User talk:Mindsetup

Welcome!

Hello, Mindsetup, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Fedor Kurj, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Foodie (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fedor Kurj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fedor Kurj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Foodie (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fedor Kurj (November 20)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fedor Kurj.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 20:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mindsetup, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Proposed deletion of Tony Petkovich

Hello, Mindsetup. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Tony Petkovich, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Tony Petkovich to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Itsalleasy (talk) 07:09, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katrina Starzhynskaya

Hello, Mindsetup. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Katrina Starzhynskaya, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Itsalleasy (talk) 07:22, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luke Yankee (December 12)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Luke Yankee.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 14:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Susan Gilbert

Hello Mindsetup,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Susan Gilbert for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Anishwiki12 (talk) 06:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of E.D. Johnson

Hello Mindsetup,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged E.D. Johnson for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Anishwiki12 (talk) 06:21, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Gary Douglas

Hello, Mindsetup,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Gary Douglas should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Douglas .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Anishwiki12 (talk) 06:25, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

David Hadley

Hello Mindsetup,

When i searched for David Hadley, I cannot find a single third party reference for him. Can you explain in details how you identified subject as notable, a very well-known social worker and a good writer? If you're new to the process, Please go through WP:NPV. You cannot remove deletion tag from page as discussion is taking place for its inclusion.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.Anishwiki12 (talk) 09:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Susan Gilbert for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susan Gilbert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Gilbert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove notice

Hello Mindsetup, I wanted to let you know that I just re-tagged Katrina Starzhynskaya for AFD notice. Please make sure you do not remove tag from page as discussion is going to include this page in Wikipedia. Itsalleasy (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove notice

Hello Mindsetup, I wanted to let you know that I just re-tagged David Hadley for AFD notice. Please make sure you do not remove tag from page as discussion is going to include this page in Wikipedia. Itsalleasy (talk) 16:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bilby (talk) 01:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as an account of User:Arifhasan23 - Bilby (talk) 01:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mindsetup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not doing any illegitimate work in wikipedia now. Why I will be blocked now? I am using my user ID for inserting informative articles, not any illegal or unusual work. I have relation with user: Arifhasasn23 long back but till then I did not make any Sock puppet. Please unblock me and I promise not to make any illegitimate work, all works will be fair enough. I always follow wikipedia rules. The previous Sock puppet was done due to my lack of knowledge as i was new and I was somehow tapped that I mentioned in my reasons. Please consider.

Decline reason:

Admitted sock of either or both User:Sultanakan and User:Arifhasan23. Standard practice to to request unblock from the original account. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:52, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To clarify, if I understand your comment correctly, you were using a previous account, which I assume to be User:Sultanakan. Is this correct? - Bilby (talk) 09:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your mentioned user ID was used by me. But there was no Sock puppet or something like this or any illegitimate work under this user ID. Mindsetup (talk) 15:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately both User:Sultanakan and User:Arifhasan23 are blocked, and we had previously determined that User:Sultanakan was an account used by User:Arifhasan23. So what you are doing by creating a new account is block evasion. That creates a problem for us. There's also a problem in that you appear to have been making edits with a conflict of interest, but have not been declaring your conflict of interest when editing. While that is not necessarily something we would block your account for, in combination with block evasion it creates a bigger issue. - Bilby (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So, will I be unblocked? I will not be engaged with any illegitimate work here. Mindsetup (talk) 18:08, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is best left to whoever considers your request above. - Bilby (talk) 09:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fedor Kurj concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fedor Kurj, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fedor Kurj concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fedor Kurj, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fedor Kurj

Hello Mindsetup. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Fedor Kurj".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fedor Kurj}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]