User talk:Mellowish126

Hello, Mellowish126, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 16:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Henry Lowe (American climber) has been accepted

George Henry Lowe (American climber), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:47, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mellowish126! You created a thread called Repeated citations at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chris Jones has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chris Jones. Thanks! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 11:06, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NotCharizard,

Thanks so much for reviewing the article. I understand the concern about an inadequate number of secondary sources. In my opinion, the articles created for the American Alpine Journal should somewhat be able to count even if they were authored by the subject of the article. The AAJ has pretty specific expectations for submitted climbs and the format has always been in first-person reports.

From the AAC website:

"The AAJ publishes first-person reports about big new routes, first free ascents, and significant attempts and mountain exploration anywhere in the world. Most routes are at least five or six pitches long, but we make some exceptions.

There are two ways to report new climbs:

Send your new route reports with this Submission Form.

Send reports and photos to AAJ or to these editors:

Alaska: Andy Anderson

All Lower 48 states (Washington, Colorado, Montana, etc.): Michael Levy

Canada, Mexico, Middle East, Africa, New Zealand: Whitney Clark

South America (except Bolivia): Erik Rieger

Himalaya, Karakoram, China, Bolivia, Greenland, Europe, Antarctica: Lindsay Griffin

Russia, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan: Dougald MacDonald"

Within the submission form, they state:

"What We Publish

Since 1929 the AAJ has been the world’s “journal of record” for documenting significant new climbs. We seek reports on big new routes anywhere in the world—usually at least five pitches long. If the route or developments in an area are especially significant, we will document shorter climbs. We may report a repeat ascent if the peak or route has not been climbed in many years; if there have been major changes in conditions on the mountain or crag; if the style is new (example: first free ascent); if the ascent was exceptionally fast; if it was the first winter ascent; or if the report supplies vital information for future climbers.

We do not publish reports on first "national" ascents (for example, the first American or Italian ascent)."

HOWEVER, I think there have been some other articles published in magazines. Some of them might be difficult to pull up because the magazines went under before they had an internet presence. I'll do my best to fill them in.

Also, I agree that the Supertopo forum is not a strong source - I just think it's an interesting bit of climbing history as written by the community itself. It certainly doesn't count as a secondary source either. It might not be appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Anyway, I'll continue to work on the article and I really appreciate your review.

Best,

mellowish Mellowish126 (talk) 17:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1974 International Climbing Disaster

Hi there Mellowish126,

I moved the page to draft space, I guessed based on the note on top and the AFC draft template that you intended to create it in draft space instead of main. The page seems decently ready for mainspace though, inline citations would be appreciated but other than that it seems all good. If you want a review please let me know :D (please mention me on reply) Justi yaya 03:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Justiyaya Thank you so much. I was mortified when it went into articles for creation. I hadn't done any of the citations I intended to do. I'll reach back out to you when I think it is worthy of review. The topic is certainly worthwhile but it's complicated so the article needs more work. Mellowish126 (talk) 13:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! although the mistake wasn't submitting it through articles for creation (AFC), you put it into article space instead instead of draft space (essentally skipping AFC and publishing directly). I would've honestly marked it as reviewed it if there wasn't the note at the very top, the article was good enough. AFC is still a good process to through for your first few articles (~5) but is a bit slow because of the backlog. The article is looking good, remember that you can publish without finishing and work on it afterwards! Justi yaya 14:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Justiyaya Gotcha. I didn't have permission previously to simply publish an article. Thank you for clarifying! Mellowish126 (talk) 22:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Jones (mountain climber) (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough independent, significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Jones (mountain climber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 08:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mellowish126! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 08:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1974 International Climbing Disaster

Hello, Mellowish126. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1974 International Climbing Disaster, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chris Jones (mountain climber)

Hello, Mellowish126. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chris Jones (mountain climber), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chris Jones (mountain climber)

Hello, Mellowish126. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chris Jones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]