Jump to content

User talk:Maximzub

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mega Stars (December 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 03:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Maximzub, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 03:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: No Idea (band) (January 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
joe deckertalk 00:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evo stojim tu (January 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering 21:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maxim Zubic (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Missing (band) (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caden Johnson (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: No Idea (band) (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tyler Crowe (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mega Stars (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Kasel (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan Fiduccia (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fam Classroom System (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Fam Classroom System, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Moroz (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Max Moroz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G3. Although it may not appear as such, it's one in a series of G3s created by this user.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Missing (band)

[edit]

Draft:Missing (band), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Missing (band) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Missing (band) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maximzub (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Max Moroz is a personal friend of mine. He was editing articles that I created about him. I'm really mad at him for that, but I assure you, I am not a sockpuppeter. So please, can my account be unblocked?

Decline reason:

This isn't the whole story. You've been editing from the same computer. As you are essentially claiming WP:BROTHER here, I'm letting the block stand. Please ensure this never happens again. Yamla (talk) 21:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maximzub (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I just talked to Max Moroz at school, and he claimed that he didn't do anything, and that he doesn't even have a Wikipedia account. He said that there are many Max Morozes in this world, and it could very likely be someone else. But if it's someone else, why was he putting his name all over a page about Rockton, Illinois? Rockton is our hometown, and I knew it was him the second I saw that User:maxmoroz had edited it. He said he was the most famous person in Rockton, and let's face it, he's just a kid. He's definitely not the most famous person in Rockton. From this information that Max gave me, I can tell he is lying, and that he in fact is the one doing things wrong. As I said before, the reason why I was accused of being a sockpuppet was because he was editing articles I created. I told him myself to do such thing. I know I am not a sockpuppet, so can you please lift my block? Maximzub (talk) 21:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline because you are no longer blocked.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 00:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CS1 error on Beyond the Machine

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Beyond the Machine, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]