User talk:MilfordBoy1991

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:36, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! MilfordBoy1991, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 00:34, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Yvonne Atkins, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Anbu121 (talk me) 12:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Black Lace

Can I remind you that there is a core requirement for Wikipedia editing, in that entries needed to be verified. See "...content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." Please familiarise yourself with the need for reliable sources, rather than simply including unreferenced personal thoughts. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 10:49, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Den Watts

Why did you blank the page?--5 albert square (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

this issue seams to occur when I edit alot of Wikipedia pages not all but some.

November 2012

Hello, I'm Ashley thomas80. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Data redundancy, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, AshLey ^Msg 13:22, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:RayBuktenica.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RayBuktenica.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Carla Connor, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - JuneGloom Talk 21:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:RayBuktenica.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RayBuktenica.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Front of a FUJIFILM S4400 Bridge Camera.png

Thanks for uploading File:Front of a FUJIFILM S4400 Bridge Camera.png. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Stape, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim McDonald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:05, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Doc Martin, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 01:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Your recent editing history at Tyler Moon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Please stop adding the exact model of car that Tyler drove. It is not important to the plot. If you think it is, please go to the talk page and start a discussion. Thank you. –anemone projectors– 16:45, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that just saying "sports car" could mean any type of sports car, either way the very fact that it was a Ferrari makes it important to the plot!!! –MilfordBoy1991 MilfordBoy– 00:05, 24 October 2013 (UK)

Thanks

Thanks for this edit: [1]. I appreciate the proofread. Fences&Windows 16:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of Coronation Street characters. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ThisIsDanny (talk) 01:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ford Orion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Top Gear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Fenton Stevens

Michael Fenton Stevens is a contemporary of Angus Deayton (1956), Geoffrey Perkins (1953), and Helen Atkinson-Wood (1955) so he can't have been born in 1947. Google gives both 1947 and 1958, and isn't a WP:Reliable source. -- Dr Greg talk 00:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Top Gear (2002 TV series), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 23:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Hammond

Why do you keep adding his surname to other names - it is obviously not another name as it is his name. noq (talk) 23:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

he has been called that by Clarkson and may on occasion thus I thought it was relevant.

September 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jeremy Clarkson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 15:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Stephenb. Your recent edit to the page Den Watts appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't keep changing this to a Saturday unless you have a good reason Stephenb (Talk) 19:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jennifer Ness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Ellis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman (season 4), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tempus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MilfordBoy1991. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Kosack. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Wayne Barnes, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Kosack (talk) 11:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Wayne Barnes. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 12:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Wayne Barnes, you may be blocked from editing. Kosack (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kosack i don't see what i am saying as personal analysis but i will change it

Words or phrases like "shambles" and "average Wales side" are not part of a neutral point of view. Kosack (talk) 12:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Walking on Sunshine (Katrina and the Waves song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 17:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MilfordBoy1991. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:John Mark Jabalé.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:John Mark Jabalé.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:01, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy McCormack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm DawgDeputy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Beethoven (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. DawgDeputy (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, I'm Martinevans123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fred West have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fred West

His eldest daughter was named Anna Marie West. Check the references and read the full text. She changed her name to Anne in the 1990s.--Kieronoldham (talk) 20:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Arsène Wenger. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Roxy Mitchell. Since this is so close in time to the prior warning, I'm assuming you hadn't yet read it; otherwise I would propose for you to be blocked for continuing to disregard the repeated warnings. TJRC (talk) 23:36, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You again re-added the material without citing a source. Stop. I'm trying to assume good faith, but your repeated practice of ignoring the requirement to include sources makes that difficult. TJRC (talk) 14:09, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Goodnight Sweetheart episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emma Amos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:JimGFenner.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:JimGFenner.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:YvonneAtkinsMostWanted.JPEG

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:D&SAlahansCSGS.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:D&SAlahansCSGS.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:00, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Ross

Please review WP:NICKNAME. Thank you, - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 12:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:DevsPrimaDonerGS.jpeg

You uploaded or restored , File:DevsPrimaDonerGS.jpeg, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work, please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:RoystonsRoysRollsGS.jpeg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:StevieMacsStreetCarsGS.jpeg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:D&SAlahansCSGS.jpeg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:RitasKabinGS.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:AlyasUnderworldGS.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:John Mark Jabalé.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Verne Troyer. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 11:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MilfordBoy1991 reported by User:General Ization (Result: ). Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 15:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Verne Troyer

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:StarsInTheirEyes15.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MilfordBoy1991. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Tony Holkham. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hill Mountain, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tony Holkham (Talk) 13:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, stop this, and consider this a Final Warning. You have been warned about this over and over and over for several years and you still continue to add material without sources. I will request a block the next time I see this. TJRC (talk) 20:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please stop making unnecessary edits to Moors murders and then reverting back to your preferred version. I have no intention of edit warring with you, but note that in almost all of the above comments on your Talk page are warnings about your conduct. If you continue in this manner, you will find yourself facing another longer block. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 14:39, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise if I offened you but I made the change as I felt it sounded better this way.

@David J Johnson: The article is written in British English. In point of fact, "at Ashworth", not "in Ashworth", is the expected construction in that dialect of English. This editor's edit was correct. General Ization ^Talk 15:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@General Ization: Well, I'm amazed, I believe most British English users would say "in", but that is WP:OR. You would do better to advise this user to abide by Wikipedia conventions - just look at their Talk page and to sign any reply they may make. Case closed. David J Johnson (talk) 18:42, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@David J Johnson: The Wikipedia convention that applies in this case is that we respect the conventions of the multiple dialects of English in which articles are written here. WP:OR has nothing to do with your ability (responsibility, actually) to research those conventions before you revert another editor based on your impressions of them. While I have no idea whether you are British, you might reasonably infer from this editor's username that they may be and therefore may be quite familiar with the dialect and its conventions. Even an editor who has been admonished before and who fails to sign their comments can make good edits that you have no valid reason to revert without discussion. General Ization ^Talk 00:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of Milford, see Peter F. Causey who "died at Milford". In this case, it refers to an American who died at an estate called Milford, but many British place names are in fact the names of historical estates and the convention carries over to the modern communities that surround them. In this case, it refers to Ashworth Hospital, which is not a hospital building per se but a campus of buildings. Think of it, if you will, as you would the campus of a university; one does not study "in" XYZ University, but "at" it. You will find many other examples, here and elsewhere, if you try. General Ization ^Talk 00:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Wembley Stadium. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:07, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Spice Girls; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ST47 (talk) 11:19, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Harry Maguire, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flix11 (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Roxy Mitchell; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Davey2010^Talk 21:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Beethoven's 2nd (film); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

The name of the associate has absolutely no bearing on the film whatsoever, and Taylor Devereaux was never referred to by his surname alone. DawgDeputy (talk) 03:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I refer to him by his surname as the sentence on question refers to sexual assault so it sounds better to use his sir name. The associate is relevant, he is mentioned when George when he reveals they are going away and there's a scene about him and his family at the cottage with George and Ryce. And I see only one person who consistently recently disagrees with my edits. MilfordBoy1991 (talk) 09:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1. In your eyes only does it sound better to use a surname instead of what was used more often in the film (this being the first name).

2. Again, the name has absolutely no bearing on the film whatsoever. DawgDeputy (talk) 17:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are the only person that doesn’t agree with this so please stop bullying me, no one else has complained MilfordBoy1991 (talk) 17:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am bullying no one. I am just trying to maintain an unbiased article. If you feel that it is necessary, take the argument to the talk page first instead of starting an edit war. DawgDeputy (talk) 19:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Word of warning...

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DawgDeputy (talk) 17:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Queen Victoria

Hi,

I've undone your edit to this article. We don't name individual owners on this article, it's fictional therefore we include all owners past and present. I don't know about the other soaps you mentioned as I don't watch them but looking at one of them, that includes what owner owns what percentage, again something that not all pub articles include and is also not included in The Queen Vic's article. If you're wanting to make the changes universal, I'd suggest starting a discussion at WP:SOAPS.-- 5 albert square (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Woolpack. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – DarkGlow • 14:11, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Woolpack, you may be blocked from editing. – DarkGlow • 18:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Woolpack (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DarkGlow was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No attempt to improve the article has been made.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Woolpack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Woolpack, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– DarkGlow • 15:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hi, this is just a talk page note in relation with this comment I left on an RfPP post regarding the article on The Woolpack. Please do not engage in edit warring after the protection expires, or in the future in general, as you may receive a block for your involvement. Anarchyte (talk) 12:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Toyah Battersby, you may be blocked from editing. – DarkGlow • 15:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He middle name is what I put it features on the original year page of characters therefore it should appear her page and I’m not being disruptive MilfordBoy1991 (talk) 16:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Gadget Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angelica Bell. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Stop adding false claims to Lex Luthor in other media. Under the assumption of good faith, I have told you three times now that you are misremembering the episodes you describe and to watch them again. The fact that you keep on re-adding the same misinformation with edit summaries which do not even address the changes you made, only a statement which no one has attempted to remove, casts the appearance that you are editing in bad faith, and at best constitutes WP:Edit warring. Martin IIIa (talk) 23:43, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Paul Cattermole, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

nothing about what I added is my personal analysis. they were together no matter how long so stop talking claptrap no one said they have to have been together for a certain time for it to be relevant, that is YOUR opinion!! and by the way I did NOT violate that policy saying someone is or isn't in a relationship is NOTHING to do with being neutral MilfordBoy1991 (talk) 09:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paul Cattermole. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 12:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]