User talk:Mb 9702

Welcome

Hello, Mb 9702, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Mb 9702, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hi Mb 9702, I noticed you asking different users for the permission to edit a particular page. I am providing you with some links which will help you understand more about wikipedia. Please feel free to contact me by pinging me here or leaving a text on my talk page.

Wikipedia:User access levels; this link will help you know why you couldn't edit the page and when and how you can edit that page.
Wikipedia:Protection policy; the page you wanted to edit was protected, so learning more about protection policy will help you.
Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism; you seemed to be interested in this particular topic. You can join the project page and can raise your concerns there.

But while working on wikipedia please remember five pillars of wikipedia. And if you find these to be violated be bold to edit and correct those. And also remember that wikipedia is not a reliable source. I hope this will help you. -ink&fables «talk» 19:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Love Jihad, you may be blocked from editing. SUN EYE 1 10:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial topic area alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 08:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making unspecified edit requests

What you need to do is specify what you what changed AND show what sources meeting WP:RS back your changes. Please also read WP:VERIFY - and don't ask again until you've read those as otherwise you'll probably just be told your sources don't meet our criteria. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article has some wrong information and misquotes like, "Islamophobic theory" and that it Love Jihad means Islamophobia that is very wrong and a misquote. I want these lines to be changed. Mb 9702 (talk) 14:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have just posted the same assertion/request to Talk:Love Jihad for the ninth time. Please specify alternative content and reliable sources that can support it, as I and other editors have asked. Otherwise, please stop. This is not constructive, and it will not bring any changes to the article. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by islamophobic? We as Hindus feel threatened by muslims in our own country India we have to live like prisoners without any aspiration and clarity of thought and expression. Mb 9702 (talk) 16:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe you can't see the irony in your statement right there. NarSakSasLee (talk) 18:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mb 9702, since original research is not permitted in Wikipedia articles, please review the verifiability policy and the reliable sources guideline for more information on the types of sources that Wikipedia requires. — Newslinger talk 19:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's the truth that I am saying. Stop being not making any sense and being a hypocrite. Mb 9702 (talk) 05:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, no name calling and no personal attacks. Again, your repeated insistence that what you say is true won't get Wikipedia to say so. If you won't provide WP:reliable sources that verify that Love Jihad is not a conspiracy theory, you will not counter the reliable sources that say it is. Just insisting that the article is biased won't change anything. You need to specify verifiable content that can balance it. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Mb 9702. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 11:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the article published is completely wrong and not based on facts then editing is the only solution. I think its based on Islamic viewpoints entirely ignoring the other view. Mb 9702 (talk) 11:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The lead section of the Love Jihad article is based on high-quality academic sources. If you have located academic sources that provide additional information on the Love Jihad conspiracy theory, feel free to share them. — Newslinger talk 11:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you guys can threaten me all the time. I've already sent a request to the Arbitration Commitee regarding your monopoly routine. Now please take care of yourself! Mb 9702 (talk) 18:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mb9702. I noticed your post at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee was removed by an arbitrator for being in the wrong place. The best place to respond and defend yourself is at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. You should post your comment below the header "Statement by Mb 9702" which is already there. Hope this helps. Bishonen | tålk 20:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

I'm not sure if reasoning with you is possible, but I would like to note that the article should reflect what reliable sources say. That mixed relationships exist is not in question. The issue is also not a WP gang. You should click on the citation blue links and read what those sources say. To assess the reliability of a source, WP:RSN and its archives can be consulted. WP:RS, WP:V and WP:NPOV are core Wikipedia policies. —Paleo Neonate – 08:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PaleoNeonate: He is now causing significant disruption at WP:ANI. See this and this. NarSakSasLee (talk) 13:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very derogatory against ones religious sentiments and creed

SuggestBot is making a list of articles that you might like to edit. You will receive these suggestions soon. In the meantime, you might be interested in checking out the following WikiProjects. If you're interested in a project, feel free to add yourself to the member list and introduce yourself on the project talk page!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Jihad (project page, talk page)

Mb 9702 (talk) 08:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Love Jihad

Please note that this page is publishing derogatory comments against ones religious sentiments and ones creed. Please listen to this earnest appeal and try to initiate the respective changes. Mb 9702 (talk) 08:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mb 9702: You are now reported in WP:AIV your distruptive behaviour. 36.76.234.82 (talk) 09:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
1,718	Popular Front of India (talk)	Add sources
524	Shirk (Islam) (talk)	Add sources
4,343	Sanskrit (talk)	Add sources
256	Freedom of religion in India (talk)	Add sources
164	Social stigma of obesity (talk)	Add sources
2,047	Terrorism (talk)	Add sources
305	Anti-Korean sentiment (talk)	Cleanup
285	Saffron terror (talk)	Cleanup
78	Leprosy stigma (talk)	Cleanup
262	Human rights in Pakistan (talk)	Expand
154	Anti-Vietnamese sentiment (talk)	Expand
3,759	Amit Shah (talk)	Expand
80	Anti-Croat sentiment (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
33	Anti-Khmer sentiment (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
55	Anti-Mongolianism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
110	Ghar Wapsi (talk)	Merge
20	Agra religious conversions 2014 (talk)	Merge
351	Social model of disability (talk)	Merge
370	Power distance (talk)	Wikify
61	Bodu Bala Sena (talk)	Wikify
1,874	Redlining (talk)	Wikify
2	Atef Yassien El Sherif (talk)	Orphan
2	Aliwal Jattan (talk)	Orphan
2	Boundary estimation in EIT (talk)	Orphan
188	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
54	Usha Thakur (talk)	Stub
12	Jhabua nuns rape case (talk)	Stub
12	Ladakh Buddhist Association (talk)	Stub
32	Clannism (talk)	Stub
35	Anti-Austrian sentiment (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a disruption-only account and wasting the time of more and more users.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 13:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]