User talk:Millions Miller

Hi

January 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to A96 road have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: A96 road was changed by Millions Miller (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92473 on 2022-01-21T22:26:25+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Bucksburn appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thanks for your work on this article. I have removed your mention of Sandy Gibson as he doesn't have a wiki article. Please remember that everything you add to the article must be referenced with reliable sources. Tacyarg (talk) 14:58, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Millions Miller, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Tacyarg (talk) 13:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bucksburn

Hello. You're breaking the infobox. There's a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography you might want to consider thinking about reading because an awful lot of the recent additions to the article, which I reverted, are clearly inappropriate. Experienced editors can guide you there. Blue Square Thing (talk) 13:17, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you're now seriously screwing up the page. This is not productive. Stop and make a list here or at the discussion that I linked above of exactly what you want to add to the page. There are ways that we need to do things and you're simply not doing them. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bucksburn‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
You seem to be ignoring the advice you have been given above - Please don't - Arjayay (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Brimmond School, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Also, please do not remove the AfC template. If you wish to submit the draft article to AfC review for publication, click on the blue 'submit' button. Simply removing the template does nothing, the draft will still remain a draft. Thank you.-- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Graham Leggat. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bucksburn. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a directory

Regarding the article Bucksburn‎, I don't know if you are in contact with IP 31.185.239.191, the other prolific editor at Bucksburn, but this issue has been brought up a number of times before about this article. Wikipedia is not a directory (see WP:NOTDIRECTORY). Articles on suburbs and cities don't list the shops and other facilities that are there.

There are exceptions where there is notability. Perhaps:

the shop that's been in continuous operation since 1796
the headquarters of a national or international company
the factory outlet that is the only one in the world for that store
the country's first ever store to use self check-out

Something notable about it.

An exception is made for P&J Live because of its relative uniqueness; indeed, it has its own Wikipedia article. But the encyclopedia doesn't want "George runs a shop with the best pizzas", or "Bucksburn has a MacDonalds". And I don't want to have to keep reverting those lists.

Thanks _signed,Willondon (talk) 21:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add an indiscriminate list of shops to Wikipedia, as you did at Bucksburn. _signed,Willondon (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022 - again

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bucksburn, you may be blocked from editing.
It has clearly been explained that you should not add lists of shops, above, and we don't need a copy of Aberdeen's weather - Arjayay (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bucksburn. - Arjayay (talk) 22:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at John Macdonald Aiken. - Arjayay (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 17:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bucksburn. - Arjayay (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re the addition of lists of shops, etc.
Before you add such a list once again, you will want to engage in discussion at the talk page for the Bucksburn article. _signed,Willondon (talk) 23:27, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Itcouldbepossible. I noticed that in this edit to Bridge of Don, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 07:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brimmond School moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Brimmond School, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:33, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I moved this article to the draft space, because it isn't ready for publication. Firstly, the text needs editing throughout, to comply with the style guide and other standards. Secondly, the referencing is non-standard and rather confusing — please see WP:REFB for help on this.

Most importantly, the articles needs to demonstrate that this school is notable by the WP:GNG notability criteria, namely that it has received significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources. Educational institutions in general, and primary schools especially, are not considered inherently notable, per WP:NSCHOOL.

Once you've improved the article and added appropriate referencing, you're welcome to submit the draft for pre-publication review via AfC. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bucksburn Thistle F.C.

Hello Millions Miller,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bucksburn Thistle F.C. for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus talk 12:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure that articles are reliably sourced, see WP:RS Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bucksburn Republic

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Bucksburn Republic, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 15 (talk) 13:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Burden of Proof

Re your new user page statement: "If you see no evidence of something search for it on google instead of perfuming it’s something unsourced." From WP:BURDEN, you will see "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material." This only makes sense. Otherwise, editors could stick any old thing into an article, claim "the truth is out there", and expect others to do their homework. Something to keep in mind. _signed,Willondon (talk) 18:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022 - again

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeff Stewart (actor). - Arjayay (talk) 19:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Robert Grierson Combe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 19:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently posting information into articles without providing citations to reliable sources, nor indeed to any sources. We can't accept information purely on the basis that someone who has chosen to create a Wikipedia account says so, for the simple reason that we have thousands of people coming along and posting false claims, sometimes as deliberate lies, sometimes as honest mistakes. Obviously, the need for reliable sources is especially important in the case of an editor who is known to have at least once posted a deliberate hoax page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 22:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Auchinleck Talbot F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heart of Midlothian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. An edit that you recently made to Aaron Hickey seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Giant Snowman 19:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bucksburn Thistle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bucksburn Thistle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bucksburn Thistle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please review the guidance at Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Your edit summaries, [1] (from IP 31.185.239.191) "This information is true only edit if you go to the school or know someone who dose from know on", and [2] (from Millions Miller) "Like I said before only change info if you know lots or go to the school for the last time please", indicate that you do not understand what is recognized as a reliable source at Wikipedia. They also indicate that you are editing under a registered account and under an anonymous IP address. That's not accepted at Wikipedia.

Please learn the culture here, and the standards expected. Your editing history is problematic and needs corrected. _signed,Willondon (talk) 21:51, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 19:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Brimmond School

Hello, Millions Miller. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brimmond School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Brimmond School

Hello, Millions Miller. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Brimmond School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]