Hello, Mikheil88, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Darwinek (talk) 13:00, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bien chér Mikheil, comment va tu? Ici ça fait froid, 20 m de neige!!!
Je te demande la gentilesse de creer cette page en ta Langue Maternelle. L'important à dire c'est qu'il est le King Momo le plus vieux de tout le Brazil, méme s'il est en repos. Depuis ça suffit 2-3 linhes de biographie, les connexions externes et la photo de lui en 1988 et lui aujourd'hui.
Il y a, dans la page King Momo un link rouge, est-ce-que c'est Waldemar esteves da Cunha? je te remercie beaucoup et je vais retribuer avec un page en Italien, Portuguais, ou LMO.
Hello MIKHEIL,
I'm contacting you because we need some Georgian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on ka.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Georgian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 17:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, chér ami MIKHEIL, comment va tu? Ça fai du temp qu'on s'ecris pas!
Je te demande la gentilesse de créer une petite page de cette trés belle actrice. C'est just un petit stub, et dire qu'elle à commencè avec la TV, et maintenant elle traville sutout avec le theatre, et mettere la belle photo!
Bonjour bien chér Mikheil, comment va tu? Ça fait long temp que on s'ecris pas, tu va bien? Ici chez-moi il y a beucoup de chaleur. J'espere que l'Italie ganhe la 5eme Coupe du Monde!
Je te propose cette page en Français de ce grand journaliste, et je te demande la gentilesse de creer un petit stub en Wiki.KA, c'est just dire qu'il etait journaliste, qu'il a ensigné Franòais pour 30 ans et il a defendu le droit de parler les Langues Regionales comme le Piemontais et le Franco-Provençal, et la bibliographie.
Merci encore pour ton aide precieux, et se t'a besoin d'aide en Italien, dit-moi!
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited European Union Association Agreement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mikheil Khachidze requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — CactusWriter (talk)17:06, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. — CactusWriter (talk)17:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Mikheil. I apologize for assuming that you were creating an article about yourself. However, please note that the article was not deleted for being an autobiography, but rather it was tagged and deleted for lacking any "meaningful claim of significance or importance" for that individual. (Per speedy deletion criteria WP:A7.) i have restored the article in draft space at Draft:Mikheil Khachidze so that you may improve it. When you are ready, you can submit it for review. Cheers. — CactusWriter (talk)19:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 16:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lali Kandelaki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mrfrobinson (talk) 03:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I wish to thank you for your article Lali Kandelaki and also apologize for the fall out caused by my exuberant following fan club. They are the reason I don't create articles. Unfortunately, in their haste to inflict pain on me, it also spills out everywhere. Again, I apologize that you have become a part of this folly. MurderByDeletionism"bang!"17:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hello, MIKHEIL. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, MIKHEIL. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello MIKHEIL: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 04:47, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, MIKHEIL. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
@MIKHEIL: ბოდიში შეწუხებისთვის, მაგრამ რა იყო იმის მიზეზი რომ მე დავიბლოკე? მაინტერესებს, არ მინდა შემდეგშიც იგივე გამიმეორდეს, ქართულ ვიკიში განხილვის გვერდზეც (საკუთარი) ვერ ვწერ ვერაფერს--ჯეო (talk) 10:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
An article you recently created, Giorgi Sukhitashvili, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 08:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Puzzledvegetable were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giorgi Sukhitashvili and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Giorgi Sukhitashvili, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, MIKHEIL!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PuzzledvegetableIs it teatime already?22:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Salome Gviniashvili, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 03:56, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
I was looking for some small help. I created an article en:Kithaab (French fr:Kithaab/ German de:Kithaab) -a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation in various languages. Looking for your possible help in translating the article en:Kithaab to your Georgian language Wikipedia. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator.
Hello, MIKHEIL. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Salome Gviniashvili, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
გამარჯობათ მიხეილ. ფეისბუქზე მოგწერეთ დედაჩემის გვერდიდან, რადგან მე არ მაქვს... თქვენ თვლით, რომ ჩემი ქმედებები ვიკიპედიის საკუთარ თავზე მორგების მცდელობა იყო და ამის გამო დავიბლოკე უსასრულოდ, მაგრამ ერთს გთხოვთ, მხოლოდ ჩემს სავარჯიშოებზე წვდომის დაშვება იქნებ თქვენი კეთილი ნების გამოვლინება იყოს უახლოეს მომავალში? გთხოვთ, განიხილეთ ადმინისტრატორებმა ჩემი საქმე.
P.S. საინტერესო ისაა, რომ ტექსტი, რომელი შინაარსი ჩემს სამუდამოდ ბლოკირებას მიუთითებს შემდეგია: თქვენ დაიბლოკეთ რედაქტირებისაგან განუსაზღვრელი ვადით, მიზეზი შემდეგია: ვიკიპედიის წესების მრავალგზის უგულებელყოფა და ვიკიპედიის საკუთარ თავზე მორგების მცდელობა. ბლოკირების ვადის გასვლის შემდეგ, გთხოვთ განახორციელოთ კონსტრუქციული რედაქტირებები. რომელი ვადის გასვლის შემდეგ თუ ბლოკირება უსასრულოა? პატივისცემით: --Lasha-george (talk) 16:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
სამწუხაროა, რომ უსასრულო ბლოკირების მოხსნა ან/და თუგინდ შემცირება არც კი განიხილება ქართულ ვიკიპედიაში, არადა ინგლისურ ვიკიპედიაში ასევე უსასრულო ბლოკირება მქონდა... მხოლოდ საკუთარ სავარჯიშოებზე წვდომა რომ დაუშვათ მიხეილ რატომ არც კი უნდა განიხილებოდეს თქვენი და სხვა ადმინისტრატორების მხრიდან, მე ხომ არ ვითხოვ სტატიების რედაქტირებებზე წვდომას?--Lasha-george (talk) 06:47, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
რავიცი, რა გიპასუხოთ, როდესაც პასუხს არ მწერთ? ვმეორდები: რედაქტირებებზე წვდომას არ ვითხოვ, მხოლოდ საკუთარ სავარჯიშოებზე მინდა წვდომა. ბლოკირება დამიტოვეთ, არ მომიხსნათ. განიხილეთ მაინც ეს საკითხი ადმინისტრატორებმა... არაფერს ვამბობ, როგორც სამუდამოდ ბლოკირებული აფხაზეთის მმართველთა სიის სტატიის რედაქტირების შემდეგ (მანამდელი სტატია ვერანაირ კრიტიკას ვერ უძლებდა), დღემდე ვერ გამიგია და მიზეზი ვერ მიპოვია თუ სამუდამო ბლოკირება (არ ვამბობ მაგალითად 1, 3, 6 ან/და 1 წლით ბლოკირებაზე) რატომ გამოიწვია ჩემმა ქმედებამ? და თუ თვლით რომ დამსახურებული ბლოკირება დავიმსახურე, სამუდამო რატომ? კი ბატონო, იყოს სამუდამო ბლოკირება, რასაც ბოლომდე არ ვეთანხმები, თუმცა უპრიანი იქნებოდა ჩემი თხოვნა მაინც არ უგულებელგეყოთ. ჩემს განხილვის გვერდზე, თხოვნა ბლოკის მოხსნის თაობაზე როგორ განვახორციელო? ეს მაინც მიპასუხეთ, როცა წვდომა საკუთარ გვერდზეც კი არ მაქვს?--Lasha-george (talk) 06:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
გამარჯობათ! მას შემდეგ, რაც ბლოკირების მოხსნის ნაცვლად მხოლოდ ჩემს სავარჯიშოებზე წვდომა ვითხოვე, ჩემს გვერდზე დაიწერა: "თხოვნა ბლოკის მოხსნის თაობაზე ვადაგასულია" მაშინ, როცა ბლოკის მოხსნა არ მითხოვია. იქნებ ადმინისტრატორებმა განიხილოთ ჩემი თხოვნა ჩემსავე სავარჯიშოებზე წვდომის შესახებ მიხეილ...--Lasha-george (talk) 10:43, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srap Shirinyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Per WP:GNG, we need to see significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. The sources cited are primary (many of which are close to the subject), and mostly routine business reporting (appointment news).
Private personal details such as DOB and educational background are also not referenced. Please note that per WP:BLP, in articles on living people all material statements, anything potentially contentious, and all private details must be clearly supported by immediate inline citations to reliable published sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tinatin Berdzenishvili and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Georgian public broadcaster logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
მიხეილ, გთხოვთ სხვა ადმინისტრატორებთან შეთანხმებით განმიხილოთ და შემიმსუბუქოთ სამუდამო ბლოკირება. ჩემი მხრიდან განზრახ მიზანმიმართულ მიუღებელ ქმედებას (ვანდალიზმი და მსგავსი რამ) გპირდებით არ ექნება ადგილი და რედაქტირებას მხოლოდ ადმინისტრატორებთან ან/და სტაჟიან მომხმარებლებთან განხილვის შემდეგ განვახორციელებ.Lasha-george (talk) 16:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, MIKHEIL. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tinatin Berdzenishvili, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Done --Mikheil Talk 16:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. — CactusWriter (talk) 17:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
