User talk:Mattyrobson

April 2020

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (season 9). If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Nobody announced a season ten. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 12:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is tehre any proof that those new 6 episodes are in fact season 10? I would more see them as standealone epsiodes that do not belong to any season at all. Uless you have a valit source, please refrein fron doing WO:OR and WP:SYNTH. Gial Ackbar (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (Season 10)

Draft:My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (Season 10), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (Season 10) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (Season 10) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborative editing

Hi - I'm Girth Summit, an administrator here. I'm concerned about this edit - both the edit itself, and the edit summary, are not acceptable. Reinstating an edit after it has been reverted is not appropriate - see the edit warring guidlines - what you need to do is start a discussion on the talk page and ask other editors politely why they disagree with your edit. If you can reach a consensus on what the article should say, then you can reinstate the edit. As for the comment I will not stand for you changing my edits. in your edit summary - to put it bluntly, you are required to stand for that. You've got two choices: you can accept that other people are allowed to revert your edits, and that you are then required to discuss it with them, in which case we're good; or, you refuse to accept that, in which case you can't edit here.

I'm going to give you an edit warring notice beneath this with some links you should read through. Best GirthSummit _(blether) 16:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One last thing - can you provide any evidence that there is going to be a tenth season of that show? If this is a hoax, I'll just block your account now for wasting other people's time. Please provide a link to a source. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked 60 hours for persistent addition of unsourced content

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mattyrobson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am trying to give you the hard evidence that you need. It doesn't come easy. I am just trying to add something really useful to this. So, please unblock me. This is so not fair to block me. Ever. Mattyrobson (talk) 22:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't need "hard evidence". Just for you to give the source for your information. Please read WP:RS and relate it to your editing. Where did you get the information that sourced your content? That is what we need. Until you can provide a reliable source, you must not add the content. We need you to not add content that is unsourced. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 23:07, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum please read the messages left earlier by GirthSummit. Please relate them to how you would proceed going forward. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 23:10, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Now you keep adding unsourced content. Do you want to be blocked again, this thim longer? Gial Ackbar (talk) 09:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (Season 10) (April 27)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mattyrobson! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights

Please respect copyrights and only use text that you wrote yourself or that was published under a free licence. Do not copy epsiode summaries from elsewhere, as you did in My Little Pony Life. Gial Ackbar (talk) 13:11, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying episode summaries into wikipeid lists violates copyright. Please stop that. Otherwise you can and will be blocked from editing. Gial Ackbar (talk) 18:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 02:27, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Discovery Family. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 20:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at My Little Pony: Pony Life, you may be blocked from editing. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 10:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Power Rangers: Beast Morphers

Please stop adding release dates without source. Lado85 (talk) 08:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tooncast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of My Little Pony: Pony Life episodes, you may be blocked from editing. If you at least cited a reliable source, you wouldn't have a problem. But since you didn't and continued an edit war, I'm going to request a page protection. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 14:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of My Little Pony: Pony Life episodes. Wow! You didn't listen to me. The page will be protected thanks to your continuing edit war, and if you do any more damage to the article before an admin honored a page protection, I will report you to an administrator about your behavior. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 00:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of My Little Pony: Friendship Is Forever for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Little Pony: Friendship Is Forever is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Pony: Friendship Is Forever until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pamzeis (talk) 10:13, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with My Little Pony: Friendship Is Forever. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Pamzeis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pamzeis (talk) 04:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Pamzeis (talk) 14:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I'm Pamzeis. Your recent edit(s) to the page My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pamzeis (talk) 02:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 04:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]