User talk:Miningpyropony/Archive 1
This archive covers my talk page from when i created this account to December 4th 2013.
I have several helpful links on my user page for editing. You can also contact me on my talk page. Thanks!
— RosscoolguyCVU | 22:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Article notability notification
[edit]
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Brunnsåkersskolan, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Brunnsåkersskolan" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 23:30, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Basic editing hints
[edit]Hello Miningpyropony! I've added a template with useful hints on top of this page, and I encourage you to read it. Reviewing your additions from the last couple of months, I've noticed that you tend to add text without wikilinks or other formatting (such as boldface), and that you've even overwritten correctly formatted text. This forces other editors to cleanup after your additions, for the articles to come up to the lowest acceptable standard. So while your additions have been OK on substance and language, and I would like to encourage you to continue with them, please pay better attention to wikiformatting. Regards, Tomas e (talk) 12:50, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Stuga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page, or a redirect loop.
If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Camyoung54 talk 15:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dovado
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Dovado, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tyros1972 Talk 07:19, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Erik Boheman for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erik Boheman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Boheman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Round Maple
[edit]Hi. I can't see how Round Maple has enough info to sustain an article separate from Edwardstone. The hamlet is part of the parish of Edwardstone, and there's not very much to say about that either. As you state, Round Maple appears to be in a hell of a lot of other language Wikipedias, but there is no significant info in those articles either. Additionally, I can't find this request for creation that you mention. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 07:32, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- I deleted the request because i created the article, you can see me deleting it here. --Miningpyropony (talk) 07:35, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- Ah yes. So the request is an automated one because of the numerous versions in other languages. Again, those non-English wikipedia articles do not contain significant information of note to warrant an independent article. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 07:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Refactoring others' talk page comments
[edit]Was this a mistake? I've been a Wikipedian for over ten years, and removing the oldest talk page comments on my own talk page is a pretty common practice. (If I didn't, by now my talk page would be gigabytes long by now.) All the best, – Quadell (talk) 12:32, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, sorry for that, wasn't a mistake when i made it, but it "is now". --Your Friendly Neigborhood Wikipedian (talk) 12:35, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! – Quadell (talk) 14:02, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keeriyo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sindhi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
eh? I don't see any detaggings? Dlohcierekim 09:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, the user recreated the article right after it was deleted --Your Friendly Neigborhood Wikipedian (talk) 09:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Lipoviza
[edit]Can Lipoviza be deleted as patent nonsense, or should it just be translated/checked for notability? George8211what did I break now? 19:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Also see the page creator's user page. George8211what did I break now? 19:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Since almost none of the words in the article cna be identified, it can be safely assumed to just be nonsense. --Your Friendly Neigborhood Wikipedian (talk) 19:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)