Jump to content

User talk:Mightythos77

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Klinetalkcontribs 18:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mightythos77! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Klinetalkcontribs 18:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The earlier submission was done by my aunt. She has published at least one article before and thought she could publish a stub for me so I could work on it but that too had been published, deleted and rejected. She resubmitted it for some reason, so I am asking there a way she can delete her submission, so mine can move up the queue as it were? Or if that is still being considered, can I just edit copy/ paste mine into her draft? Hers is a tiny stub, while mine is weeks of work and pretty much an entire article. I honestly ask if you saw both and what can I do to have hers disregarded and mine finally published? This isn't a competitive thing. She thought she was doing me a favor by trying to publish, but since her initial submission was published and deleted I have been building and refining the article in my sandbox. We thought because of it's veracity and volume that hers would just be rejected again. Mightythos77 (talk) 21:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just work on it and submit it for review when you are ready.
Do not tag team with your aunt. That is meat puppetry. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Thank you. I am going to resubmit it because there is no tag teaming going on, just me working in an unfamiliar space. Thanks again. Mightythos77 (talk) 17:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix Albrecht Harta (May 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 18:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you submit this for review? That is a rhetorical question. If you don't want to use it, leave it alone and just submit the other one, whcih appears to be more complete 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sincere apologies. I tried to submit the one from the sandbox, the more complete one. I was given the option to submit this as Draft:Felix Albrecht Harta and when I did it looked like the tiny stub had been submitted instead. I messed up. So I resubmitted the more complete one immediately. I sincerely apologize for the confusion. Now when I go to the "Draft" page it looks correct where it didn't before. Mightythos77 (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix Albrecht Harta (2) (June 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 01:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix Albrecht Harta has been accepted

[edit]
Felix Albrecht Harta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]