User talk:Mel Lichtenheld

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mel Lichtenheld! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:21, Wednesday, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mel Lichtenheld! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:21, Wednesday, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avionica Inc. (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Avionica Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mel Lichtenheld, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Avionica Inc.

Hello, Mel Lichtenheld. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Avionica Inc.".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editor - Yes, please remove the draft article submission.

Thank you for your help and useful comments. Mel Lichtenheld (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Mel[reply]

File:Ocean Bank 2017 logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ocean Bank 2017 logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(:)Hi ShakespeareFan00 -- thanks for the heads up. I left the logo parked, because I need to return as time allows and code the correct size that it fits above the photo. The logo is required to differentiate it from a Vietnamese bank with the same name. I appreciate any help you are willing to provide.Mel Lichtenheld (talk) 21:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ocean Bank 2017 logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ocean Bank 2017 logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Willy1018 (talk) 18:08, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Okhee Lee (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Okhee Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Okhee Lee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Okhee Lee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Okhee Lee. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Okhee Lee (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MapleSoy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Okhee Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Okhee Lee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 00:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MapleSoy:

Hi MapleSoy, thank you for your careful review of the draft on Okhee Lee and for specifying where citations are needed. The early life and academic career sections are the weakest. Would it be worthwhile to eliminate them for now and bring them back in once she obtains third-party sources to support the statements? I appreciate your help and your work to promote women's biographies. Mel Lichtenheld (talk) 17:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mel, I think that's a good idea, to eliminate the weaker sections and go for getting a simpler draft accepted. You're right that you can always expand once there are more independent sources available. I would include a Career section that includes her current positions at least (and move the references from the lede into this section), and then sections for Research, Selected works, and Awards and honors. I think based on her Awards she should meet notability criteria for an academic, once you add references for those. - MapleSoy (talk) 19:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maplesoy, thanks for your advice. I resubmitted the article after I added references for honors, deleted the early life and personal life sections, and changed the list of honors to start with the most recent awards. I really appreciate your help!Mel Lichtenheld (talk) 20:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Okhee Lee has been accepted

Okhee Lee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 22:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]