User talk:MegSimpson

Welcome!

Hello, MegSimpson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Miroslav Donutil, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Iakub (talk) 12:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Miroslav Donutil

A tag has been placed on Miroslav Donutil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Iakub (talk) 12:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've declined the speedy deletion nomination of Miroslav Donutil as I consider the subject to be notable. Ϣere SpielChequers 13:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kristýna Leichtová

A tag has been placed on Kristýna Leichtová requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fre h ley 08:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've downgraded this speedy deletion tag to a notability tag as I consider that importance is asserted in the article. Ϣere SpielChequers 10:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Stephan a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 18:55, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pavlína Němcová

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pavlína Němcová, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Just a filmography does not explain who this person is

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 01:42, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kašpar Theatre Company

A tag has been placed on Kašpar Theatre Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Guy0307 (talk) 08:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Honeypot Productions

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Honeypot Productions, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wiki.jorjafox.net/wiki/Honeypot_Productions. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rearranging first name articles

Hi. I notice that you are interested in cleaning up articles on first names, which is great because many of them are cluttered and unorganized. However, names are distinct and should not be combined into one article, even if they are etymologically related. For instance, you have redirected Amelie to Amelia and Amalie to Amalia, and dumped the content in the remaining article. While some extremely close variations might be considered one name—say, Amelie and Amélie—the people in the articles you edited do not have the same name, and it is confusing to have them all on one page. Redirects are meant to link pages referring to the exact same topic. Differences in spelling are usually insignificant, but in the case of proper names, it's more like bread and tortilla.

In general, one should "be bold" in editing Wikipedia. However, when it comes to removing (or just moving) large portions of a page, it is best to seek consensus by posting something on the discussion page. (See my recent post to Talk:Allies (disambiguation).) MagnesianPhoenix (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Angelina Jolie. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 08:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please stop making changes to the surnames of well-known individuals as you did to Jon Voight and Jennifer Aniston without first discussing the change on the article talk pages. Any change would need to be supported by multiple reliable sources in addition to the establishment of consensus for the changes. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 10:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Plays With Devils

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Plays With Devils, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No sources support the notability of this film.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 10:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Plays With Devils

I have nominated Plays With Devils, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plays With Devils. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 13:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ivana Jirešová

A tag has been placed on Ivana Jirešová requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. freshacconci talktalk 12:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI

Hi, this is just for your information regarding the edit you made to Linnéa: the twinflower (Linnaea Borealis) is the province flower for one of Sweden's provinces, but not Sweden's national flower. Sweden doesn't have a national flower -- I know that there are a couple of websites claiming that the twinflower is it, but that's incorrect. I just thought you might want to know :-) Cheers, bonadea contributions talk 20:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uhuh, I don´t know. I think it´s Sweden´s national flower.--MegSimpson (talk) 05:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you read or hear that? It's not correct, I'm afraid. A couple of years ago a poll in a popular science magazine voted for the lilac to be the Swedish national flower, but there was never any official recognition of that; that's the closest we've ever been to having a national flower. This Swedish-language source, from Uppsala university, confirms that there is no national flower in Sweden. --bonadea contributions talk 07:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Translations

Please help other editors by offering a careful edit summary: Using the cover of "Tidy" to insert material (which I have removed as not notable pending some context) can seem misleading. Thanks. --Old Moonraker (talk) 10:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cast lists for plays

Hi. You have recently been adding detailed Czech cast lists to a number of Wikipedia articles about theatrical plays, such as The Merry Wives of Windsor. However, for such internationally famous plays, that have been performed hundreds (probably thousands) of times all over the world, it is not reasonable for an encyclopedia article to include such specific material about any particular production, without giving a good reason (backed by independent, reliable sources) indicating why this cast in particular should be considered more significant or notable than any of the others. Thanks, Hqb (talk) 11:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Christopher McLinden

I have nominated Christopher McLinden, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher McLinden. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Oscarthecat (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Celebrity s.r.o.

A tag has been placed on Celebrity s.r.o. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PrJ 27 (talk) 11:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Apple Tree Theatre

A tag has been placed on Apple Tree Theatre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PGWG (talk) 23:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ještě jednou, profesore

A tag has been placed on Ještě jednou, profesore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 16:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of S tvojí dcerou ne

A tag has been placed on S tvojí dcerou ne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 17:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 17:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leading Ladies

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Leading Ladies, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kenludwig.com/leading_ladies/leading_ladies.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Troubadour Theater Company

A tag has been placed on The Troubadour Theater Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 18:56, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding info to name pages

Hi, I've seen you adding lots of info to name pages, but please also provide info on your sources, e.g. for this edit re Sonia. If you don't know how to do it, WP:CITE gives very full information and WP:CHEAT has a brief summary, but I will be happy to help you with formatting citations if you leave me a note.

I'd also like to invite you to join WP:WikiProject Anthroponymy! - Fayenatic (talk) 17:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Amber Stanton

I have nominated Amber Stanton, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Stanton. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJMitchell You rang? 16:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed

Hello. When you add new information to an article, you need to cite to the source where you got the information. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Klíče na neděli

The article Klíče na neděli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has been listed at WP:PNT for more than 2 weeks with no progress

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jarkeld (talk) 21:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Klíče na neděli

I have nominated Klíče na neděli, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klíče na neděli. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jarkeld (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petr Švácha

The article Petr Švácha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to be at most a WP:BLP1E issue. No sources are specified. After cleaning up the prose at most a 2 or 3 liner can remain.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:56, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry.--MegSimpson (talk) 21:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello MegSimpson! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 22 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Ian Barford - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Klára Sedláčková - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lucie Štěpánková - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lada Jelínková - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Helena Dvořáková - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Michal Jagelka - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Zuzana Šulajová - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Stanislava Jachnická - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rosita Erbanová - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kamila Špráchalová - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Ľuboš Kostelný 12. Pavla Ptáčková 13. Vendula Ježková 14. Lukáš Hejlík 15. Mattie Hawkinson 16. Alana Arenas 17. Antonín Procházka (actor) 18. Roman Zach 19. Winter Ave Zoli 20. Tomáš Matonoha 21. Lukáš Jůza

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Legenda o Nepočujúcich

The article Legenda o Nepočujúcich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cindy and the Disco Ball

The article Cindy and the Disco Ball has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability asserted. The bluelinks are false positives.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:36, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Electra (disambiguation). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 15:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You'd left a message but it was completely ambiguous and left absolutely no indication of what you'd done. What you did do, when compared with the edit summary, actually looked like vandalism. Please consider using more appropriate, or more specific edit summaries so other users can follow your work. The statement "Edits in meanings", while removing 2 KB of text is suspicious in itself. Dawnseeker2000 15:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prija

Sources please? PamD (talk) 16:46, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Iška (name)

The article Iška (name) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails Wikipedia:Deletion policy/names and surnames

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 20:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article Nastja

Dear MegSimpson, I see that you recently created the new article Nastja. However, I noticed the article contains spelling/grammatical errors, especially in the first section. As you know, Wikipedia is not just an "encyclopedia", it's a "community" as well and there will always be resources to help you along your way. Have a good day! Jipinghe (talk) 23:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Šárka Vaculíková

The article Šárka Vaculíková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can find only passing mentions, no evidence of notability, fails WP:ENTERTAINER

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:56, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karel Dobrý

The article Karel Dobrý has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can only find MySpace, Facebook, wiki mirrors and filmography lists, no reliable sources to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Klára Issová

The article Klára Issová has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can only find, wiki mirrors, filmography listings, passing mentions in articles on films, no substantial sources to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kristýna Kociánová

The article Kristýna Kociánová has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can find no reliable sources to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:32, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kristýna Leichtová

The article Kristýna Leichtová has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can find no reliable sources to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin Písařík

The article Martin Písařík has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can find no reliable sources to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matouš Ruml

The article Matouš Ruml has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can find no reliable sources to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:43, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miroslav Šimůnek

The article Miroslav Šimůnek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can find no reliable sources to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ondřej Kavan

The article Ondřej Kavan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable actor, can find no reliable sources to support notability, fails WP:ENTERTAINER

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matouš Ruml for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matouš Ruml is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matouš Ruml until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 08:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jesminder

A tag has been placed on Jesminder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rangilo Gujarati (talk) 16:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Zdeslava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slavic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Christian (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Satyana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sasha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Jan Tříska, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Three Sisters, Arsenic and Old Lace and Idiot's Delight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ve státním zájmu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonín Procházka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Madla (name) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madla (name) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madla (name) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lukáš Jůza

The article Lukáš Jůza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication the subject meets the general notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 11:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sandra Nováková

The article Sandra Nováková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 21:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rosita Erbanová

The article Rosita Erbanová has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 13:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rostislav Novák

The article Rostislav Novák has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 21:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lada Jelínková

The article Lada Jelínková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 05:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucie Černíková

The article Lucie Černíková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 13:57, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Veronika Poláčková

The article Veronika Poláčková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 11:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicole Wiesner

The article Nicole Wiesner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomáš Matonoha

The article Tomáš Matonoha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alana Arenas

The article Alana Arenas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lukáš Hejlík

The article Lukáš Hejlík has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:41, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vendula Ježková

The article Vendula Ježková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pavla Ptáčková

The article Pavla Ptáčková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Viktor Skála

The article Viktor Skála has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:44, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zuzana Kajnarová

The article Zuzana Kajnarová has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kateřina Lojdová

The article Kateřina Lojdová has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Braňo Polák

The article Braňo Polák has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Magdaléna Zimová

The article Magdaléna Zimová has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:51, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ivan Martinka

The article Ivan Martinka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dana Verzichová

The article Dana Verzichová has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:54, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Václav Neužil

The article Václav Neužil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:54, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suzanne Ford

The article Suzanne Ford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 14:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zobaczyć cisze

The article Zobaczyć cisze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of whether the programme is notable per WP:TVSERIES, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 15:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Klára Sedláčková

The article Klára Sedláčková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 15:07, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tereza Duchková

The article Tereza Duchková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 15:08, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dagmar Edwards

The article Dagmar Edwards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant roles per WP:NACTOR, no evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 15:10, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Těžká Barbora

The article Těžká Barbora has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 15:12, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mattie Hawkinson

The article Mattie Hawkinson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject who appears to fail WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 19:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Perfect Wedding (play) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perfect Wedding (play) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect Wedding (play) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vlastimil Horváth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MegSimpson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mnislav for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mnislav is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mnislav until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AWI Film, o.s. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AWI Film, o.s. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AWI Film, o.s. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 14:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jara (given name) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jara (given name) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jara (given name) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Devil's Ruse

The article The Devil's Ruse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Holka nebo kluk

The article Holka nebo kluk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. casualdejekyll 14:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jesminder

The article Jesminder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 07:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prija

The article Prija has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 23:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Radana

The article Radana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 06:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Satyana

The article Satyana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 07:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zdeslava

The article Zdeslava has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 07:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nezamysl (name)

The article Nezamysl (name) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 07:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Neklan (name)

The article Neklan (name) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 07:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Erlea

The article Erlea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 07:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Liběna

The article Liběna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 07:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Radana

The article Radana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 07:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michal Suchánek for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michal Suchánek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michal Suchánek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clara A. Djalim (talk) 13:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]