User talk:Metagraph/June 15 - July 15

I am very sorry

Im sorry about all this edit warring. I know where you are coming from and you are just protecting the neutrality of this page.... once again I am sorry for blowing my top.... i felt that you were trying to show that I am biased and just pushing my own political agenda. I am shamed by my own actions.

Once again my eternal apologies. Your sincerity in protecting the integrity of wikipedia is admirable.

THank you for your understanding i will make an account and notify you. Goodluck in your wikipedia quests!

Block

Sorry, can't delete or clear a block log, but my unblock reason of "Huggle conflict" should be painfully clear to anyone looking at it that you did nothing wrong. Feel free to loudly curse my name at a future RFA. MBisanz ^talk 09:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

The Chris Willis Page

I'm not sure why you have against chris willis. But his quite notable in fields and deserves more credit. I'll person write his page, but please don't delete it because you are not aware of his notability as simple google search or you tube search would return notable hits. He's a popular icon in the dance house music industry and is the voice behind every David Guetta number 1 song. Give the guys some credit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.99.55.249 (talk) 06:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

• Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment

The edits made by the above user were not vandalism. From the lead of Wikipedia:Vandalism: "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." The edits were however copyvios from his MySpace page. Be careful when calling edits vandalism. ~ Eóin (talk) 02:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

• Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment

Sure, this diff. ~ Eóin (talk) 17:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't think there is a problem with the template you added. My only qualm was that you jumped to calling the edits vandalism before explaining what was wrong with them. The editor thought their edits were constructive and calling the edits vandalism feels a little bitey to me. ~ Eóin (talk) 04:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Acquisition Page

Hi! I'm the anonymous editing Acquisition page. It should be stated that this piece of software violates GPL. You can verify yourself if ou don't trust by comparing the source code provided (see acquisitionx.org) and the requiriments of the GPL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.174.51.188 (talk) 09:17, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Regarding your user page.

I didn't know I couldn't plug personal websites/videos on my user page. Sorry. (those links have actually been defunct for a long time, but I never really bothered to take them off. I'll do that now.)

I didn't know I couldn't keep previously deleted information on my userpage either. Hmmm... I guess I can rid of that list now too. ._. (I really miss that article. xD)

But administrators and other users have previously visited my page and haven't commented on the list. That list has actually been on my page for about a year now; why hasn't anyone told me about it previously?

Anyway yeah, thanks for the heads-up. What's your username on SPPf, by the way? Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ U | T | C ] 03:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehhhh, I think I'm done with that list for now. It's up at StrategyWiki anyway, and I really can't be bothered with it anymore. (summer lethargy has taken ahold of me >_>) As for merging it with the Spectrobes article, I actually did put a very condensed list a while back (just names of the Spectrobes), but it was removed for some reason. So I won't bother with that either. =/ Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ U | T | C ] 03:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

So what? (Oil Pulling)

It's quite impolite to threaten to ban someone for not following some random warning that reflects a "previous editor's" wishes. It's not like "previous editors" have some kind of special authority. If the link in inappropriate and ban-worthy, I think you need to take the time to describe somewhere exactly why it is or why it doesn't meet this or that policy. Otherwise, be nice. 24.131.178.174 (talk) 06:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I have tried to add citation as a foot note Also have added link to the article abstract

JDC Phosphate discovery has as much relevance as other companies who invented new process.

This one has relevance in solving world food shortage.

So why do the foot notes references not stick? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geoseh (talk • contribs) 07:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Diebold

I'm just heading out the door for a bit, I'll respond later today. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 23:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

I've started a thread on talk:Diebold. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 04:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

The Lost Fleet

What's the big idea? 70.51.10.112 (talk) 07:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Since I was going to rewrite the plot section, and your edit indicates you think that's useless, I still dont' get your big idea. 70.51.10.112 (talk) 07:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Tux (disambiguation)

The store's name is "Tux," and as such, deserves to be placed on the disambiguation page. How is that not cunstructive? 209.137.182.35 (talk) 23:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

It's fine. If you need to contact me further, you can use User:white.matthew.09. Keep up the good work, fellow RCP-er. 209.137.182.35 (talk) 23:45, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Censorship of murdered Tibetans by your friend and the deletion of a whole section

I assume you are Sceptre's friends. A whole section was deleted which referred to murders of many by a cult as well its bloody historic background with no reason or explanation. I will post my replies to you in your talk also so that you will see them. Thegone (talk) 23:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

My RFA Thanks

Thank you for your support at my RFA, which has closed as a success. I understand your concerns about my coaching, and looking back on what I had written, it could appear to be more than a little staged. The way I approached it was I felt that as Balloonman was taking the time to look at what I was doing and setting me tasks, the least I could do would be to give as full and complete answers as possible. However, this isn't the time and the place for me to act defensive about my coaching, I had said in my RFA that I wouldn't be trying to sway anyones votes, and you did support me anyway! So feel free to ignore everything I've typed here apart from the first line and this last comment: Your support means a lot to me, and I look forward to working with you in the future. StephenBuxton (talk) 17:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Please...

...check List of most wealthy historical figures. I think 117.201.64.230 is giving fake information. I'm translating to spanish and I don't know what to tranlate of this new informtaion. Thanks OboeCrack (talk) 22:41, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Answer here es:Usuario discusión:OboeCrack. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by OboeCrack (talk • contribs) 22:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Bujar (Trickz Beatz) Bulukraqi

Hello! Just a little note - you just reverted a page blanking of this article but it was done by the page's only author in good faith after it had been tagged for speedy deletion. I have since tagged it with WP:CSD G7 and removed your vandalism warning, I hope this is ok? I know page blanking is generally vandalism but maybe the tiniest bit more patience before hitting the revert button? Thank you for your edits anyway! Avnjay^Talk 22:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

That's no problem. By the way, I'm sure you're aware of this and far be it from me to insult your intelligence, but did you realise it says "explination" at the top of your talk page? Anyway, happy editing and have a good day/night! Avnjay^Talk 22:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

St. Thomas Evangelical Church

Hi there,I was trying to understand your this edit. The anon user only made a right correction. Why did you revert it ?? -- Tinu Cherian - 02:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Metagraph. You have new messages at Tinucherian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

02:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)