December 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 1931 China floods—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1931 China floods. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at GO Transit, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: GO Transit was changed by Mayormatt1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877643 on 2021-12-10T18:21:10+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to York Region District School Board, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 14:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mayormatt1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what I was blocked for, I will not do it again, sorry. Can you please unblock my IP address.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:29, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mayormatt1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that vandalizing Wikipedia articles is not helpful to the Wikipedia community, I will not continue to do these disruptive edits again, I will make helpful and informative edits that will contribute to Wikipedia's mission.

Decline reason:

Thank you for your offer to contribute to Wikipedia, but we already have enough vandals and trolls. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:18, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Such as what? 331dot (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't understand your message, could you please elaborate?

What constructive edits do you wish to make? 331dot (talk) 16:44, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to make constructive and helpful edits by editing spelling and updating information on outdated articles.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mayormatt1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I thank you for your responses, but I do truly want to contribute to Wikipedia's articles, I will not vandalize or troll on articles again, I truly want to make helpful and informative edits to contribute to Wikipedia's articles. Thanks for your time! Mayormatt1 (talk) 18:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's not likely you will be unblocked unless you can tell us a specific, constructive, and substantive edit you wish to make(more than fixing spelling). The process I laid out above is the best way you can demonstrate that edit. Wikipedia a serious project that warrants serious effort, perhaps more that you are able to give(even if you want to). It might be better for you to first mature as a person and editor before attempting to get unblocked, but if you wish to try now, it is there for you. 331dot (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I'd just like to know which article you would personally want me to edit, Thanks! Mayormatt1 (talk) 14:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article of your choosing that you wish to make a substantive edit to. There is no deadline for this, take all the time you need. I can't pick an article for you. 331dot (talk) 14:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello, I'd just like to know when you're citing a source for the first name and last name, what do I put, do I put my own name or do I put the author's name? Mayormatt1 (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are referring to adding a reference to (for example) an article written by Clark Kent of the Daily Planet, in the {{cite news}} you would have |last=Kent and |first=Clark. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 14:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Opzs

OPzS is used to refer to a flooded type of tubular-plated, lead acid, deep cycle batteries. These batteries, generally have a cell voltage of 2 volts and are connected in series to produce higher voltages. These types of batteries are generally vented and are used in stationary applications like; solar, wind and backup energy storage. They contain a liquid electrolyte which is generally composed of diluted sulfuric acid.^[1]

OPzV battery and OPzS batteries are very popular stationary batteries, developed at the end of 2005. OPzV and OPzS batteries are high-end products, specially developed for applications that require frequent deep cycling. This is an energy-saving solution for energy storage. Even in remote installations that require long-term discharge and excellent charging performance, it can provide significant advantages in terms of single-cycle cost, the highest level of reliability and performance.

OPzS stands for : O = Ortsfest (stationary) Pz = PanZerplatte (tubular plate) S = Flüssig (flooded)^[2]

Features

They have a cell voltage of 2V and have to be connected in series to produce higher voltages. Also, they are differentiated from the other types of batteries by their upright and vertical orientation.^[3]OPzS batteries also feature High Capacity, Long lifetime, Reduced Maintenance, Low Self-Discharging, Quick and simple acid level control, Economical water consumption, Appropriate dimensions and weight, and The lowest and constant maintenance current.^[4]

Diffrences Between OPzS and OPzV Batteries

OPzV is the tubular GEL battery. And OPzS is the tubular flooded battery. OPzS is a flooded cell, meaning the electrolyte (generally sulfuric acid) is in liquid form inside the cell. And the electrolyte of OPzV within the battery is in gel form which allows for recombining the electrolyte back into the water. OPzV battery is a sealed battery and users don’t need to maintain the battery. But the OPzS battery is not sealed. Users occasionally need to add distilled water to the top of the battery to maintain the normal use of the battery.^[5] OPzS and OPzV batteries are both types of the tubular-plated battery. The differences is in the nature of their electrolytes. While the acid electrolyte of OpzS is FLA, the OPzV is VRLA. It electrolyte is made into gel by the addition of silica dust. Hence they are also referred to as "silicone batteries". Also, the OPzV is valve-regulated, sealed and thus, maintenance-free.^[6]

Specifications

Here's an example of the specs of an OPzS battery.

APPLICATION Macro Cells Energy Storage Switchgear and Substation Microgrids Medical Standby Power

TECHNOLOGY / CHEMISTRY Flooded lead acid

CAPACITY (MIN) - EUROPE STANDARD 216

CAPACITY (MAX) - EUROPE STANDARD 3360

CAPACITY EUROPE STANDARD Ah / C10 / 1.8Vpc / 20°C

CAPACITY (MIN) - US STANDARD 217

CAPACITY (MAX) - US STANDARD 3543

CAPACITY US STANDARD Ah / 8hr / 1.75Vpc / 77°F

VOLTAGE (MIN) 2

VOLTAGE (MAX) 2

DESIGN Top terminal DIN sizes^[7]

References

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mayormatt1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, I've re-written the OPzS article, I hope you take this into great consideration, my past of vandalizing will not reflect my future of contributing to Wikipedia articles. Thank you.Mayormatt1 (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I'm willing to give you another chance. 331dot (talk) 22:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: ~~Dear LOrd, I've gone cross-eyed.~~ That is to say, looks OK to me. OK to unblock? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem okay to me although Blablubbs is the blocking admin. 331dot (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot and Deepfriedokra: I haven't read through all of the above, but given that the block was for fairly non-egregious (albeit repeated) vandalism, I have no objections with anyone unblocking if you think it's the right call. --Blablubbs (talk) 22:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello, thanks for your help, I just have 1 more request to un-ban my IP address, many of my other friends would like to help and contribute to Wikipedia, thank you!Mayormatt1 (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]

It appears to me that others on your IP address have been blocked from editing, causing an autoblock on your IP address. They will have to request unblock themselves. They will also need to describe why they should not be considered socks. 331dot (talk) 18:30, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Is there a way to unblock the IP without the account requesting and if not how do we contact the user?Mayormatt1 (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

331dot has already explained above Naleksuh (talk) 05:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:OPzV

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:OPzV, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Flood Lead Acid Battery Deep Cycle OPzS Tubular Battery For Telecom 2V 200-3000ah".

[2] "What Is Difference Between OPzV And OPzS Battery?".

[3] "OPzS and OPzV Batteries".

[4] "OPzS Flooded Battery".

[5] "What Is Difference Between OPzV And OPzS Battery?".

[6] "OPzS and OPzV Batteries".

[7] "POWERSAFE® OPZS BATTERIES".

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]