Jump to content

User talk:Matusotruba

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Matusotruba! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Ayaena Aya helps you 18:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
Immune system contribution to regeneration, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sentinel cell, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 22:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposed edit to Monkeypox Virus

[edit]

Here's a copy of my reply to your proposed edit:

Hi @Matusotruba

First of all, thanks for you interest in this article. Your proposed edit shows that you have both enthusiasm and expertise, and that's great. Wikipedia needs you.

I'm not ging to add your edit in its present form, for a number of reasons:

  • First of all, it's too long. It will increase the byte count of the article by about 50% and that's an indication either that the article is a stub (which it isn't) or that undue weight is being given to a particular subsection.
  • Delving into your edit, it seems to me to be too technical for the Wikipedia target audience. There's guidance on this in the Manual of Style under WP:TECHNICAL and WP:NOTATEXTBOOK
  • Third, this looks as if it might be the product of original research. You've used sentences containing words like "might", "likely" and "suggestion" which indicate a personal opinion rather that generally accepted scientific consensus. In general, Wikipedia editors are encourage to cite reliable secondary sources of information (in this case, probably widely available textbooks or widely cited reviews) rather than strike out on their own. Please checkout WP:SOURCES and WP:No original research for a full explanation.
  • Fourth, although you have plenty of citations, some sentences are uncited - again, a suggestion that you are straying from established consensus.

Please consider whether the section which you are trying to replace or beef up is significantly deficient in information as far as the general reader is concerned. It may be sufficient just to add a sentence or two, or to update the wording and citations without any significant change to the length.

My advice to you, as a novice editor - stick to minor tweaks for the time being, and watch what other editors are doing, both right and wrong, until you have a better feel for the Wikipedia environment.

Bob (talk) 13:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]