User talk:MehrdadFR
Notice
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is MehrdadFR. NeilN talk to me 14:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Mjbmr (talk) 17:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
[edit]Your recent editing history at Girl of Enghelab Street shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- Ad Orientem, see below. Drmies (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at My Stealthy Freedom. I don't have a "Final warning for disruptive editing", but by this time we might as well use the word "vandalism" to describe your editing against against consensus in that article. Drmies (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)October 2018
[edit]This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Jasbir Puar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Toddst1 (talk) 00:29, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, MehrdadFR. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sock puppetry
[edit]Are you just filing under any master? Where is the overlap for the master here or [here]? Praxidicae (talk) 13:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
In particular - edit summaries of "rv to NPOV version, before VwM.Mwv's tendentious editing"[1], "These are minor opinions, as well as conspiracy theories.",[2], "vandalism",[3], and "WP:LEAD is plagued by Zionist hate propaganda".[4] (I'll note that the "Zionist" nature of the sources here is far from obvious). Furthermore, following 12:55, 10 March 2019 - coupled with filing 2 SPI reports - 13:03, 10 March 2019 (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Plot Spoiler), 13:13, 10 March 2019 (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim) - this is quite a severe reaction. Icewhiz (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2019 (UTC)