWN BURGM paoil14.jpg doesn't have. PamD 23:24, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- After experimenting while uploading File:Circe Resplendens (1913) by Margaret Murray-Cookesley.jpg, I think the tag needed is
{{PD-Art| PD-old-70-1923}}which seems to produce the desired effect. PamD 23:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- After experimenting while uploading File:Circe Resplendens (1913) by Margaret Murray-Cookesley.jpg, I think the tag needed is
- Thanks, that's very helpful - I hadn't found that in a brief exploration of Commons help files. But I wonder whether you've used the right licensing tag? That article talks about the {{PD-Art}} tag but doesn't say how it's used, but their example file File:Benjamin_West_by_Gilbert_Stuart_1783-84.jpg displays a copyright statement which explicitly states "This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason: ..", and more below, which your upload of File:LAN TOWN BURGM paoil14.jpg doesn't have. PamD 23:24, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- No, you can't claim copyright on a photograph of a public domain painting. There is actually a lawsuit that involved the National Portrait Gallery in the UK, in which they lost, trying to claim photography copyright on public domain artworks. Now, if it was a 3D artwork (sculpture) then they could claim copyright on it. Here's a bit more information here: [7]. Missvain (talk) 18:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- So you don't believe that the copyright of the photograph exists, as something separate from the (expired) copyright in the painting? Well, that's not my understanding. I'll research a bit further when not on my phone. PamD 17:56, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- It's fine. They actually have no right to be able to claim copyright on it due to its age in the UK. :) Missvain (talk) 17:01, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
_by_Margaret_Murray-Cookesley.jpg){kind=link}
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amal Azzudin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Somali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Precious three years!
 | |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
I really appreciate your work on this and other recent articles, both on Wikipedia and Wikidata. It's always satisfying to see other editors making improvements and I'm always glad to receive your "thanks". I do nevertheless have a couple of queries. I see you reintroduced the stub template on the article. With text running to 3289 B and "running text" to 1914 B, I would have thought the article could be considered start class. Other seasoned editors have recently removed stub templates from some of my articles which were in fact rather shorter than this one. Perhaps you could tell me which criteria you use to define a stub. If you look at WP:Stub, you will see that it starts by saying: "A stub is an article deemed too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject." I would argue that the article on Drejer covers her in sufficient detail to be "encyclopedic", drawing on all the essentials from the sources I used (and there is hardly anything more which can be readily accessed). But I would be interested in hearing your views on this. I do aim for start class as far as possible in all my new articles.
Secondly, I usually try to introduce basic Wikidata details on all my new biographies using the "gadget". I see however that you replaced the information I added (even if it was identical). Is it worthwhile for me to use the gadget in future or will it simply be replaced within hours by you and your Wikidata colleagues? Perhaps my Wikidata time would be more usefully spent on adding profession details to the huge backlog of Wikidata biographies which have nothing in this slot. (All the women's biographies entered on Wikidata by the bot usually just have human and female.)
Enjoy your Sunday!--Ipigott (talk) 08:04, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
And thanks for all the draft articles you have improved and moved to mainspace. Quite an assignment!--Ipigott (talk) 12:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- What gadget are you talking about? Also, I guess I just see stubs as short articles and in 11 years of editing I never really cared to read the actual "description" of what a stub is defined as. If you want to remove my stub tags go for it, I don't care! :) Missvain (talk) 15:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back to me on this. You can see the gadget here. If you download it, it allows you to add the basic Wikidata info while you are still working on the Wikipedia article. You can add all the data in one go, without the need to add one item at a time as when you work directly on Wikidata. I find it very useful. I know some other seasoned editors from Women in Red also make use of it.
- I can certainly understand that when working at full speed as you usually do, it may indeed be a good idea to add stub to what you consider to be a short article. I was a bit surprised in this case as your "thanks" was on my edit for removing the stub template which you then reintroduced. I'm pretty conscious of what is considered to be a stub as I have helped out with a number of contests on de-stubbing and article creation. But there are no hard and fast rules so your guess is as good as mine.--Ipigott (talk) 11:48, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- What gadget are you talking about? Also, I guess I just see stubs as short articles and in 11 years of editing I never really cared to read the actual "description" of what a stub is defined as. If you want to remove my stub tags go for it, I don't care! :) Missvain (talk) 15:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Public art in Washington, D.C.
Template:Public art in Washington, D.C. has been nominated for merging with Template:Public art in the United States. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --Another Believer (Talk) 13:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Apache Arrow article
Hello, I am new to this part of Wikipedia, so please forgive if I have done this the wrong way.
You flagged this page as a conflict of interest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Apache_Arrow
Note that the subject of this article is Apache Arrow, a software project owned by the Apache Software Foundation. This foundation stewards hundreds of such projects, many of which are listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Apache_Software_Foundation_projects.
I am not affiliated with the Apache Software Foundation. I wrote the article because I believe the project is important and that it meets the notability requirements of Wikipedia. I do not believe there is a COI, and I think you comment makes a reference that is not relevant to the subject of this article.
Thank you for your consideration. Again, apologies if I have failed to follow the appropriate protocol for responding to your comment.
Kstirman (talk) 07:08, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello I'm also new to the Wikipedia I'm sorry if I'm doing this wrong.
You marked this page as a COI:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Protey_Temen Yes, I do have a conflict of interest with the subject but it wasn't me who wrote the article, it was journalist Armas Shpilev Vikström and it was translated by the agency, I just published it. Armas doesn't have any additional info and this article is pretty impartial and just facts, so it's not much to change. It is an impartial source article and it would be a waste to just throw it away. What do I do? Should I request deletion of the article and ask Armas to post it himself?
Thank you so much for your help. Really hope to fix this.
Ira Ivanova (talk) 13:08, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freestone, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saloon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Giuliano Ghelli
Hi I'm preparing an article on the Italian painter Giuliano Ghelli. I started with a longish draft and have been cutting it down. Although I have my sources lined up, before filling them in I wanted some feedback on the content and tone. Ghelli was fairly well-known in Europe but had only a handful of small shows in the US in his lifetime. Also worth mentioning that virtually all the sources are written in Italian (one book has parallel English text).
Current draft is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Giuliano_Ghelli
Many thanks in advance (and, if you are not the right person to ask or too busy, please point me in the right direction!).Alexsubrizi (talk) 20:30, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
Orphaned non-free image File:Sun King Brewing Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sun King Brewing Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:04, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
James Michalopoulos keeps reverting
Hi there I've been working on the page about the painter James Michalopoulos and I keep having bots revert it, and now it seems you have a problem with 'inappropriate links' - as I am new to wiki i have a lot to learn -- please enlighten me as to which links are running afoul and why - NEW: I reviewed the guidelines and it seems perhaps I should not have put the homepage to one of the subject's businesses as it is a retail site - would removing that remedy things?
additionally I got rid of the maintenance tag because I resolved the COI problem (I am writer/hostorian and have no personal connection with the subject) - and I said so in the talk page and in the summary and yet it returns - I am working hard to improve the page and am looking to raise it to at least a level B biography - but with this static reverting the page back to the boring mess that it was is a little vexing -- please lend me some guidance -- thanks Mikkopresents (talk) 17:38, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, the artist is well known in New Orleans and is one of the city's icons. I was fortunate to meet him last year during an exhibition at his studio, and was quite impressed with his work and dedication to his adopted city. I'd suggested that the page would benefit from an image of one or two of his paintings, so readers could see their interesting texture and treatment of subject matter (and hopefully Mikkopresents can obtain permission to add one or two images of the paintings to the article). In fact, other artists have tried to copy his style, and sell their paintings in other shops. If editor Mikkopresents is truthful, and there is no reason to think they're not, as a historian of the city it would make sense to improve this page. Hopefully this can be resolved, and Mikkopresents will become further involved in articles about New Orleans and its rich history. Randy Kryn (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- As someone who knows nothing about the person and little about New Orleans, I cut much of what I thought was incidental to making the person notable. David notMD (talk) 17:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Thank you (talk) and again (talk) I am presently talking to someone at his company to get permission to put his pictures up - I am going to prepare a full-on profile on James including his art, his philanthropy, and that he basically brought rum back to the united states - when I prepare profiles, I tend to build them up as i go, if people are going to come along and remove the foundation saying the stuff is incidental before I can build it, how is that helpful? for example his father was one of the most important architects in pittsburgh history, I mean if whitney houston's page can mention darlene love is her godmother, i can't talk about that? these are all salient points to his significance - as I understand it, I can start to edit and eventually the tag will get removed? i want to get going on this, so thank you all again for your guidance, i hope to get it right soon
Mikkopresents (talk) 23:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
James Michalopoulas
hello, i have been chatting with many other contributors and it seems i was doing things backwards i am told i have to make my edits and then the tag will come down either way i am going to improve the page and i hope you can guide me in this i won't post any inappropriate links and i am trying to get relevant artwork on the page by getting the right permissions i've already declared to a couple of the editors that i am in no way associated with the subject please tell me anything else i have to do thanks
Mikkopresents (talk) 23:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Byron Gallery.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Byron Gallery.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
AfC submission - Battushig Batbold
Hi Missvain,
Thanks for the cookies! I thought I'd take you up on your offer of advice. I'm having some trouble with an article I've created (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Battushig_Batbold) - it was first declined due to unreliable sources, which I looked into and addressed. The second submission was then declined for the same reason, yet with no further detail on which sources were deemed as being unreliable. To my mind, the sources used are appropriate.
Any advice you can offer before I submit it again would be much appreciated!
Thanks, Nickjames1984 (talk) 11:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: March 2018
| ||||||
Select Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_5tp6rhV7P1aGrEp&Q_CHL=gl
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 01:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Capitol Pride Salem Logo.jpg.png
Thanks for uploading File:Capitol Pride Salem Logo.jpg.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — trlkly 07:16, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 at Women in Red
  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Wiki Loves Food
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 20:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Artesa Vineyards & Winery logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Artesa Vineyards & Winery logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
