User talk:Milliot
RE: earning your medals (barnstar) etc.
[edit]
Sadly I've not been awarded any barnstars based on my actual contributions. Like you I've taken on projects which require edits across multiple pages without recognition of others. Personally I'm not bothered by this. Service awards however are easier to get, so easy you can do it your self, just look at and follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:Service awards. If need be you can research yourself and your edits through the tool server by way of programs such as Interiots edit counter[1]. You can also confirm your first logged in edit as a user by clicking on my preferences.
You may wish to add the edit counter to your user page for later research by adding {{userinfo}} to the very top.
My research would show you have been a member for 16 Months and have made 1777 (1499 Mainspace) edits. According to Wikipedia:Service awards you are officially only an Apprentice but could also award yourself the earlier service award of Novice. The guidelines are clear for service awards, not just time as a member of the community but also edit count.
Furthermore there are often Barnstar Drives for performing needed tasks often listed in the villiage pump and community portal.
My only advice to you would be don't take anything personally, quality is still better than quantity, and include more edit summaries (which also reduces the chances of reversion). Slysplace talk ♫ 21:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- The reward is often just in the doing, the expectation of something deserved is often similar to assumed ownership of an article one creates. Have you read Contributing to Wikipedia? or better yet Five pillars Remember just be bold. It's all about sharing knowledge, awards will come. Slysplace talk ♫ 22:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Editing your user page is good practice, enhancing it is good practice too. Should teach you skills to format other pages the User page design center is a good resource once kept by the Transhumanist . Best of luck Slysplace talk ♫ 23:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- May I be so bold as to help you clean up your user page? Paste this into search - - > User:Slysplace/charitypage1 (purposely not linked) Some suggestions your free to use. Slysplace talk ♫ 22:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Stradivarius
[edit]hello. i once again, restored the information you deleted from the stradivarius article on the Nagyvary research. regardless of whether or not the data appears elsewhere, it still has relevance here. cheers! --emerson7 07:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Please don't add biographies of other people into the Elizabeth Gilels article. If they're notable enough to pass WP:BIO, then they should have their own articles. If they're not notable enough for BIO, then one or two sentences is sufficient. Corvus cornixtalk 17:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
It seems to me like a sneaky way to try to get biographical information about people who fail WP:BIO into the encyclopedia. Please discuss at [[2]]. Corvus cornixtalk 20:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
You will note that I have made no claims about the notability of the subject of the article, Elizabeth Gilels. If you think that there are reliable sources to prove the notability of her descendants, then they should be in separate articles for each of them. If they don't meet notability standards, then stuffing them into an article about somebody else is, indeed, sneaky, and I stand by that. Corvus cornixtalk 22:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Corvus, I notice that you are not an administrator. If you are a commited wiki contributor, you would see how much I have contributed. And calling my article sneaky is rather adolescent of you. The dynasty of Leonid Kogan and his wife Elizabeth Gilels, is an important one in the music world. Leonid Kogan is described in all of the history books, and encyclopedias as a legendary violinist. His wife is from the same circles and is considered an important violinist and one of the great pedagogues of the Soviet School. Her teacher ABRAM ILICH YAMPOLSKY is a world renowned pedagogue of the Soviet School of Violin. Who's students went on to become legendary. These figures of the music world have earned the right to these titles. Every known book mentions them in these terms. If you have issues, look them up to confirm your reservations. But please, stop belittling the legendary musicians and pedagogues by taking out the superlatives that they have earned in history. Would you call Einstein just a Scientist? Merci Milliot (talk) 23:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's your responsibility as the editor of the article to provide reliable sources, it's not the responsiblity of those of us who come by and find sources lacking, to do the diligence that you should have performed when you wrote the article to begin with. Corvus cornixtalk 23:13, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Provide the sources and all will be fine. Don't provide sources, and you're being obstructionist. Corvus cornixtalk 23:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Village_pump_(assistance)#User:Milliot. I have no quarrel with the notability of the subjects of your articles, nor do I want to take anything away from the large amount of work you have done, which I applaud, but there really needs to be a lot of work done to your articles to get them up to encyclopedic (and English grammatical) shape. Please don't take this as an attack, as it really is not, in any form. If you find this insulting, I strongly apologize, because I am really not trying to insult you. Corvus cornixtalk 23:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
No problems here. I have provided references where citation was requested. Perhaps you would like to offer me a service badge for the large amount of work I have done? :)Milliot (♫♫) 00:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
verifications
[edit]any claim made regarding blp must be buttressed by reliable, verifiable references. --emerson7 20:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Can you be more specific "regarding blp" ?Milliot (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
blp is a reference to assertions made regarding living people. further, you cannot use wikipedia articles as references. --emerson7 21:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Just so you are aware, I was not the one using wikipedia articles as references.Milliot (talk) 03:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:GiuseppeFiorini.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:GiuseppeFiorini.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Ricky81682, The image is in public domain, dating from 1890's. Author is uknown. If you would like, please ask User:Florenus about its background.Milliot (talk) 00:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Guadagnini
[edit]i once again reverted your changes. please, please, please, reference mos guidelines for creating and formatting references, and the how to set up and order articles. if you need help, please ask. --emerson7 19:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- verifications;
Please help. I seem to be having a problem with emerson7 undoing work that I have contributed. The adds. that I have made are self explanatory. The issue is with "Performers who have used or are using Guadagnini instruments"
The performers who have used (and most of them are deceased), are linked to wiki articles. The instruments that these artists used, are linked to a professional database cozio.com. The links are to specific instruments they have used (which are marked accordingly on cozio site). If emerson7 is not familiar with such information, he/she should either get familiar & or try to correct whatever it is that he/she does not agree with. But deleting valuable information and reverting it back to the way it was, which was insufficient for that reason had these posted:
 | This article possibly contains original research. (February 2008) |
 |
stradivari
[edit]firstly, i think the word you seek is debunked, not rebuked. secondly, i reverted because whether or not the research was invalidated, it nevertheless passes the test of relevance, and is of importance to the overall story of the mystic of the stradivari instruments. thirdly, since i personally have not reviewed navagry's research, i didn't think it appropriate for me to either defend his work, or challenge your claim.
please understand, that my concerns about your editing are not personal. however, i urge you to pay particular attention to wp:mos style guidelines, and not be so obstinate when the errors you make are corrected. cheers. --emerson7 22:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
If one is to consider the importance of the hundreds of makers who have been inspired by Stradivari, and the mystery surrounding his instruments, there are much bigger names that should be named who have made their own significant contributions.Milliot (talk) 23:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject France newsletter
[edit]
|
|
Thank you for your contributions to the project, Jordan Contribs 18:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Notability of Jean Adam / bow maker
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Jean Adam / bow maker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
I don't think this contetnt is relevant and has no notability sorry. Use {{hangon}} if you think it is! Didz93 (talk) 02:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
I have just created the article of this notable 19th century French Master Bow Maker. Please read the full article before you start tagging articles for deletion. We are trying to expand wiki not delete it;) Thanks in advance.Milliot (talk) 02:37, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi. This is to explain that although composers don't have bio-infoboxes, neither do violinists etc. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical music#Biographical_infoboxes. Thanks for your understanding on this.--Kleinzach 05:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
To ascertain a consensus about using info boxes on instrumentalists, we should have more time to see what that consensus truly stipulates. At the moment the guidelines don't reflect a major consensus against info boxes for violinists, they reflect the consensus on Composers Project and the Opera Project.See Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical music#Biographical_infoboxes. So if you don't mind, I would rather like to see info box for Garcin and other violinists. There are existing info boxes for other "historic" violinists, that were done by others and nobody seemed to mind them. Thank you for your understanding. Milliot (talk) 09:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi. An article you created on Mainspace does not meet guidelines for acceptable submissions, due to having no references, no introduction, no subject, no assertion of notability, no categories, and no content apart from the subject's name. It will most likely be tagged for speedy deletion. In the future, it might be better to build articles in WP:SAND, or create an extra user page. If you have questions, there is a significant amount of information contained here: WP:FIRST and WP:STYLE. Thanks again for your contributions. --OliverTwisted (Talk) 09:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. What I actually wanted to do, is to link "Grand Adam" to an existing article of the same person Jean Adam / bow maker known as "Grand Adam". If you know a better way of re-routing "Grand Adam" to the existing article, please make a correction. I have no intention of writing two identical articles under different titles. So, again to reiterate, "Grand Adam" is Jean Adam / bow maker. Thank you.Milliot (talk) 10:01, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
April 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Caressa & Francais, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 05:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Caressa & Francais
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Caressa & Francais, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives/d5872a.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Caressa & Francais and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Caressa & Francais with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Caressa & Francais.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Caressa & Francais saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!
Though this is from the Smithsonian website, I dont know that it can be freely copied as some govt sources can. Requesting another editor consider it. From the website in question: A duplication application must be completed and submitted to the Archives Center for review and approval. RadioFan (talk) 16:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your concern.
If you read carefully, what you refer to as a violation, was a quote from the Smithsonian Site on Jacques Francais.
I have just confirmed with the Smithsoian Institution, that it is OK with them and they are delighted with it.
Permission granted from the Smithsonian Institution for the use of the small bio on Jacques Francais. Feel free to contact them at haberstichd@si.edu.Milliot (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Caressa & Francais, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. If you disagree with these maintenance tags, please note that in your edit summary and add some information to the talk page describing why you feel the tag is inappropriate. RadioFan (talk) 17:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Caressa & Francais, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. If you disagree with these maintenance tags, please note that in your edit summary and add some information to the talk page describing why you feel the tag is inappropriate. RadioFan (talk) 17:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
The material you marked as [not in citation given], is information that is confirmed by a leading expert in this field. He is often quoted in string magazines etc. I consult him often. You can contact him yourself, just follow his link. The information you marked, is also verifiable in other literature (listed in References). Since he is a reliable source for confirming and providing invaluable historic information, I cite him as well as experts such as Charles Beare and others. It makes for a stronger article when it concerns the categories of Luthier and Archetier.Milliot (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- The problem is that the information in the article was not in the source you referenced. The citation was to the top level of a website and I'm not seeing any mention of the information in the article. The quotations you mention in magazines would make a very good reference, could you use that instead?--RadioFan (talk) 18:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
The material you marked as [not in citation given], is information that is confirmed by a leading expert in this field. He is often quoted in string magazines etc. I consult him often. You can contact him yourself, just follow his link. The information you marked, is also verifiable in other literature (listed in References). Since he is a reliable source for confirming and providing invaluable historic information, I cite him as well as experts such as Charles Beare and others. It makes for a stronger article when it concerns the categories of Luthier and Archetier.Milliot (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
I just provided other references where marked [not in citation given], and those references are from the References List. If that makes you happier....Milliot (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
I am having problems explaining to an editor RadioFan (talk · contribs · count) that tagging an article before it is finished is not the ideal situation for trying to expand wikipedia. I have taken into account what he/she is trying to improve, but if they are not familiar with the Luthier and Archetier categories in wiki, they should not be deleting material & or tagging it as [not in citation given]. I have provided info (as per request by RadioFan), and acquired permission from the Smithsonian Institution to use a small part (bio on Jacques Francais).
It is not the most productive way one can help in expanding wikipedia. Deleting my previous posts on his/her talk back page, is quite telling. If he/she is not familiar with the categories of Luthier and Archetier, they should not intervene. You may also notice that I have expanded those categories a great deal. I consult with top experts, and provide all citations where necessary. Tagging an article while it is being written and expanded, is not courteous. I request that the article in question is fully protected. Thank you in advance.Milliot (talk) 22:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- I removed those items from my talk page to keep the discussion in one place, there is no need to copy and paste between the two. Perhaps this should be taken to the article's talk page? Really, I am trying to help make this article better and am having trouble understanding why proper sourcing is such a big deal here. The ultimate goal is to get each article to featured article status. Rather than assume ownership, step back and look at the citations and see how they can be improved. Also, copyright violations are taken very seriously on wikipedia. There is a process to follow to ensure that permission is granted in a way that is accepted by wikipedia, when you removed those tags, instructions on that process were lost. --RadioFan (talk) 22:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
I really think you have not heard a single thing I have replied to you. There is no copyright violation. I have permission from the Smithsonian Institution for use of some of their material.
Citations have been updated and changed. You are not reading it or you choose to ignore it.Milliot (talk) 22:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, its clear that there is an issue here. How about we focus discussion onto the Talk:Caressa & Francais so we can sort this out. :) ∗ \ / (⁂) 22:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, and I request that the article in question is fully protected. Thank you in advance.Milliot (talk) 22:57, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hullo, as you may have seen I posted on RadioFan's talk page a few moments ago. I'd encourage you to continue the present discussion at the article's talk page. First of all, thank you for creating the content. I notice that you state you have permission from the Smithsonian institute for potentially copyrighted and incompatibly licensed material. For it to be used on Wikipedia, the copyright owner needs to agree to license the content under the GFDL version 1.2 and any later version. This permission then needs to be sent on to the OTRS (ticketing) system run by wikimedia to that it can be verified and archived.
- In terms of your specific dispute with RadioFan, I'd really encourage you both to take a step back and, effectively, get onto the same wavelength. You both have one aim - improving the encyclopedia, but you are going about it different ways. I'm sure you'll be able to come to a solution with a mutual concerted effort! Thanks Martinp23 23:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have made the post similar to this on the articles talk page. Full protection is, at this stage, unnecessary. ∗ \ / (⁂) 23:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:GiuseppeFiorini.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GiuseppeFiorini.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Ricky81682 (talk) 05:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Giovanni Grancino
[edit]Help, please, if possible! I found a reference missing for Giovanni Grancino, #2, you happen to be the last one who edited there. I could't find a reference but am no expert in the field. How about you? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problem: William Watson (bow maker)
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as William Watson (bow maker), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.hillbows.com/bowmakers.php?makerID=4&name=William%20Watson, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:William Watson (bow maker) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, William Watson (bow maker), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:William Watson (bow maker) with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:William Watson (bow maker). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:William Watson (bow maker) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Pais (talk) 11:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Igino Sderci with Leandro Bisiach 1919.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Igino Sderci with Leandro Bisiach 1919.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:36, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphan pages
[edit]Please reread the definition of Wikipedia:Orphan. In the Wikipedia:Glossary, an orphan is defined as "an article with no links from other pages in the main article namespace". -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
You can also check Special:WhatLinksHere/Célestin Émile Clasquin where you can see that the page in questions has NO (zero) incoming links. Nothing links to this page in main article namespace. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:10, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Ways to improve August Barbe
[edit]Hi, I'm Salimfadhley. Milliot, thanks for creating August Barbe!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Rather than provide a list of references, it's generally best to use inline citations so readers know which source backs up which point.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:12, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Morizot family
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Morizot family. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Louis Morizot. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Louis Morizot – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. – S. Rich (talk) 04:55, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:J.B.Vuillaume 1860 scroll "Le Messie" Stradivarius copy.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:J.B.Vuillaume 1860 scroll "Le Messie" Stradivarius copy.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Milliot. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The file File:Pietro Sgarabotto and David Oistrakh.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Davidl.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Davidl.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 12:51, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
