User talk:MbahGondrong/Archive until 31.12.2021

This is an archive of past discussions about User:MbahGondrong. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, MbahGondrong, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! 70.51.44.60 (talk) 03:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello! MbahGondrong, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Welcome!

Hello, MbahGondrong, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeannette Yango

Hello MbahGondrong,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jeannette Yango for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. PawanAhuja (talk) 18:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you for your help. Jallouljalloul (talk) 19:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for you're cooperation in making articles for players in the 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup! Wikipedia and I appreciate you're contributions in the Association Football field! Da Drewster (talk) 20:53, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your article Ajara Nchout

Hi MbahGondrong, I'm afraid your newly created article Ajara Nchout is actually a duplicate of the existing Njoya Nkout. I'm not sure how to resolve this conflict in en-wp, however. --Headlocker (talk) 21:11, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. Redirected the old to the new one. Cheers! MbahGondrong (talk) 08:39, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

You should have also requested that the histories of the two pages be merged. – Pee Jay 17:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry did not know that, how could I do that? MbahGondrong (talk) 18:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

It's okay, I've done it now. For future reference, you just need to add {{histmerge}} to the new page. – Pee Jay 18:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

2015–16 Austrian Regional Leagues

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 2015–16 Austrian Regional Leagues, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 2014–15 Austrian Regional Leagues. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

New articles

Hi, I saw you created some new articles for players who participated in FIFA Women's World cup (I have done the same). However the article you created today seems to be completely unsourced and I would appreciate if you in the future also consider quality ahead of quantity. Please do not only create a lot of articles but also source them and add some content instead of just one line of text. You could always compare Aurelle Awona I created yesterday to your creation Agathe Ngani and spot the difference. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

I would like to second this and express another concern: FIFA publishes the players' cap and goal totals, but your articles invariably contain different totals which are unreferenced/incorrect. For example Zhang Yue (footballer), created by you with 5 caps 0 goals. Quickly updated by other editors to the 48/0 widely published by FIFA.

These ones were the same and all seem to have been corrected by other editors now. But this is just one team. I dread to think what a mess the other teams are in! I could understand it if you'd copy & pasted the same stat (after all, you churned out many of these stubs on the same day). What concerns me is that this isn't carelessness: each article had its own unique pretend or imaginary figures inserted. I am sure I won't be the only one watching your edits very closely from now on. Thanks, Målfarlig! (talk) 13:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

I just have an addition. When putting welcome message on new editors it states Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source. and unsourced BLPs can be speedily removed as you can not prove notability so please check out your creations and improve them or you risk having a lot of removal messages on your talkpage soon and several articles removed. Qed237 (talk) 14:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

@Målfarlig! and Qed237: I appreciate your feedbacks for the articles I created. Mostly I use Soccerway as a source when I create new articles and most of them (seems like some editors have replaced ith the FIFA ones) have it in the external links, and so far that seems to be just fine. My goal is to reduce the red links (women & men) on football articles by creating articles thats fulfills minimum notability so that they can be further improved, especially player articles, and I really appreciate (even though I dont thank personally) when other editors improve those articles I created.
Both of you can check the soccerway links on the articles I created and see if they are from my imagination or not. I could of course use FIFA as a source but the profiles there are limited to only players that have played for the senior national team and not their league performances (especially for less known/women).
Please next time check first before you accuse someone to make articles from their imagination or just copy pasting their stats. Oh, by the way Zhao Lina article have been kept, before start improving that article with the sources on the AfD before any other editors nominates it again. Cheers! MbahGondrong (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

I am not accusing you for making articles from your imagination, I am just saying that I would appreciate if you spend some more time on your articles and try and add some more sources. For example it is not so hard to find a source to say that the player played in the Women's Worsd Cup and therby verify that the player is notable. Qed237 (talk) 14:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

It was not intended for you. Thanks for your feedback. MbahGondrong (talk) 14:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Tamer Seyam

Hello, I'm Målfarlig!. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Smail Prevljak

Hello, I'm Bosniantennis. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Smail Prevljak because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Preceding undated comment added 17:26, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Your recent editing history at Smail Prevljak shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Keri (talk) 18:26, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Zombie433

Hi, are you User:Zombie433? I've been looking back through your created articles and like Tamer Seyam they pretty much all have made up infobox stats. You include Soccerway as an external link but I've looked at plenty and have yet to find one where your infobox caps/goals actually matches the totals at Soccerway! This was Zombie433's modus operandi too. Obscure footballers, tonnes of very short under-referenced stubs, deliberate introduction of false info, German connection... it's just a hunch. Målfarlig! (talk) 20:41, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Please, if you suspect me with wrong doing here in Wikipedia, give a proper prove of my mistakes and stop accusing me with false accusations or hunch or whatever thing you thought I have been doing. Just give me one example of an article I created that does NOT match the stats on Soccerway if you found any. MbahGondrong (talk) 21:33, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Ok MbahGondrong, I have now had time to properly review your contributions and I am withdrawing my claim that you are deliberately introducing errors like Zombie433. I apologise for any offence caused. However, with respect, you do have quite a serious WP:COMPETENCE issue. This stems, in part, from your reliance on Soccerway which is not a WP:RS for international football. The games included for female players seem to be only official qualifiers and tournament games, not friendlies or other tournaments. Also it does not cover some leagues. I mean, when you created Sine Hovesen and Karoline Smidt Nielsen, for example, did you really think that they were in Denmark's national team despite playing zero times for their club? Here you also provided stats for national youth teams which were based on Soccerway but were incomplete/wrong because only UEFA competitions are included. I recommend in future that you try the national association for your cap/goal totals, or UEFA/FIFA etc when major tournaments come round. At the very least you need to start looking beyond Soccerway. As User:Qed237 said, you generally need to start putting more time and effort into your articles which overall are of a desperately poor standard and full of inaccuracies, even if not always intentional.
I hope now that I have withdrawn my suspicion that you are Zombie433, the low-level WP:WIKIHOUNDING and WP:EDITWARRING which you seem to have branched out into will stop. I think you have misunderstood WP:INFOBOXREF, perhaps because English is not your first language. I invite you to look at Steve Bruce and Robin Friday which are feature articles with references in their infoboxes. The height field (obviously) should reflect those provided in the source. I hope that this message has clarified a few things for you, but don't hesitate to get back in touch if I can be of any more help. Thanks, Målfarlig! (talk) 17:39, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Apologies accepted. Just a suggestion, please in the future, when someone disagree with you, always have WP:AGF in mind and don't directly be defensive or attack the related user. After all, we are all here to improve Wikipedia, I assume. As for the samples you mentioned, maybe I made mistake in some of the articles I created, since as I said previously, I usually make a number of articles in a row and well, mistakes can happen. FYI I will admit if I make mistake and I will accept the consequences (deletion or whatever), just don't make proveless accusations, that is totally NOT cool.
Regarding the cases you mention above, I just follow what the source mention and if it says they have international caps but no club caps than it is so. This cases happen especially for women football, since there are not as many documentation as men's football. That is when the use of community be needed, too improve articles.
Regarding the WP:INFOBOXREF thingy, maybe you missed the last sentence "However, editors should first consider including the fact in the body of the article", it is not a pain in the ass too add 4-5 more sentences. It is quite straight forward and no need to comment on my English please, thank you very much for caring. Oh and about deletion of my warning in your talk page, better be careful with that, it can show your approach in dealing a debate of conflict with other users. Happy editing. MbahGondrong (talk) 18:22, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Målfarlig!

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

2015–16 RB Leipzig season

The "results by round" section exists in most of german clubs season pages so i think it is better to keep the section and there's no need to delete the section. you can check these pages for example: 2015–16 Borussia Dortmund season 2015–16 Borussia Mönchengladbach season 2015–16 VfL Wolfsburg season. So obviously the section should stay. Jallouljalloul (talk) 20:44, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Personally I do not quite like these type of additional statistics, as actually it have little information contribution compared to other sections. The result and position by round actually are clearly seen in the "2. Bundesliga fixtures & results". That is why I stated redundant as the reason. Please make sure though that it will be properly updated. If not in the end it could be cleaned up. Thanks! MbahGondrong (talk) 20:58, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

After a second thought I think that you're right and the section is not adding any information. You can remove that section if you want or maybe I'll do it myself. Jallouljalloul (talk) 03:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Some tips for making your stubs a bit better

Apart from your over-reliance on Soccerway (which isn't always a WP:RS), I've noticed there are some other aspects of your created articles which need substantial improvement. Typing "player who plays" is poor English, try to put "footballer who plays..." or "soccer player who represents..." The word "currently" is pretty pointless too - I mean, they either play for the team or they don't, right? Also, try not to say they play for Bayern Munich in the Frauen-Bundesliga. Put of the Frauen-Bundesliga instead, because they play matches for their teams outside the league too. Please remember to always put the stub tags at the bottom of the article, this will draw attention to the fact that your creations require expansion and improvement. These are just small suggestions, but hopefully by taking this advice you will get better and eventually take some steps on the path to becoming a worthwhile contributor. Thanks, Målfarlig! (talk) 20:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the advices. Will apply them for my new articles, so I could become a worthwhile editor. MbahGondrong (talk) 21:12, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Hey, you're welcome. Like I said before, I'm always here if you're not sure or need some more help. Målfarlig! (talk) 22:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Women Bundesliga transfers

Sigh. Doing all this work and getting it deleted like this is frustrating.

I don't agree it's totally unnecesary, I'd say it's interesting for those into this topic, and I don't know what you mean with 5 seasons when this is just about the 2015-16 season. And Frauen Bundesliga teams don't have season pages so far.

Whatever. Would it be acceptable to make a section in the club's page with season by season signings? I'm sure some users might be interested in seeing the progression of the club's signing policy rather than searching in every season page. And like I said there aren't season pages anyway.

But really, I think this 2015-16 signings chart was interesting and looked great and it's a shame to have it deleted. Pakhtakorienne (talk) 14:56, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for the revert. I know how frustating it is, been there before. The last 5 seasons means at least the last 5 Bundesliga Women seasons does not have the section. Consistency needs to be taken every year. Maybe you can create another article such as List of German football transfers summer 2015 and have it on the external links for 2015–16 Bundesliga (women). Hope it helps, good job anyway. MbahGondrong (talk) 15:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll try doing that. Pakhtakorienne (talk) 15:43, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your welcome. :) MbahGondrong (talk) 07:03, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Persib Bandung

Mbah tulisan saya yang Persib dan pemain asing kenapa lu hapus?? Jangan di hapus lah...... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.69.122.31 (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

It is unnecesary to add the list as there is already a link pointing to a category with shows all Persib players present and past. MbahGondrong (talk) 23:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hack (talk) 04:49, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

That alignment thing

Hi, I see you've reverted my aligning the attendance figures at 2015–16 1. FC Magdeburg season. My rationale was that since the attendances vary by factors of 10, it is easier to read when the commas as delimiters are aligned, rather than wobbling to the left and right for individual data points. What is your rationale for the revert? Madcynic (talk) 17:25, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Madcynic, I simply just follow the consistency done on other season articles which uses similar tables. Such as 2014–15 FC Bayern Munich season and 2014–15 FC Schalke 04 season. This are also done on season articles that I create and maintain. MbahGondrong (talk) 01:17, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

May I politely suggest we change this for the Magdeburg article? It enhances readability as it is easier to compare attendance figures. The Bayern article is a bad example, as they only ever have five-digit attendances. I believe consistency to not be a good argument. I'd suggest using {{0}} instead, but that wouldn't work for three- vs. four-digit attendances. Madcynic (talk) 13:15, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cilegon United FC Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cilegon United FC Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

You may delete it if it is needed. Thanks for giving notice. MbahGondrong (talk) 13:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information.

Direct citations

Please see WP:RS, WP:V and WP:BLP - dierect in-line citations are always preferred. Giant Snowman 12:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Creations

Come on, you have been told several times how poor/bad your creations like Sydney Mohamed Sylla are. It is better with redlinks than these articles. Please start creating proper articles or you will have to get a ban. Consider this a final warning. Qed237 (talk) 20:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Well, if your creations were better you would not have to explain yourself all the time. Qed237 (talk) 12:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your first creations back in 2012, "German Football Referees" (sic) of dubious notability, were utterly terrible. It's not that your subsequent creations have got worse - indeed, that would be almost impossible - but incredibly three years later they haven't got any better. There is a saying "you can't polish a turd but you can roll it in glitter". Well, I've rolled dozens of your dreadful creations in glitter and I'm getting tired of it. Especially since you branched out into childish disruption. Wikipedia is not the best place for you to try and learn English, or to deliberately introduce false information, like your German/Indonesian alter ego Zombie433 did. I'd definitely support a topic ban, although jettisoning you altogether would be preferable! Målfarlig! (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonathan Barrios, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alianza F. C. and Primera División de Fútbol Profesional. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

3rr

You're at 3rr again mongoboy. Seriously how long are you going to keep this up? Until the unlikely event that you ever get a girlfriend or job and have to move out of your sweaty mom's basement? Why don't you fuck off to the wikipedia of whatever language it is you actually speak!? Perhaps your stupid edits and spectrum disorder would be appreciated there. I doubt you would last two minutes at wp.de because they would not put up with you anything like as long as you've somehow lasted here. Målfarlig! (talk) 20:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period for ten days for severe edit warring that has disrupted the project. You can see my statement at AN3 for more information. Swarm ♠ 07:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fotis Bazakos

The article Fotis Bazakos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Fotis Bazakos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fotis Bazakos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fotis Bazakos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 09:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 FC Ingolstadt 04 season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Modeste. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ashley Rodrigues

The article Ashley Rodrigues has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 333 -blue 11:41, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alison Heydorn

The article Alison Heydorn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 333 -blue 11:41, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kayla Desouza

The article Kayla Desouza has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 333 -blue 11:47, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Olivia Gonsalves

The article Olivia Gonsalves has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 333 -blue 12:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Yvrase Gervil(le)

Hello, MbahGondrong. You have new messages at talk:Yvrase Gervil.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, MbahGondrong. You have new messages at talk:Yvrase Gerville.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Creating duplicate articles is not the way to have an article occupy multiple pagenames. They will invariably become out of synch and not contain the same information. You can request one article title to redirect to another using WP:AFC/R request process. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 03:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for pointing out my mistake. I totally forgot that I have made an article for the same person. There definitely needs to be redirects to one single article. The case is there seems to be different info from different sources. Here and here, she was mentioned as Yvrose Gervil, but here she is mentioned as Yvrase Gerville. Which one do you think are more accurate and correct? MbahGondrong (talk) 10:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

That can be determined through a merger discussion, post a message to WP:PM (proposed mergers) asking for help. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 10:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Dylan Connolly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dylan Connolly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Connolly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Willy Stephanus

The article Willy Stephanus has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KDS4444^Talk 14:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Verifiability

Please read WP:VER before placing inappropriate templates on other peoples talk pages. Cheers. — 37 ^(talk) 05:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the RB Leipzig page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Muzi Dlamini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muzi Dlamini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muzi Dlamini until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 03:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		Moves like Kim Little Barnstar
		As a recipient of the Kim Little barnstar, we'd like to thank you for make amazing Kim Little-like contributions to articles related to women's football (soccer) and WP:WOSO. Thank you for your diligent work!

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Hertha BSC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heidenheim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Please help defend SAFF articles for deletion

Dear MbahGondrong, please help me defend the SAFF sub articles which are currently being considered for deletion. Many of these articles contain information that is useful to football in the SAFF region and in my opinion should remain on Wikipedia. You can join the discussion here although of course you should express your opinion, not mine. Thanks. Inter&anthro (talk) 04:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ismail Elfath

The article Ismail Elfath has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence subject meets WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 04:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ismail Elfath for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ismail Elfath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ismail Elfath until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 05:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ju Hyo-sim

A tag has been placed on Ju Hyo-sim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Donottroll (talk) 04:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kim Su-Gyong

The article Kim Su-Gyong has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 06:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Huang Kaixiang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zhang Wen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Katarzyna Daleszczyk

The article Katarzyna Daleszczyk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies)/Wikipedia:Notability (soccer) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Badminton profiles

Hello, User: MbahGondrong. I have noticed that you have been creating lot of badminton players profile and we appreciate those contributions. Unfortunately, your editing style in showing player achievements are not using the agreed color-coding for various tournament level. You can check the color list in WP:BADM and look at Juliane Schenk page for further reference. Thanks. Griff88 (talk) 08:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing it out. I will use it for future new articles. MbahGondrong (talk) 09:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shen Yaying, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Li Yun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

2015–16 Oberliga Niederrhein & Mittelrhein

I have updated the 2015–16 Oberliga Niederrhein & Mittelrhein, two articles that you used to do in the past. Just to let you know, I use a slightly different system to update which you might, at least initially, find confusing. I've got an Excel spreadsheet in which I directly copy tables from soccerway.com, which converts them and than I copy the information directly into the article. It eliminates manual editing every column. It's a bit difficult to use it for manual entry however so if you update again next time and find it annoying just revert to your version. Regards, Calistemon (talk) 00:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

It is quite simple to use once you get used to it and eliminates a lot of data entry. It works well with soccerway but I can't make it as yet work with German websites like kicker or Weltfussball as they use club logos in their tables which throws it off. The only way to send it to you is for you to email me and I email it back as I can't attach the file otherwise. I'm happy to send it to you, it helped me greatly when I created the historical Oberliga seasons in Category:Oberliga (football) seasons. By the way, I update the Regionalliga article as well, same story there. Calistemon (talk) 06:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

I have send you an email back with the attachment. See how you go. Calistemon (talk) 22:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

I have replied but I don't know what is causing the issue. I used for the 2014–15 Oberliga Westfalen article today and it worked fine. Sorry, don't have much of an answer for the problem. Calistemon (talk) 12:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 FA WSL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emma Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Bali United F.C.

Hi. I want to add information to Bali United page like history, honours, staff, etc. Can I add it like one you deleted last time? Thanks and sorry for my bad english. Regards, User:Wira rhea (talk) 08:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC+8)

Proposed deletion of Megan Toohey

The article Megan Toohey has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Insert CleverPhrase Here 23:06, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beatrice Gärds

The article Beatrice Gärds has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Insert CleverPhrase Here 23:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Recently created soccer bio articles

You have recently created a bunch of articles for players such as Megan Toohey in the second devision of Swedish football play Kvarnsvedens IK, however these players do not qualify for automatic notability under WP:NFOOTBALL. These articles, as far as i have seen so far are unsourced except for an external link to their profile on [soccarway.com]. Please indicate how these players qualify for GNG. Insert CleverPhrase Here 23:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Apologies, I was confused by several out of date articles. I see that they have been promoted to the 2016 Damallsvenskan, but the Damallsvenskan article was out of date and did not list the team, and team's article is out of date and needs a significant update. Insert CleverPhrase Here 23:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

No worries, its often many articles are not updated properly. Thanks a lot for updating the Damallsvenskan article. MbahGondrong (talk) 23:41, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 22 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2016–17 FC Bayern Munich season page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 31 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2016–17 2. Bundesliga (women) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jean-Brice Wadriako

added a link pointing to New Caledonian

Jefferson Dahite

added a link pointing to New Caledonian

Joerisse Cexome

added a link pointing to New Caledonian

Kevin Nemia

added a link pointing to New Caledonian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Bramfelder SV has been nominated for discussion

Category:Bramfelder SV, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 22:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Ricardo John

It seems to be a recurring issue for you based on your Talk Page, but your creation of the Ricardo John is... pointless? Not only does the person in question fail all guidelines for an article, the article provides literally nothing. In fact, all it does include is incorrect information, I'm not sure how you would incorrectly research a single sentence and a poorly filled out infobox. The article wasn't even written to the standard of a very basic stub, it just featured a couple of words. I presume it was created so you can claim you created it to look good on your user page. It doesn't provide any valid contribution to Wikipedia or the community.

Your article Mariana Larroquette

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Mariana Larroquette to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Jianhui67^T★C 15:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

I placed this notice to inform you that someone has added new content in Spanish (not you). Jianhui67^T★C 15:08, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mariana Larroquette

The article Mariana Larroquette has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

standings updater

Yeah, i've got those. Try: www.filedropper .com/liga1 and filedropper .com/wales1415 Those are from women's seasons. The principle is explained at the Sain tab. They sure can be updated to use the sports module. -Koppapa (talk) 12:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

2016–17 Regionalliga

Whats the point of sorting the list of the standings according to the position? An alphabetic sorting makes more sense.

Categorising categories

When you create new categories such as Category:2016–17 in Austrian women's football, please can you not leave them blank but assign them to categories? Otherwise a)humans can't find the categories so they might as well not exist, and b)a lot of automated maintenance relies on the category hierarchy being used. See WP:Categorization for more information - with those kinds of categories you can usually clone the categories from a similar one. Cheers. Le Deluge (talk) 23:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Please can you add categories - you are now responsible for over 10% of all uncategorised categories on English Wikipedia. It's easy enough to do - you can just copy them across from the previous season's category.Le Deluge (talk) 22:40, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

If I had known this had been going on I would have descended with every swear word I know in dutch, javanese and indonesian (I am very behind on arabic and russian varieties). Yes - categories are what hold the whole of wikipedia together. Please do not ever create a category without a category again - otherwise I will wish every problematic soccer article into your lap for at least 4 seasons. in WP:AGF of course JarrahTree 00:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Jangan... you have it wrong completely I was being slightly over-dramatic for effect, your editing is always appreciated.... - if you ever create a new category - please make sure it is in another!!! - cheers - keep up the good work JarrahTree 08:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Creating categories

When you create new categories, please add them to the appropriate existing categories (see WP:CAT for details.) Thanks! —swpb^T 16:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

I see you created several more orphan categories. Please be aware that this creates work for other editors – see Wikipedia:Database reports/Uncategorized categories. Please categorize your new categories when you create them. Le Deluge and User:JarrahTree have already complained to you about this. —swpb^T 12:58, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MbahGondrong. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sardor Rakhmanov

The article Sardor Rakhmanov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abbosbek Makhsatalliev

The article Abbosbek Makhsatalliev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Indonesian spelling

Please note you are welcome to join in the discussion for the proposal about spelling to be ratified (about 8 years after it was thought about) - trust your festival season has been a good one - and hope to see your comments at the page - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Indonesia - thanks JarrahTree 00:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Indonesia Super League

An article that you have been involved in editing—Indonesia Super League —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Yogwi21 (talk) 09:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Re:

Hello, MbahGondrong. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hi, MbahGondrong

Long time no see. haha Tommy Syahputra (talk) 13:23, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your article Mimmi Larsson

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Mimmi Larsson to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Lcmortensen (mailbox) 03:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Article you wrote proposed for deletion

FYI I have proposed deletion on your article "Aurelio Gonzales-Vigil". I am unsure if he is notable enough and the article is, frankly, almost useless. I understand that I have a personal bias but if you feel strongly for Aurelio Gonzales-Vigil, please remove the proposal.

Thanks! Alex the Nerd (talk) 01:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Alex the Nerd

An invitation for you

Please join us during the month of May 2017 for the...
Women's Sports worldwide online edit-a-thon
	Contributions to new or existing articles on women athletes (including WOSO players) are encouraged and appreciated. For more information and resources, please see WP: Women in Red, the Women's football task force and WP:Women's Sport. `#wikiwomeninred`

(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) (Delivered: 16:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC))

Nomination for deletion of Template:2017–18 in Danish football

Template:2017–18 in Danish football has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Subject of mass mailing: Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017

Should the women's football task force become WikiProject: WOSO?

According to an op-ed in the recent Signpost, some editors think task forces and subgroups are dying in 2017.

What do you think about forming our own WikiProject separate from WP:FOOTY? There's an on-going discussion of the potential pros and cons on the task force talk page. Input is welcome.

Recent developments

New initiatives have been created for:

FA WSL (England's top-division league)
NCAA (American university teams, conferences, etc.)
W-League (Australia's top-division league)

Ongoing tournaments

UEFA Women's Euro 2017 (July 16 – August 6, 2017)
- UEFA Women's Euro 2017 Final (August 6, 2017)
2017 Tournament of Nations (July 27– August 3, 2017)

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues

2017 National Women's Soccer League season (United States) ongoing
2017–18 Liga MX Femenil season (Mexico) ongoing
2017–18 W-League (Australia) starts in Sept.
2017–18 FA WSL (England) starts in Sept.
2017–18 Division 1 Féminine (France) starts in Sept.
2017–18 Frauen-Bundesliga (Germany) starts in Sept.
2017–18 Indian Women's League season (India) starts in Oct.

Did you know?

While WP:FPL lists only two women's top-division leagues as notable due to its "fully professional" criteria, did you know you can create an article on any player in any league as long as the references meet WP:GNG guidelines? Make sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}.

Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks page if you'd like and other editors may be able to help. Need tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) – Hmlarson (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2017–18 in Danish football

Template:2017–18 in Danish football has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MbahGondrong. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2016–17 ProB

A tag has been placed on 2016–17 ProB requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. H-Hurry (talk) 11:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of categories for domestic women’s association football leagues by year

Please see my proposal to delete (and upmerge where necessary) the following categories: Hugo999 (talk) 01:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

WOSO Task Force News: April 2018

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: April 2018

Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014

Hello WOSO editors! A few initiatives have been started with an emphasis on making more WOSO links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles.

If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, take a look at the initiatives listed in the box below. Sign up at the bottom of an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles ... or create your own initiative.

Did you know ...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in 1 active women's league)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues

Czech Republic: 2017–18 Czech First Division ends Apr
England: 2017–18 FA WSL ends May 20
Faroe Islands: 2018 1. deild kvinnur started Mar 11
France: 2017–18 Division 1 Féminine ends May 27
Germany: 2017–18 Frauen-Bundesliga ends Jun 2
Iceland: 2018 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football) starts May 3
Ireland: 2018 Women's National League started Mar 11
Israel: 2017–18 Ligat Nashim ends Apr 28
Italy: 2017–18 Serie A ends May 12
Japan: 2018 Nadeshiko started Mar 21
Mexico: 2017–18 Liga MX Femenil season ends May 5
Moldova: 2017–18 Moldovan Women Top League started Apr 1
Netherlands: 2017–18 Eredivisie ends May 25
Scotland: 2018 Scottish Women's Premier League started Feb 11
South Korea: 2018 WK League starts Apr 23
Spain: 2017–18 Primera División ends May 13
Sweden: 2018 Damallsvenskan started Apr 14
United States: 2018 National Women's Soccer League season started Mar 24

Current season articles needing creation

Albania: 2017–18 Kampionati Femrave started in Oct
Algeria: 2017–18 Algerian Women's Championship started in Sept
Austria: 2017–18 ÖFB-Frauenliga started in Aug
Belgium: 2017–18 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal (nl) started in Sept
China: 2018 Chinese Women's Super League season started in Apr
Cyprus: 2017–18 Cypriot First Division started in Nov
Finland: 2018 Naisten Liiga started Mar 24
Northern Ireland: 2018 Women's Premiership starts Apr 18
Norway: 2018 Toppserien started Mar 24
Portugal: 2018 Campeonato Nacional de Futebol Feminino (pt) ends May 19
Romania: 2017–18 Romanian Superliga ends Jun 2
Switzerland: 2018 Nationalliga A ends May 26
Vietnam: 2018 Vietnam Women's Football Championship started Mar 10
Wales: 2017-18 Welsh Premier Women's Football League ends May 18

Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Has an article you worked on been nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello MbahGondrong! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 22:32, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019

Opening ceremony of the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, Parc de Princes, Paris, June 7, 2019

Hello WOSO editors! What a 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup in France! There has been a lot of activity on tournament- and player-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of the tournament and its players. Let's keep the momentum going.

WOMEN IN SPORTS EDIT-A-THON FOR JULY + AUGUST!

WikiProject Women in Red is focusing on Women in Sports during their edit-a-thon for July & August 2019.

Get all the info here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/126

Sign up and help fill in the gaps within various articles related to women's football / soccer - whether they be players, teams, leagues, historical, administrators, referees, etc. Every little bit helps. Be sure to tag your article talk pages with {{WIR-126}}.

These edit-a-thons are a great way to work with others to help bridge the gender gaps on Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions!

Did you know...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues

Australia: 2019–20 W-League
Belgium: 2018–19 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal
China PR: 2019 Chinese Women's Super League
Colombia: 2019 Colombian Women's Football League
Croatia: 2019–20 Croatian Women's First Football League
Czech Republic: 2019–20 Czech First Division (women)
England: 2019–20 FA WSL
Faroe Islands: 2019 1. deild kvinnur
France: 2019–20 Division 1 Féminine
Germany: 2019–20 Frauen-Bundesliga
Iceland: 2019 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football)
Republic of Ireland: 2019 Women's National League
Israel: 2019–20 Ligat Nashim
Italy: 2019–20 Serie A (women)
Korea Republic: 2019 WK League
Japan: 2019 Nadeshiko
Mexico: 2019-20 Liga MX Femenil
Moldova: 2019–20 Moldovan Women Top League
Netherlands: 2019–20 Eredivisie (women)
New Zealand: 2019 National Women's League
Nigeria: 2019 Nigeria Women Premier League
Scotland: 2019 Scottish Women's Premier League
Spain: 2019-20 First Division (women)
Sweden: 2019 Damallsvenskan
United States: 2019 National Women's Soccer League season

Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)

Nomination of Norbert Grudzinski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norbert Grudzinski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norbert Grudzinski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Gagelmann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Gagelmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Gagelmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Frauen DFB-Pokal Logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frauen DFB-Pokal Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kathleen Radtke

The article Kathleen Radtke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 11:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kim Sundlöv

The article Kim Sundlöv has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nathalie Persson

The article Nathalie Persson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:09, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hanna Persson

The article Hanna Persson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Catrine Johansson

The article Catrine Johansson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:11, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Filippa Curmark

The article Filippa Curmark has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rebecka Blomqvist

The article Rebecka Blomqvist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ellen Karlsson

The article Ellen Karlsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lejla Basic

The article Lejla Basic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mimmi Paulsson-Febo

The article Mimmi Paulsson-Febo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:16, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Freja Olofsson

The article Freja Olofsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:16, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anna Welin

The article Anna Welin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maja Göthberg

The article Maja Göthberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:18, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lisa Lantz

The article Lisa Lantz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emma Lennartsson

The article Emma Lennartsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sejde Abrahamsson

The article Sejde Abrahamsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 17:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Lejla Basic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lejla Basic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lejla Basic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mightytotems (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Women's Football / Soccer Update > October 2020

WP:WOSO News: October 2020

Chelsea striker Bethany England scoring the winning goal in the team's 2-1 win against Arsenal at the 2019–20 FA Women's League Cup, February 29, 2020.

Hello WOSO editors!

What a year to be alive. As usual (but perhaps even moreso since there have been unexpected quarantines), there has been a lot of activity on player, team, league and tournament-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of women's football / soccer. Great work!

Fall Focus: FA WSL articles

You may have noticed lots of great things going on for the top English league this year: the FA WSL. More (international!) broadcasts, top international player signings, improved media coverage, and increased viewership. Let's keep the momentum brewing, shall we?

Here's a sampling of articles that could use creation, expansion or updating. What will you commit to working on?

Historical Topics

Managers

Teams

Brighton & Hove Albion W.F.C. roster update, add stadium, broadcasting sections
Everton F.C. (women) roster update, add broadcasting section, former manager articles

Players

Caroline Siems de (Aston Villa)
Ramona Petzelberger de (Aston Villa)
Asmita Ale (Aston Villa)
Ella Franklin-Fraiture (Aston Villa)
Elisha N'Dow (Aston Villa)
Jodie Hutton (Aston Villa)
Hannah Blundell (Chelsea) update
Danielle Turner (Everton captain) update
Nor Mustafa (West Ham)
Natasha Harding (Reading captain) update
Jane Ross (Manchester United) expand
Kirsty Hanson (Manchester United) expand
Chloe Peplow (Tottenham) expand
Hannah Godfrey (Tottenham) expand

Other

England women's national under-15 football team (see under-16 men's for inspiration)

See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Initiatives/FA WSL to collaborate and organize with other editors.

Every little bit helps! Thanks for your contributions!

Did you know...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues

Australia: 2020–21 W-League
Belgium: 2019–20 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal
China PR: 2020 Chinese Women's Super League
Colombia: 2020 Colombian Women's Football League
Croatia: 2020–21 Croatian Women's First Football League
Czech Republic: 2020–21 Czech First Division (women)
England: 2020–21 FA WSL
Faroe Islands: 2020 1. deild kvinnur
France: 2020–21 Division 1 Féminine
Germany: 2020–21 Frauen-Bundesliga
Iceland: 2020 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football)
Republic of Ireland: 2020 Women's National League
Israel: 2020–21 Ligat Nashim
Italy: 2020–21 Serie A (women)
Korea Republic: 2020 WK League
Japan: 2020 Nadeshiko League
Mexico: 2020–21 Liga MX Femenil
Moldova: 2020–21 Moldovan Women Top League
Netherlands: 2020–21 Eredivisie (women)
New Zealand: 2019 National Women's League
Nigeria: 2020 Nigeria Women Premier League
Scotland: 2020 Scottish Women's Premier League
Spain: 2020-21 First Division (women)
Sweden: 2020 Damallsvenskan
United States: 2020 National Women's Soccer League season

Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lina Domberg

The article Lina Domberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 09:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Louise Högrell

The article Louise Högrell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 09:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

footballer articles proposed for deletion

If you think any of these articles being proposed for deletion have refs to meet WP:GNG, please let me know or consider posting a list to talk page of WP:WOSO. In general, WP:FPL is not reliable for women's soccer articles. Thanks for all of your long-term work. Hmlarson (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Timur Khakimov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timur Khakimov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timur Khakimov (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlameRuiner (talk) 12:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Linnéa Åberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linnéa Åberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linnéa Åberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Lisa Renlund for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Renlund is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Renlund until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Afriyandi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afriyandi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afriyandi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:53, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Linnéa Ågren for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linnéa Ågren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linnéa Ågren until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)