User talk:Mazedon626

June 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 14:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello Jingiby no I'm not doing test edits I'm aware that I'm doing permanent editing. And my thoughts are that I'm trying to make every edit to be as much true as possible Mazedon626 (talk) 19:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 13:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to Jingiby i only want to help this Encyclopedia and to represent the Macedonian people. Mazedon626 (talk) 13:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 16:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Macedonian Americans shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jingiby (talk) 16:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Macedonian Australians, you may be blocked from editing. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Jingiby (talk) 10:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. Jingiby (talk) 12:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. Jingiby (talk) 07:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.05:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

What godamn sources? You constantly change articles according to what you believe and don't care about anyone accept you. You are a Bulgarian editor editing Macedonian articles and every Macedonian who tried to fix the problems caused by you and your team has been banned . Mazedon626 (talk) 07:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have to know that the new law from 2019 extended the official use of Albanian language over the entire territory of North Macedonia, easing communication in Albanian with the institutions. Under the new legislation Albanian may be used now as a second official language, including at a national level in official matters. The legislation stipulates also all public institutions in the country will provide Albanian translations in their everyday work.Jingiby (talk) 08:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter the law wasn't even signed by the president so it isn't an official law and you cannot find the albanian language in the east and southeast part of the country only in the west and north where there is a significant amount of albanians.but in the rest of the country you cannot find the albanian language anywhere. Mazedon626 (talk) 08:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia uses reliable sources for the information added to the encyclopedia. In the article Languages of North Macedonia, there is a section on the Albanian language which points that it is the second official language there. This info is supported by several reliable sources. That any editor has a different opinion or claims otherwise has no value here and must not be added. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 09:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jingiby, Mazedon626 (talk) 09:27, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jingiby, Mazedon626 (talk) 09:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Macedonian language. Jingiby (talk) 17:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of the Macedonian people

Hi, may you provide any reliable source confirming that the flag of the then Republic of Macedonia (1992–1995), you have added to the article Macedonian Americans, is the flag of the Macedonian people? If no, I will remove it from this page as personal opinion.Jingiby (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could only find information about this in Bechev's 2009 book Historical Dictionary of the Republic of Macedonia (p. 214), that it was used by nationalist Macedonian groups in North America. However, that doesn't make it representative of the diaspora group as a whole. @Mazedon626, whenever you add or change information in articles, you need to cite sources which support that information. You can check WP:Citing sources and WP:Reliable sources. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood but a have to clarify more then 90% of Macedonian Americans use this flag to represent themselves Mazedon626 (talk) 08:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that's a flag of the Macedonian people if you were Macedonian you would have known that Mazedon626 (talk) 08:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If 90% use it, then it won't be hard finding a source. StephenMacky1 (talk) 08:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

they use it as a symbol of there people and there is no source because they don't care about Wikipedia Mazedon626 (talk) 08:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please, review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 08:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am only adding real things to Wikipedia And what do you know about the Macedonian people to remove my edits and add what you think that is extremely disrespectful towards me and my people. Mazedon626 (talk) 08:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Languages in N. Macedonia

Dear Jingiby,

Thank you for your input. However, I must respectfully disagree with your interpretation. According to the Law on the Use of Languages in North Macedonia, passed in January 2019, Albanian is recognized as a co-official language. This law ensures that any municipality where at least 20% of the population speaks Albanian can use it as an official language in government and administrative functions, alongside Macedonian.

Wikipedia strives to present information based on verifiable and reliable sources. The article you mentioned, "Languages of North Macedonia," correctly reflects this legal status. It is not a matter of opinion but of legal fact, supported by the law and acknowledged by multiple reputable sources.

We must adhere to documented and verifiable facts, irrespective of personal beliefs. For further reference, I suggest reviewing the actual legislative text and additional credible sources that corroborate this information.

Thank you for your understanding.

Best regards, Mazedon626 (talk) 09:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invasion of Yugoslavia

G’day. Bulgaria did not enter Yugoslavia before the Yugoslav capitulated. Only those who actually participated in the invasion are included. The fact that Bulgarian annexed and occupied parts of Yugoslavia after the surrender is not relevant to the invasion article. The scope of the article does not include the latter occupations. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]