User talk:MehrdadFR/Archive 1

Irreligion in Iran

There are errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar with the reverted edits. Sources have been removed as well.--AnarchistFakest (talk) 03:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring. The verified sources are continuously being removed.--AnarchistFakest (talk) 04:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you seem to understand what I'm trying to tell you. I have reliable sources that you keep removing. In doing so, you add your own sources that are irrelevant to the article and then cite them with grammatical and spelling errors. Now who's the one pushing their agenda?--AnarchistFakest (talk) 04:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you working for the Islamic Republic by any chance due to your persistent anti-irreligious edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnarchistFakest (talk • contribs) 04:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. All Rows4 (talk) 21:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Averysoda (talk) 06:30, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more constructive in engaging with content you dispute

Your recent edit to the Lake Urmia article deleted a large chunk of text supported by about 15 references. This Wikipedia policy specifically identifies your actions as disruptive. If you feel this section of the Lake Urmia article is biased there are other more constructive ways to handle this than to simply delete the text. I see you've been warned about edit warring multiple times already. It would be great if you could work towards a better, unbiased encyclopedia, rather than damaging what already exists. Rupert Clayton (talk) 16:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion of Kashf-e hijab

I noticed your valuable efforts expanding the Kashf-e hijab article. You've used various scholarly works in your edits and that's an important point. Btw, the article was eligible to be nominated for WP:DYK as it had got five fold by you and I did the nomination. I can change the hook if you have any suggestions. Thanks. Mhhossein (talk) 07:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kashf-e hijab has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, MehrdadFR. Kashf-e hijab, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 16:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discrimination against atheists

I've already blocked User:Chronus for edit warring at Discrimination against atheists; if you edit that article again without discussing it on the article talk page, the same will happen to you. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And you did, and you are now blocked. Really. Is using a talk page so hard? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jpgordon, I was thinking map is the actual problem, and I didn't touch it. If I knew text is an issue also I would revert my edit myself to avoid edit warning. Do not consider this explanation as a call for unblocking, one week is nothing serious and at least I deserve it for stupidity. --MehrdadFR (talk) 12:33, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And now you're blocked again. Is using a talk page so hard? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jpgordon, don't you see discussion is going on? Considering map is dubious in many aspects, I've chosen not to insist on alternative version but to remove it until case is solved, plus I put NPOV tag instead of replacing material. Your newest blockade really doesn't make sense. --MehrdadFR (talk) 19:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any evidence of you participating in any discussion; you've used the article talk page once, three weeks ago; even after posting the POV tag, you didn't even attempt to justify it or seek consensus on the talk page; and as I made clear, "if you edit that article again without discussing it on the article talk page", you will be blocked. Really, is using a talk page so hard? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kashf-e hijab

On 26 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kashf-e hijab, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many Iranian women chose not leave their houses, and a few even committed suicide, to avoid removing their hijabs due to Reza Shah's Kashf-e hijab decree? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kashf-e hijab. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please try not to revert editors repeatedly as I've seen you do on a few pages. I commend you on trying to bring new sources in this edit of yours but you also should have tried to leave in much, if not all, of the sourced text that you removed in that edit. If you continue to edit war at United Against Nuclear Iran you may find yourself blocked again. Sepsis II (talk) 01:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to make personal attacks you might also find yourself blocked. Even if you see a horribly stupid comment or edit, please do not insult the editor, but try to help them improve. Sepsis II (talk) 23:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Plot Spoiler (talk) 01:51, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]