User talk:Miko2020

Welcome!

Hi Miko2020! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Zefr (talk) 04:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Couscous. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 04:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Largoplazo. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ras el hanout without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Largoplazo (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice Miko2020 (talk) 20:58, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tajine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 23:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For Tagine the edit wss correct, all sources and receipts for tagine are from Morocco, algeria should open an apart section with their exiating tagines and receipts. Thanks Miko2020 (talk) 01:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also this is not a vandalism, i m trying to correct vandalisme of others, i made mistakes at the beginning but never wss a vandalisme Miko2020 (talk) 01:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to familiarize yourself with the policies and guidelines. M.Bitton (talk) 14:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. M.Bitton (talk) 14:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I promise i will follow the guidelines and policies. I made a mistake to not read them carefully at the beginning. Thanks again Miko2020 (talk) 16:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. El_C 07:37, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, i 'm respecting the wikipedia rules, i made mistakes at the beginning but now foloowing the rules, for the talk page sorry didn't know that there is a dispute page. I will follow the rules regarding dispute, thanks Miko2020 (talk) 09:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 22:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moroccan Al-mansuriah (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

instabusters is about the furthest you can get from a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moroccan Al-mansuriah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Moroccan Al-mansuriah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Miko2020! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 14:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

As you know, you have been reported at WP:AN. See the heading 'Personal attacks and disruptive editing by Miko2020'. Please note that further attacks like this one may lead to a block of your account. I also notice the aggressive edit summary here where you accuse two other editors of vandalism and adding 'fake text'. Admins won't allow this to continue, so please restrain yourself. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moroccan Kaftan has been accepted

Moroccan Kaftan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 01:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Moroccan Al-mansuriah

Hello, Miko2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moroccan Al-mansuriah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Moroccan Al-mansuriah

Hello, Miko2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moroccan Al-mansuriah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources removal

Why are you removing the reliable sources? Also, what makes you think that registering something as a unesco heritage (which anyone can do) would trump what RS say? I suggest you check out the French article which has a longer section on the history of the fantasia, including the name of the first known painting depicting one in Tunisia in 1535. M.Bitton (talk) 17:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moroccan kaftan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Moroccan kaftan, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]