User talk:Microchip08/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

New guy

Thanks for contacting me. This is all pretty bewildering - every link I go to to try to learn something leads to more links, and not all are very clear (e.g., when I clicked "talk" to message you, it led to a page with previous messages with no instructions on how to "talk" - I guessed!).

What does it mean to be "adopted"? I could use some help navigating this. There are a couple of specific articles that interest me; one is "protected" but needs some editing, so I could use some guidance. Daveler16 (talk) 22:05, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

I didn't realise adding a new talk page wasn't clear! I'll add a message to make it more obvious in future; thanks.

The first thing about Wikipedia you ought to know is that you mustn't worry about making a mistake: the software Wikipedia is built around makes it very easy to undo and fix things if something goes wrong, so you should be bold and just edit – don't worry about not reading all the policies and guidelines, because someone will help you when something goes wrong :-). The only policy you really should to know is the Wikipedia:Five pillars; everything else is merely going into more detail.

Wikipedia has a pretty daunting learning curve – it's something people are actively trying to fix – but there's a few things that might help you. You might find Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure helpful; I haven't tried it myself, but it looks like it's an interactive guide to get you up and running.

You can find more about the user adoption program here – it's probably best to contact a user directly (take a look at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's_Area/Adopters for a list of available mentors).

Regarding the protected article: you can edit almost any article on Wikipedia without restriction, but some articles are protected from editing to some or almost all users (for example, if there's a large amount of people vandalizing/editing unconstructively). Most of the time – Huon talks more about it below. If you tell me which article you were looking at, I should be able to help you add your edit. —Microchip08 (talk) 23:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Adoption is a program to help new editors by pairing them with experienced mentors. It's a way to find someone willing to help you find your way around Wikipedia and become a better editor. Regarding the protected article, the usual way to deal with that is to propose an edit on the article's talk page and to use the {{edit protected}} or {{edit semi-protected}} template, depending on whether the article is semi-protected (ie only autoconfirmed editors can edit it) or fully protected (ie only admins can edit it), to request someone with sufficient rights to perform the edit for you. The more specific your edit request, the more likely that it will be done. Huon (talk) 22:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Talk

Sorrt I'm being so obtuse about this. I wanted to respond to your response to my previous. It says "Put new text under the old text", but I don't see where I am supposed to do that.

The topic I am interested in is "Soka Gakkai". It is the only page on a religion I have seen with so much malice towards its subject, and whoever is in charge seems to be okay with that. I am currently catching up on the "talk" behind the subject.

Thank you for your patience. --Daveler16 (talk) 16:48, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

That article looks like it's quite controversial, and is semi-protected, so accounts need to be at least four days old, and must have at least ten edits (you currently have five). Edit some more elsewhere and you'll be able to edit that page :-). I suggest you read the talk page.

To continue this discussion "under the old text", just click the edit button on the section header. —Microchip08 (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

u edited my thing i dissagree with u — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killerdude66 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

King's Shilling Comment

Thanks for blamming the typo on the assessment page. I had a look at the Shilling page - may I suggest putting the citations at the end of sentences? These days I find that mid-sentence citations break the flow. RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 14:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

 Done I've moved most of the references to the end of sentences (and split most of the long running sentences into smaller ones). —Microchip08 (talk) 01:37, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited King's shilling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attestation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Dear Microchip08, My edit on Don Jon was just to try to be a bit more descriptive on it. I prefer movie plots on Wikipedia to be a bit more descriptive than they usually are, but, that's just me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.12.176.227 (talk) 18:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited King's shilling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judges (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Alex Ekubo Image

I noticed you were not completely satisfied with my licensing of Alex Ekubo1.jpg, can you give me specific reasons why you think the message forwarded was insufficient. I am asking all these because I already briefly explained Wikipedia image policies to Alex Ekubo via mail and he decided to send those images based on my explanation. Please let me know if you think there is anything he can do to make the ticket confirmed. Darreg (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

We were unable to confirm whether the person sending the email was the copyright holder of the images, as only the copyright holder can relicense their images. File:Alex Ekubo1.jpeg appears to be copyrighted by Anuel Photography, hence the watermark: we would need a release from them in order to license the image freely. I hope this helps. —Microchip08 (talk) 08:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I will tell him to send an email from Anuel Photography and NOT his personal email address. I hope that will help. Darreg (talk) 09:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Edits on Bangalore School of Speech and Drama page

Hello Microchip08, I don't think that the edit which you have made is necessary as the topic i had written about is entirely unique and different which needs to be highlighted upon. Please do reconsider the changes you have made as it would be in the best interests of mine as well as the students of this school. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishi.chhapolia (talk • contribs) 10:56, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

May i tell u that u smell like fish? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killerdude66 (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Juliet Blake

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Juliet Blake, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is not a Wikipedia project page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Gparyani (talk) 15:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

James I. Woods

Microchip08,

Thank you for your response. I have been reading the guidelines and am reshaping the language to seem more neutral having identified my conflict of interest. Is there any way to hold off deleting the page? It is a pertinent entry, I just need to reword it.

Thanks for your time

JPorcupine — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPorcupine (talk • contribs) 21:18, 10 June 2014‎

Salvatore Cuomo's Picture

Hello there. I'm not sure this is the right way to reply but i'll try. I've just uploaded an image that i was told i could use for free without problems by the company of Salvatore Cuomo. They told me that all his images are not copyright protected and anyone can use them. How do i fix this? Thanks and good evening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torratte (talk • contribs) 13:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) By default every photo is copyrighted. If this one has been released under a free license that allows everybody to re-use and modify it for any purpose, including commercial purposes, we'd need some evidence in writing. On Cuomo's Facebook page I found only the comment that it's a "free public profile picture", but that's too vague. The easiest solution would probably be to ask Mr Cuomo to send an explicit release form to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, or to add more explicit licensing information to the image page. Huon (talk) 19:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

permissions-enwikimedia.org would be the most appropriate email address here. Microchip08 (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

actually -commons is preferred for images, since freely licensed images should be uploaded directly to the Wikimedia Commons so they can be used on sister projects such as foreign-language Wikipedias as well. Huon (talk) 22:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

It's a fairly academic distinction, but my understanding is that photos already on English Wikipedia should go to permissions-en, and photos already on Commons to permissions-commons. Microchip08 (talk) 00:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

why are there cheating men out there doing?

                                                 (70.195.201.194 (talk) 03:21, 8 August 2014 (UTC))

Sahrawi article

I think women are only "privileged" compared to how they are treated in other societies. Within the context of Sahrawi society itself, women are only considered something closer to equals than in other societies compared to men. "Privileged" really is the wrong word. "Privileged" is what men are in most societies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.194.24.250 (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Happy birthday!

Hey, Microchip08. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 07:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Event in progress

Hi, I see you have been patrolling changes to articles on Welsh photographers, Just to let you know we are holding an Wikimedia Edit-a-thon on the subject today so there will be lots of changes until about 5 this evening. Thanks Jason.nlw (talk) 11:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm McGeddon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Aberystwyth Times, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 11:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about that automated message there, I must have misclicked the sidebar. Article seems fine, I've re-reviewed it. --McGeddon (talk) 19:12, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brizzly

The article Brizzly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: released in 2009; acquired in 2010; shut down in 2012, resulting in an article on a non-notable company/product.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Brizzly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brizzly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brizzly (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Microchip08. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Happy birthday!

Warm regards, Mz7 (talk) 04:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Microchip08. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Birthday

Wishing Microchip08 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Microchip08. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stelios Haji-Ioannou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by A 10 fireplane (talk • contribs) 00:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cog-uk-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cog-uk-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Noadswood.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Noadswood.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Microchip08 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo-Chiffres-et-lettres.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-Chiffres-et-lettres.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Microchip08 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 20:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Template question

What is the purpose of this redirect: Template:Qd?--Bbb23 (talk) 22:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

The counterpart to {{csd}} on Simple English Wikipedia is simple:Template:QD. Redirects are cheap and it improves cross-wiki working. Microchip08 (talk) 22:11, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Ah. I asked because a new user was (mis)using the tag, and I don't think I've ever seen an editor use the tag on en.wiki. The user has never edited at Simple.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)